POLICY REPORT
                           DEVELOPMENT AND BUILDING

                                           Date: May 30, 1997
                                           Dept. File No. 96049-LC
                                           CC File:  5303-1

   TO:       Vancouver City Council

   FROM:     Director of Central Area Planning, on behalf of
             Land Use and Development

   SUBJECT:  CD-1 Text Amendment:  550 Burrard Street (Bentall V)

   RECOMMENDATION

        THAT the application by Musson Cattell Mackey Partnership to amend
        CD-1 By-law No. 6884 for 550 Burrard Street (Lots C, D and E, Blk
        30, DL 541, Pl. LMP7821) to add hotel and other uses, increase the
        floor space ratio (FSR), increase the height and reduce the parking
        requirement, be referred to a Public Hearing, together with:

        i)   plans received December 18, 1996;

        ii)  draft CD-1 By-law amendments, generally as contained in
             Appendix A; and

        iii) the recommendation of the Director of Central Area Planning on
             behalf of Land Use and Development to approve, subject to
             conditions contained in Appendix B.

        FURTHER THAT the Director of Legal Services be instructed to
        prepare the necessary by-law for consideration at Public Hearing.

   GENERAL MANAGER'S COMMENTS

        The General Manager of Community Services RECOMMENDS approval of
        the foregoing.

   COUNCIL POLICY

   Relevant Council policies for this site include:

       CD-1 By-law No. 6884 which was enacted on September 24, 1991.

       Central Area Plan, adopted December 3, 1991, which supports the
        retention of the hotel bonus in the CBD and encourages the creation
        or enhancement of pedestrian interest and comfort on non-retail
        streets.

   PURPOSE AND SUMMARY

   This report assesses an application to amend CD-1 By-law No. 6884, which
   applies to the site at 550 Burrard Street, to add hotel use and to
   expand the list of other permitted uses to include those permitted in
   the adjacent Downtown District (DD).  The application also requests
   amendments to allow an increase in the FSR in accordance with the 15%
   hotel density bonus permitted in the DD, to increase the height of the
   proposed tower from 134.7 m (442 ft.) to 137.2 m (450 ft.), and to
   reduce the parking requirement from a minimum of 932 spaces to 739
   spaces.

   Staff support the uses, height and density proposed in this application. 
   The hotel use would provide more activity to this area of the downtown
   and is consistent with the policy to encourage hotels in the CBD.  The
   height is consistent with the maximum height that could be approved in
   the adjacent area of the DD to the west.  Also, it does not intrude into
   any adopted view corridor.  Furthermore, the increased height and
   density can be accommodated in a building which is similar in scale to
   the one previously approved.  Staff do not support the proposed parking
   reduction which would be inconsistent with the parking requirements
   elsewhere in the Downtown District, however a compromise is proposed by
   staff.

   Staff recommend that the application be referred to a Public Hearing,
   with a recommendation that it be approved subject to conditions.

   DISCUSSION

   Use: The CD-1 By-law currently specifies office use and limited retail,
   service, cultural and recreational, institutional, and parking uses, all
   of which were considered as suitable for a site which would include an
   office tower, public parking, and the YWCA.  The application proposes to
   expand the permitted uses to broader use categories which would include
   hotel use, to allow the same range of uses as permitted in the adjacent
   Downtown District.  The amendment would allow the owners of the site to
   proceed with Tower V of the Bentall Centre as a mixed-use development
   containing office space on the upper floors and a major hotel in the
   lower levels.

   Staff support the addition of these uses, as a mixed-use development
   would add to the diversity of the downtown core as well as providing a
   more dynamic project.  The proposed hotel use is also consistent with
   the Central Area Plan which encourages hotel uses in the Central
   Business District (CBD).

   Density:  The maximum density under the existing CD-1 zoning is 9.47
   FSR, of which 2.47 FSR is the result of a density transfer from 901
   Hastings Street (Hornby street-end park) (see Appendix C).  The
   requested hotel density bonus would permit a 15% increase in density in
   the portion of the building used for guest accommodation and ancillary
   space.  Staff consider this density acceptable as it is consistent with
   the density bonus available in the adjacent CBD to encourage hotel use. 
   The lower floor-to-floor height requirements of hotel use allow the
   additional density to be accommodated within a tower that would be
   similar in scale to the previously approved form of development but with
   an additional five floors.  This density bonus would not be available
   should Bentall decide not to include a hotel component.

