ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT

                                           Date: July 4, 1997
                                           C.C. File No.: 4160

   TO:       Vancouver City Council

   FROM:     General Manager of Parks and Recreation and General Manager of
             Community Services

   SUBJECT:  Coal Harbour Community Centre - Funding Recommendations


   RECOMMENDATION

        A.   THAT Council allocate $4,640,000 from the Community Amenity
             Contributions collected in the "Triangle West" area to fund
             the City's share of the capital cost of the Coal Harbour
             Community Centre.

        B.   THAT Council allocate $1,080,000 from the Community Amenity
             Contributions collected in the Triangle West area, as a loan
             to be recovered from the budget for the non-market housing
             when it proceeds, to fund the underground parking for the
             future 40 units of non-market housing which will be built on
             the adjacent site.  

   CITY MANAGER'S COMMENTS

        The City Manager RECOMMENDS approval of A and B.

   COUNCIL POLICY

   There is no specific Council resolution identifying the funding source
   for the project.  However the cost sharing principle is contained in the
   May 1995 rezoning report for Coal Harbour Sub Area 1-B, and references
   are made in various CAC reports on Triangle West developments, such as
   "... it is recommended that the funds be assigned for park and/or social
   amenity use within Triangle West or for facilities nearby that will
   serve the people in this area".  (March 1992)

   PURPOSE

   The purpose of this report is to identify and allocate funding for the
   City's share of the development costs of the Coal Harbour Community
   Centre and related parking.

   BACKGROUND

   As outlined in the May 2, 1995 rezoning documentation, an approximate
   1,800 square metre community centre is to be built on the site between
   Broughton and Jervis Streets on the seawall.  This size is based on the
   projected new population for Coal Harbour, the Bayshore project and the
   Triangle West area.  Hence the project is to be cost-shared among
   Marathon Realty as the site developer, the Bayshore development, and the
   City.  This sharing was respectively referred to as 40%/20%/40% in the
   1995 report.

   The Bayshore rezoning report of 1991 set out the figure of $771,300 plus
   inflation ($863,000, 1997 dollars) for their share.  This estimate was
   calculated on the basis of both the parkade and building construction
   costs.  This figure did not include consultant, furniture or
   miscellaneous costs and did not anticipate the poor soil conditions
   which nearly doubled the cost of the parking.  Therefore Bayshore s
   share will amount to about 12% while the City's will be 48%.

   Council approved a change in the project parking provisions as outlined
   in the enclosed report titled Marathon Coal Harbour - Phase 1B dated
   June 17, 1996.  As a result Marathon not only pays 40% of the community
   centre cost but also 40% of the total approved parking of 110 stalls. 
   It is important to note that the risk of any future increases to this
   cost will be shared by the City (60%) and Marathon (40%).

   DISCUSSION

   The Community Centre is one component of a project that will also
   include a park, 806 square metres of daycare space, the Coal Harbour
   School, 40 units of family social housing, and public parking.  The
   project is being developed in two phases because there is no current
   funding for the school and the social housing.  The first phase will
   contain the community centre located on the waterfront walkway, with the
   public parking garage behind and the park over top of both.  The second
   will consist of an eight storey building with the school on the first
   two floors, the daycare on the third, and the social housing on the top
   five storeys.  The preliminary design for the project covers both phases
   and has received preliminary development permit approval.

   The second phase of the project will proceed when funding for the school
   is available.  Funding for the daycare has been provided by Marathon,
   and funding for the social housing will be sought through BC Housing's
   proposal call process once the school funding is approved.  The project
   is complex and expensive because of the mix of uses and the small size
   of the site.  A mixed use building, however, is the only way that these
   public amenities can be provided in this high density neighbourhood. 
   The construction cost of the project is in part off-set by the City
   receiving the site for free.  The preliminary design for the project has
   been costed by quantity surveyors and the cost of the project can be
   covered by the budgets available.

