SUPPORTS ITEM NO. 2 P&E COMMITTEE AGENDA FEBRUARY 22, 1996 ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT Date: February 6, 1996 File No. 3725RENF TO: Standing Committee on Planning & Environment FROM: Director, Permits and Licenses SUBJECT: 3725 Renfrew Street RECOMMENDATION THAT Council instruct the Director of Permits and Licenses to withhold enforcement action regarding the use of the first storey of 3725 Renfrew Street as a children's dance studio with ancillary retail for the life of the existing building. GENERAL MANAGER'S COMMENTS The General Manager of Community Services RECOMMENDS approval of the foregoing. COUNCIL POLICY There is no Council policy directly related to this issue. BACKGROUND The main floor of this building has been occupied as a dance studio with accessory retail since 1981. This use was approved by the Board of Variance for a limited period of time and has been extended by the Board a number of times. The last extension, authorized by the Board of Variance in 1993 and approved under Development Permit No. DP808465 was to December 31, 1995. When considering the last appeal in December of 1993, the Board informed the tenants that any further appeal must be heard prior to the expiry of the Development Permit. SUBJECT: 3725 RENFREW STREET DISCUSSION On December 5, 1995, over three weeks prior to the expiry of Development Permit No. DP808465, the tenants submitted an appeal to the Board of Variance requesting a further extension. However, because the deadline for the meeting of December 13, 1995 had already passed and the next Board of Variance meeting was not until - 2 - January 10, 1996 due to the Christmas holidays, the Development Permit expired before the appeal could be heard. Ordinarily the Board of Variance meets every two weeks; hence, if it weren't for Christmas holidays, a meeting would have been held on December 27, 1995. Given that circumstances had not changed since the original approval, presumably the Board of Variance would have granted a further extension of time. However because the Development Permit had expired, the Board no longer had jurisdiction to hear the appeal. Our records indicate that the Zoning of the property is C-1. A dance studio, which is a school for Arts or Self Improvement by Zoning by-law definition, is not a permitted use in this zone. Consequently, the Director of Planning has no jurisdiction on this matter and the use must be discontinued. CONCLUSION This use has existed since 1981 with no recorded complaints. Therefore, because of the unusual circumstances, staff are recommending that enforcement action be withheld with respect to this occupancy. * * * * *