   Parking:  The CD-1 By-law requires that parking be provided in
   accordance with the Parking By-law, with an additional 400 spaces
   provided for transient (public) parking.  A total of 962 parking spaces
   would be required for an office development, including parking for the
   YWCA and the transient parking.  According to the CD-1's current parking
   requirements a total of 932 spaces would be required for a mixed
   office/hotel development should the hotel use be approved.  The rezoning
   application originally proposed a total of 684 spaces based on the
   rationale that fewer parking spaces are required because the spaces can
   be shared between the different uses in the building.  Hotel guests and
   visitors could use parking spaces at night that are used by the office
   workers during the day.  The application also proposed that some of the
   parking required for the hotel's guests could be accommodated by the
   transient parking spaces.

   After reviewing the parking requirements for the site which is located
   in an area of the downtown which staff have identified as being parking
   deficient, Engineering staff concluded that a minimum of 801 parking
   spaces would be required to meet the parking demands of the uses (351
   spaces for hotel/office uses, 50 spaces for YWCA and 400 spaces for
   transient parking).  This figure also takes into account the
   time-varying demand of the hotel/office uses.

   After discussions with Engineering staff, the applicant has increased
   the proposed parking only to 739 spaces (289 spaces for hotel/office
   uses, 50 spaces for YWCA and 400 spaces for transient parking).  As a
   compromise, staff suggest that 15% of the parking requirement for the
   hotel/office and YWCA uses (approximately 60 spaces) could be waived if
   the applicant agrees to provide payment-in-lieu and demonstrates that as
   much parking as physically and economically reasonable has been planned
   for and provided on the site.  The applicant is requesting that the
   final decision on the parking requirement be made by Council at a Public
   Hearing (see Appendix D: Applicant's Comments).

   CONCLUSION

   Staff support the proposed amendments to the existing CD-1 By-law  to
   expand the uses, increase the height and allow a density bonus for hotel
   use.  Staff do not support the proposed parking reduction in an area of
   the downtown which is considered parking deficient, however a compromise
   is proposed by staff.

   Staff recommend that the application be referred to a Public Hearing
   with a recommendation from the Director of Central Area Planning on
   behalf of Land Use and Development that it be approved, subject to draft
   CD-1 By-law provisions generally as shown in Appendix A, and to proposed
   conditions of approval as listed in Appendix B.

                                 *  *  *  *  *
                                                                 APPENDIX A



                         DRAFT CD-1 BY-LAW AMENDMENTS


   1.   Amend Section 2, of CD-1 By-law No. 6884, by deleting clauses (a)
        to (w) and replacing with the following:

        (a) Cultural and Recreational Uses,

        (b) Institutional Uses,

        (c) Office Uses,

        (d) Parking Uses,

        (e) Retail Uses,

        (f) Service Uses, and

        (g) Accessory Uses customarily ancillary to the above uses.

   2.   Amend Section 3, Floor Area, by numbering the first paragraph as
        3.1 and adding the following new section 3.2 after clause 3.1 (b):

        "3.2 The Director of Planning may permit an increase in the floor
             area for hotel use, provided that the increase in no case
             exceeds a maximum of 15% of the floor area of that portion of
             the building having floor-to-floor dimensions of less than 3.1
             m (10 ft.) and used for guest accommodation and ancillary
             corridors, service and access areas."

   3.   Amend Section 4, Height, by replacing the figures "134.72 m (442
        ft.)" with "137.2 m (450 ft.)".

   4.   Amend Section 5, Off-Street Parking, by deleting the title and
        first paragraph and replacing with the following:

        "Off-Street Parking and Loading

        Parking, loading and bicycle spaces must be provided, developed and
        maintained in accordance with the applicable provisions of the
        Parking By-law, except that:

        (a)  a minimum of 400 spaces must be provided for public parking
             purposes,

        (b)  a minimum of 50 accessory parking spaces must be provided for
             the YWCA,

        (c)  a minimum of 351 accessory parking spaces must be provided,
             for a mixed-use development including both hotel and office
             uses, and

        (d)  in all other cases, the number of parking spaces will be in
             accordance with Area I of the Downtown District provisions of
             the Parking By-law."

