POLICY REPORT URBAN STRUCTURE Date: March 27, 1997 Dept. File No.PB CC File No. 5301-1/8018/8005 TO: Vancouver City Council FROM: Director of Community Planning SUBJECT: RS Options - Douglas Park, West Southlands and Portions of Dunbar and West Point Grey RECOMMENDATIONS A. THAT the Director of Land Use and Development be instructed to make application to amend the RS-5 District Schedule to add RS-5S, generally in accordance with Appendix A; FURTHER THAT the Director of Land Use and Development be instructed to make application to rezone the areas shown on Figure 1 from RS-1S to RS-5S (see Appendix B - Douglas Park RS-1S and Appendix C - Dunbar RS-1S); FURTHER THAT the Director of Land Use and Development be instructed to make application to rezone the areas shown on Figure 2 from RS-1 to RS-5 (see Appendix D - West Point Grey RS-1 and Appendix E - Dunbar RS-1); FURTHER THAT the Director of Land Use and Development be instructed to make application to rezone the area identified as Sub-Area 1 shown on Figure 3 from RS-1 to RS-5 and to rezone the area identified as Sub-Area 2 shown on Figure 3 from RS-1 to RS-6 (see Appendix F - West Southlands RS-1); FURTHER THAT the Director of Legal Services be instructed to prepare the necessary by-laws for consideration at the Public Hearing, including amendments to the Sign By-law to extend the current provisions for RS-5 to RS-5S; FURTHER THAT these applications and by-laws be referred to Public Hearing, together with the condition of approval recommended by the Director of Land Use and Development that, if RS-5S zoning is approved at Public Hearing, the by-laws be accompanied at the time of enactment by the renamed "RS-5/RS-5S Design Guidelines" to be adopted by resolution of Council for the new RS-5S Districts; FURTHER THAT, subject to approval of the RS-5S rezoning at Public Hearing, the Subdivision, Parking, and Fee By-laws be amended to extend the provisions for RS-5 to RS-5S; AND FURTHER THAT the Director of Legal Services be instructed to bring forward the amendments to the Subdivision, Parking, and Fee By-laws at the time of enactment of the Zoning By-law. B. THAT the Director of Community Planning be instructed to report to Council development applications which are contrary to the proposed zoning amendments for possible withholding pursuant to Section 570 of the Vancouver Charter. GENERAL MANAGER'S COMMENTS The General Manager of Community Services RECOMMENDS approval of A and B. COUNCIL POLICY On June 6, 1995, Council asked staff to report back on interim measures to deal with neighbourhood requests for character zoning until such time as staff are able to go back into those neighbourhoods to work with them on the CityPlan Neighbourhood program. On May 17, 1996, Council instructed staff to proceed, in co-operation with neighbourhood groups, with a consultation process to determine neighbourhood support for an interim zoning in single-family areas in advance of CityPlan's neighbourhood visioning program, to proceed with RS-6 as an interim zone available to RS-1 and RS-1S single-family neighbourhoods and, where there is demonstrated community support, to include RS-5 as a possible interim zone for single-family neighbourhoods. Figure 1. Proposed RS-5S Districts - A Portion of the Dunbar RS-1S District and Douglas Park RS-1S District Figure 2. Proposed RS-5 Districts - Portions of the West Point Grey RS-1 District and the Dunbar RS-1 District Figure 2. continued Figure 3. Proposed RS-5 and RS-6 Districts - Portions of the West Southlands RS-1 District SUMMARY AND PURPOSE This report recommends referral to Public Hearing of: RS-5S zoning for a portion of the Dunbar RS-1S district (Dunbar RS-1S) and the Douglas Park RS-1S district (Douglas Park RS-1S) illustrated on Figure 1 above; RS-5 zoning for portions of the West Point Grey RS-1 district (West Point Grey RS-1) and the Dunbar RS-1 district (Dunbar RS-1)illustrated on Figure 2 above; and RS-5 zoning for the area identified as Sub-Area 1 on Figure 3 above and RS-6 zoning for the area identified as Sub-Area 2 on Figure 3 above. Multi-language random sample telephone surveys of area residents and property owners were conducted in all areas. The surveys indicated that in each of the above areas there was roughly 60% support for a zoning change to deal with concerns about the design of new developments and landscaping: Douglas Park 59%; Dunbar (RS-1S area) 62%; Dunbar (RS-1 area) 65%; West Point Grey 64%; and West Southlands 59%. Of those in favour of a zoning change, 67% in Douglas Park and 66% in Dunbar (RS-1S area) chose RS-5S, 61% in West Point Grey and 62% in Dunbar (RS-1 area) chose RS-5. In West Southlands, 49% chose RS-5, 48% chose RS-6; however, in the northern portion of West Southlands RS-1 the majority (61%) of residents and property owners who favoured change chose RS-5 zoning, while in the south the majority (56%) chose RS-6 zoning. RS-5 and RS-5S zoning encourages new development and additions to be compatible with the neighbourhood by providing a floor space increase if