SUPPORTS ITEM NO. 2
                                                        VTC AGENDA         
                                                        SEPTEMBER 14, 1995 


                              ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT


                                                     Date:  August 16, 1995
                                                     File No. 634 077      


     TO:       Vancouver Traffic Commission

     FROM:     General Manager of Engineering Services

     SUBJECT:  Arbutus Street and 1st Avenue - Traffic Circle



     RECOMMENDATION

          A.   THAT a permanent traffic circle  be installed at Arbutus and
               1st  Avenue,  with  funding  of $6,400  from  Streets  Basic
               Capital Unappropriated Account Number 13/32/9801/999 - Other
               Improvements.

          B.   THAT neighbourhood  residents be  requested to  adopt circle
               landscaping  and  the  Streets  annual  operating  budget be
               increased  by $100 to fund maintenance.  In absence of this,
               the Streets annual  operating budget be increased by $500 to
               fund maintenance.


     COUNCIL POLICY

     Council has a long  standing policy of protecting  neighbourhoods from
     intrusion of non-local traffic.

     On  January 12, 1995, Council  approved that property  owners be given
     the  option  of installing  traffic  circles  on local  streets  where
     appropriate through  the local improvement petition  process with 100%
     property-owner  funding,  and that  the  Streets  Operating Budget  be
     increased by $500 annually for the maintenance of each circle.



     PURPOSE

     The  purpose of  this report  is to  present the  results of  a public
     opinion  survey regarding the  proposed Arbutus Street  and 1st Avenue
     traffic  circle, and  to recommend proceeding  with installation  of a
     traffic circle.

     BACKGROUND

     In  October  1994,  residents  forwarded  a  petition  to  Engineering
     Services  asking that  the area  be reviewed  for the  installation of
     traffic calming measures, such as traffic circles.

     On  March 13, 1995, Vancouver Traffic Commission received a report for
     information regarding Engineering Services  intent to conduct a ballot
     to determine support for  installation of a traffic circle  at Arbutus
     Street and 1st Avenue.

     In  May 1995, a neighbourhood public opinion survey was circu-lated to

     residents.


     DISCUSSION

     Residents  in the area of 1st  and Arbutus are concerned about traffic
     through  their neighbourhood.  To  help calm traffic  along this local
     residential street a permanent  traffic circle is proposed at  Arbutus
     Street and 1st Avenue.

     On Arbutus between 4th Avenue and Cornwall Avenue four-way stops exist
     at York,  2nd and 3rd Avenues.  There are  stop signs on 1st Avenue at
     Arbutus and traffic  signals on  Arbutus at 4th  and Cornwall  Avenues
     (see Figure 1).

     Traffic on Arbutus is quite high and is heavier during  the spring and
     summer months.  Vehicle volumes on Arbutus are 4,780 and 3,727 per day
     in  late spring and winter  respectively. Studies also  show that some
     drivers  use  Arbutus as  a  through route,  travelling  along Arbutus
     (south of 4th Avenue) to eastbound Cornwall (towards Burrard Bridge).

     Given these high volumes, installation of a traffic  circle at 1st and
     Arbutus  would be justified.  Four-way stop signs were also considered
     since  this type  of control  is used  at York,  2nd and  3rd Avenues.
     However, a traffic circle  will cause less noise in  the neighbourhood
     than stop signs,  and would  emphasize that Arbutus  is a  residential
     street.

     In almost  all cases within  the City,  traffic circle  installa-tions
     have been very popular. For  this reason and since traffic  circles do
     not  cause a large disruption  in traffic patterns,  it is recommended
     that the traffic circles  be made permanent. This would  be consistent
     with  Council's decision of  February 2, 1995,  that to  save time and
     money  and to  supply better  service to  the public,  traffic circles
     could  be installed  on  a perma-nent  basis  with landscaping,  where
     appropriate.
     Public Opinion Survey

     Residents  living within one block of the proposed traffic circle were
     surveyed with the following results:


             Surveys Distributed             342
             Surveyed Returned               99 (29% return rate)

             In Favour of Traffic Circle     74 (75%)

             Opposed to Traffic Circle       23 (24%)
             Unsure                          2  ( 2%)


     A 29% response rate is typical for surveys such as this.   The results
     also  show  that a  strong majority  (75%  of respondents)  favour the
     installation of the  traffic circle.   The survey  area is  relatively
     small;  however, it  is  in agreement  with  Council's July  18,  1995
     decision  defining  survey  areas  for  local traffic  circles.    For
     installation of traffic calming on busier streets, such as a collector
     street, a much larger survey area would be appropriate.   Because this
     is a local  residential street  only the immediate  area was  surveyed
     regarding the traffic circle (see Figure 1).

     From the  surveys returned the  most common  comment in favour  of the
     traffic circle  is that it  will slow down  traffic.  The  most common
     concern is a preference  for 4-way stops.  In almost  all cases it was
     expressed that some type of traffic calming measure is needed.

     A  sample of the ballot delivered to  residents and a summary of their
     comments is included as Appendix A.


     FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS

     The traffic circle is estimated to cost $6,400 and can  be funded from
     the Streets Basic Capital Unappropriated Account Number 13/32/9801/999
     - Other Improvements.

     It  should be noted  that on January  12, 1995,  Council approved that
     property  owners  be  responsible  for funding  the  installa-tion  of
     traffic circles in most cases.  However, in this case discussions with
     residents began before the new policy so owners have not been asked to
     fund the traffic circle.

     Future maintenance  of the  traffic circle including  landscaping will
     need to  be  funded through  a  $500 increase  in  the streets  annual
     operating  budget.   However,  residents will  be  asked to  adopt the
     landscaping  of   the  circle,  which   would  lower   the  costs   to
     approximately $100 per year.


     CONCLUSION

     It is recommended that a permanent  traffic circle be installed at the
     intersection of  Arbutus Street  and 1st  Avenue.   Traffic conditions
     justify  this   measure,  and  of  the   neighbourhood  residents  who
     participated in the  survey a strong majority (75%)  were in favour of
     implementing the traffic circle.



                                *   *   *   *   *