CITY OF VANCOUVER


                        REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING



        A  Regular Meeting of the  Council of the  City of Vancouver
   was  held on  Tuesday,  May 16,  1995,  in the  Council  Chamber,
   commencing at approximately 2:00 p.m.



        PRESENT:                 Mayor Owen
                                 Councillors   Clarke,  Hemer,   Ip,
                                      Kennedy,    Kwan, Price,  Puil
   and                                Sullivan

        ABSENT:                  Councillor Bellamy (Illness)
                                 Councillor Chiavario (Illness)


        CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE:   Ken Dobell, City Manager


        CLERK TO THE COUNCIL :   Maria Kinsella




   PRAYER

        The  proceedings in  the  Council Chamber  were opened  with
   prayer read by the City Clerk.




   ADOPTION OF MINUTES

   MOVED by Cllr. Puil,
   SECONDED by Cllr. Hemer,
        THAT  the  Minutes  of  the Regular  Council  Meeting  (City
   Services & Budgets) of April 27, 1995, be adopted.

                                                -      C A R R I E D
   UNANIMOUSLY

   ADOPTION OF MINUTES (CONT'D)

   MOVED by Cllr. Price,
   SECONDED by Cllr. Ip,
        THAT the Minutes  of the Regular Council meeting (Planning &
   Environment)  of  April  27,   1995,  be  adopted,  following  an
   amendment  to record Councillor  Clarke as  being present  at the
   meeting;

        FURTHER THAT the  annual lease rental contained  in clause 2
   of recommendation A on page 3 of the Minutes, be approved.

                                                -      C A R R I E D

   UNANIMOUSLY


        Following discussion of the foregoing Minutes, the following
   motion was put:

   MOVED by Cllr. Price, 
   SECONDED by Cllr. Ip,
        THAT the Ontario  Corridor south of 14th  Avenue be approved
   to  allow  implementation of  this section  as soon  as possible;
   funding of  $149,500 to be  provided from  Streets Basic  Capital
   Unappropriated Account #12/31/6903/999.

                                                -      C A R R I E D
   UNANIMOUSLY



   MOVED by Cllr. Sullivan,
   SECONDED by Cllr. Clarke,
        THAT the Minutes of the following meetings be adopted:

        -    Special Council Meeting (Public Hearing) - May 2, 1995;
        -    Regular Council Meeting (with the 
                 exception of the 'In Camera'
                 portion)                             - May 2, 1995

                                                -      C A R R I E D
   UNANIMOUSLY



   MOVED by Cllr. Clarke,
   SECONDED by Cllr. Hemer,
        THAT the Minutes of the Vancouver Traffic Commission meeting
   of May 4, 1995, be adopted.

                                                -      C A R R I E D
   UNANIMOUSLY

   COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE

   MOVED by Cllr. Hemer,
   SECONDED by Cllr. Ip,
        THAT  this  Council resolve  itself  into  Committee of  the
   Whole, Mayor Owen in the Chair.

                                                -      C A R R I E D
   UNANIMOUSLY




                            REPORT REFERENCE


   1.   Public Opinion Poll -                            File:  4105
        100% Non-Smoking By-law

        Dr. John Blatherwick, Medical Health Officer, advised that a
   public  opinion poll was commissioned to survey a large number of
   residents of the Lower Mainland and the Capital Regional District
   to investigate how residents  deal with the impact of  smoking on
   indoor air quality and whether they  would support no-smoking by-
   laws in  their municipalities.   This survey was  commissioned by
   the  Metropolitan  Board of  Health,  along  with  the B.C.  Lung

   Association, the Canadian Cancer Society and the Heart and Stroke
   Foundation of B.C. & Yukon.

        Mr. Nick Losito, Director  of Environmental Health, with the
   aid of overhead  slides, provided  Council with a  review of  the
   survey  results.  This is  a two-phase strategy,  with the public
   opinion poll  surveying the general public being  the first stage
   of the initiative.  The next  phase is to meet with the community
   and industry  stakeholders to look  at their concerns  and obtain
   feedback on this process.  

        The results  of  the  Angus  Reid  Group  survey  are  Lower
   Mainland  wide,  but  also  contain  specific Vancouver  results.
   Across the  region, respondents  to the  survey, when  asked what
   their  choice would  be  when frequenting  restaurants and  bars,
   advised as follows:

        ˜    73% request non-smoking areas
        ˜    18% request smoking areas
        ˜     9% express no preference


                                     cont'dREPORT REFERENCE (CONT'D)


   Public Opinion Poll - 
   100% Non-Smoking By-law (cont'd)


        Of  those individuals  who  request  non-smoking areas,  the
   primary reason given  is their concern for their personal health.
   Of the 18% who request a smoking section, this is principally due
   to them  being smokers.  The  remaining 9%, who do  not express a
   preference, stated it depends on who they are accompanied by.

        The  Vancouver results  very  closely parallel  the regional
   results, and are as follows:

        ˜    76% of the respondents would request non-smoking areas
        ˜    17% would request smoking areas
        ˜    7% indicated no preference

        Approximately 45%  of those surveyed  indicated an awareness
   of the initiative to restrict smoking in public  places.  Of this
   number,  66% of the respondents across the Lower Mainland and the
   Capital Regional  District indicated they would  support a by-law
   in their  municipality to prohibit  smoking in all  indoor public
   places. 
        Within  this  group, 41%  of  the  respondents are  strongly
   supportive  of   a  non-smoking  by-law;     25%  are  moderately
   supportive and 32% are moderately or strongly opposed.

        Mr. Losito  also highlighted that part of the survey results
   indicate the  elimination of  smoking could  have a  net positive
   effect  on   anticipated   attendance  on   some  categories   of
   establishments.

        Meetings  will  be  held with  industry  stakeholders,  both
   locally and regionally,  over the next four to six  weeks, and it
   is  intended  to  report  back  to  Council   with  findings  and
   recommendations in early to mid-July.

        Responding  to questions  from Council,  Mr. Losito  advised
   that survey results are  not available on the basis of culture or
   ethnicity, and that he would undertake to determine if the survey
   was conducted in other languages.

        The Mayor thanked Mr. Losito for his presentation.


                       REPORT REFERENCE (CONT'D)


   2.   Comparison of Rapid Transit                    File:  5559-3
        from Vancouver (on Broadway) to Coquitlam
        and from New Westminster to Coquitlam    

        Before Council was  a Policy  Report dated May  3, 1995,  in
   which  the  General  Manager  of  Engineering  Services  and  the
   Associate Director  of Planning  - CityPlan reviewed  the various
   rapid  transit  route  options  proposed  by  the  Province,  and
   provided the City's perspective on a New  Westminster routing and
   a  Vancouver  routing (via  Broadway)  to Lougheed  Mall  and the
   Coquitlam Mall. 

        The General Managers of  Engineering Services and  Community
   Services submitted the following recommendations:

        A.   THAT Council recommend to the GVRD, Province,  and
             BC  Transit  that   a  Broadway/Lougheed  line  to
             Lougheed Mall and  Coquitlam Town Centre  via Port
             Moody be the first  priority line to the Northeast
             sector.

        B.   THAT staff  evaluate further  with BC  Transit and
             its consultants the impacts of a Broadway/Lougheed
             rapid transit line in Vancouver for report back on
             issues  such as  land use  implications, alignment
             options, mitigation measures, traffic  impacts and
             integration with existing transit services.

        C.   THAT staff be instructed to arrange a meeting with
             the Burnaby  City Council to  discuss measures  to
             coordinate planning  for a  rapid transit  line in
             the Broadway/Lougheed corridor.

        Mr. Dave Rudberg, General  Manager of Engineering  Services,
   advised that  Council, at its meeting on April 11, 1995, had been
   provided with  information on  the three rapid  transit corridors
   being studied by BC Transit.   At that time,  Council requested a
   one month delay to allow  time to study the options further,  and
   this was subsequently agreed to by the Regional Board.  The Board
   is expected to indicate its preference in early June.

