CITY OF VANCOUVER M E M O R A N D U M From: CITY CLERK'S OFFICE Date: Jan. 2/96 Refer File: 5340-2 To: Vancouver City Council Subject: CityPlan in Neighbourhoods The attached Policy Report dated November 30, 1995 and the draft discussion paper entitled "Bringing CityPlan to Neighbourhoods - a Proposal for Discussion"* dated December 1995 refer. Dr. Ann McAfee, Director, City Plans Division, and Ms. Ronda Howard, CityPlan, will make brief presentations. COMMITTEE CLERK MCross:sr * LIMITED DISTRIBUTION TO COUNCIL MEMBERS. (Copies on file in the City Clerk's Office and the Planning Department). POLICY REPORT Date: Nov. 30, 1995 Dept.File No. RH/TF/SA TO: Vancouver City Council FROM: Director of City Plans Director of Community Planning, in consultation with CityPlan Department Heads Steering Committee General Manager of Engineering Services General Manager of Community Services General Manager of Corporate Services General Manager of Parks & Recreation Manager of the Housing Centre SUBJECT: CityPlan in Neighbourhoods RECOMMENDATIONS A. THAT Council approve the release of the discussion paper entitled, *"Bringing CityPlan to Neighbourhoods". B. THAT Council invite public review of the discussion paper, during January through March 1996, and that Council approve the review process described in this report (including distributing a summary of the discussion paper to the CityPlan mailing list; staff presentations, discussion groups, and city-wide workshop). C. THAT the Planning Department report back in May 1996 on the results of the public review of the discussion paper and on a proposed approach to implementing CityPlan in Neighbourhoods, including staff and budget requirements. D. THAT Council approve carrying forward the remaining CityPlan budget of approximately $72,000 and using $23,800 for the public review noted in "B" above, and $44,000 for preparation of "neighbourhood planning guides" - with costs as detailed in Appendix B. CITY MANAGER'S COMMENTS The City Manager RECOMMENDS approval of the foregoing. COUNCIL POLICY On June 6, 1995, Council approved CityPlan as providing directions for Vancouver. Included in CityPlan are directions for neighbourhoods, as noted in Appendix A. These include: - ... create or strengthen neighbourhood centres in all neighbourhoods as a place where people can find shops, jobs, and services close to home. - ...increase housing variety and affordability in neighbourhoods that have little variety now to help meet the housing needs of people of different ages and incomes in the neighbourhoods, the city, and region. - ...maintain and improve neighbourhood character. - ...increase walking, biking, and transit in neighbourhoods and between neighbourhoods, and reduce single-occupant car use. CityPlan includes the following statements about implementation: - "The City should, as a first step, bring people from across the city together with Council and City staff to determine how to plan for neighbourhoods and their neighbourhood centres." - "Develop a new planning process to be used in the planning of each centre and its surrounding community which promotes problem solving and resolving differences." SUMMARY CityPlan was adopted on June 6, 1995, as directions for Vancouver. Among the new directions identified in CityPlan are several that are very relevant to the city's neighbourhoods. These include, for example, a desire for housing choice throughout the city, reducing travel by locating jobs closer to where people live, and choice of neighbourhood character. Realizing that there are various ways to proceed with these directions and that any process will involve a significant commitment of City resources for some years to come, Council asked staff to propose a process for implementing CityPlan in neighbourhoods. The City would then invite public comment. This public input would assist staff to firm up a neighbourhood planning proposal for Council's consideration. The discussion paper, *"Bringing CityPlan to Neighbourhoods" outlines a proposed approach to implementing CityPlan at the neighbourhood level. The discussion paper contains four sections: principles, expectations, product, and process, as well as questions and answers on topics such as cost, boundaries, timing, and rezoning policies. The process proposed in the discussion paper is to develop "neighbourhood visions". Each "vision" would involve residents, business owners and operators in a six-month process. The product, a vision, would describe the kind of neighbourhood people want and how to move on CityPlan directions at the neighbourhood level. It would, for example, identify: the location and form of neighbourhood centres; important aspects of neighbourhood character, public places, and services; ways to increase the type and amount of housing and jobs in the neighbourhood; and ways to make the neighbourhood less car dependent. A concurrent process at the city-wide scale will assist neighbourhood visions to