7
CITY OF VANCOUVER
SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
December 14, 1999
A Special Meeting of the Council of the City of Vancouver was held on Tuesday, December 14, 1999, in the Council Chamber, Third Floor, City Hall, for the purpose of hearing delegations on Entertainment Centres, including Family Sports and Entertainment Centres. Concurrently, a Special Council meeting was held for the purpose of holding a Public Hearing to consider proposed amendments to the Zoning and Development By-law.
These items have been minuted concurrently.
PRESENT: Mayor Philip Owen
Councillor Fred Bass
Councillor Lynne Kennedy
Councillor Don Lee
Councillor Tim Louis
Councillor Sandy McCormick
Councillor Gordon Price
Councillor Sam SullivanABSENT: Councillor Clarke
Councillor Daniel Lee (Leave of Absence)
Councillor PuilCITY MANAGER'S
OFFICE: Brent MacGregor, Deputy City ManagerCLERK TO THE
COUNCIL: Nancy LargentCOMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
MOVED by Cllr. Don Lee,
SECONDED by Cllr. Louis,
THAT this Council resolve itself into Committee of the Whole, Mayor Owen in the Chair, to hear delegations on Entertainment Centres, including Family Sports and Entertainment Centres, and to consider proposed amendments to the Zoning and Development By-law.
- CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
1. (a) Entertainment Centres, including Family Sports
and Entertainment Centres File: 5302
(b) Text Amendment: International Village
[88 West Pender Street] File: 1401-16
An application by Henderson Development Ltd., was considered as follows:
Summary: The proposed text amendment would permit Entertainment Centre as a permitted use.
The Director of Current Planning recommended approval.
Also before Council was a memorandum dated December 14, 1999 from the Director of Current Planning, recommending the revision of Figure 3 - Land Use.
In addition, Council had before it a Policy Report dated November 15, 1999, entitled Entertainment Centres, including Family Sports and Entertainment Centres.
Staff Opening Comments
Larry Beasley, Director of Current Planning, gave a brief introduction, reviewing the history of the moratorium on Family Sports and Entertainment Centres. Mr. Beasley also explained the order of agenda, noting that Council should first reach a decision on the issue of entertainment centres, then deal with the text amendment application for 88 West Pender Street.
Rob Whitlock, Planner, gave a presentation on entertainment centres with the assistance of audiovisual aids. Among items reviewed were:
· the excellent operational history of the Score, the sole existing Family Sports and Entertainment Centre in the city;
· the moratorium placed by Council on other such operations to allow staff to monitor;
· previous arcade regulations, and the new definition reached for Entertainment Centre;
· hours of operation, age limitations and similar regulations;
· the rationale for the recommended policy decisions;
· examples of games and simulated activities; and
· security measures.
Mr. Whitlock also responded to queries about fee structure and client groups, and indicated he was unaware of any complaints from parents about children attending the Score.
Michael Gordon, Planner, reviewed the proposed zoning amendments before Council, noting that CD-1 amendments provide an ideal venue to consider entertainment centres since they are site specific. Some of the items discussed were:
· proposed locations within the complex (there will be no first floor frontage);
· types of games;
· the size of the facility (approximately 3% of the shopping centre will be converted to this use);
· age restrictions and hours of operation;
· the public process;
· the proposed revision to Figure 3 - Land Use; and
· .the rationale for recommending approval, including potential for revitalization of the neighbourhood.
Staff were asked about a Vancouver School Board policy that schools not be located within 1000 feet of incompatible uses. Mr. Gordon advised there is currently no school in this mixed use area. There is potential for a community school in the vicinity of 88 West Pender; however, a school put in retroactively would have no effect on the zoning of this site.
Mr. Beasley advised that there is no legal requirement on Council to take the School Board's policy into account.
Applicant Opening Comments
Larry Kerr and Mike Flanigan, representing the applicant, Henderson Development Ltd., noted that the two entertainment centre locations proposed are for key tenants who have made significant contributions to the development, and will address market challenges. Benetton will provide interactive retail, allowing its customers to try out products on site. The location upstairs in the cinema will be closer to the description of an arcade. Hours of operation will be dictated by retail hours.