   5.   Delete Section 6, Off-Street Loading.

   6.   Add Acoustical Provisions as per the RM-4N District Schedule.



                                                                 APPENDIX B

                        PROPOSED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL


   (a)  That the proposed form of development be approved by Council in
        principle, generally as prepared by Musson Cattell Mackey
        Partnership, and stamped "Received City Planning Department,
        December 18, 1996", provided that the Director of Planning may
        allow minor alterations to this form of development when approving
        the detailed scheme of development as outlined in (b) below.

   (b)  That, prior to approval by Council of the form of development, the
        applicant shall obtain approval of a development application by the
        Director of Planning, who shall have particular regard to the
        following:

        (i)  design development to the tower base to contribute to
             animation of the Burrard sidewalk and to integrate the base
             with the entrance to the office tower;

             Note to Applicant:  Consideration should be given to lowering
                                 ground floor in relation to sidewalk
                                 elevations.

        (ii) design development to provide a minimum setback of 0.75 m (2.5
             ft.) to the ground floor of the building from the southerly
             property boundary (Dunsmuir Street);

        (iii)     design development to Dunsmuir Street ground floor to
                  provide pedestrian interest along the full frontage.

             Note to Applicant:  Proposed baggage storage should be
                                 relocated and exit stairs reconfigured.

        (iv) design development at the Dunsmuir/Burrard Streets corner to
             provide greater visibility from the street of lobby
             activities;

        (v)  design development to improve the podium roof to provide an
             attractive outlook from surrounding buildings;

        (vi) delete taxi spaces from the lane right-of-way; 

        (vii)     design development to the Burrard Street vehicular entry
                  to accommodate right turns off Burrard Street onto the
                  site;

        (viii)    design development to the autocourt kiosk area to reduce
                  its impact on pedestrians, giving careful consideration
                  to details such as light level, landscaping, ceiling
                  design and the interface with the sidewalk on Burrard
                  Street;

        (ix) design development to improve visibility to the pedestrian
             arcade and autocourt area;

             Note to Applicant:  This can be achieved by extensive glazing
                                 in the office tower lobby and retail and
                                 by providing openings in the blank wall at
                                 the parking entrance.

        (x)  design development to ensure that bicycle parking, showers and
             changing facilities conform to the requirements of the Parking
             By-law and the Building By-law;

        (xi) design development to reduce opportunities for theft in the
             underground;

             Note to Applicant:  Theft from auto and bicycle theft are the
                                 most prevalent crime in the downtown. 
                                 Open exit stairs have shown to provide
                                 easy access to underground parking areas
                                 as well as creating nuisance
                                 opportunities.  These exit stairs should
                                 be relocated within the building envelope,
                                 with only the door exposed.

        (xii)     design development to delete the exit alcove on Dunsmuir
                  Street; and

             Note to Applicant:  This can be achieved by relocating exit
                                 doors away from the property line.

        (xiii)    suitable arrangements made to the satisfaction of the
                  General Manager of Engineering Services and the Director
                  of Finance, to provide payment-in-lieu for up to 15% of
                  the required accessory parking (401 spaces) if it can be
                  demonstrated that as much parking as is physically and
                  economically reasonable has been planned for and will be
                  provided.

   (c)  That, prior to enactment of the amending By-law and at no cost to
        the City, the registered owner shall:

        (i)  make suitable arrangements to the satisfaction of the General
             Manager of Engineering Services, for the relocation of the
             ALRT ventilation shaft onto the site.              Note to Applicant:  This will require negotiations between the
                                 applicant, City, and B.C. Transit to
                                 determine an acceptable location and
                                 design.




                                                                 APPENDIX C

   ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

   Site:  The site includes three legal parcels with a total area of 5
   971.7 m2 (64,225 sq. ft.) located between Burrard Street and Hornby
   Street.  The Hornby Street portion of the site is developed with the new
   YWCA building.  The site also includes 638 underground parking stalls
   (under the new YWCA and Lot C), of which 400 are transient (public)
   spaces operated by the Downtown Parking Corporation (DPC), and a
   temporary surface parking facility (located on Lot C) facing Burrard
   Street.  The original YWCA building is still standing, although it is
   vacant

   Surrounding Area: The area around the site is zoned Downtown District
   (DD) and is regulated by the Downtown Official Development Plan (DODP). 
   Immediately adjacent to the site and forming the remainder of the south
   end of the block are four lots which include the site for a proposed
   small hotel "Le Soleil" currently occupied by a 2-storey commercial
   building and the Marc building.  South of the site across Dunsmuir
   Street is the Park Place office tower, to the north is the Manulife
   building, to the east is a parkade and office buildings, and to the west
   are the Bentall I, II and III towers.