        Of the three corridors proposed, Richmond is no longer being
   considered  due to  the regional  desire to  serve  the northeast
   quadrant.


                                     cont'dREPORT REFERENCE (CONT'D)


   Comparison of Rapid Transit  
   from Vancouver (on Broadway) to Coquitlam
   and from New Westminster to Coquitlam (cont'd)


        Mr. Rudberg explained the  New Westminster to Coquitlam Town
   Centre corridor is supported by Regional staff as they believe it
   best supports the regional land use plan by linking regional town
   centres.  These include the Coquitlam  Town Centre, Lougheed Mall
   area  down  to  New  Westminster  Centre,  and  linking with  the
   SkyTrain which would connect  to Surrey, Metrotown and ultimately

   to the Downtown area.  Regional staff believe this best  fits the
   regional strategic plan and  minimizes risks in the long  term by
   focusing  growth in that corridor, and in and around the regional
   town  centres.   They  also believe  this  is supportive  of  the
   compact  Metropolitan  area  model  which is  anticipated  to  be
   endorsed by the Regional Board.

        The  second proposed  route along  the Broadway  corridor to
   Lougheed  Mall  links  into  the existing  heavily  used  transit
   corridor  along  Broadway,  and  serves the  greatest  number  of
   people.  This option also represents the lowest risk in the short
   term due to the high initial ridership which would be  carried on
   this particular corridor.  

        The  capital  cost between  these  two  route alignments  is
   approximately  the  same,  however,  the  big  difference  is  in
   ridership.   The peak hour  ridership is 4,300  passengers on the
   Broadway-Lougheed route, while it is only 2,200 passengers on the
   New  Westminster-Coquitlam  Town  Centre route.    The comparison
   between routes on a cost per rider basis is $3.03 per ride on the
   Broadway  to Lougheed corridor, and  just over $5.00  per ride on
   the New Westminster to Coquitlam Town Centre route.

        City  staff  have developed  a  third  option for  Council's
   consideration which  would link  Broadway to Lougheed  Mall area,
   and extend on  to the Coquitlam Town Centre.   Staff believe this
   is  a  link which  would not  only serve  the greatest  number of
   people, but would  also be  supportive of the  Regional Land  Use
   Strategy.  This  option could both serve and  shape the region by
   providing a backbone rapid  transit link across the region.   The
   BC  Transit   consultant  has  not  studied   this  option,  and,
   therefore,  the City  does not  have the  benefit of  the numbers
   concerning  ridership.  However,  the costs which  have been used
   are those which were established   for  the  New Westminster   to
   Coquitlam  Town  Centre 
                                                              cont'd
                       REPORT REFERENCE (CONT'D)


   Comparison of Rapid Transit  
   from Vancouver (on Broadway) to Coquitlam
   and from New Westminster to Coquitlam (cont'd)


   alignment.  Therefore,  the costs are considered  to be accurate.
   The  daily  ridership  on  this third  option  is  conservatively
   estimated to be  85,000.   This option is  also competitive  with
   regard to cost per ride at $3.80.  The Lougheed/Broadway corridor
   is projected to  have a significantly higher population growth in
   the  time frame of 2006.   There is also a significant employment
   growth  potential.  The City  of Burnaby believes  this option is
   very supportive of its land development plans within the Lougheed
   corridor.   Burnaby also has population  projections which exceed
   those shown by the Regional District.  This route would provide a
   significant link  between major areas of  growth potential, which
   would  increase ridership in the  future.  What  this route would
   not provide is a link from Lougheed Mall to New Westminster. 

        Mr.  Rudberg also  discussed  the system  capacities of  the
   different forms of transit and noted:

        ˜    RapidBus capacity - 4,500 passengers per hour;
        ˜    Conventional  light  rail capacity  - 9,000-20,000
             passengers  per hour  depending  on the  degree of
             grade separation;  and
        ˜    SkyTrain - 27,000 passengers per hour.

        The peak  hour demand on the  Broadway-Coquitlam Town Centre
   corridor  is  5,000  passengers  which exceeds  the  capacity  of
   RapidBus service.   The New Westminster to Coquitlam  Town Centre
   corridor would have a peak hour demand of 2,200 passengers, which
   only represents approximately 50% of  the ridership capacity on a
   RapidBus system.   It was  also noted that  transit ridership  in
   Vancouver  represents  over 50%  of  the total  ridership  on the
   transit system.  When  Burnaby and New Westminster are  included,
   this figure reaches nearly  70%.  The ridership in  the northeast
   sector only represents  4%-5% of  the total.   Given the  transit
   ridership,  demand and  type of  development which  has occurred,
   staff believe attention  should be directed to those  areas where
   transit  works  best,  and  that  is  the  Broadway  to  Lougheed
   corridor.  



                                                              cont'd
                       REPORT REFERENCE (CONT'D)


   Comparison of Rapid Transit  
   from Vancouver (on Broadway) to Coquitlam
   and from New Westminster to Coquitlam (cont'd)

        If Council  supports the corridor along  Broadway, there are
   other issues which need  to be studied, including the  impacts on
   the City from noise, visual impacts, impacts on traffic, parking,
   loading and pedestrians, as well as issues of land use around the
   stations and  the local transit system itself.  There may also be
   other possible alignment opportunities including use of a portion
   of the Burlington Northern Rail, which should be looked at.

        Mayor  Bob Bose, Chair,  GVRD Strategic  Planning Committee,
   provided  Council with  the Regional  perspective on  the transit
   alignment options.   The  Transport 2021  Plan provides  for five
   transit lines, of  which three were  selected for further  study.
   The Regional Board  has been asked by  the Province to provide  a
   clear  indication of the  regional priority for  building a light
   rail system.  This decision should be based on rational argument.
   Within  the   region,  the  metropolitan  area   model  has  been
   universally supported.   Rapid transit is the key to implementing
   the  growth management  strategy.   On  May 10,    eleven of  the
   thirteen  municipalities represented  on  the Strategic  Planning
   Committee  endorsed the recommendations of the Technical Advisory
   Committee,  the  Regional Administrative  Advisory  Committee and
   GVRD  staff,   supporting  the   Coquitlam  to  New   Westminster
   alignment.   This choice of priorities has also been confirmed by
   the  Board  due to  the critical  role this  route would  have on
   shaping the region. 

        Mayor  Bose   requested  Council   to   take  the   regional
   perspective as it is  crucial that Vancouver be a  contributor to
   the consensus decision.  It is  intended to meet with the Premier
   and Cabinet Ministers later in June concerning the decision which
   has been made.

        Mr. Ken  Cameron, GVRD Manager, Strategic  Planning, advised
   the route option recommended  by City staff in the  Policy Report
   before  Council,  was  not  presented or  analyzed  in  the rapid
   transit  studies prepared for BC  Transit for review  by the GVRD
   and  the affected  municipalities.   This further option  was not
   presented as a viable option in any other municipal review of the
   rapid  transit options, including Burnaby's.  There is no body of
   commonly  accepted or  understood technical  information on  such
   basic issues  as ridership estimates for  this proposed corridor,

   which would be  comparable to  the information  available on  the
   other corridor options.  
                                     cont'dREPORT REFERENCE (CONT'D)


   Comparison of Rapid Transit  
   from Vancouver (on Broadway) to Coquitlam
   and from New Westminster to Coquitlam (cont'd)


        The material from City staff does not contain other relevant
   information concerning the economic performance of rapid transit,
   which is available for the other corridor options.  There is also
   no estimate of  the impact  which a Broadway  Rapid Transit  line
   could have on other existing transportation facilities, and there
   may   be  no  net  benefit   in  overall  ridership.     The  New
   Westminster/Coquitlam corridor  provides for longer  average trip
   lengths,  which  in  turn  provides  for  greater  transportation
   efficiency and does more  to improve air quality.   The Broadway-
   Lougheed corridor  serves  a Vancouver  commuting pattern,  while
   potential for growth  in population and employment is  greater in
   the rest  of  the region.   The  decision on  route selection  is
   critical as  it relates to how the  eastern portion of the region
   will  develop.    It  will  either  develop  with  an  automobile
   orientation which  will have a detrimental impact  on air quality
   or, if there is a commitment  to a transit alternative, this area
   will develop in  a different  way, which  will be  kinder to  the
   environment  and  the  livability  of  the region.    The  option
   proposed  by  Vancouver  does  not address  the  regional  growth
   management challenge.

