ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT Date: June 19, 1997 Dept. File No.: HB C.C. File: 5305 TO: Vancouver City Council FROM: Director of Community Planning SUBJECT: Possible Withholding Action for 4396 Locarno Crescent - West Point Grey Interim Zoning Review Study Area RECOMMENDATION A. THAT Council instruct staff to process the Development Permit Application for the proposed alterations at 4396 Locarno Crescent in the normal manner. Alternatively, the following is submitted for CONSIDERATION: B. THAT in accordance with Council's instruction of April 22, 1997, to refer portions of West Point Grey to Public Hearing, Council withhold for 30 days in accordance with the provisions of Section 570(1) of the Vancouver Charter, the Development Permit for the proposed addition at 4396 Locarno Crescent, expiring July 2, 1997, and for a further 60-day period, expiring August 31, 1997, for a total of 90 days from the date of submission, pursuant to Section 570(2)of the Vancouver Charter. GENERAL MANAGER'S COMMENTS The General Manager of Community Services RECOMMENDS approval of A. If Council does not support A, B is submitted for CONSIDERATION. COUNCIL POLICY On April 22, 1997, Council referred Dunbar RS-1, a portion of West Point Grey, and a portion of West Southlands to Public Hearing to consider rezoning from RS-1 to RS-5 and referred a portion of Dunbar RS-1S and Douglas Park to Public Hearing to consider rezoning from RS-1S to RS-5S, and referred a portion of West Southlands to Public Hearing to consider rezoning from RS-1 to RS-6. Council also instructed the Director of Community Planning to report development applications for possible withholding action pursuant to Section 570 of the Vancouver Charter. PURPOSE The purpose of this report is to report for possible withholding of a development application received on June 3, 1997. BACKGROUND On May 9, 1996, Council approved an Interim Zoning Review for RS-1 and RS-1S areas. On April 22, 1997, Council referred rezoning for the following areas to Public Hearing: Dunbar RS-1, a portion of West Point Grey, and a portion of West Southlands to consider rezoning from RS-1 to RS-5; a portion of Dunbar RS-1S and Douglas Park to consider rezoning from RS-1S to RS-5S; and, a portion of West Southlands to consider rezoning from RS-1 to RS-6. Following meetings held on May 29, 1997, and June 3, 1997, the Public Hearing will reconvene on July 8, 1997. The Public Hearing for West Point Grey has been scheduled for July 28, 1997. At the time of referral, Council also instructed staff to report any development applications to Council for possible withholding action pursuant to Section 570 of the Vancouver Charter. This section enables Council to withhold permits for 30 days for assessment and, following a subsequent report, a further 60 days pending conclusion of the proposed rezoning. The purpose of withholding action is to prevent development applications which are at variance or in conflict with a proposed zoning from being processed until the proposed zoning has been considered at a Public Hearing. However, because the proposed zoning has not been adopted by Council, the application must also conform with the existing zoning in order to be approved. In the event Council withholds issuance of a permit and the rezoning is ultimately refused, or approved to the extent that the permit withheld would comply, the City is liable for damages suffered by the owner. PROPOSED NEW DEVELOPMENT On June 3, 1997, staff received an application to construct a renovation and addition in the West Point Grey RS-1 area at 4396 Locarno Crescent. The site survey is dated May 21, 1997. The application involves interior and exterior alterations to add a second floor dormer and roof top garden with access stairs. 1. RS-1 Conformity The existing house does not conform to the front yard, rear yard, building depth, and overall floor area regulations of the RS-1 District Schedule as is common with many older houses. The proposed renovation would further bring the house into non-conformity with the secondary envelope and above-grade floor area regulations [a reduction of 33 m2 (355 sq.ft.) would be required to meet the floor area regulation]. The Director of Planning would consider relaxing the front yard, rear yard and building depth regulations as existing non-conforming. It is also within the discretion of the Director of Planning to relax the secondary envelope to accommodate the roof deck. In considering this relaxation, staff would typically notify neighbours because of the possible impact of the proposed roof deck on privacy and views in this view-sensitive area. The applicant intends to apply to the Board of Variance for a relaxation of the permitted above-grade floor area. The applicant is seeking to exclude the floor area equivalent to that of the existing parking space within the principal building. This would effectively reduce the above-grade floor area to meet the current RS-1 maximum. Staff support the application to the Board of Variance given the constraints of the site. Secondary access to the lot is from Trimble Street and there is a steep embankment at the rear of the site which would make alternate locations for parking difficult. 2. RS-5 Conformity With respect to the RS-5 zoning, applicants have the option of submitting their design for a new house or renovation/addition for a discretionary design review in return for a floor area bonus or designing a renovation/addition outright (i.e., no design review) at the same above-grade floor area as RS-1. The proposed above-grade floor area is in excess of the RS-5 outright floor area maximum [0.20 FSR plus 130 m2 (1,400 sq.ft.)]. As well, the application is greater than the RS-5 conditional floor area [0.24 FSR plus 130 m2 (1,400 sq.ft.). The applicant did not submit the information necessary for a design review analysis, and therefore, the application has been assessed as an outright application. The existing house also does not conform to the front yard, side yard, rear yard and building depth regulations of the RS-5 District Schedule. As under the RS-1 District Schedule, the Director of Planning would consider relaxing the front yard, side yard, rear yard, and building depth as existing non-conforming. In addition, the proposed alterations do not conform to the outright above-grade floor area [a reduction of 33 m2 (355 sq.ft.) would be required to meet the floor area regulation]. The floor area relaxation necessary under RS-5 would be considered under the Board of Variance application. Whether the development application is approvable or not depends largely on the decision made by the Board of Variance. If the Board of Variance grants the floor area relaxation, then the application would meet the floor area requirements for an outright RS-5 application and would not be subject to design review. The Director of Planning may then consider the required yard and building depth relaxations. The relaxation for the secondary envelope under RS-1 would depend on input received from notifying the neighbours. However, if the Board of Variance does not grant the relaxation, the development application will be refused. 3. Other Considerations In addition to the specifics of the development application, the timing of the Public Hearing process for the West Point Grey area needs to be considered. The Public Hearing is scheduled for July 28, 1997. If Council does not make a decision at that time and should Council have decided to withhold this application, it will be necessary to release the application as the 90-day withholding will expire on August 31, 1997, prior to any possible subsequent Public Hearing date for West Point Grey. The results of a recent survey conducted jointly by the Planning Department and the North West Point Grey Residents Association are also important to note. The results indicate that the portion of West Point Grey north of 4th Avenue between Blanca Street and Discovery Street (where the subject site is located) would prefer to retain the current RS-1 zoning given that the RS-5 zoning allows pitched roofs to be 1.5 m (5 ft.) higher than under RS-1 which may impact views in this view-sensitive area. The survey had a response rate of 47% with 88% of respondents favouring retention of the RS-1 zoning. Based on the fact that if the Board of Variance does not allow the floor area relaxation, the application will be refused, the difficulties of the timing of the Public Hearing process, and the recent survey results staff recommend processing the Development Application under the RS-1 zone in the normal manner. CONCLUSION Staff conclude that Council should instruct staff to process the Development Application for the proposed alternations at 4396 Locarno Crescent in the normal manner as outlined under Recommendation item A. Withholding would be initiated if Council chooses Consideration item B. * * * * *