build toward a consistent response to CityPlan. Based on the visions, the City can be strategic about the location and timing of implementation actions such as rezonings, capital projects, and the provision of city services. Staff propose that the discussion paper, and a shorter summary version, be released for public review and comment early in the new year. Following this review, a revised program proposal including staffing and budget will be submitted to Council in May 1996. For Council's information, preliminary estimates of staffing and budget required for the approach laid out in the discussion paper are provided in Appendix C of this report. Concurrent with the public review of the discussion paper, staff propose assembling Neighbourhood Planning Guides and other data, information, and tools/models to assist in the neighbourhood program. Costs associated with the discussion paper and public review as well as information gathering can be met from funds remaining in the 1995 CityPlan budget. Staff are available to undertake the activities outlined. The CityPlan in Neighbourhoods Program will be under the direction of the Directors of City Plans and Community Planning. The CityPlan Department Heads Steering Committee will continue to provide guidance and coordination between policy planning initiatives (e.g. Neighbourhoods Program, Transportation Plan).PURPOSE The purpose of this report is: - to present a discussion paper which outlines a proposed approach to implementing CityPlan in neighbourhoods, including proposed budget estimate; and - propose a process for public review of the discussion paper. BACKGROUND CityPlan provides fourteen key directions for Vancouver. In addition to ongoing City initiatives in the areas of "Addressing Housing Costs," "Art and Culture," "the Downtown," and Clean Air and Water," a variety of new initiatives are underway which further the CityPlan directions. These include: Distinctive Neighbourhhod Character: A new zoning schedule, RS- 6, will be considered at Public Hearing in January. In February staff will be reporting on a program to assist neighbourhoods to maintain neighbourhood character. Accessible Community-Based Services: Fifteen community-based inter-departmental "Integrated Service Teams" are now in place. Their mandate is to work with staff from civic departments and with the community to solve community issues in the community. Promoting Safety: Nineteen community-based safety initiatives are underway through Police/Community Service Centres, Community Crime Prevention Offices, neighbourhood police offices, and police visitation programs. New and More Diverse Public Places: On July 18, 1995, Council adopted a City Greenways network plan involving 14 City Greenways totalling approximately 140 km. A "Ridgeway Greenway" is under development along 37th Avenue between Granville and Knight Streets linking VanDusen Gardens, Queen Elizabeth Park, and Kensington Park. Diverse Economy: Early in 1996, changes will be considered to the City's Industrial Schedules to facilitate city-oriented and city-serving jobs. From January to June 1996, a public process will consider sites for a convention centre -- a major new initiative to enhance tourism. Transit, Walking, and Biking: During January to April 1996, the City will be undertaking a public process on key transportation choices. This input will be the basis for a draft Transportation Plan which will then be distributed for public review. People Involved in Decision-Making and Financial Accountability: Better City Government initiatives, such as the Development and Building Regulation Review and the Public Process Review, are addressing CityPlan Directions. CityPlan in Neighbourhoods These ongoing and new programs form a context for the CityPlan neighbourhood initiative outlined in this report. The proposed program considers all CityPlan directions, from a neighbourhood perspective. In particular it will address directions for Neighbourhood Centres and Housing Variety, Distinctive Neighbourhood Character, Housing Cost, Jobs Close to Home, Diverse Public Places and Transit, Walking, and Biking. 1. PROPOSED NEIGHBOURHOOD PLANNING PROCESS In June, Council asked staff to consider ways to implement CityPlan in neighbourhoods. The attached discussion paper -- "Bringing CityPlan to Neighbourhoods" -- outlines a proposed approach to implementing CityPlan at the neighbourhood level. The discussion paper contains four sections: principles, expectations, product, and process plus questions and answers. a) Neighbourhood Principles: In developing the proposed approach, staff were guided by principles which emerged from the CityPlan process: - Reach all neighbourhoods in a reasonable time; - Follow up on the full range of CityPlan topics together; - Move forward in the CityPlan directions; - Recognize neighbourhood distinctiveness; - Help neighbourhoods keep a city-wide perspective; - Encourage as many people as possible to participate by making it easy to be involved in different ways; and - Keep costs reasonable. b) Neighbourhood Expectations: Arising from the principles, staff identified some possible expectations for the scope of the program. For example: - CityPlan directions (see Appendix A) provide a guide for neighbourhood planning. - Each neighbourhood will seek ways to bring CityPlan directions to the neighbourhood level.