ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
Date: July 4, 1997
Dept. File No. WB
C.C. File No.: 2604
TO: Vancouver City Council
FROM: Director of Community Planning on behalf of Land Use
and Development
SUBJECT: RM-5B Multiple Dwelling Development: Rate of Change
1171 Barclay Street - D.E. 402145
Owner of Development: Carriage Lane Fine Homes Ltd.
RECOMMENDATION
THAT Council confirm a 12-month rate of change of 0.11 percent is
acceptable for the West End neighbourhood, and that the intent of
the guidelines regarding "rate of change" is being met.
GENERAL MANAGER'S COMMENTS
The General Manager of Community Services RECOMMENDS approval of
the foregoing.
COUNCIL POLICY
On October 26, 1989, Council adopted the RM-3, RM-5, RM-5A, RM-5B, RM-5C
and RM-6 Multiple Dwelling Guidelines for any proposed multiple dwelling
with a floor space ratio in excess of 1.0 or a height greater than 18.3
metres (60 feet).
PURPOSE
This report seeks Council's advice on a conditional approval use
multiple dwelling development application located in the RM-5B Zoning
District.
BACKGROUND
As previously reported to Council, there is little guidance available to
determine what is considered a reasonable rate of change. In reporting
on March 8, 1990, Council agreed with staff that a two percent rate of
change was reasonable and that a ratio in excess of two percent should
initiate incremental application of the mitigating criteria contained in
the guidelines.
On April 4, 1995, Council approved amendments to the Zoning and
Development By-law whereby individual development applications need not
be reported to Council unless approval would result in a cumulative loss
of residential rental units, during the 12 months prior to development
application submission, exceeding two percent in the West End RM
Districts.
On November 5, 1996, when considering a report regarding a development
at 1000 Broughton Street where sixteen residential units were to be
demolished, Council resolved that "pending Council consideration of a
report from staff on how occupancy rates are measured and on options for
a "no net loss" policy with respect to rental housing stock, the rate of
change in the West End be amended to zero percent," and all applications
involving the loss of residential rental units be reported to Council.
Staff in the Housing Centre are preparing the report to Council on the
overall rate of change issue. It is expected the report will be ready
for submission to Council in the fall.
(For additional background relating to "Rate of Change", see Appendix
'B'.)
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
The proposed residential development involves the construction of two
four-storey multiple dwellings containing a total of ten market dwelling
units.
The site currently consists of two separate legal lots each containing a
residential building. One of the buildings was owner-occupied and the
other contained one rental dwelling unit and six rental housekeeping
units. A total of seven (7) residential rental units will be displaced
by this proposal.
In reviewing the statistical "rate of change" in the West End area
(refer to Appendix 'A'), the total number of rental units decreased by
0.04 percent between May 31, 1996 and June 1, 1997. If approved, this
proposal will result in a decrease of rental units by 0.11 percent of
that which existed as of May 31, 1996, being approximately one year ago.
The "rate of change" in this RM-5B area is still within the two percent
limit which Council previously agreed was acceptable, but is greater
than the 0 percent limit that was recently imposed on this West End
area.
With respect to the "opinion of tenants" issue, one tenant has vacated
the premises voluntarily and the six (6) tenants currently occupying the
building at 1137 Barclay Street were notified in writing of the
proposal. No response was received.
CONCLUSION
The Director of Planning is recommending approval of Development
Application Number DE402145 as current quantitative measures indicate
the "rate of change" is still "reasonable" in the RM-5B area. Staff
believe the intent of the guidelines regarding "rate of change" is being
met, and the tenants in the existing building have not expressed
objections to the proposal.
Council is being advised of the development application before the
Development Permit Board considers the rate of change in the
neighbourhood. However, it is intended that this application will be
dealt with by the Director of Planning, on behalf of the Development
Permit Board, pursuant to By-law provisions.
* * * * *