A5
                              ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT


                                             Date: Apr. 30, 1996
                                             Dept. File No.:  SP

     TO:       Vancouver City Council

     FROM:     Director of Cultural Affairs

     SUBJECT:  Public Art Commission, 901 West Hastings Plaza



     RECOMMENDATIONS

          A.   THAT staff commission Daniel Laskarin's public art proposal
               "Working Landscape" for 901 West Hastings Plaza, based on
               the approved budget of $100,000 on account in the Public Art
               Reserve.

          B.   THAT after a technical and budget review, staff report back
               on the cost of the selection panel's recommendation that the
               commission be expanded to include a fourth turntable, and
               additional planting for the plaza.


     GENERAL MANAGER COMMENTS

          The General Manager of Community Services RECOMMENDS approval of
          A and B.


     COUNCIL POLICY

     On May 3, 1995, City Council approved a public art budget of $127,667
     for the Plaza at 901 West Hastings Street.

     On December 14, 1995, Council approved $13,000 to enable public
     display of short-listed proposals and increase public access to the
     public art process.


     PURPOSE

     This report recommends that City Council commission Daniel Laskarin's
     "Working Landscape" for 901 West Hastings Plaza.

     BACKGROUND

     On May 3, 1995, City Council approved a public art process budgeted at
     $127,667 for public art at 901 West Hastings Street Plaza.  In
     response to growing public interest in the public art process, Council
     approved an additional $13,000 on December 14, 1996, enabling the
     short-listed proposals to be exhibited for public review.

     In October, 1995, an open call to artists was issued and 85
     submissions were received.  The selection panel, consisting of artist
     Renee Van Halm, architect Richard Henriquez, and SFU Downtown City
     Program director Judy Oberlander, recommended a short-list of five. 
     Five artists were given a budget of $2,000 to refine their schemes and
     make models for display at Library Square.

     The models and a description of the public art process were exhibited
     at the library from April 4 through 29.  Public comment on the
     proposals was invited, and approximately 325 comments were recorded
     (sample comments are on file with City Clerk).  Finally, after
     conducting artist interviews, technical analyses, and in-depth reviews
     of the public comments, the panel unanimously recommended Daniel
     Laskarin's "Working Landscape".  Mr. Laskarin's artist statement is
     attached as Appendix A.


     DISCUSSION

     Staff and the Public Art Committee are pleased with the selection
     process and the display of the short-listed proposals.  Thoughtful
     comments were made about all five proposals, and these informed the
     selection panel's deliberations.  Many members of the public expressed
     appreciation for the opportunity to comment.

     As a follow-up to its recommendation, the panel will discuss its
     process for making its short-list and final recommendation at a public
     forum at 6:00 P.M. on May 23, at SFU Downtown.


     "Working Landscape"

     Mr. Laskarin's proposal includes three turntables which rotate at
     rates equalling one hour, eight hours, and forty hours, representing,
     respectively, the lunch hour, the work day, the work week.  The work
     includes a fourth turntable which could rotate every fifteen minutes
     (the coffee break) were more funds available.  All turntables differ
     in size but are large enough to accommodate standard park benches. 
     After a preliminary review, City Engineers have indicated the proposal
     is technic-ally sound.

     The selection panel has recommended that Council approve additional
     funds to activate the fourth ("Coffee Break") turn-table, and add more
     planting to the Plaza.  Staff recommend a report back on the
     additional cost, after the detailed design review given to the
     proposal prior to commission.  The source of any additional funding
     would be the Public Art Unallocated Budget.


                                *   *   *   *   *