        Mr. Glen Leicester, BC  Transit, responded to questions from
   Council, and advised the option proposed by Vancouver will not be
   included in  the options being studied.   Mr. Leicester confirmed
   the  cost estimates  proposed by  Vancouver for the  extension to
   Coquitlam  from  Lougheed Mall  are  reasonable  given they  were
   extracted  from existing  reports.   The estimated  ridership may
   also be somewhat on the low side.  It is also expected there will
   be very little impact on commuter rail or SkyTrain from Broadway-
   Lougheed rapid  transit  line.   Commuter  rail  has  a  distinct
   catchment  area  and does  not  compete  with the  rapid  transit
   proposals.

        Dr.  Ann McAfee,  Associate Director  - City  Plans, advised
   that  Vancouver currently  has a  multiple zoning  capacity which
   provides  for  growth potential,  notwithstanding  rapid transit.
   However, rapid transit  would better serve to move people.  It is
   important  to  ensure  that  the  residents  along  the  Broadway
   corridor receive the same or better service, not reduced service.


                                     cont'dREPORT REFERENCE (CONT'D)


   Comparison of Rapid Transit  
   from Vancouver (on Broadway) to Coquitlam
   and from New Westminster to Coquitlam (cont'd)

   MOVED by Cllr. Puil,
        THAT  the  recommendation   of  the   General  Managers   of
   Engineering Services and Community Services, as contained in this
   report and noted herein, be approved.

                                                -      C A R R I E D
   UNANIMOUSLY

   MOVED by Cllr. Price,
        THAT  staff be requested to  begin exploring a  design for a
   RapidBus  corridor from  Commercial  Drive to  the University  of
   British Columbia.

                                                -      C A R R I E D
   UNANIMOUSLY



   VARY THE ORDER OF THE AGENDA

        It was  agreed the order  of the agenda  be varied and  that
   Report A13 be considered at this time.




                            MANAGER'S REPORT


   13.  Administrative Report
        (May 11, 1995)       

   Crowd Control Equipment                             File:  3701-3

        In an  Administrative Report dated  May 11, 1995,  the Chief
   Constable recommended the purchase of crowd control equipment and
   requested funding approval in the amount of $238,700.

        Superintendent  Rick Stevens, Officer-in-Charge of the Crowd
   Control Unit, responded to  questions from Council concerning the
   use of tear gas.

                                     cont'dMANAGER'S REPORT (CONT'D)



   Crowd Control Equipment (cont'd)

   MOVED by Cllr. Kennedy,
        THAT  the   recommendations  of  the  Chief   Constable,  as
   contained in this report, be approved.

                                                -      c a r r i e d
   unanimously



   MOVED by Cllr. Kwan (in amendment),
        THAT the foregoing motion  be amended to delete items  No. 7
   (Gas Masks), 8 (Shields) and 9 (Gas Guns) from the  list of crowd
   control equipment proposed to be purchased.

                                                - LOST

         (Councillors Clarke, Hemer, Ip, Kennedy, Price, Puil,
                    Sullivan and the Mayor opposed)


        The motion to amend having lost, Councillor Kennedy's motion
   was put and CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.

                               *   *   *

       Council recessed at 4:20 p.m. and reconvened at 4:30 p.m.
                     with the same members present
                 except Councillors Kwan and Sullivan.

                               *   *   *

                          UNFINISHED BUSINESS



   1.   Bicycle Parking Requirements
        (Amendments to Parking 
        and Building By-laws)       

        Before  Council  was  a Policy  Report  dated  May  3, 1995,
   concerning  bicycle  parking  requirements.   It  was  noted  the
   proposed amendments to the Parking and Building By-laws were at a
   Public  Hearing on October 20, 1994, at  which time a decision on
   the  amendment was deferred pending a workshop.  The workshop was
   held on February 23, 1995.

        Also  before Council was  a memorandum, dated  May 15, 1995,
   from the City Clerk recommending that because of the  substantial
   changes which have been made to the recommendations in the report
   since the Public  Hearing, this  matter should be  referred to  a
   public information meeting prior to consideration.

   MOVED by Cllr. Price,
        THAT the Policy  Report, dated May  3, 1995, concerning  the
   proposed  amendments to  the Parking  and Building  By-laws, with
   respect to bicycle parking requirements, be referred  to a public
   information meeting.

                                                -      C A R R I E D
   UNANIMOUSLY



                    COMMUNICATIONS AND/OR PETITIONS


   1.   Compensation Review Committee

        In  a  memorandum  dated  May  9,  1995,  the  City  Manager
   submitted the following eight names, representing both the public
   and   private  sectors,  for   appointment  to  the  Councillors'
   Compensation Review Panel:

             Sue    Adams,   President,    Western   Businesswomen's
   Association
             John Fryer, Professor, University of Victoria
             Gerald Haslam, Freelance Writer and Consultant
             Lois Hollstedt, Executive Director, YWCA
             Judi Korbin, Labour Arbitrator
             Jack Munroe, Chair, Forest Alliance of B.C.
             Brian Salvador, Assistant Vice President,
                  Compensation and Benefits, Hongkong Bank of Canada
             Michael   Walker,   Executive   Director,  The   Fraser
   Institute

        The City  Manager also proposed a  possible meeting schedule
   for the panel.

   MOVED by Cllr. Price,
        THAT the Councillors'  Compensation Review Panel membership,
   as submitted by the  City Manager and noted herein,  be approved,
   and the City Manager  be instructed to proceed with  the proposed
   meeting schedule.

                                                -      C A R R I E D
   UNANIMOUSLY


                       MANAGER'S REPORTS (CONT'D)


   1.   Administrative Report
        (May 2, 1995)        

   Reduction in Police Issued 
   By-law Tickets                                      File:  3701-3


        In an  Administrative Report  dated May 2,  1995, the  Chief
   Constable provided  information concerning the  reduction in  the
   number of  By-law tickets  issued by  the Police  Department from
   1992 through 1994.

        During discussion of this  report, a member of Council  drew
   attention to a  reference in  the report that  no statistics  are
   kept  on  the  number of  tickets  issued  to  motorcycles.   The
   Councillor  requested   the  Chief  Constable   to  endeavour  to
   distinguish between motorcycles and other motor vehicles.

   MOVED by Cllr. Hemer,
        THAT this report be received for information.

                                                -      C A R R I E D
   UNANIMOUSLY


                               *   *   *

                Councillor Kwan returned to the meeting
                 after the vote on the foregoing item.

                               *   *   *



   2.   Administrative Report
        (April 25, 1995)     

   Offer to Lease - 1401 Hornby Street
   Wimco Nurseries Ltd.                                  File:  5117

   MOVED by Cllr. Puil,
        THAT the recommendation of  the General Manager of Corporate
   Services, as contained in this report, be approved.

                                                -      C A R R I E D
   UNANIMOUSLY

                       MANAGER'S REPORTS (CONT'D)


   3.   Administrative Report
        (April 25, 1995)     

   Re-approval of Strata Title Conversion -              File:  5312
   1140-1150 Hamilton Street               

   MOVED by Cllr. Price,
        THAT the recommendation of  the General Manager of Community
   Services, as contained in this report, be approved.

                                                -      C A R R I E D
   UNANIMOUSLY



   4.   Administrative Report
        (April 26, 1995)     

   Sale of Residential Lot:                              File:  5111
   3153 East 45th Avenue   

   MOVED by Cllr. Ip,
        THAT the recommendation of  the General Manager of Corporate
   Services, as contained in this report, be approved.