   Background: The site was rezoned from DD to CD-1 in 1991 in a complex
   rezoning which included:

       transfer of density from a site at the north foot of Hornby Street
        (now redeveloped as an urban park with an underground parkade);
       replacement of public parking from a DPC parkade which faced Hornby
        Street;
       a new YWCA building facing Hornby Street (now constructed); and 
       a 34-storey office tower facing Burrard Street with a pavilion
        (Palm Court) on the corner of Burrard Street and Dunsmuir Street.

   The office tower and pavilion were never constructed due to changes in
   the market conditions and a decreased demand for office space.

   Proposed Development: The application proposes a mixed-use development
   in a 35-storey tower with a 4-storey podium.  The top 17 floors of the
   tower would be occupied by offices, the lower 18 floors would contain a
   498-room hotel and the podium would accommodate the lobby for the office
   component and hotel facilities including the lobby, reception area,
   restaurant, lounges, ballroom, meeting rooms and a health club.  These
   functions would provide a  lively face to the Dunsmuir Street and
   Burrard Street corner.

   Parking Access and Circulation:  Access to the existing underground
   parking is provided from Hornby Street, under the new YWCA building, at
   the northeast corner of the site.  This is also the proposed access to
   the office/hotel development's parking facilities.  The current
   application also proposes limited access to the site from Burrard Street
   to provide the hotel with a highly visible entry.  Although normally
   access would be prohibited from either Burrard Street or Dunsmuir Street
   because of safety, street function or design considerations, staff
   support limited, right turn "in only" access from Burrard Street to the
   hotel's autocourt, which is intended to provide the hotel with a
   distinguishable entrance primarily for the purpose of passenger drop off
   by buses and taxis and for guests who arrive by car.  These vehicles
   would exit onto Dunsmuir and Hornby Streets via two existing public
   lanes.

   Form of Development:  The position and configuration of the building
   core are determined to a large extent by structural elements that were
   built with the underground parking garage.  For this reason the tower
   remains at 45 degrees to the city grid.  The basic massing remains very
   similar to the previously approved  form of development but now benefits
   from a slightly slimmer tower form,  as the floorplates have been 
   reduced  from  approximately 1 700 m2 to 1 500 m2 (18,300 sq. ft. to
   16,200 sq. ft.).  

   The height of the tower has been increased slightly from 134.72 m (442
   ft.) to 137.2 m (450 ft.) but is still within the maximum height
   permitted in the adjacent area of the Downtown District to the west. 
   The proposed height would not impact view corridors and is significantly
   below the approximately 160 m (525 ft.) limit identified in the Downtown
   Vancouver Skyline Study.  In addition to the slight increase in height
   of the tower, the podium has more mass at the Dunsmuir/Burrard corner. 
   The base treatment of the tower is also higher than the previous
   proposal.  Staff and the Urban Design Panel support the slightly taller
   tower and higher base, but agree that further design development is
   required to integrate the base with the tower/office entrance.

   In the current proposal, the podium has been brought forward to the
   Dunsmuir Street property line.  Staff propose that the podium be set
   back 0.75 m at ground floor on Dunsmuir Street to provide a pedestrian
   right-of-way to accommodate future pedestrian and transit needs.  (See
   Appendix B.)  This requirement would be consistent with the previously
   approved form of development which included a greater setback in the
   approved development permit plans.

   The previous proposal included a semi-public enclosed space along the
   lines of an arboretum, the "Palm Court", located in the podium at the
   southwest corner (Burrard and Dunsmuir Streets) of the site. In the new
   proposal, the lobby and other public function areas of the hotel would
   replace the "Palm Court".  The Burrard Street portion of the podium
   would have a transparent exterior which would present passing
   pedestrians with a building that is visually alive during both day and
   evening hours of the week.  The "Palm Court" was seen as a major public
   amenity in the earlier scheme, however staff and the Urban Design Panel
   expect that with further design development the current proposal has the
   same opportunity to feel public and could be more animated. (Conditions:
   Appendix B; Plans: Appendix E.)

