SUPPORTS ITEM NO. 1
T&T COMMITTEE AGENDA
JUNE 24, 1997
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
Date: June 10, 1997
Dept. File No.
CC File No.: 5551
TO: Standing Committee on Transportation and Traffic
FROM: General Manager of Engineering Services
SUBJECT: Transit Service to Fraser Lands, Riverside and Champlain
Heights South
RECOMMENDATION
A. THAT Council approve the extension of the #29 Elliott route to
Champlain Mall via Fraserview Drive to Victoria Drive, Marine
Drive and through Champlain Heights as shown in Appendix B.
B. THAT staff report back on new bus stops, shelters, litter
containers, necessary to implement the route.
COUNCIL POLICY
Council has approved a Transportation Plan which recognizes that Transit
and not the automobile will have to accommodate future increases in
travel demand.
PURPOSE
The purpose of this report is to recommend a transit option that meets
the needs of the residents of Fraser Lands, Riverside and Champlain
Heights South.
BACKGROUND
The residents of Riverside, Fraser Lands and the southern portions of
Champlain Heights do not have direct transit connections to the north
and therefore are reliant on the automobile for most, if not all, of the
trips made from their neighbourhoods. These neighbourhoods are the last
areas of higher density residential in the City without acceptable
transit. The estimated population affected is about 5900 residents(1996
census) including a number of non-market housing complexes and co-ops.
The development of the transit network in the South East corner of
Vancouver followed, for a time, the development of the Champlain Heights
community. Since the early 1980's, several transit options have been
proposed to serve emerging developments in Riverside (south side of
Marine Drive between Victoria Drive and Elliott Street), Fraser Lands
(south side of Marine Drive east of Riverside to Boundary Road) and the
southern portion of Champlain Heights. However, none has been approved
that meets the needs of the residents. In the end, Council did approve
the option shown in Appendix A, but this is not effective. A summary of
the history of the various proposed options is contained in Appendix E.
The Vancouver Regional Transit Commission has not approved the proposal
in Appendix A. The route is very circuitous for residents in Riverside
who wish to reach destinations to the north. As well, the route would
not serve certain schools, including David Oppenheimer, the local
elementary school, Champlain Mall, the Champlain Heights Community
Centre and Killarney.
In February 1996 Council reviewed BC Transit's Annual Service Plan for
the coming year. The principal of the David Oppenheimer Elementary
School appeared at committee expressing a need for improved transit
connections. As a result, Council passed a motion expressing concern to
BC Transit that service to Fraser Lands was not yet implemented.
Further, Council directed staff to re-poll the residents of Fraserview
Drive regarding the possibility of linking the #29 and #26 bus routes.
This poll was taken and the results were very conclusive. There were 65
survey forms sent out and 59 returned. Of these 59 returned, 54 or 93%
were opposed to the use of Fraserview Drive by transit.
In November 1996 a meeting was organized by the Fraser Lands residents
to discuss the lack of transit and other basic amenities (shops, school,
community services) in their community. Approximately 100 residents
attended and the need for a transit connection to the north to access
schools, services, community centres, other transit, and shopping was
confirmed.
The Fraser Lands Riverside Residents' Association subsequently appeared
as a delegation to the Vancouver Regional Transit Commission in January
97 reiterating their concern with the lack of transit service to their
neighbourhood. Transit staff reported back in February on this and the
VRTC subsequently directed staff "to develop a detailed service plan for
revised services to South Vancouver and forward the proposal to the City
of Vancouver for approvals and that staff include this service plan in a
future quarterly service plan for implementation".
Following this recommendation, BC Transit staff, in consultation with
City staff, have reviewed a number of route options that address the
needs identified by the residents of Fraser Lands and Riverside. These
options have been reviewed by a committee of residents from these
communities who have recommended an option for Council to consider.
DISCUSSION OF OPTIONS
Previous route proposals were reviewed by staff and a number of new
options developed. The two options that best serve the needs of the
neighbourhoods are shown in Appendices (Options) B and C. Options B and
C operate along Marine Drive in both directions.