the RS-5 Design Guidelines are followed. If followed, the design of new houses and major additions along with site landscaping would be derived from the design of adjacent properties to the development site. RS-6 zoning requires/prohibits certain design features, and encourages site landscaping in order to establish a minimum standard of design quality and foster a greater variety of design than under RS-1 zoning. BACKGROUND On May 17, 1996, Council adopted a proposed process to implement the interim zoning program requested by Council on June 6, 1995. The program would address issues of external design and site landscaping in RS-1/RS-1S neighbourhoods. RS-6 zoning would be made available, with the additional option of RS-5 zoning where there is demonstrated community interest in that zone. Both RS-5 and RS-6 were to be offered as interim zones. RS-5 zoning encourages new houses and additions to be compatible with existing houses and landscaping by providing a floor space increase for going through a design guideline review process. Buildings which meet design guidelines would derive their design from adjacent houses and site landscaping. "Impermeability" regulations prohibit excessive paving of the site. When the guidelines are used, the permit process in this zone takes two to three months for a development permit, one to three weeks for the building permit. RS-6 zoning requires/prohibits certain design features, and encourages site landscaping in order to establish a minimum standard of design quality and foster a greater variety of design than under RS-1 zoning. "Impermeability" regulations prohibit excessive paving of the site, and a modest floor space increase is provided if landscape design guidelines are followed. The combined Development Permit and Building Permit process in this zone takes roughly three to five weeks. The Council-approved planning process for the interim rezoning program involves three steps: 1. Phase I - This phase determines the general level of neighbourhood support for a change in zoning. Only after neighbourhood support is demonstrated would Planning commit significant time and resources to a rezoning process. This first step is therefore carried out in co-operation with resident groups who assist in notifying area residents/property owners of the planning program. A post-returned "expression of interest" survey is then conducted among all area residents. This survey is monitored or carried out by Planning staff. If the survey achieves a 25% response rate, and if 60% of the respondents to the survey support a change in zoning, then staff proceeds with Phase II. 2. Phase II - This phase determines the type of single-family zoning which the neighbourhood supports. Staff distribute more detailed information on RS-1, RS-6 (and RS-5) zoning to all area residents and property owners and hold open houses. Following this, an independent consultant is used to conduct the Phase II survey as a multi-language random sample telephone survey. Typically approximately 700 households are contacted in each neighbourhood, leading to the completion of approximately 400 interviews (taking into account people who are not home or who refuse to be interviewed), yielding statistical results at a 95% confidence level with a plus or minus 5% margin of error. A 60% support rate for a new zoning would be adequate for staff to refer a rezoning report to Council. 3. Staff report back to Council on the Phase II survey results with a recommendation on the area zoning and, where appropriate, referral to Public Hearing. DISCUSSION 1. Planning Process (a) Phase I Resident Surveys Phase I resident surveys were conducted in West Point Grey, Dunbar RS-1 and RS-1S areas, West Southlands, Douglas Park, the Glen Park RS-1S district and the Cedar Cottage RS-1S district (see Figure 4). Figure 4. The Glen Park RS-1S District and the Cedar Cottage RS-1S District Figure 4. continued The results of the Phase I survey can be summarized as follows, with response rates for each area (i.e., total surveys mailed back/total surveys delivered) listed below each area in the first column: Question 1: Which a) Retain the b) Seek an c) Undecided option do you current RS-1/ alternative prefer? RS-1S zoning zoning West Point Grey 36% 62% 1% (38% response rate) Dunbar (RS-1) 27% 71% 1% (40% response rate) Dunbar (RS-1S) 39% 59% 2% (37% response rate) West Southlands 34% 64% 2% (44% response rate) Douglas Park 35% 63% 1% (35% response rate) Glen Park 49% 49% 3% (25% response rate) Cedar Cottage 59% 38% 2% (21% response rate) The results of the mail-back survey indicated that there was sufficient support in West Point Grey, the Dunbar RS-1 and RS-1S areas, West Southlands and Douglas Park to proceed onto Phase II of the Interim Zoning process: all areas had a greater than 25% response rate and each had approximately 60% of those responding supporting a change in zoning. Both Glen Park and Cedar Cottage had relatively poor response rates and neither area achieved a clear majority response in favour of changing the