Agenda Index City of Vancouver

SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES

DECEMBER 8 & 10, 1998

COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE

MOVED by Cllr. Bellamy,
SECONDED by Cllr.Don Lee ,

1. Comprehensive Development Agreement Application:

Summary: The Comprehensive Development Agreement would allow for the development of the convention centre expansion, a convention hotel, a third cruise ship berth, and supportive retail, commercial and transportation facilities.

(a) THAT the draft Comprehensive Development Agreement (attached as Appendix A to the Administrative Report dated November 5, 1998 and revised as of November 30, 1998) be approved by Council specifying, among other things, the land uses, development allowances, design parameters, and public benefit requirements for the expansion of the Vancouver Trade and Convention Centre including:

(b) THAT the proposed form of development be approved by Council in principle, generally as prepared by Greystone Properties Ltd., and stamped “Received City Planning Department, December 8, 1998, provided that the Director of Planning may allow minor alterations to this form of development when approving the detailed scheme of development, subject to the Design Development conditions as outlined in revised Appendix C dated December 7, 1998 of the referral report;

(c) AND THAT the Comprehensive Development Agreement be submitted to the Vancouver Port Corporation and the developer for agreement generally in accordance with the draft attached.

Staff Comments

· casino use (not permitted);
· retail impact assessment;
· water coverage;
· pedestrian linkages;
· public benefits;
· training and employment opportunities;
· housing impact assessment;
· movement of dangerous goods;
· liquor licensing;
· funding sources for the development.

· structure of the viaduct;
· application to be made to the Burrard Environmental Review Committee;
· ownership of CRAB Park;
· seabus connection and linkages;
· transit connections and routes;
· parking;
· pedestrian connections;
· traffic impacts;
· new Cordova intersection;
· Port roadway;
· provision for taxis and buses.

· convention centre expansion;
· cruise ship expansion including a third berth;
· new Marriott hotel with reference to tower height, shape, and impact on views;
· other commercial components;
· child daycare facility;
· public transit and pedestrian connections;
· seabus access;
· points of access suitable for persons with disabilities;
· cyclist access and bypass route.

Applicant Comments

· stimulus to the local and provincial economy including 11,000 jobs during construction and 4,100 jobs in operations;
· job training and entry level positions in the service sector;
· approximately $51 million in payments-in-lieu of property taxes;
· increased cruise ship revenues;
· the hotel capacity required for large conventions;
· assurance that Vancouver can meet the cruise industry's needs for expansion;
· a high level of excellence in design and construction.

· hotel tower location and shape;
· shape of the Phase 2 tower;
· shape of the plaza;
· pedestrian linkages.

Summary of Correspondence

Speakers

· the proposed development addresses the issue of loss of convention business due to the existing facility being outgrown;
· Vancouver's ability to accommodate the expanding convention business is being strained;
· the tourism industry offers diverse employment opportunities and has a good history of accommodating new employees;
· it was hoped the project will have positive social impacts, and that any housing impacts created can be dealt with through creation of better, alternative housing;
· the project should not be stalled any longer;
· the project would provide a golden opportunity for vertical display of the Challenger Map, to the benefit of tourists, the city, and the province;
· it was hoped the project would serve as an amenity for Gastown and improve access to it;
· the GHAPC representative gave a point-by-point comparison of the current proposal to the concerns expressed by GHAPC at its meeting of July 15, 1998, and observed that the majority have been dealt with satisfactorily or are in the process of being dealt with;
· the project is supportable as long as access is controlled and issues such as loss of SRO housing are dealt with;
· representatives of the GBIS expressed enthusiasm for the convention centre, and hoped it will happen quickly, but expressed alarm about the lack of attention given to pedestrians at the complicated Cordova intersection, and hoped Council would ensure that there are good pedestrian linkages to Gastown, and no undue retail impacts on the heritage area;
· Gastown would be interested in having the maritime centre located at the foot of Carrall Street;
· the economic benefits and stability from this project strongly merit its approval;
· the convention centre will provide job opportunities for lower-income area residents and First Nations people;
· stakeholder groups in the community have been consulted on the issue of employment and the training will meet their needs;
· Mariott Hotels have a good history of employee training.

· various features of the project are not fully accessible to persons with disabilities;
· the walkway to the seabus will be almost doubled in length;
· "golf carts" and moving sidewalks, which have been proposed for the SeaBus connection, have not worked well in providing disabled access, and the latter cannot be used by guide dogs;
· there will need to be enough space between the moving sidewalks for wheelchairs as well as pedestrians or cart traffic;
· a development of this nature should not be permitted near the railyards, an area from which hazardous goods are shipped, nor should the City play down the issue;
· CRAB Park should be protected and transferred to the City under fee-simple ownership, not just by a 99-year lease;
· Council should refuse to approve this application unless a binding legal covenant is placed on both the land and water, prohibiting any casino use forever;
· Marriott Hotels are currently in partnership with the MGM Grand Casino in Las Vegas;
· this application should not be approved until details are available on proposed development of the east lands;
· not nearly enough public amenities are being gained from this enormous development;
· SRO housing will be lost because land values in surrounding areas will go up as a result of this development; Council should refuse the application until funds are made available to fully replace all housing lost;
· too much housing has already been lost in the Downtown Eastside due to gentrification; more should not be lost to tourism;

·Council should ensure that Downtown Eastside housing is protected through passage of an anti-conversion by-law;
· the poor will suffer from this megaproject as they did from Expo 86 and subsequent development of the Expo lands, which resulted in considerable loss of housing;
· rather than plead lack of jurisdiction, Council should remember that the Port of Vancouver could not operate without the City's cooperation; for example, the Port needs water and roadways;
· it is disturbing that there has been almost no discussion of the design of a project of this size and importance; the design of the project has changed six times in the last six months, and there are not sufficient details available for intelligent comment;
· the project lacks public open spaces;
· pedestrian linkages are inadequate;
· an urban design study is needed in order to review the merits of the project in the proper context; Council should not approve it, or at most; should only give approval in principle subject to detailed urban design study;
· provision for loading and unloading buses and taxis is inadequate; it will take a great deal of time to move large groups away from the convention centre;
· weather protection is insufficient;
· this large development will be located on the waterfront in front of a low-rise historic community, and will block the significant Canada Place building;
· the views of many area residents will be blocked, leaving them unable to see Canada Place, Stanley Park or the North Shore mountains;
· the project should be tiered down to prevent blocking views;
· a precedent will be established, and the HA-2 District will all be built up in height.

MOVED by Cllr. Kennedy,

(Councillor Bellamy not present for the vote)

The Special Council recessed at 11:05 p.m., and reconvened
at 3:00 p.m. on Thursday, December 10, 1998, in the
Council Chamber, with the same members present.

* * *


sp981208.htm

Applicant’s Closing Comments

Staff Closing Comments

- accessibility into the site, including pedestrian access from Gastown
- the intersection of Cordova and Water Streets
- the Urban Design Analysis
- the Plaza principle
- weather protection
- water links
- the view corridors
- the CPR tracks
- the amenity contribution
- housing impact assessment
- Crab park
- casinos
- the bus management plan, which will be reported back to Council.

Council Decision

MOVED by Cllr. Clarke,

RISE FROM COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE

MOVED by Cllr. Bellamy,

ADOPT REPORT OF COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE

MOVED by Cllr. Don Lee,
SECONDED by Cllr. Price ,

The Council adjourned at 4:20 p.m.

* * * * *


sp981208.htm


Comments or questions? You can send us email.
[City Homepage] [Get In Touch]

(c) 1998 City of Vancouver