                                                -      C A R R I E D
   UNANIMOUSLY





   5.   Administrative Report
        (May 2, 1995)        

   Addition of St. James Social Service Society        File:  4656-2
   to the List of Potential Sponsor Groups
   for Non-Market Housing                      

   MOVED by Cllr. Ip,
        THAT the recommendation of  the General Manager of Community
   Services, as contained in this report, be approved.

                                                -      C A R R I E D
   UNANIMOUSLY


                       MANAGER'S REPORTS (CONT'D)


   6.   Administrative Report
        (April 25, 1995)     

   Award of Consulting Contract:                       File:  1801-3
   Design and Construction Supervision
   for Replacing and Upgrading 
   Existing Pressure Regulating and 
   Rechlorination Stations            

   MOVED by Cllr. Clarke,
        THAT  the   recommendations  of   the  General   Manager  of
   Engineering Services, as contained in this report, be approved.

                                                -      C A R R I E D
   UNANIMOUSLY



   7.   Administrative Report

        (May 8, 1995)        

   Proposed Closure and Sale of the                   File:  5753-2 
   Lane South of Vanness Avenue 
   between Joyce Street and the 
   Lane East of Joyce Street       

        In an Administrative Report  dated May 8, 1995, the  General
   Manager of Engineering Services proposed the closure of a portion
   of the lane south of Vanness  Avenue between Joyce Street and the
   lane  east of Joyce  Street.  It was  also recommended the closed
   portion  of lane be sold  to the abutting  owner and consolidated
   with Lot "R". 

        Mr. Terry Bland, Corporation Counsel, suggested an amendment
   to  the recommendation  with  respect to  the consolidation,  and
   proposed the  closed portion  of lane  be  consolidated with  the
   abutting Lot "R"  or Lot 4, or  both, so as to  provide the owner
   and the City with some flexibility. 

   MOVED by Cllr. Puil,
        THAT   the  recommendation   of   the  General   Manager  of
   Engineering Services, as contained in this report, be amended and
   approved as follows:

                                    cont'dMANAGER'S REPORTS (CONT'D)


   Proposed Closure and Sale of the   
   Lane South of Vanness Avenue 
   between Joyce Street and the 
   Lane East of Joyce Street  (cont'd)


        THAT  all that  portion of  lane shown within  the both
        outline on  the plan  attached as  Appendix "A"  to the
        Administrative  Report dated  May 8,  1995, be  closed,
        stopped-up, subdivided, with the abutting lands subject
        to the following conditions:

        1.   The abutting  owner to pay $222,390,  plus GST, if
             applicable, as value for  the 2,500 square feet of
             closed lane, in accordance with the recommendation
             of the Manager of Real Estate.

        2.   That the proceeds of  this sale be applied  to the
             Streets Capital Accounts  for land acquisition and
             construction of left turn bays, on Joyce Street at
             Vanness Avenue.

        3.   The closed  portion of lane is  to be consolidated
             with the  abutting Lot "R", Plan 20906,  or Lot 4,
             Plan  2750,  except part  in Explanatory  Plan LMP
             18818,  both of  Block  158, District  Lot 37,  or
             both,  to  the   satisfaction  of  the   Approving
             Officer.

        4.   The  abutting  owner  to be  responsible  for  any
             necessary plans, documents,  and Land Title Office
             fees.

        5.   Any agreements  are to  be to the  satisfaction of
             the Director of Legal Services.

        6.   No legal right or  obligation shall be created and
             none  shall arise  hereafter, until  the documents

             are executed.

                                                -      C A R R I E D
   UNANIMOUSLY

   * underlining denotes amendment

                       MANAGER'S REPORTS (CONT'D)


   8.   Administrative Report
        (May 3, 1995)        

   Tender No. 35-95-04:  Supply of                     File:  1801-3
   a Telescoping Boom Excavator   

   MOVED by Cllr. Price,
        THAT   the   recommendation  of   the  General   Manager  of
   Engineering Services and the  City Purchasing Agent, as contained
   in this report, be approved.

                                                -      C A R R I E D
   UNANIMOUSLY


   9.   Administrative Report
        (May 1, 1995)        

   Award of Contract No. 9502 for the                  File:  1801-3
   Construction of the Pump Station 
   and Associated Works:  Dedicated Fire
   Protection System - Coal Harbour Site

   MOVED by Cllr. Puil,
        THAT   the  recommendation   of  the   General  Manager   of
   Engineering Services, as contained in this report, be approved.

                                                -      C A R R I E D
   UNANIMOUSLY



   10.  Administrative Report
        (May 3, 1995)        

   Occupational Health Services -                      File:  4101-3
   Request for Proposal          

   MOVED by Cllr. Kennedy,
        THAT  the recommendations  of the  General Manager  of Human
   Resource  Services,  in  consultation  with  the  Medical  Health
   Officer  and  the  General  Manager  of  Community  Services,  as
   contained in this report, be approved.

                                                - CARRIED 

                       (Councillor Kwan opposed)
                       MANAGER'S REPORTS (CONT'D)


   11.  Administrative Report
        (May 2, 1995)        

   1995 Childcare Grants Allocation -                  File:  2401-2
   Report 1 of 3                     

   MOVED by Cllr. Clarke,
        THAT the recommendations of the General Manager of Community
   Services,  as  contained in  this  report  and  quoted below,  be
   approved:

        A.   THAT  Council  approve  five  City-wide  Childcare
             Support  Service  Grants  totalling   $241,940  as
             listed in  the Administrative Report  dated May 2,
             1995.   Source  of funds:   1995  Childcare Grants
             Funds, 1995 Operating Budget.

        B.   THAT  Council approve one  Administration of City-
             owned Childcare Facilities grant of $55,050 to the
             Vancouver Society  of Children's Centres.   Source
             of  funds:    1995  Childcare  Grants  Funds, 1995
             Operating Budget.

        C.   THAT  Council  approve  one Childcare  Innovations
             Grant  of $5,650  to Westcoast  Childcare Resource
             Centre  to  undertake  the  Multilingual  Services
             Clearing-House project described in Appendix IV of
             the  Administrative  Report  dated  May  2,  1995.
             Source  of funds:   1995  Childcare Grants  Funds,
             1995 Operating Budget.

        D.   THAT  Council  approve  three Program  Development
             Grants   totalling  $15,000   as  listed   in  the
             Administrative Report  dated May 2, 1995.   Source
             of  funds:    1995  Childcare  Grants  Funds, 1995
             Operating Budget.

                                                -      C A R R I E D
   UNANIMOUSLY
                                                  AND BY THE 
                                                  REQUIRED MAJORITY

                               *   *   *

                   At this point in the proceedings,
                  Councillor Kennedy left the meeting.

                               *   *   *

                       MANAGER'S REPORTS (CONT'D)


   12.  Administrative Report
        (May 9, 1995)        

   Agreement on Internal Trade:                   File:  6001/3253-3
   Chapter Five - Procurement  

   MOVED by Cllr. Puil,
        THAT the recommendation of the City Manager, as contained in
   this report and quoted below, be approved:
        A.   THAT  Council advise  the  Provincial Minister  of
             Employment  and Investment  that the  City objects
             strongly  to the  provisions of  the Agreement  on
             Internal Trade as they may  apply to the City, and
             instruct  the  City Manager  to contact  the Chief
             Provincial Negotiator on Internal Trade to discuss
             how  the City  can be  exempted from  the proposed
             arrangement.

        B.   THAT  Council  advise   the  Federal  Minister  of
             Industry that  the City  objects  strongly to  the

             provisions of  the Agreement on  Internal Trade as
             they may  apply to the  City and request  that the
             Minister intervene to  ensure that  municipalities
             are excluded from the agreement.

        C.   THAT the FCM be requested to include this issue as
             an emergency item on the forthcoming FCM agenda.

                                                -      C A R R I E D
   UNANIMOUSLY


                               *   *   *
              Councillor Sullivan returned to the meeting
               prior to the vote on the foregoing motion.



   13.  Administrative Report
        (May 11, 1995)       

   Crowd Control Equipment                             File:  3701-3

        For Council action see page 10.


