ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT

                                           Date:  May 28,1997

   TO:       Vancouver City Council

   FROM:     Director of Civic Theatres

   SUBJECT:  Theatre Rental Rates -
             September 1, 1997 to August 31, 1998


   RECOMMENDATION

        THAT Council approve the Schedule of Rental Rates for Civic
        Theatres, detailed in Appendix A, effective September 1, 1997.


   CITY MANAGER'S COMMENTS

        The City Manager RECOMMENDS approval of the foregoing.


   COUNCIL POLICY

   Council annually approves the Schedule of Rental Rates for the Queen
   Elizabeth Theatre, Vancouver Playhouse and Orpheum.


   PURPOSE

   This report seeks approval to extend the theatre rental rates
   established for 1996-1997 to apply to the period September 1, 1997 to
   August 31, 1998, unchanged.


   BACKGROUND

   Rental rates are reviewed during preparation of the annual operating
   budget and any adjustments are made effective September 1 of each year
   in alignment with the traditional performing arts season.  The rental
   rates are periodically reviewed in relation to those of comparable
   facilities in other cities to ensure that Vancouver s rates are
   correctly placed in relation to the local, national and international
   markets.

   In 1995, rental rates were increased by 4.6% and in 1996 the increase
   was 3%. 

   Event and Audience Statistics; 1990-1996

   These are for all three theatres combined.  The QET seats 2,930, the
   Playhouse 668 and the Orpheum, 2,780. It is also important to
   remember that the Playhouse, in any year, has 60 to 80 more performances
   than the QET or Orpheum.

                  Year      Events    Audience       Average

                  1990      700         952,936      1361
                  1991      752       1,113,996*     1481
                  1992      657         833,462      1269
                  1993      698       1,008,367*     1445
                  1994      674         861,115      1278
                  1995      622         768,464      1235
                  1996      616         787,487      1278
                  1997 est. 630

   * Long summer runs of  The Phantom of the Opera  and  Joseph and the
   Technicolour Dreamcoat  at the QET.

   Of the total events in 1996, approximately 40% were by the resident 
   performing arts presenters who receive grants equal to rent for uses of
   the civic theatres.  Their programming volume from year to year is
   relatively stable thanks to the grant program, although the grant
   program does not cover all of their activities.  The major variables are
   in for-profit and community programming.  These presenters are most
   vulnerable to market forces.  For example:

             Music Events Only at QET & Orpheum; 1994 - 1996

                  1994      195       375,000        1923
                  1995      145       264,000        1820
                  1996      141       254,000        1801

   Accepting that the VSO is relatively stable from year to year with
   around 80 events, there was a huge drop from 1994 to 1995 which
   continued into 1996.  This was not a local phenomenon.  The popular
   music industry reported exactly the same drop for all of North America
   in 1995, for venues of less than 10,000 seats.  The industry is
   predicting a modest upswing in 1997 and this appears to be true for
   activity at civic theatres so far.

   Operating Costs

   Seventy percent of Civic Theatres operating costs are in salaries and
   wages with half of that in casual wages only incurred when there is a
   show.  Settlements of collective agreements have been running at 0% to
   1.5%.  General inflation seems to be holding at about 1.5%.


   DISCUSSION

   Comparisons With Other Venues

   In reviewing our rental rates in terms of other venues, we have usually
   compared with Portland, Seattle and Toronto, all of whom can be
   significantly higher because they charge a base fixed rent plus a
   percentage of the box office plus expenses plus equipment use charges. 
   We have kept our rental rates (and terms of rental) competitive with
   these venues.  

   We have not tried to match our rates to the Canadian theatres between
   here and Toronto because their rates are all much lower as a result of
   government mandated discounting for local presenters and high levels of
   government subsidies, provincial in most cases.  These same theatres are
   under pressure from their governing bodies to reduce their dependance on
   those subsidies and we expect to see their rental rates and structures
   change in future.  Nevertheless, these lower rates to the east continue
   to influence our rates.

   The Live Entertainment Market

   The market has changed rather suddenly, and for the worse, during the
   past year.  There has been a general decline in audiences across the
   spectrum of live entertainment events, although once again the
   non-profit performing arts companies are relatively more stable, likely
   as a result of loyal subscription audiences.

   Again, the decline is not localized but seems, in varying degrees, to be
   continental in nature, at least for traditional events such as Broadway
   musicals.  In the same way that there was a recent seminar in Vancouver
   on the topic of "Where is the Audience?", Broadway producers recently
   met to discuss the same question with respect to Broadway and the North
   American touring market.  The growth represented by "CATS", "Les
   Miserables" and "The Phantom of the Opera" has not been sustained by the
   shows that followed.

   As expected there has been considerable speculation on the causes
   ranging from effects of the aging baby boomers, to lack of job security
   to inconsistent quality of the product leading to distrust by the
   audience to a lack of good new shows and the high fees being charged by
   the artists (in pop/rock the band typically takes 90% of the box office,
   leaving the local presenter with 10% for expenses and profit). There is
   no visible concurrence on the question, except that it is once again a
   good year to be very conservative.

   Action

   To summarize, there are several factors which motivate maintaining the
   rental rates at the 1996-1997 level.

   *    The rate of inflation is very low; increases in costs of operation
        are in the minimal to negligible range.

   *    The volume of bookings is relatively low.  

   *    Audiences have been unpredictable, even in previously stable
        or growing sectors, creating a higher risk environment for
        presenters of all kinds.

   *    In the past few years, our rent has increased at a rate higher than
        inflation.

   Accordingly, Civic Theatres proposes no increase in rental rates for the
   1997-1998 season.

   FINANCIAL IMPACTS

   The 1997 operating budget was prepared on the assumption of no rental
   rate increases in 1997 and projects a year-end surplus of $48,000.  A
   rental rate increase would actually only impact the last four months of
   1997.  If a 1% increase were added, the net result for 1997 would be
   approximately $9,000, of which approximately 50% would be from the
   grants equal to rent budget.  

   There is a risk that this proposal may make it difficult to balance the
   1998 operating budget since these rates will apply to nine months of
   next year.  If the same 1% were applied, the net result would be
   approximately $16,000 of which approximately 30% would be from the
   grants budget.  It remains to be seen whether there will be any  changes
   in the costs of operation, booking volume and attendance levels that
   will cause positive or negative financial impacts in 1998.

   CONCLUSION

   For a variety of reasons to do with low inflation, small or no increases
   in labour costs and market instability, Civic Theatres recommends that
   the theatres' rental rates continue unchanged for the coming year.

                                   * * * * *