   ALRT Ventilation Shaft:  A ventilation shaft serving the ALRT (Skytrain)
   imposes a large metal grate [12.5 m by 2.1 m (41 ft. by 7 ft.)] in the
   sidewalk butting against the Dunsmuir Street curb.  Its location was
   designed for expedience at the time of ALRT construction, with the
   expectation that when the adjacent property (550 Burrard Street)
   redeveloped, the shaft would be redirected through the new structure. 
   The positioning of the shaft has drawbacks, such as limiting tree
   planting and other boulevard enhancements, reducing pedestrian comfort,
   and curtailing options for transit accommodation and road widening.  To
   overcome the limitations imposed by the present shaft position, a
   collaborative effort by the developer, B.C. Transit and the City is
   required. [See Appendix B: section (c)(i).]

   Social and Environmental Implications: There are no implications with
   respect to the Vancouver Children's Policy or Statement of Children's
   Entitlements.  The proposed rezoning neither contributes to nor detracts
   from the objective of reducing atmospheric pollution.



                                                                 APPENDIX D

   COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC, REVIEWING AGENCIES AND THE APPLICANT

   Public Input: A notification letter was sent to 51 nearby property
   owners and a rezoning information sign was posted on the site on January
   20, 1997.  One phone call was received and one person came to City Hall
   to receive additional information about the application.  There were no
   objections to the proposed rezoning.

   Comments of the General Manager of Engineering Services:  The General
   Manager of Engineering Services has no objection to the proposed
   rezoning, provided that the applicant complies with the conditions as
   shown in Appendix B.

   Urban Design Panel Comment: The Urban Design Panel reviewed this
   proposed rezoning on January 29, 1997, and offered the following
   comments:

   "The Panel unanimously supported this application.

   The Panel strongly supported the proposed change in use and thought the
   hotel would be a valuable addition to this part of the downtown.

   The massing of the tower was generally supported and the Panel thought
   its slimmer form was an improvement over the previous proposal.  The
   majority of Panel members had no problem with the orientation of the
   tower.  One Panel member thought the top of the tower needed to be
   refined, given its high visibility from the harbour and elsewhere to the
   north.  The additional height of the tower was not an issue with the
   Panel.

   Panel members commented that the base needs considerable design
   development.  The base of the tower and the architectural statement for
   the office entry was seen as a bit weak.  Integration of the base with
   some single tower/office entrance was encouraged.  The higher base was
   strongly supported.

   The importance of transparency at the Dunsmuir/Burrard corner was
   emphasized for the next stage of the design.  Design development of this
   corner should also include the treatment of the roof.  The "Palm Court"
   of the earlier scheme was seen as a major public amenity that
   contributed to the additional density permitted on this site.  While
   this proposal has the same opportunity, as yet it lacks the same degree
   of publicness that was evident in the earlier proposal.  Animation of
   the lobby to the fullest extent possible should be reinforced in the
   detail design development.  The Panel thought there should be more uses
   in the lobby.  One Panel member commented it is unfortunate the check-in
   desk is not at the ground level.

   The vehicular access off Burrard was thought to be quite workable.

   The entry to the proposed financial institution may need to be lowered
   so that it can be entered directly.

   The Panel had major concerns about the treatment of the lane as an
   extension of entry to this and the adjacent hotel across the lane.  Full
   cooperation among this developer, the adjacent hotel developer and the
   City Engineering Department was strongly urged so that the best can be
   made of the lane as an entrance, i.e., continuance of the paving
   pattern.  It was noted that the upgrading of the laneways in this mid
   block route would also be a major amenity for the city.  It needs to be
   a major, well designed through lane.

   The importance of detailed design in the development of the autocourt
   was stressed.  Given the difficulty of getting covered autocourts to
   work well, details such as light levels, landscaping, and detailed
   design of the ceilings, etc., will need to be carefully considered."