                       MANAGER'S REPORTS (CONT'D)



   14.  Administrative Report
        (May 12, 1995)       

   Adoption of 1995 Operating Budget,                  File:  1606-1
   Taxation Resolutions and By-laws  

   MOVED by Cllr. Hemer,
        THAT the recommendation of  the General Manager of Corporate
   Services, as contained in this report, be approved.

                                                - CARRIED BY THE
                                                  REQUIRED MAJORITY

                       (Councillor Kwan opposed)





   1.   Policy Report
        (April 25, 1995)

   CD-1 Text Amendment - 3655 Clark Drive              File:  5303-2

   MOVED by Cllr. Clarke,
        THAT the recommendation of  the General Manager of Community
   Services, as contained in this report, be approved.

                                                - CARRIED

                       (Councillor Kwan opposed)

                       MANAGER'S REPORTS (CONT'D)

   2.   Policy Report
        (May 3, 1995)


   Rezoning:  501 Bute Street -                        File:  5303-2
   Harbour Green Neighbourhood
   Area 3 of Marathon's 
   Coal Harbour Development     

        In a Policy Report dated May 3, 1995, the Associate Director
   of  Planning -  Central  Area, in  consultation with  the General
   Managers  of Engineering  Services  and Parks  & Recreation,  the
   Directors of Social  Planning and Legal Services, and the Manager
   of the Housing Centre, reviewed an application by Marathon Realty
   Company  Ltd. to  rezone Area  3 in  Coal Harbour  called Harbour
   Green Neighbourhood, to permit residential development, including
   non-market housing.

        The General  Manager of  Community Services recommended  the
   application  be  referred  to   Public  Hearing  subject  to  the
   conditions contained in the report.

        Also before Council was  a letter, dated May 16,  1995, from
   the General Manager of Board of Parks & Recreation, advising that
   the  Park Board,  at its  meeting  on May  15,  1995, approved  a
   resolution concurring  with the park related  issues contained in
   the aforementioned Policy Report.

   MOVED by Cllr. Price,
        THAT the recommendation of  the General Manager of Community
   Services, as contained in this report, be approved.

                                                - CARRIED

                       (Councillor Kwan opposed)
                       MANAGER'S REPORTS (CONT'D)


   Rezoning:  501 Bute Street -  
   Harbour Green Neighbourhood
   Area 3 of Marathon's 
   Coal Harbour Development (cont'd) 


   MOVED by Cllr. Price,
        THAT the advertised height of the easterly tower 1.6 in Area
   1B  be  99  m(325  ft)  with  a  corresponding  increase  in  the
   advertised  residential  floor area  (about  2500  m›) and  units
   (about 20);

        FURTHER   THAT  staff   bring   this   option  forward   for
   consideration at  Public Hearing, which, if  approved, would lead
   to an equivalent decrease  in height, floor area, and  units from
   the adjacent tower to the east (westerly tower 2A in Area 3).

                                                - CARRIED

               (Councillors Hemer, Kwan and Puil opposed)

                               *   *   *

              Councillor Kennedy returned to the meeting 
               prior to the vote on the foregoing motion.

                               *   *   *

   3.   Policy Report
        (May 2, 1995)

   Rezoning:  301 Jervis Street -                      File:  5305-2
   Marina Neighbourhood, Sub-area 1B
   of Marathon's Coal Harbour Development

        In a Policy Report dated May 2, 1995, the Associate Director
   of  Planning -  Central Area,  in consultation  with the  General
   Managers  of Engineering  Services  and Parks  & Recreation,  the
   Directors  of Social Planning and Legal  Services, the Manager of
   the Housing Centre,  and the Superintendent of the  School Board,
   reviewed an application by Marathon Realty Company Ltd. to rezone
   Sub-area 1B of  its Coal  Harbour Development, a  portion of  the
   previously-approved  Marina  Neighbourhood.    If  approved,  the
   proposed  development would  include both  non-market and  market
   housing, community facilities,  and limited commercial  use along
   the waterfront.  
                                    cont'dMANAGER'S REPORTS (CONT'D)


   Rezoning:  301 Jervis Street -  
   Marina Neighbourhood, Sub-area 1B
   of Marathon's Coal Harbour Development (cont'd)

        The General  Manager of  Community Services recommended  the
   application  be  referred  to  Public  Hearing,  subject  to  the
   conditions contained in the report.

        Also before Council was  a letter, dated May 16,  1995, from
   the  General Manager, Board of  Parks & Recreation, advising that
   the Park  Board, at  its meeting  on May  15, 1995,  approved the
   following motion:

        A.   THAT  the Board  concur with  park related  issues
             contained in the Policy Report, dated May 2, 1995,
             on 301 Jervis Street.

        B.   THAT  the  Board  support  staff's  rationale  for
             establishing a  lease rate for the proposed marina
             parkade  as outlined in  the Policy  Report, dated
             May 2, 1995.

   MOVED by Cllr. Price,
        THAT the recommendation of  the General Manager of Community
   Services, as contained in this report, be approved.

                                                -      C A R R I E D
   UNANIMOUSLY


   MOVED by Cllr. Price,
        THAT staff be requested  to report at the Public  Hearing on
   view implications  from Pender Street and  options for preserving
   such views.

                                                -      C A R R I E D
   UNANIMOUSLY


   MOVED by Cllr. Price,
        THAT the General Managers of Engineering Services, Community
   Services and Parks & Recreation be requested to review and report
   back on the widths assigned to the various public walkways in the
   property development.

                                                -      C A R R I E D
   UNANIMOUSLY         MANAGER'S REPORTS (CONT'D)


   4.   Policy Report
        (May 2, 1995)

   City Funded Water Services for                      File:  4552-2
   Single-Family and Duplex Residences

        In a Policy Report dated May 2, 1995, the General Manager of
   Engineering Services  reviewed the City's existing  policy of not
   charging  property  owners  for  the installation  of  new  water
   services to single-family and duplex residences, and the existing
   practice of  not charging to discontinue  existing water services
   on development sites that have several old services.  The General
   Manager of  Engineering  Services  recommended  Council  set  new
   policies so that the  property owner directly funds a  portion of
   the costs involved.

        Also submitted for consideration was whether the City wished
   to continue  to  fund  new water  service  connections  for  fire
   sprinklers required to legalize permanent secondary suites.


   MOVED by Cllr. Sullivan,
        THAT   the  recommendations  of   the  General   Manager  of
   Engineering  Services, as  contained  in this  report and  quoted
   below, be approved:

        A.   THAT the  City's existing  policy  of funding  new
             water   services   to  single-family   and  duplex
             residences  installing  fire sprinkler  systems be
             revised so that the City funds 50% of the cost and
             the  property   owner  funds  50%  of   the  cost,
             effective June  1, 1995, and  the 1995  Waterworks
             Capital   Budget   and   borrowing  authority   be
             increased  by  $1 million  to  fund the  remaining
             water services shortfall.

        B.   THAT the City's existing policy of not charging to
             discontinue existing water services be  revised so
             that only one discontinued service per project  be
             funded from  the water  service account,  and that
             owners be charged $500 per service for services 1-
             inch through 2-inches, and $1,500  per service for
             services  4-inches  through  12-inches,  effective
             June 1, 1995.


                                    cont'dMANAGER'S REPORTS (CONT'D)


   City Funded Water Services for  
   Single-Family and Duplex Residences (cont'd) 

        C.   THAT the  Director of Legal  Services be requested
             to bring forward the appropriate by-law revisions.

        D.   THAT the  City continue to fund  new water service
             connections  for fire sprinklers that are required
             to legalize permanent secondary suites.

                                                -      c a r r i e d
   unanimously

   MOVED by Cllr. Kwan (in amendment),
        THAT the  foregoing motion be  amended to  provide that  the
   property owner  fund 100%  of the cost  of new water  services to
   single-family and duplex residences.

                                                - LOST

         (Councillors Clarke, Hemer, Ip, Kennedy, Price, Puil,
                    Sullivan and the Mayor opposed)

        The  motion  to  amend  having lost,  Councillor  Sullivan's
   motion was put and CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.




