ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT

                                           Date: May 2, 1997
                                           CC File: 113/1150-1


   TO:       Vancouver City Council

   FROM:     City Clerk

   SUBJECT:  Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy:
             Amendment of By-law 7364


   RECOMMENDATION

        A.   THAT Council amend By-law 7364 to give the Information and
             Privacy Co-ordinator the authority to apply discretionary
             exceptions to disclosures under the Act and to exercise the
             power of the Head to charge or to waive fees related to a
             request.

        B.   THAT the Director of Legal Services be instructed to bring
             forward the necessary by-law amendments.

   CITY MANAGER'S COMMENTS

        The City Manager RECOMMENDS approval of A and B.

   COUNCIL POLICY

   In December 1994, Council passed By-law 7364 designating the Standing
   Committee on City Services and Budgets as the Head for the purposes of
   the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act.  This by-law
   also delegated some of the Head's duties and powers to the Information
   and Privacy Co-ordinator. The by-law designated the City Clerk as the
   Information and Privacy Co-ordinator.

   In July 1995, Council amended By-law 7364 to designate the City Clerk,
   City Manager and the Corporation Counsel as the Head.

   In December 1996, Council created a regular full-time exempt position in
   the City Clerk's Department to deal with the Freedom of Information and
   Protection of Privacy Act.

   PURPOSE

   The purpose of this report is to ask Council to amend the Freedom of
   Information and Protection of Privacy By-law (By-law 7364) to authorize
   the Information and Privacy Co-ordinator to exercise more duties and
   powers of the Head.

   BACKGROUND

   The Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act ("the Act")
   gives the members of the public a right of access to records in the
   custody or under the control of the City.

   Since November 1994, the City has received over 220 requests under the
   Act for access to various records. Under the Act, the duty to respond to
   a request as well as the discretion to withhold information under any of
   the exceptions listed in the Act rests with the Head of a public body.

   The Act requires Council to designate the Head for the purposes of the
   Act.  The Act does not allow the Head designated by Council to delegate
   any of the Head's powers or duties. However, the Act allows Council to
   authorize any person to perform any duty or to exercise any function of
   the Head.

   Under By-law 7364, as amended in 1995, Council designated the City
   Manager, City Clerk and Corporation Counsel as the Head.  Council also
   authorized an Information and Privacy Co-ordinator to exercise some of
   the functions of the Head, such as responding to requests except where
   the Head has the discretion to withhold information. The City Clerk was
   designated as the Information and Privacy Co-ordinator.

   The everyday handling and processing of requests is done by the Manager
   of Information and Privacy in the City Clerk's Department with
   assistance, when required, from Legal Services.

   DISCUSSION

   Under the Act, the applicant has a right to access records of the City
   subject to limited exceptions.  Three of those exceptions are mandatory
   but the remaining nine exceptions are discretionary. The mandatory
   exceptions require the City to withhold information and, under the
   present by-law, they can be applied by the Information and Privacy
   Co-ordinator.  The discretionary exceptions may be, but do not have to
   be, applied to withhold information.  Application of a discretionary
   exception requires consideration of all relevant  factors before
   deciding whether to apply the exception or not. Under the current
   by-law, only the Head can apply discretionary exceptions.  The Head
   cannot delegate this function, nor can this discretion be exercised
   through a standard policy. Each case must be decided on its own. 
   Failure to properly exercise discretion could result in the decision
   being overturned by the Information and Privacy Commissioner.

   The same issues arise with respect to the charging and waiving of fees
   related to the processing of requests.  Only the Head can decide to
   charge a fee and, if requested by the applicant, only the Head can
   consider and decide whether to waive or refuse to waive a fee.

   Although the powers and functions of the Head cannot be delegated by the
   Head, the Act allows Council to authorize another person to perform any
   of the Head's duties or functions. Council has authorized the City
   Clerk, acting as the Information and Privacy Co-ordinator, to exercise
   some of the Head s powers and functions. 

   Based on the City's experience since the Act was extended to cover local
   government bodies in November 1994, staff conclude that it is
   impractical and inefficient to have the Head (City Manager, City Clerk
   and Corporation Counsel) involved in every case where a discretionary
   exception might be applicable. It is recommended, therefore, that the
   Information and Privacy Co-ordinator be authorized to handle all aspects
   of processing a request, including application of the discretionary
   exceptions and charging and waiving fees.  Such an amendment would not
   reduce the powers of the Head who would retain the overall
   responsibility and authority over the administration of the Act in the
   City.

   CONCLUSION

   This report recommends that Council amend the By-law to allow for more
   efficient and cost effective handling and processing of freedom of
   information requests.

                                 *  *  *  *  *