- The City's expectation for a neighbourhood product is that it demonstrates a full consideration of the CityPlan directions, data, and consequences, and shows movement toward the CityPlan directions. - Targets will be set from the ground up based on information provided in Neighbourhood Planning Guides and the unique circumstances of each neighbourhood. - CityPlan is intended to unfold over 30 years. As conditions and needs will change over that time, not all details need to be resolved now. - Neighbourhoods will be given the opportunity and responsibility of sharing information and work in progress and taking stock as the process proceeds. Expectations will need to be widely shared and agreed as a guide for both the neighbourhood process and the product. c) Neighbourhood Product: Staff took the above principles and expectations into account when considering alternate approaches to preparing neighbourhood plans. One option considered, but not proposed, is to do detailed "neighbourhood plans." This would be similar to approaches we have used in the past. The advantage of this approach is that the product provides certainty about development directions (e.g., zoning, design guidelines, development cost levies), services, and capital plan priorities. The drawback of this approach is that it can take up to three years to complete each neighbourhood plan. Given current staff resources, it could take more than 20 years to reach all neighbourhoods. Staff are proposing a new approach called "neighbourhood visions." Visions will provide overall guidance on implementing CityPlan directions in each neighbourhood. Visions will, for example, include the location of neighbourhood centres, important aspects of neighbourhood character and services, ideas to increase the type and amount of housing and jobs in the neighbourhood, ways to make the neighbourhood less car dependent, and actions for followup implementation. Not every detail will need to be resolved in the visions. They could contain options for resolution at a later date. Since visions will provide less detail than traditional neighbourhood plans, they can be prepared in a shorter time, reaching all neighbourhoods within about five years. With visions in place, the City can be strategic about the location and timing of implementation. d) Neighbourhood Process: The process for developing a neighbourhood vision is designed to encourage wide public involvement over a six-month period. The process has two levels -- a neighbourhood process complemented by a concurrent city-wide process (Figure 1). The city-wide process creates a link between neighbourhoods. It provides a forum for information exchanges, discussion of common concerns, and opportunities to take stock of progress and addresses questions of equity between neighbourhoods. To facilitate the visioning processes, and subsequent implementation, staff will be developing neighbourhood planning guides containing information on new approaches to implementing neighbourhood visions. The city-wide program provides a forum for staff to discuss new ideas for implementation with the public.The neighbourhood process (Figure 2) includes two activities - those that involve the public and those that require staff to assemble information and integrate material for further public review and comment. (1) Introductory events invite people to participate in developing a neighbourhood vision. (2) At workshops residents, business owners and operators discuss ideas for the neighbourhood. (3) Staff assemble workshop ideas into draft visions. (4) Workshops, displays, and surveys engage citizens in choosing and refining a preferred vision. (5) Staff assemble public input into a draft preferred vision. (6) The neighbourhood discusses and proposes any changes to the preferred vision. (7) The neighbourhood vision process concludes with the preferred vision being discussed with City Council in a public forum. Staff suggest starting with two neighbourhood vision programs concurrently. This would complete four visions a year. A program review is proposed at the conclusion of four visions. This will provide an opportunity to adjust the program based upon experience. At that time staff will be in a better position to assess actions required to implement completed visions and advise Council on ways to adjust staff resources between developing new visions and implementation. In addition to this major review, staff will be reporting to Council for direction at the start and conclusion of each vision process. e) Neighbourhood