A25 ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT Date: November 28, 1996 Dept. File No. WB TO: Vancouver City Council FROM: Director of Land Use and Development SUBJECT: Form of Development: 5650 Oak Street D.E. 401604 - CD-1 By-law Number 7656 Owner of Development - Taddei Developments Group RECOMMENDATION THAT the approved form of development for the CD-1 zoned site known as 5592 - 5650 Oak Street (5650 Oak Street being the application address) be generally approved as illustrated in Development Application Number DE401604, prepared by Ekistics Architecture Inc. and stamped "Received, City Planning Department, October 10, 1996", provided that the Director of Planning may approve design changes which would not adversely affect either the development character of this site or adjacent properties. GENERAL MANAGER'S COMMENTS The General Manager of Community Services RECOMMENDS approval of the foregoing. COUNCIL POLICY There is no applicable Council policy except that Council did approve in principle the form of development for this site when the rezoning was approved, following a Public Hearing. PURPOSE In accordance with Charter requirements, this report seeks Council's approval for the final form of development for the above-noted CD-1 zoned site. SITE DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND At a Public Hearing on June 27, 1996, City Council approved a rezoning of this site from RS-1 One-family Dwelling District to CD-1. Council also approved in principle the preliminary form of development for these lands. CD-1 By-law Number 7656 was enacted on November 5, 1996. The site and surrounding zoning are shown on the attached Appendix 'A'. Subsequent to Council's approval of the CD-1 rezoning, the Director of Planning approved Development Application Number DE401604. This approval was subject to various conditions, including Council's approval of the form of development. The latter condition is one of the few outstanding prior to permit issuance. DISCUSSION The proposal involves the construction of a four-storey multiple dwelling on this site containing a total of 31 residential dwelling units and one level of underground parking. Simplified plans, including a site plan and elevations of the proposal, have been included in Appendix 'B'. Since the Public Hearing, the "footprint" and the roof forms of the building have been revised. (see Appendix 'C') This has resulted in more bulk particularly on the north end of the site. Concerns were raised at the Public Hearing about the effects of bulk on the single-family dwelling and possible future 3-storey multiple dwellings at a lower density (FSR) located on the site to the immediate north. The revised form of development is different in two significant ways which increase the visual scale of the building, as follows: The north end of the proposed development would have a building depth (from front to back) of 14.6 m (48 ft.), plus an open rear balcony, instead of the 8.5 m (28 ft.) shown to Council at Public Hearing. Also, condition B(i) with respect to Form of Development required, "design development to improve the character of the roof and eaves;". Instead of the low-hipped roof initially proposed, it would now have peaked dormers, a change common to all facades, and which adds 2.4 m (8 ft.) to the height at the eave-line, without affecting overall maximum building height. At Public Hearing, the applicant responded to neighbours' concerns stating that the building would only be one storey higher than the adjoining house. Technically, this is still true, but the peaked dormer will appear higher. The neighbouring property-owner to the north has been advised of the proposed changes and has indicated they support these revisions. (see Appendix 'D') Staff believe that the revised form of development meets the intent of the CD-1 By-law and that the design changes remain within an acceptable range of scale in relation to the neighbouring site. CONCLUSION The Director of Planning has approved Development Application Number DE401604, subject to various conditions to be met prior to the issuance of the development permit. One of these conditions is that the form of development first be approved by Council. * * *