ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT Date: July 4, 1997 Dept. File No. WB C.C. File No.: 2604 TO: Vancouver City Council FROM: Director of Community Planning on behalf of Land Use and Development SUBJECT: RM-5B Multiple Dwelling Development: Rate of Change 1171 Barclay Street - D.E. 402145 Owner of Development: Carriage Lane Fine Homes Ltd. RECOMMENDATION THAT Council confirm a 12-month rate of change of 0.11 percent is acceptable for the West End neighbourhood, and that the intent of the guidelines regarding "rate of change" is being met. GENERAL MANAGER'S COMMENTS The General Manager of Community Services RECOMMENDS approval of the foregoing. COUNCIL POLICY On October 26, 1989, Council adopted the RM-3, RM-5, RM-5A, RM-5B, RM-5C and RM-6 Multiple Dwelling Guidelines for any proposed multiple dwelling with a floor space ratio in excess of 1.0 or a height greater than 18.3 metres (60 feet). PURPOSE This report seeks Council's advice on a conditional approval use multiple dwelling development application located in the RM-5B Zoning District. BACKGROUND As previously reported to Council, there is little guidance available to determine what is considered a reasonable rate of change. In reporting on March 8, 1990, Council agreed with staff that a two percent rate of change was reasonable and that a ratio in excess of two percent should initiate incremental application of the mitigating criteria contained in the guidelines. On April 4, 1995, Council approved amendments to the Zoning and Development By-law whereby individual development applications need not be reported to Council unless approval would result in a cumulative loss of residential rental units, during the 12 months prior to development application submission, exceeding two percent in the West End RM Districts. On November 5, 1996, when considering a report regarding a development at 1000 Broughton Street where sixteen residential units were to be demolished, Council resolved that "pending Council consideration of a report from staff on how occupancy rates are measured and on options for a "no net loss" policy with respect to rental housing stock, the rate of change in the West End be amended to zero percent," and all applications involving the loss of residential rental units be reported to Council. Staff in the Housing Centre are preparing the report to Council on the overall rate of change issue. It is expected the report will be ready for submission to Council in the fall. (For additional background relating to "Rate of Change", see Appendix 'B'.) PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The proposed residential development involves the construction of two four-storey multiple dwellings containing a total of ten market dwelling units. The site currently consists of two separate legal lots each containing a residential building. One of the buildings was owner-occupied and the other contained one rental dwelling unit and six rental housekeeping units. A total of seven (7) residential rental units will be displaced by this proposal. In reviewing the statistical "rate of change" in the West End area (refer to Appendix 'A'), the total number of rental units decreased by 0.04 percent between May 31, 1996 and June 1, 1997. If approved, this proposal will result in a decrease of rental units by 0.11 percent of that which existed as of May 31, 1996, being approximately one year ago. The "rate of change" in this RM-5B area is still within the two percent limit which Council previously agreed was acceptable, but is greater than the 0 percent limit that was recently imposed on this West End area. With respect to the "opinion of tenants" issue, one tenant has vacated the premises voluntarily and the six (6) tenants currently occupying the building at 1137 Barclay Street were notified in writing of the proposal. No response was received. CONCLUSION The Director of Planning is recommending approval of Development Application Number DE402145 as current quantitative measures indicate the "rate of change" is still "reasonable" in the RM-5B area. Staff believe the intent of the guidelines regarding "rate of change" is being met, and the tenants in the existing building have not expressed objections to the proposal. Council is being advised of the development application before the Development Permit Board considers the rate of change in the neighbourhood. However, it is intended that this application will be dealt with by the Director of Planning, on behalf of the Development Permit Board, pursuant to By-law provisions. * * * * *