   RISE FROM COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE

   MOVED by Cllr. Clarke,
        THAT the Committee of the Whole rise and report.

                                           - CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY



   ADOPT REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE

   MOVED by Cllr. Hemer,
   SECONDED by Cllr. Sullivan,
        THAT the report of the Committee of the Whole be adopted.

                                           - CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
                                BY-LAWS


   1.   A By-law to amend By-law No.
        6580, being the Health By-law
        (Feeding of Wildlife)        

   MOVED by Cllr. Sullivan,
   SECONDED by Cllr. Clarke,
        THAT the By-law be introduced and read a first time.

                                           - CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

        The By-law was read  a first time and the  Presiding Officer
   declared the By-law open for discussion and amendment.

        There being no amendments, it was

   MOVED by Cllr. Sullivan,
   SECONDED by Cllr. Clarke,
        THAT the By-law be  given second and third readings  and the
   Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to sign and seal the By-law.

                                           - CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY


   2.   A By-law to amend By-law No.6066, 
        being the Vehicles for Hire By-law
        (Deletion of Wheelchair Loading Provision)

   MOVED by Cllr. Clarke,
   SECONDED by Cllr. Sullivan,
        THAT the By-law be introduced and read a first time.

                                           - CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

        The By-law was read  a first time and the  Presiding Officer
   declared the By-law open for discussion and amendment.

        There being no amendments, it was

   MOVED by Cllr. Clarke,
   SECONDED by Cllr. Sullivan,
        THAT the By-law be  given second and third readings  and the
   Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to sign and seal the By-law.

                                           - CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
                            BY-LAWS (CONT'd)


   3.   A By-law to Limit Commercial
        Property Tax Increases for 1995

   MOVED by Cllr. Puil,
   SECONDED by Cllr. Hemer,
        THAT the By-law be introduced and read a first time.

                                                - CARRIED BY THE
                                                  REQUIRED MAJORITY

                       (Councillor Kwan opposed)

        The By-law was read  a first time and the  Presiding Officer
   declared the By-law open for discussion and amendment.

        There being no amendments, it was

   MOVED by Cllr. Puil,
   SECONDED by Cllr. Hemer,
        THAT the By-law be  given second and third readings  and the
   Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to sign and seal the By-law.

                                                - CARRIED BY THE
                                                  REQUIRED MAJORITY

                       (Councillor Kwan opposed)



   4.   A By-law to Amend By-law No. 3575,
        being the Zoning and Development By-law
        (2309 West 10th Avenue)                

   MOVED by Cllr. Kennedy,
   SECONDED by Cllr. Price,
        THAT the By-law be introduced and read a first time.

                                           - CARRIED 

                       (Councillor Kwan opposed)

        The By-law was read  a first time and the  Presiding Officer
   declared the By-law open for discussion and amendment.


                                              cont'dBY-LAWS (CONT'D)

   A By-law to Amend By-law No. 3575,
   being the Zoning and Development By-law
   (2309 West 10th Avenue)(cont'd)        

        There being no amendments, it was

   MOVED by Cllr. Kennedy,
   SECONDED by Cllr. Price,
        THAT the By-law be  given second and third readings  and the
   Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to sign and seal the By-law.

                                           - CARRIED

                       (Councillor Kwan opposed)

        COUNCILLOR SULLIVAN WAS EXCUSED FROM VOTING ON BY-LAW 4

   5.   A By-law to levy rates on all taxable
        real property in the City to raise a 
        sum which, added to the estimated revenue 
        of the City from other sources, will be 
        sufficient to pay all debts and obligations
        of the City falling due within the year 1995 
        and not otherwise provided for (1995 General 
        Purpose Taxes Rate Levy By-law - 
        Capping Class 6 [Business and Other])       

   MOVED by Cllr. Kennedy,
   SECONDED by Cllr. Hemer,
        THAT the By-law be introduced and read a first time.

                                                - CARRIED 

                       (Councillor Kwan opposed)

        The By-law was read  a first time and the  Presiding Officer
   declared the By-law open for discussion and amendment.

        There being no amendments, it was

   MOVED by Cllr. Kennedy,
   SECONDED by Cllr. Hemer,
        THAT the By-law be  given second and third readings  and the
   Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to sign and seal the By-law.

                                                - CARRIED

               (Councillor Kwan opposed)BY-LAWS (CONT'D)


   6.   A By-law to levy a rate on Property 
        to raise monies required to be paid 
        to the Greater Vancouver Regional 
        District                           

   MOVED by Cllr. Puil,
   SECONDED by Cllr. Hemer,
        THAT the By-law be introduced and read a first time.

                                           - CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

        The By-law was read  a first time and the  Presiding Officer
   declared the By-law open for discussion and amendment.

        There being no amendments, it was

   MOVED by Cllr. Puil,
   SECONDED by Cllr. Hemer,
        THAT the By-law be  given second and third readings  and the
   Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to sign and seal the By-law.

                                           - CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY


   7.   A By-law to levy a rate on property 
        to raise monies required to be paid 
        to the Greater Vancouver Regional 
        Hospital District                  

   MOVED by Cllr. Puil,
   SECONDED by Cllr. Hemer,
        THAT the By-law be introduced and read a first time.

                                           - CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

        The By-law was read  a first time and the  Presiding Officer
   declared the By-law open for discussion and amendment.

        There being no amendments, it was

   MOVED by Cllr. Puil,
   SECONDED by Cllr. Hemer,
        THAT the By-law be  given second and third readings  and the
   Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to sign and seal the By-law.

                                           - CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
                                MOTIONS


   A.   Adult Retail Store Guidelines

   MOVED by Cllr. Price,
   SECONDED by Cllr. Kennedy,
        THAT the document entitled  "Adult Retail Store  Guidelines"
   be  adopted  by  Council for  use  by  applicants  and staff  for
   development  applications   involving  Adult  Retail   and  Adult
   Entertainment Stores.

                                                -      C A R R I E D
   UNANIMOUSLY



   B.   Closing Portion of the Southerly
        Side of Southwest Marine Drive,
        Westerly of Hudson Street       

   MOVED by Cllr. Ip,
   SECONDED by Cllr. Puil,
        THAT WHEREAS:

        1.   The City  of  Vancouver is  the owner  of all  the
             streets and  lanes lying within the  limits of the
             City of Vancouver;

        2.   The Federal Government and  the City agreed to the
             construction  of  the  Arthur  Laing  Bridge  over
             certain  Crown  Lands  and  City   streets,  which
             necessitates  an exchange  of  lands  between  the
             parties;

        3.   The exchange requires the  closure of a portion of
             the  southerly  side  of Southwest  Marine  Drive,
             westerly of Hudson Street;

        4.   The exchange will consolidate  the portion of road
             to be closed with the abutting Federally-owned Lot

             B, Block 1, District Lot 318, Plan 14774;

        5.   That portion  of road dedicated by  the deposit of
             Plan  1749,  on the  southerly  side  of Southwest
             Marine Drive, adjacent to Lot B, Block 1, District
             Lot 318, Plan 14774, is no longer  required by the
             City for road purposes;

                                              cont'dMOTIONS (CONT'D)

   Closing Portion of the Southerly
   Side of Southwest Marine Drive,
   Westerly of Hudson Street (cont'd)

        THEREFORE BE  IT  RESOLVED THAT  all  that portion  of  road
   dedicated by the  deposit of Plan  1749, and  adjacent to Lot  B,
   Block 1, District Lot 318, Plan 14774, the same  as shown heavily
   outlined on a  Reference Plan of survey completed  on the 8th day
   of  June, 1994, attested to  by K. Mitchell  Power, B.C.L.S., and
   marginally  numbered  (D)  BC  2858, be  closed,  stopped-up  and
   conveyed to the abutting owner;

        BE IT FURTHER  RESOLVED THAT  the said portions  of road  so
   closed be consolidated with the abutting said Lot B.