Program: Estimate of Costs and Staffing: At this point, Council is not being asked to approve budget or staff for the neighbourhood vision process. Following a decision on the preferred process, staff will propose a program budget. For information purposes, staff have done some preliminary program cost estimates. Based on the proposed program: - Annual non-staff cost to do four neighbourhood visions is $305,000. This cost could be partially offset by funds normally spent on community planning projects. - Estimated annual staffing requirements to do the neighbourhood and city-wide processes is 20 staff. All but three positions (multicultural, communications, and youth coordinators) are available through redirection of existing staff from community planning and policy programs. If this program proceeds, there will be substantially reduced resources for undertaking traditional local area planning programs, area studies, and zoning reviews. Further information on possible staff and other resource requirements is attached as Appendix C. A more refined cost projection will be included in the May 1996 Council report. 2. DISCUSSION PAPER REVIEW Staff propose that the discussion paper "Bringing CityPlan to Neighbourhoods" be released in January 1996, for public review and comment from January through March (Figure 3). Following this review, staff will report back to Council with a proposed program for implementing CityPlan in neighbourhoods. Funds required for the public review are $23,800 as noted in Appendix B, page 1. Source of funds is the CityPlan budget. Staff will coordinate with other City initiatives such as the Transportation Plan and Better City Government to take advantage of opportunities for joint programming and efficiencies. 3. PREPARATION OF NEIGHBOURHOOD PLANNING GUIDES During this same period, January to May 1996, staff recommend starting to assemble information for "Neighbourhood Planning Guides". The guides will include information which residents can use to develop vision statements on such directions as housing variety and neighbourhood character. The guides will outline expectations for the program and provide information about the extent of the City's resources for implementing visions. The guides will also include a "catalogue" of example traffic calming methods, affordable housing actions, public place designs, financing options, and zoning schedules to provide for more housing variety and address neighbourhood character. These ideas can be used by residents to develop their neighbourhood vision and implementation plans. The estimated cost to start preparing the guides is $44,000 as noted on page 2 of Appendix B. Source of funds is the carry- over CityPlan budget. 4. REZONINGS DURING NEIGHBOURING VISIONING PROCESSES On June 6 1995, staff noted the possible problems associated with privately initiated rezonings potentially prejudicing visioning processes. At that time Council approved a motion that applications for rezoning prior to adoption of a neighbourhood vision should not justify the rezoning on the grounds that it "supports CityPlan neighbourhood centres." Staff have reviewed the issue of rezonings prior to and during neighbourhood visioning programs. Staff continue to be concerned about the potential disruption and diversion of staff resources which might occur should a controversial rezoning be initiated prior to an agreed neighbourhood vision. This is particularly problematic in or near otherwise single-family areas where development of a neighbourhood centre will be a significant new direction for the neighbourhood. A seperate report from the Directors of Planning and the Manager of the Housing Centre proposes policies regarding rezoning inquiries during the neighbourhood visioning process. CONCLUSIONS The adoption of CityPlan provides the City with overall directions. These directions provide a context for: future neighbourhood, city, and regional plans; capital plans; and the delivery of city services. A wide variety of programs to implement CityPlan are already underway. Programs include Greenways, the Transportation Plan, Community Policing, zoning schedules for more compatible single-family zoning, and Integrated Service Teams. Further initiatives will be considered in the context of Capital Plan proposals. The CityPlan directions provide quidance for improving neighbour- hood livability. The next step is to develop neighbourhood initiatives which respond to CityPlan directions. This report proposes a process to develop Neighbourhood Visions. These Visions will provide a framework for actions in neighbourhoods which meet both the needs of neighbourhoods and contribute to the kind of city thousands of people supported through the CityPlan process. The neighbourhood vision process is a proposal which is being aired for public discussion. Following public input staff will prepare a detailed work program for "bringing CityPlan to neighbourhoods." * * *` * *