A25
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
Date: November 28, 1996
Dept. File No. WB
TO: Vancouver City Council
FROM: Director of Land Use and Development
SUBJECT: Form of Development: 5650 Oak Street
D.E. 401604 - CD-1 By-law Number 7656
Owner of Development - Taddei Developments Group
RECOMMENDATION
THAT the approved form of development for the CD-1 zoned site
known as 5592 - 5650 Oak Street (5650 Oak Street being the
application address) be generally approved as illustrated in
Development Application Number DE401604, prepared by Ekistics
Architecture Inc. and stamped "Received, City Planning Department,
October 10, 1996", provided that the Director of Planning may
approve design changes which would not adversely affect either the
development character of this site or adjacent properties.
GENERAL MANAGER'S COMMENTS
The General Manager of Community Services RECOMMENDS approval of
the foregoing.
COUNCIL POLICY
There is no applicable Council policy except that Council did approve in
principle the form of development for this site when the rezoning was
approved, following a Public Hearing.
PURPOSE
In accordance with Charter requirements, this report seeks Council's
approval for the final form of development for the above-noted CD-1
zoned site.
SITE DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND
At a Public Hearing on June 27, 1996, City Council approved a rezoning
of this site from RS-1 One-family Dwelling District to CD-1. Council
also approved in principle the preliminary form of development for these
lands. CD-1 By-law Number 7656 was enacted on November 5, 1996.
The site and surrounding zoning are shown on the attached Appendix 'A'.
Subsequent to Council's approval of the CD-1 rezoning, the Director of
Planning approved Development Application Number DE401604. This
approval was subject to various conditions, including Council's approval
of the form of development. The latter condition is one of the few
outstanding prior to permit issuance.
DISCUSSION
The proposal involves the construction of a four-storey multiple
dwelling on this site containing a total of 31 residential dwelling
units and one level of underground parking.
Simplified plans, including a site plan and elevations of the proposal,
have been included in Appendix 'B'.
Since the Public Hearing, the "footprint" and the roof forms of the
building have been revised. (see Appendix 'C') This has resulted in
more bulk particularly on the north end of the site. Concerns were
raised at the Public Hearing about the effects of bulk on the
single-family dwelling and possible future 3-storey multiple dwellings
at a lower density (FSR) located on the site to the immediate north.
The revised form of development is different in two significant ways
which increase the visual scale of the building, as follows: The north
end of the proposed development would have a building depth (from front
to back) of 14.6 m (48 ft.), plus an open rear balcony, instead of the
8.5 m (28 ft.) shown to Council at Public Hearing. Also, condition B(i)
with respect to Form of Development required, "design development to
improve the character of the roof and eaves;". Instead of the
low-hipped roof initially proposed, it would now have peaked dormers, a
change common to all facades, and which adds 2.4 m (8 ft.) to the height
at the eave-line, without affecting overall maximum building height. At
Public Hearing, the applicant responded to neighbours' concerns stating
that the building would only be one storey higher than the adjoining
house. Technically, this is still true, but the peaked dormer will
appear higher.
The neighbouring property-owner to the north has been advised of the
proposed changes and has indicated they support these revisions. (see
Appendix 'D') Staff believe that the revised form of development meets
the intent of the CD-1 By-law and that the design changes remain within
an acceptable range of scale in relation to the neighbouring site.
CONCLUSION
The Director of Planning has approved Development Application Number
DE401604, subject to various conditions to be met prior to the issuance
of the development permit. One of these conditions is that the form of
development first be approved by Council.
* * *