   Comments of the Applicant:  The applicant has been provided with a copy
   of this report and has provided the following comments:

   "We have reviewed the report and there are three items on which we wish
   to comment as follows:

   1.   The Amendment to Section 3, Floor Area

        The Tower V proposal to include a 498 room hotel was chosen based
        upon hotel market demand and supply conditions over nine months
        ago.  While this is still the applicant s goal, the hotel market is
        changing so that a hotel with fewer rooms may be more appropriate. 
        For clarity, the applicant requires the ability to change hotel
        floor space to office floor space on the understanding that the
        total floor space will be reduced by the appropriate 15% hotel
        bonus.  It is assumed the proposed new Clause 3.2 will allow this
        discretion.

   2.   Off Street Parking

        The Shared Parking Study by N.D. Lea Consultants Ltd. analyzed the
        parking requirement for hotel, office and transient uses.  The
        findings showed that a parkade of 700 stalls could adequately meet
        demands due to the complimentary times of parkade use, i.e. hotel,
        evenings and weekends, office in business hours in the week.  The
        applicant did add a further additional level of parking to the
        original proposed 700 stalls for a new total of 739 stalls which is
        clearly adequate.  The applicant does not believe it is appropriate
        to provide more parking thereby encouraging further vehicle use and
        the fact that Tower V is well served by public transportation and
        is adjacent to an ALRT station.

   3.   Comments on Proposed Conditions of Approval

        (b)(xiii) Applicant believes there is sufficient parking provided
                  with 739 stalls.

        (c)  ALRT Ventilation Shaft.

        This ventilation shaft has been in the sidewalk since the ALRT
        opened over 10 years ago.  Its inclusion into the Tower V site was
        not a condition of the previous Tower V rezoning or the subsequent
        Tower V Development Permit.

        The design development requests set out in:

        (b)(ii)   to set back the building 2.5 feet on Dunsmuir Street
        (b)(iii)  relocate exit stairs and baggage storage
        (b)(iv)   provide greater visibility to lobby activities
        (b)(xii)  deletion of exit alcove on Dunsmuir Street

        all require major revisions of the Dunsmuir Street frontage.  The
        inclusion of the ALRT ventilation shaft into this area of high
        quality space will add a major level of complexity and create
        structural and design costs into the parking level.  The cost and
        complexity of dealing with BC Transit and the City is likely to be
        a lengthy process delaying the Tower V project.

        Therefore, the applicant requests deletion of this condition of
        approval."



                                                                 APPENDIX F

           APPLICANT, PROPERTY, AND DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL INFORMATION

   APPLICANT AND PROPERTY INFORMATION

    Street Address      550 Burrard Street
    Legal Description   Lots C, D and E, Blk 30, DL 541, Pl. LMP7821 

    Applicant           Mussen Cattell Mackey Partnership

    Architect           Mussen Cattell Mackey Partnership
    Property Owner      Bentall Properties Ltd.(Lot C);Omers Realty
                        Corp. (Lots D & E)

    Developer           Bentall Properties Ltd.
   SITE STATISTICS

                        GROSS         DEDICATIONS            NET

    SITE AREA         5 971.7 m2                          5 971.7 m2
                     (64,225 sq.                      (64,225 sq. ft.) 
                        ft.) 
   DEVELOPMENT STATISTICS

                      DEVELOPMENT                          RECOMMENDED
                    PERMITTED UNDER    PROPOSED          DEVELOPMENT (if
                    EXISTING ZONING    DEVELOPMENT       different than
                                                            proposed)

    ZONING        CD-1                 CD-1
    USES          Office and limited   Office and all
                  Cultural and         Cultural and
                  Recreational,        Recreational,
                  Retail, Service      Institutional,
                  and  Parking Uses    Retail, Service
                                       (includes
                                       hotel) and
                                       Parking Uses

    MAX. FLOOR    58 932 m2 (634,357   58 932 m2
    AREA          sq. ft.)             (634,357 sq.
                                       ft.) plus 15%
                                       hotel density
                                       bonus

    MAXIMUM       134.72 m (442 ft.)   137.2 m (450
    HEIGHT                             ft.)    PARKING       min. of 1/115 m2     739 spaces       801 spaces
    SPACES        (1/1,238 sq. ft.)
                  and max. of 1/100
                  m2 (1/1,076
                  sq.ft.) for
                  non-residential
                  uses, plus 50 for
                  YWCA and 400
                  public parking
                  [equivalent to
                  minimum of 962
                  spaces]
                    

    SIDE YARD     none                 none             0.75 m
    SETBACK                                             (Dunsmuir St)