Option B (Appendix B)
This option is an extension of the #29 Elliott route which starts and
finishes at the 29th Avenue SkyTrain Station and operates via Elliott,
Muirfield, Fraserview Drive, Victoria Drive, Marine Drive and through
Champlain Heights to Champlain Mall. The buses return to 29th Avenue
Station via Champlain Heights, Marine Drive, Victoria, Fraserview Drive
and Elliott.
Direct service is provided to David Oppenheimer School (on Muirfield
Drive), the Champlain Mall and Champlain Heights Community Centre,
SkyTrain, buses on 49th Ave., 41st Ave, Kingsway and Victoria Drive.
Only one bus added to the route is necessary to provide an initial 30
minute service to the Marine Drive area. Two buses added to the route
are necessary to provide a 15 minute service.
Option C (Appendix C)
This option also starts and finishes at 29th Avenue Station but operates
as a large loop via Elliott, Muirfield, Fraserview Drive, Victoria,
Marine, Champlain Heights, Kerr/Rupert, Kingsway, and Earles. The
service would operate in both directions, ie, clockwise and
counterclockwise. This option combines the #29 Elliott route with the
western half of the existing #26 Champlain Heights route (See Appendix D
for the existing #26 Route). The eastern half of the #26 route which
starts at Joyce Station would turn around using streets in the vicinity
of Champlain Mall and return to Joyce Station.
As in Option B, direct service is provided to David Oppenheimer School,
Champlain Mall and Champlain Heights Community Centre, SkyTrain and
various bus routes. Overall, 3 additional buses are necessary to
achieve a 15 minute service.
BC Transit supports Option B as it achieves the necessary connections to
other transit routes, SkyTrain, the schools and other facilities and
services to the north. It also requires only one additional bus for a
proposed, initial service of every 30 minutes. As well, it does not
impact the existing #26 route and therefore minimizes the disruption to
other transit users.
In summary, both Options B and C achieve the necessary connections to
other transit routes and serves the schools and other facilities north
of Marine Drive. Option C is somewhat better for the residents south of
Marine Drive than Option B because the looped service provides more
choices in how to reach destinations. For example, a resident returning
home from 29th Avenue Station could return home via Elliott or
Rupert/Kerr depending on when the first bus was leaving. On the other
hand, Option C does impact other transit users because it requires
"breaking" the existing #26 route. Finally, Option C requires two more
buses than Option B. This is a concern to BC Transit as they did not
budget for providing service to SE Vancouver this year.
The residents' committee, in reviewing the two options, supports Option
B, noting that it provides direct transit service to most of the
destinations they wish to reach. Direct service is provided to David
Oppenheimer School, the Champlain Mall and Champlain Heights Community
Centre, SkyTrain, buses on 49th, 41st, Kingsway and Victoria Drive. The
residents are also sensitive to existing transit travel patterns and do
not wish to disrupt other residents normal travel habits.
Use of North and South Kent Avenues
North and South Kent Avenues are narrow streets (27 feet/ 8.3m) with
parking. Operating between the two streets is the CP Railway. The Kent
Avenues are also discontinuous at various places.
North and South Kent Avenues are desirable streets to route buses as
residents would not then have to use Marine Drive. A number of options
exist and involve the use of North and/or South Kent between Kerr and
Jellicoe (in Fraser Lands) and even as far as Victoria Drive
(Riverside).
The present width of both Kent Avenues, coupled with street parking and
the rail line between the two streets, makes it very awkward for BC
Transit to operate conventional 40 foot buses on these streets and to
stop at, and cross, the rail tracks in a conventional manner. However,
the City and BC Transit, in consultation with the residents, will
undertake a review of what street changes would have to be made to
accommodate conventional buses. The use of Kent Ave remains a future
option.
The use of small buses was considered but is not an option, especially
if service is to start this year. BC Transit is not expanding the small
bus program at this time. Further, transit demand will be high enough
to warrant large buses.
Public Process
The Fraser Lands Riverside Residents' Association has been involved in
the review leading to a preferred option.