                                                -      C A R R I E D
   UNANIMOUSLY



   C.   Closing Portion of the Southerly
        Side of 75th Avenue, easterly 
        of Hudson Street                

   MOVED by Cllr. Ip,
   SECONDED by Cllr. Puil,
        THAT WHEREAS:

        1.   The  City of  Vancouver is  the  owner of  all the
             streets and  lanes lying within the  limits of the
             City of Vancouver;

        2.   The Federal Government and  the City agreed to the
             construction  of  the  Arthur  Laing  Bridge  over
             certain  Crown  Lands  and  City   streets,  which
             necessitates  an exchange  of  lands  between  the
             parties;

        3.   The exchange requires the  closure of a portion of
             the  southerly side  of  75th Avenue,  easterly of
             Hudson Street;

        4.   The exchange will consolidate the  portion of road
             to be  closed  with the  abutting  Federally-owned
             Lots  14  to  20, inclusive  of  Lot  2, Block  Y,
             District Lot 318, Plan 3069;

                                              cont'dMOTIONS (CONT'D)



   Closing Portion of the Southerly
   Side of 75th Avenue, easterly 
   of Hudson Street (cont'd)        

        5.   That portion  of road dedicated by  the deposit of

             Plan 3069,  on the southerly side  of 75th Avenue,
             adjacent to Lot 20 of Lot 2, Block Y, District Lot
             318, Plan 3069  is no longer required by  the City
             for road purposes;

        THEREFORE BE  IT  RESOLVED THAT  all  that portion  of  road
   dedicated by the deposit of Plan 3069, and adjacent to  Lot 20 of
   Lot 2,  Block Y, District Lot  318, Plan 3069, the  same as shown
   heavily outlined on a  Reference Plan of survey completed  on the
   8th  day of  June,  1994,  attested  to  by  K.  Mitchell  Power,
   B.C.L.S.,  and  marginally  numbered  (D)  BC  2863,  be  closed,
   stopped-up, and conveyed to the abutting owner;  and

        BE IT FURTHER  RESOLVED THAT  the said portions  of road  so
   closed be consolidated with the Lots  14 to 20, inclusive, of Lot
   2, Block Y, District Lot 318, Plan 3069.

                                                -      C A R R I E D
   UNANIMOUSLY




   D.   Form of Development Approval
        2309 West 10th Avenue       

   MOVED by Cllr. Kennedy,
   SECONDED by Cllr. Price,
        THAT the  approved form of  development for  the CD-1  zoned
   site  known  as  2309 W.  10th  Avenue  be  amended generally  as
   illustrated  in   DA  #217376,   prepared   by  Hughes   Baldwin,
   Architects, and stamped  "Received, City  of Vancouver,  Planning
   Department,  February 1,  1995",  provided that  the Director  of
   Planning  may approve  design changes  which would  not adversely
   affect either  the development  character and livability  of this
   site or adjacent properties.

                                                -      C A R R I E D
   UNANIMOUSLY


                            MOTIONS (CONT'D)


   E.   Approval of 1995 Operating
        Budget Estimates          

   MOVED by Cllr. Puil,
   SECONDED by Cllr. Hemer,
        WHEREAS the  City Manager and  the Director of  Finance were
   instructed  by Council on  January 31,  1995 to  review estimated
   revenues  and expenditures  of the  City for  the year  1995 with
   department  heads  and  boards and  to  report  back  through the
   Standing Committee of Council on City Services and Budgets;

        AND  WHEREAS  Council  has  reviewed  reports  on  the  1995
   estimates  prepared  by the  City  Manager  and  the Director  of
   Finance  dated  April  11, 1995,  and  April  25,  1995, and  has
   recommended certain amendments thereto;

        AND WHEREAS the total estimated expenditures of the City  to
   pay all debts and obligations of the City falling due in the year
   1995, exclusive of  the amounts required for  school, the Greater
   Vancouver  Regional  Hospital  District,  the  Greater  Vancouver
   Regional District, the British Columbia Assessment Authority, the
   Municipal Finance  Authority, and  B.C. Transit purposes  and not

   otherwise  provided   for,  as  amended  by   Council  amount  to
   $538,563,900;

        AND WHEREAS the total estimated expenditures as aforesaid is
   the  sum of  the appropriation  requests of  all departments  and
   boards   properly  supported  by   detailed  analyses   of  those
   expenditures and listings of the salaried staff;

        AND WHEREAS the total estimated revenue of the City for 1995
   from  sources  other  than real  property  taxes,  as amended  by
   Council, amounts to $217,321,696;

        AND WHEREAS the amount  of the General Tax Levy  so required
   is $321,242,204;

        THEREFORE be it resolved that the said estimates, both as to
   totals  and  individual items  pertaining  thereto,  of the  City
   Manager the Director  of Finance as so amended  by Council be and
   the same are hereby adopted by Council.

                                                -      C A R R I E D
   UNANIMOUSLY
                            MOTIONS (CONT'D)


   F.   Adjusted Tax Rate for
        Provincial Schools   

   MOVED by Cllr. Puil,
   SECONDED by Cllr. Hemer,
        THAT WHEREAS  pursuant to  the School  Act, the Surveyor  of
   Taxes for the Province of British  Columbia in each year levies a
   tax on  the net taxable value of all land and improvements in the
   City of Vancouver;

        AND  WHEREAS on  April 27,  1995 the  Lieutenant-Governor in
   Council levied the following  tax rates on Class 1  - Residential
   and Class 6 - business and other:

             Class 1 - residential          2.73880
             Class 6 - business and other  10.10000

   being dollars of  tax for  each one thousand  dollars of  taxable
   value, for the 1995 taxation year, which when  applied to the net
   taxable  value of  all land  and improvements  in the  respective
   Classes in the City of Vancouver would raise the following sums:

             Class 1 - residential         $ 137,813,430
             Class 6 - business and other  $ 116,517,917

        AND WHEREAS on March 28, 1995, pursuant to provisions of the
   Vancouver  Charter, Council  approved  an adjustment  of the  net
   taxable value  of land  in Class  1 - residential  and Class  6 -
   business and other, within the City of Vancouver;

        AND  WHEREAS the net taxable value  and the adjusted taxable
   value pursuant to the  Council by-law of March 28,  1995, of land
   in  the above-noted Classes subject  to taxation under the School
   Act for the year 1995 are as follows:

                            Net  Taxable  Value    Adjusted  Taxable
   Value

   Class 1 - residential     $ 50,318,909,773   $ 48,477,634,353
   Class 6 - business & other  11,536,427,407     11,733,740,672

        AND WHEREAS  Council is obliged to vary  the rate set by the
   Lieutenant-Governor  in  Council in  order  to  produce the  same
   amount of revenue  that would have been raised if the net taxable
   value of the specified land had not been adjusted;

                                              cont'dMOTIONS (CONT'D)


   Adjusted Tax Rate for
   Provincial Schools (cont'd)

        NOW THEREFORE  BE IT RESOLVED THAT, in the case of Class 1 -
   residential, the rate  of 2.84282 is  hereby substituted for  the
   rate of 2.73880; and in the case of Class 6 - business and other,
   the rate of  9.93016 is substituted for the rate  of 10.10000 for
   taxation  pursuant to the School Act within the City of Vancouver
   for the 1995 taxation year.