zoning so these two areas did not go forward in the process. (b) Phase II Telephone Surveys In January of 1997, staff distributed detailed information on RS-6 and RS-5 (RS-6S, RS-5S) zoning to all residents and property owners in West Point Grey, Dunbar RS-1 and Dunbar RS-1S areas, West Southlands and Douglas Park (see Appendix G). Contained in the information package were staff phone numbers in order that questions could be asked and responses given. Multilingual "call back" lines were set up for people with English as a second language. All distributed material was translated into Chinese. Open houses (with translation services) was held in all areas to answer questions and display additional, more detailed information about the zoning. In addition, a Chinese language open house was held on January 31, 1997, at the Fraser Street SUCCESS offices, for residents of the four study areas. The random sample telephone surveys of area residents and property owners were conducted by an independent consultant in each of the areas in late February/early March. With over 400 completed phone surveys in West Point Grey and the Dunbar RS-1 area, 200 completed calls in the Dunbar RS-1S area and Douglas Park, and 136 calls in West Southlands, the accuracy of the resulting statistics is roughly plus or minus 4% to 5% for each neighbourhood at a 95% confidence level. The survey results for the areas or portions of areas where zoning changes are proposed are as follows (see summary - Appendix H; a full detailed report is available from the Clerk). Question 1: Which a) Retain the b) Seek an c) No opinion option do you current RS-1/ alternative prefer? RS-1S zoning zoning West Point Grey 34% 64% 2% Dunbar (RS-1) 32% 65% 3% Dunbar (RS-1S) 34% 62% 4% West Southlands 39% 59% 2% Douglas Park 38% 59% 3% Question 2: Which a) RS-5/ b) RS-6/ c) Undecided zoning option do you RS-5S RS-6S prefer? West Point Grey 39% 24% 1% Dunbar (RS-1) 40% 24% 1% Dunbar (RS-1S) 41% 18% 2% West Southlands 28% 28% 3% Douglas Park 40% 19% 1% The surveys indicated that all areas have approximately 59%-65% support for a zoning change to deal with concerns about the design of new houses and landscaping. Of those in favour of a zoning change, most preferred RS-5/RS-5S zoning. West Southlands was split on whether RS-5 or RS-6 was the most preferred zoning, although further analysis indicated that the majority who favoured change in the northern portion also favoured RS-5 zoning (61%), while in the south the RS-6 zoning was favoured (56%) (please see Appendix F - West Southlands RS-1). Staff, therefore, recommend referral to Public Hearing of RS-5S zoning for Dunbar (RS-1S area) and Douglas Park, RS-5 zoning for the northwest portion of West Southlands, for a portion of West Point Grey and Dunbar (RS-1 area), and RS-6 zoning for the southeast portion of West Southlands. Staff should note that the clear majority of respondents who preferred RS-6 zoning also preferred to adopt it as written without any changes. Staff should also note to Council that further analysis of the survey results was conducted to determine the boundaries of these proposed rezonings. Staff had mentioned to Council in the report outlining the Interim Zoning program that view blockage would not be addressed as part of the rezoning program. There were a number of areas within the larger study areas where views were an issue, particularly in light of the additional height (to 35 ft. from 30 ft.) allowed under RS-5/RS-5S and RS-6 zoning. In such cases, staff examined the results of the surveys on a block-by-block basis to determine if residents and property owners felt differently than the majority of residents living in the overall study area. In two cases, we found this was so and have adjusted the boundaries of the proposed rezonings to delete these areas, thereby remaining RS-1 or RS-1S (please see Appendix C - Dunbar RS-1S and Appendix D - West Point Grey). Staff should also note that the current "South Shaughnessy RS-5 Design Guidelines" should be renamed to the "RS-5/RS-5S Design Guidelines" to reflect its use in areas of the city currently zoned RS-1S (permitting legal rental suites). No substantial changes are proposed for these design guidelines, although some consequential amendments will need to be made. A copy of the renamed and amended RS-5/RS-5S Design Guidelines is available at the City Clerk's Office. 3. Impact on Property Values The Manager of Real Estate Services advises that under current market condition, there should be no significant impact on property values in the short term if the RS-5, RS-5S or RS-6 zoning is adopted. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPLICATIONS The RS-5/RS-5S and RS-6 zoning encourages site landscape planting which will positively affect the city's micro-climate and air quality. The RS-5/RS-5S and RS-6 zoning also regulates the maximum site coverage by impermeable materials which would also have positive effects on micro-climate, and reduce runoff thereby decreasing flooding potential and reducing combined sewer overflows. Each of the zones provide some moderate incentive for renovating existing houses which could result in lessening the burden on landfill sites from the demolition of existing houses on sites where new houses are proposed. SOCIAL IMPLICATIONS The Children's Policy and the Statement of Children's Entitlements are not applicable to this amendment. PERSONNEL IMPLICATIONS RS-5/RS-5S zoning is unique and much more complex than RS-1 zoning. Processing of applications will generally involve extra staff time for checking applications, meetings with applicants, meetings with staff (e.g., landscaping and engineering), telephone enquiries, file searches, correspondence, site visits, and providing information to residents and prospective applicants. Compared to RS-1/RS-1S applications, RS-5/RS-5S applications will affect staff in the following areas: Development Planners or Planning Facilitators (additional 12 to 16 hours per application); Plan Checking Technicians (additional 20 to 25 hours per application -- bulk of research, correspondence, and neighbourhood applicant and staff liaison duties are handled by this position); Development Information Officers (additional 2 to 3 hours per application); Landscaping Technicians (additional 0.5 hour per application); and Building Inspectors (additional 2 hours per application). In October of 1996, Council adopted RS-5 zoning and design guidelines for a portion of West Kerrisdale and Mackenzie Heights. Four staff positions were added at that time: a Development Planner, a Plan Checking Technician, a Development Information Officer, and a Building Inspector. Staff reported to Council that the added workload from the rezoning justified the additional staff resources, although processing RS-5 applications would only use a portion of a full-time staff member (i.e., given that the two areas had 40 to 45 Joint Applications and Development Applications per year, a total of 40 person-weeks would be added to the staff workload). Staff noted that with further rezonings through the Interim Rezoning program, the residual staff time would eventually be used. Recently Council has sent to Public Hearing a proposal to rezone some RT-4 and RT-5 areas to make one- and two-family dwellings conditional. The areas under consideration, if rezoned, will yield an additional 23 conditional applications per year, adding a total of 30 person-weeks to the workload. West Point Grey, Dunbar, Douglas Park and West Southlands are composed of roughly 8,600 properties. These RS-1/RS-1S areas together have had an average of 92 Joint Applications and Development Applications for new houses per year over the last five years (i.e., West Point Grey 38 per year, Dunbar 41, Douglas Park 8, West Southlands 5). To administer the same number of applications under RS-5/RS-5S and RS-6 zoning, assuming most applicants in the proposed RS-5/RS-5S zoning (i.e., roughly 75%) will seek the maximum FSR and submit a conditional application, additional staff time required would be approximately 84 person-weeks in total. Given all of the changes and proposed changes listed above, the additional workload would be distributed among staff in the following way: 52 person-weeks for the Development Planners or Planning Facilitators; 83 person-weeks for the Plan Checking Technicians; 9 person-weeks for the Development Information Officer; 3 person-week for Landscaping Technicians; and 7 person-weeks for Building Inspectors. In addition, approximately 15% of applications for building renovations and additions will occur in the conditional stream of the RS-5/RS-5S zoning, for those seeking the maximum permitted floor space. This will also add to the staff workload, most particularly for Development Planners/Facilitators and Plan Checking Technicians. Finally, there may be as many as 15 more neighbourhoods which will go through the Interim Zoning process, which may result in further rezonings to RS-5/RS-5S or RS-6/RS-6S, which will again increase the workload on staff. The implications of the increase in staff workload for Planning will be discussed in a companion memorandum to Council from the Director of Land Use and Development. The City Building Inspector notes that the additional workload for building inspections will be accommodated with existing staff, although future rezonings will likely bring about a request for additional staff in order to maintain current levels of service. There may also be some additional workload placed on property use inspectors, particularly due to the impermeability regulations and site landscaping guidelines associated with the proposed RS-5/RS-5S and RS-6 zoning. Staff will be monitoring the situation and will report back to Council should the workload require additional staff. CONCLUSION This report recommends referral to Public Hearing of: RS-5S zoning for Dunbar (RS-1S area) and Douglas Park, RS-5 zoning in the northern portion of West Southlands, West Point Grey and Dunbar (RS-1 area), and RS-6 zoning in the southern portion of West Southlands. * * * * *