The residents of Fraserview Drive were polled in 1996 and the poll
clearly indicates they are not in favour of buses on Fraserview Drive
between Victoria Drive and Nanaimo Street. Muirfield Drive, the
easterly extension of Fraserview Drive, is the same pavement width and
has the same land use as Fraserview Drive, and has successfully
accommodated transit for decades.
The west side of Champlain Crescent between 54th Avenue and Maquinna
would be used by buses operating in the southbound direction only in
either option. This is not presently a bus route. The west side of the
street is undeveloped green space. The east side of the street is town
house development set back and oriented away from the street. We have
not contacted these residents as the impact of the buses would be
minimal.
CONCLUSION
Fraser Lands, Riverside and the southern portion of Champlain Heights
lack transit connections to the north to other transit services and many
of the community services lacking in their neighbourhoods. As a result,
these neighbourhoods are largely auto dependant. Many transit options
have been considered over the years to serve these residential areas,
including the use of small buses. All options that serve the needs of
the residents inevitably have to use Fraserview Drive as one of the
connecting roads buses must use.
A transit route option acceptable to the neighbourhoods south of Marine
Drive and BC Transit has been forwarded to the City for approval. This
option, shown in Appendix B, requires the use of Fraserview Drive
between Victoria Drive and Nanaimo Street. The residents along
Fraserview Drive continue to oppose the use of this street by transit.
Staff recommends Council approve the route shown in Appendix B, so
that the residents of Fraser Lands, Riverside, and Champlain Heights
South will have transit access to the various community services to the
north, other transit routes and SkyTrain.
* * * * *
APPENDICES A TO D (MAPS) ON FILE IN CITY CLERK'S OFFICE.
APPENDIX E
Page 1 of 2
SUMMARY OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF TRANSIT
Before 1980 Champlain Heights is under development and transit
service is extended from the Kingsway area as development
ocurrs.
1981 Council approves an extension of transit service to a proposed
transit loop at Marine and Matheson Crescent with an "interim"
routing planned to Matheson Crescent and Champlain Heights
Crescent until such time as the loop is constructed.
1985 The Riverside area south of Marine Drive in the vicinity of
Victoria Drive and Elliott street is under development and an
extension of the #29 Elliott service via Fraserview Drive and
Elliott Street is proposed. Council defeats the proposal but
recognizes that as Riverside is in the early stages of
development, this proposal should be reviewed again.
1988 Transit is prepared to commit funds to the construction of a
transit loop at Marine Drive and Matheson Crescent. A
rezoning of the land set aside for the loop is required.
However, Council refuses the rezoning on the basis of
residential concerns.
1989 Council revisits the matter of an off-street transit loop and
recommends staff discuss alternatives to an off-street bus
loop with the community.
1991 Council reviews a "looped" route option (similar to Option C
in this report) and requests BC Transit hold an open house to
solicit input on the option. Overall, attendees of the open
house support the proposal.
At the May 30, 1991 Traffic Commission meeting, the Commission
reviewed a staff report recommending implementing the looped
service. The Commission, noting the concerns of the
residents, directed staff to explore with BC Transit, three
other route options raised at the Traffic Commission meeting.
The Commission recommended that Fraserview Drive be deleted
from further consideration.
1991 In December 1991, the Traffic Commission reviews the three
options discussed at the May meeting of the Commission and
recommend the route option shown in Appendix A of this report.
1992 In August 1992, the Vancouver Regional Transit Commission does
not support the City's proposed option (Appendix A) and
requests staff review other route options.
1993 BC Transit staff, in consultation with City staff and the
Fraser Lands Development consultant review a number of small
bus options and a conventional bus option. Council reaffirms
its previous approval of the route shown in Appendix A.
1996 Council reviews a report on the 1996/1997 Annual Transit
Service Plan and expresses its concern that transit service to
Fraser Lands has not yet been implemented and that this
service be initiated quickly. Further, Council directed staff
to re-poll the Fraserview Drive residents regarding the
possibility of linking the Elliott and Champlain Heights bus
services.