   1.   Design:

        While the parking for the housing can be built separately from the
        parking for the community centre and school, there is a significant
        cost efficiency in enlarging the parking for the community centre
        to include the housing parking, rather than build it underneath the
        school.  Staff recommend that the 40 stalls for the social housing
        be built as part of the phase one garage, bringing the total number
        of stalls to 150.  These stalls cost $26,900 each for a total of
        $1,080,000 for the 40 social housing units.  Funding for these
        stalls would be paid out of the Community Amenity Contributions
        raised from the Triangle West rezonings to date.  Some of these
        funds were to be spent on replacement housing for the rental units
        that may be lost in the area.  While some rental units in Triangle
        West have been demolished recently, demolition of the remainder is
        not expected in the near future.  Hence rental replacement funds
        are not needed now in Triangle West and could be available as a
        loan to pay for the 40 stalls for the social housing in this
        project.  They would be paid back from the social housing project
        budget when funding is received through provincial housing
        programs.  The repayment of this loan to the CAC fund is affected
        by both the provincial program and the school construction.  As the
        housing and daycare are on top of the school, the latter must be
        built prior to the housing.  The Province will only provide the
        construction funding after the potential new pupils have
        materialized.  Project build out could take a decade and there are
        no guarantees that enough children will move into the area to
        trigger school development.  The school is designed for 375 
        students.  However, the City will own this site and, if after this
        time there is no school demand apparent, the City may choose to
        develop the site in a different fashion.  The 40 stalls could be
        assigned to the new development.  Currently, $7.4 million is in the
        Triangle West CAC account.  If the additional parking, as well as
        the community centre, are funded from this account, $1.7 million
        will remain for other projects.  Also, the net revenue from the 40
        parking stalls (used in the interim as public parking) will be
        credited back to the CAC fund until the phase two project is built.

        The original concept contemplated an after school care/family place
        activity room of approximately 180 square metres  adjoining the
        community centre space.  This function has now been consolidated
        with the daycare facilities above the school.  Staff wish to retain
        this space as valuable for additional community centre programming. 
        Space utilization at the West End Community Centre is among the
        highest in the community centre system.  Space is at a premium and
        expansion possibilities are few at the Denman location.  Given that
        the Coal Harbour centre will in all likelihood be programmed in
        conjunction with the West End Community Centre, the potential extra
        multi purpose space is very desirable.  As this will be a poured in
        place concrete structure, it would be difficult and costly to
        develop additional space in the future.  The cost of this
        additional space would be outside the cost sharing agreement with
        Marathon and hence would also have to be borne by the City.  In
        addition there is more circulation space required thereby bringing
        the total floor space to 350 square metres.

   2.   Development Costs:

        The following is a breakdown of the estimated costs to complete the
        first phase of the project, including the community centre, parking
        structure and the park located above these two uses.  The cost of
        the park is entirely paid for by the developer, Marathon.

                                    Total        City      Marathon
        Parkade - 110 spaces      $2,960,000  $1,776,000 $1,184,000
        Community Centre-1,800 sm   3,376,000  2,025,500  1,350,500
        Construction Contingency     400,000     240,000    160,000
        Utilities/Hookup Charges     150,000      90,000     60,000
        Furnishings                  360,000     216,000    144,000
        Consultants/Testing          730,000     438,000    292,000
        Permits                      100,000      60,000     40,000
        Park Board Staff Time         70,000      70,000
        Activity Room and    
         Circulation 350 sq m        587,500     587,500
        Sub-Totals                 8,733,500   5,503,000  3,230,500
        Bayshore Contribution                  - 863,000
        City's share-community centre          4,640,000
        Parkade - 40 spaces for
         future housing            1,080,000  1,080,000         
        Totals                     9,813,500  5,720,000   3,230,500

        In summary, the City share of the project costs is roughly
        $5,503,000 for the community centre and related parking, less
        approximately $863,000 contribution from the Bayshore 

        (inflation adjusted), leaving $4,640,000.  In addition, $1,080,000
        is required from the City for the advance funding of the 40 parking
        spaces for the non-market housing, bringing the total City cost to
        $5,720,000.

   3.   Timing:

        The developer is estimating that the market housing trigger for the
        community centre in areas 1-B or 3 could come into effect in
        January 2000.  As a result, they wish to push forward at this time
        with detailed design to procure a building permit by roughly year
        end.

        Design work on the south/west portion of the site (school, daycare,
        housing) will not proceed beyond the existing preliminary
        development permit stage until the Ministry of Education is
        prepared to fund the school.

   4.   Funding:

        Funding for the City's portion of the development is being
        requested from the Community Amenity Contribution collections from
        the Triangle West area.  Currently, there is approximately
        $7,400,000 in this account.  Staff are in the process of finalizing
        a report recommending the establishment of a Development Cost Levy
        District to provide funding for required public amenities and
        replacement housing for Triangle West.  This would replace CAC
        contributions in the future.  The Community Amenity Contribution
        funds are separate from DCL funds and can be applied to amenities
        which may not be DCL fundable, for instance, the Coal Harbour
        Community  Centre.  A future report from the Planning Department
        will provide various funding options for a variety of required
        public amenities as part of a detailed Public Benefits Strategy for
        the downtown.

        At this stage, we require approximately $498,000 to cover the
        City s share of consulting contracts and permits to have a
        completed tender package in hand by early 1998.

   5.   Estimated Operating Costs:

        The projected operating costs are based on the current operating
        costs of similar size community centres in the system, i.e. Douglas
        Park and False Creek.  This envisages an annual cost of
        approximately $340,000 for the new facility.

                                   * * * * *