                                                -      C A R R I E D
   UNANIMOUSLY


   G.   Adjusted Tax Rate for
        B.C. Assessment Authority

   MOVED by Cllr. Kennedy,
   SECONDED by Cllr. Hemer,
        THAT  WHEREAS pursuant  to the  British Columbia  Assessment
   Authority Act, the British  Columbia Assessment Authority in each
   year  levies  a tax  on the  net taxable  value  of all  land and
   improvements in the City of Vancouver (excluding property that is
   taxable for school purposes only by special act);

        AND  WHEREAS on  April  3,  1995,  the Authority,  with  the
   Approval  of  the  Lieutenant-Governor  in  Council,  levied  the
   following  tax rates  on Class  1  - residential  and  Class 6  -
   business and other:

             Class 1 - residential         0.1221
             Class 6 - business and other  0.3956

   being dollars of  tax for  each one thousand  dollars of  taxable
   value, for the 1995 taxation year,  which when applied to the net
   taxable value  of all  land and  improvements  in the  respective
   Classes in the City of  Vancouver (excluding property taxable for
   school purposes only  by special act)  would raise the  following
   sums:

             Class 1 - residential         $ 6,143,831
             Class 6 - business and other  $ 4,543,037

        AND WHEREAS on March 28, 1995, pursuant to provisions of the
   Vancouver  Charter, Council  approved  an adjustment  of the  net
   taxable value  of land in  Class 1  - residential and  Class 6  -
   business and other, within the City of Vancouver;

                                              cont'dMOTIONS (CONT'D)


   Adjusted Tax Rate for
   B.C. Assessment Authority (cont'd)

        AND WHEREAS the  net taxable value and  the adjusted taxable
   value  pursuant to the Council by-law of  March 28, 1995, of land
   in the above-noted Classes subject to taxation under  the British
   Columbia  Assessment  Authority Act  for  the  year  1995 are  as

   follows:

                            Net  Taxable  Value    Adjusted  Taxable
   Value

   Class 1 - residential      $ 50,318,028,873  $ 48,476,753,453
   Class 6 - business & other   11,483,914,407    11,681,171,673

        AND  WHEREAS Council is obliged to vary  the rate set by the
   British  Columbia Assessment  Authority in  order to  produce the
   same  amount of revenue  that would have  been raised  if the net
   taxable value of the specified land had not been adjusted;

        NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT,  in the case of Class 1 -
   residential,  the rate of  0.12674 is hereby  substituted for the
   rate of 0.12210; and in the case of Class 6 - business and other,
   the rate  of 0.38892 is  substituted for the rate  of 0.39560 for
   taxation pursuant to  the British  Columbia Assessment  Authority
   within the City of Vancouver for the 1995 taxation year.

                                                -      C A R R I E D
   UNANIMOUSLY


   H.   Adjusted Tax Rate for
        Municipal Finance Authority

   MOVED by Cllr. Puil,
   SECONDED by Cllr. Hemer,
        THAT  WHEREAS pursuant  to the  Municipal Finance  Authority
   Act,  the  British Columbia  Assessment  Authority  in each  year
   levies  a  tax  on  the  net   taxable  value  of  all  land  and
   improvements in the City of Vancouver (excluding property that is
   taxable for school purposes only by special act);

        AND  WHEREAS  on March  9,  1995,  the Authority,  with  the
   Approval  of  the  Lieutenant-Governor  in  Council,  levied  the
   following  tax  rates on  Class  1 -  residential and  Class  6 -
   business and other:

        Class 1 - residential         0.0003
        Class 6 - business and other  0.0004

                                              cont'dMOTIONS (CONT'D)


   Adjusted Tax Rate for
   Municipal Finance Authority (cont'd)


   being dollars of  tax for  each one thousand  dollars of  taxable
   value, for  the 1995 taxation year, which when applied to the net
   taxable value  of all  land and  improvements  in the  respective
   Classes in the City of  Vancouver (excluding property taxable for
   school purposes only  by special act)  would raise the  following
   sums:

        Class 1 - residential         $    15,095
        Class 6 - business and other  $     4,594

        AND WHEREAS on March 28, 1995, pursuant to provisions of the
   Vancouver  Charter, Council  approved  an adjustment  of the  net
   taxable value  of land in  Class 1  - residential and  Class 6  -
   business and other, within the City of Vancouver;

        AND WHEREAS the  net taxable value and the  adjusted taxable

   value pursuant  to the Council by-law of  March 28, 1995, of land
   in  the  above-noted  Classes   subject  to  taxation  under  the
   Municipal Finance Authority Act for the year 1995 are as follows:

                            Net  Taxable  Value    Adjusted  Taxable
   Value

   Class 1 - residential     $ 50,318,028,873   $ 48,476,753,453
   Class 6 - business & other  11,483,914,407     11,681,171,673

        AND WHEREAS Council is obliged  to vary the rate set by  the
   Municipal Finance Authority  in order to produce the  same amount
   of revenue that would  have been raised if the  net taxable value
   of the specified land had not been adjusted;

        NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT, in the case of  Class 1 -
   residential, the  rate of 0.00031  is hereby substituted  for the
   rate of 0.0003; and in the case  of Class 6 - business and other,
   the  rate of  0.00039 is substituted  for the rate  of 0.0004 for
   taxation pursuant  to the Municipal Finance  Authority Act within
   the City of Vancouver for the 1995 taxation year.

                                                -      C A R R I E D
   UNANIMOUSLY

                            MOTIONS (CONT'D)


   I.   Adjusted Tax Rate for
        Vancouver Regional Transit Commission

   MOVED by Cllr. Puil,
   SECONDED by Cllr. Hemer,
        THAT WHEREAS  pursuant  to the  Vancouver  Regional  Transit
   Commission  Regulation  No.  14-1991,   B.C.  Reg  105/91  ,  the
   Vancouver Regional Transit  Commission in each year  levies a tax
   on the net taxable value of all land and improvements in the City
   of Vancouver; 

        AND  WHEREAS  on March  15,  1995 the  Commission,  with the
   approval  of the  Lieutenant-Governor in  Council, adopted  a tax
   rate of 0.9627 on  the specified land and improvements in Class 6
   - business and other, being dollars  of tax for each one thousand
   dollars of taxable value  for the 1995 taxation year,  which when
   applied  to the  net  taxable value  of  the specified  land  and
   improvements  in Class  6 -  business and other,  in the  City of
   Vancouver would raise the sum of $11,055,564;

        AND WHEREAS on March 28, 1995, pursuant to provisions of the
   Vancouver  Charter, Council  approved  an adjustment  of the  net
   taxable value of land in Class 6 - business and other, within the
   City of Vancouver;

        AND  WHEREAS the net taxable value of the specified land and
   improvements  in the  City  of Vancouver  for  the year  1995  is
   $11,483,914,407  and  the  adjusted  taxable  value  pursuant  to
   Council by-law of March 28, 1995 is $11,681,171,673;

        AND WHEREAS Council  is obliged to vary the rate  set by the
   Vancouver  Regional Transit  Commission in  order to  produce the
   same amount  of revenue that  would have been  raised if  the net
   taxable value of the specified land had not been adjusted;

        NOW THEREFORE BE  IT RESOLVED  THAT the rate  of 0.94644  is
   hereby substituted for the rate of 0.96270 for  taxation pursuant
   to the  Vancouver Regional Transit Commission  Regulation No. 19-

   1995 within the City of Vancouver for the 1995 taxation year.    
        
                                           - CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY



                      ENQUIRIES AND OTHER MATTERS


   Rapid Transit Routes                                File:  5559-3

   MOVED by Cllr. Kennedy,
   SECONDED by Cllr. Hemer,
        THAT the  Policy Report  dated May  5, 1995,  concerning the
   comparison  of  Rapid Transit  from  Vancouver  (on Broadway)  to
   Coquitlam and from New Westminster to Coquitlam, be forwarded  to
   GVRD  Board members,  the Regional Engineers'  Advisory Committee
   and the Regional Administrative Advisory Committee.

                                                -      C A R R I E D
   UNANIMOUSLY




   Bill C76 -
   Budget Implementation Act                            File:  111-2

   MOVED by Cllr. Kwan,
   SECONDED by Cllr. Price,
        THAT the  Social Planning Department be  requested to report
   on the impact of Bill C76 (Budget Implementation Act) on the City
   of Vancouver and the issues which this raises.

                                                -      C A R R I E D
   UNANIMOUSLY



   Rehabilitation Services                             File:  4101-3

   Councillor Sullivan           advised  the rehabilitation  sector
                                 is  concerned   with  the  negative
                                 impact of the clustering of sevices
                                 and   facilities  planned   by  the
                                 Vancouver  Regional  Health  Board,
                                 and noted this is an issue which he
                                 is pursuing.


                               *    *   *

            The Council recessed at approximately 5:35 p.m.
           for an 'In Camera' meeting in the Mayor's Office.

                               *   *   *