Summary of Correspondence
Council received the following correspondence:
(a) Entertainment Centres, including
Family Sports and Entertainment Centres
Article entitled The Relationship Between Gambling and Video-Game Playing Behavior in Children and Adolescents, Journal of Gambling Studies Volume 12(4), Winter 1996 (previously circulated to Council members and on file), submitted by Citizens Against Gambling Expansion (CAGE)
(b) Text Amendment: 88 West Pender Street
(International Village)
· Four letters opposed to the application
· One letter in support of the applicationSpeakers
The following speakers opposed lifting the moratorium on entertainment centres, or the application for 88 West Pender street, or both:
Don Larson
John Crawford
Isabel Minty, CAGE
Louise Seto
Connie Fogal, CAGE (newspaper article and Simon Fraser University press release filed)
Professor Robert Clark, CAGE (brief filed)
Val Anderson, MLA
Judith Sommerfeld
Ernest CulleyFollowing are some of the comments made by the opposed speakers:
· this is a poor location to which to attract youth, because of the proximity of numerous crack cocaine dealers, pubs and cheap cigarettes;
· the facility will draw young males who are statistically more attracted to criminal activity;
· parking security is a concern - the Downtown Eastside already has a high incidence of vehicle break-and-enters;
· the Downtown Eastside needs more Police;
· sports fans passing through the area often behave disrespectfully of the Downtown Eastside and its inhabitants - concern was expressed that patrons of the entertainment centres may also behave disrespectfully, with resultant fears for personal security;
· the aforementioned article submitted by CAGE was referenced by a number of speakers as evidence that young high frequency players are more likely to become involved in gambling later in life;
· video games have also been linked to desensitization and violence among children, risk-taking and compulsive behaviour;
· youth who have difficulties already are more likely to be drawn to addiction and violent behaviour,
· youth at risk are more likely to come from poor families, and will not have readily available disposable income for such activities;
· entertainment centres are not beneficial to the mental health of families and children;
· the moratorium should be continued until the consequences of video game use are clear - a decision should be deferred pending further review;
· the moratorium should not be lifted, but if it is, Council should at least ban violent games;
· the prevalence of violence in video games is appalling - an exact rating system for video games is required before any such centres should be considered;
· this proposal sets a precedent for combining children's and adults' games in the same facility;
· Council has given its commitment to ban redemption games;
· approval will open the door to more and more children's arcades in Vancouver;
· concern was expressed that the proposed process for considering future entertainment centre applications through privately initiated rezoning applications will take the process out of City Council's hands and leave decisions to staff;
· while changes are needed in the Downtown Eastside, this is not the model to use -artists and the disadvantaged contribute much to the special character of the community and should not be forced out;
· the Downtown Eastside is a community where people care for and look after each other, and development in the area should reflect this ethos;
· the proposed development is tacky and gaudy;
· there is already an entertainment centre in the vicinity (the Score), and the need for more was questioned;
· a school and a Park Board skateboarding facility are planned for this area;
· there will be no benefits to the neighbourhood.
The following speakers supported the application for 88 West Pender Street:
Cherie Bokis, Mark James Group
Peter Diniz, Strata Council, 183 Keefer PlaceFollowing are some of the comments made by the supporting speakers:
· the area has decayed, and development will bring more families with disposable income to the Downtown Eastside;
· legitimate businesses will help to clean up the area and make it safer;
· drug dealers and users will be less comfortable on the street with more shoppers in the area;
· a school located in this area would be able to educate children about what happens with drug use, by showing examples;
· the big problem in this area is drugs, not having games in a store;
· positive experiences are needed to draw people to the Downtown Eastside and assist in its revitalization;
· the Keefer Steps skateboarders are a greater concern to residents of 183 Keefer Place than this proposal;
· the same enhancements are needed as were provided on the Concord Pacific site;
· although artificial violence is a valid concern, this is just a store that wants a different marketing concept - Benetton won't be selling any violent equipment, and won't want violent games.
The Mayor ascertained that there were no further speakers.
Applicant Closing Comments
Asked whether the developer would be willing to have a prohibition on violent games as a condition of approval, Mr. Flanigan did not anticipate there would be any violent games. However, the problem would be how to define violent games, so the developer would not accept such a condition of rezoning at this time.
Staff Closing Comments
Mr. Whitlock reiterated that reports from Police and Licensing suggest that the Score is a well managed facility frequently utilized by school groups. No enforcement problems are envisaged. The policy allowing no redemption games has been adhered to. All CD-1 rezoning proposals would be considered by Council on a case by case basis. Staff will continue to monitor the situation and new information can be brought forward to Council during future evaluations of entertainment centre applications..
Mr. Beasley noted that this proposal is not based on games intended to promote killing people. Staff concluded this was simply an extension of commercial activity in a new way.
Council Decision
Council agreed to refer its decision on both the Entertainment Centres report and the application for 88 West Pender to the Council meeting immediately following the Standing Committee on City Services and Budgets meeting on December 16, 1999.
The Director of Current Planning was asked to provide information at the December 16 meeting on whether Council has the power to control content of video games.
RISE FROM COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
MOVED by Cllr. Don Lee,
THAT the Committee of the Whole rise and report.
- CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
ADOPT REPORT OF COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
MOVED by Cllr. Don Lee,
SECONDED by Cllr. Price,
THAT the report of the Committee of the Whole be adopted.
- CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
The Special Council adjourned at 10:35 p.m.
* * * * *
(c) 1998 City of Vancouver