SUPPORTS ITEM NO. P&E COMMITTEE AGENDA
NOVEMBER 7, 1996 ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT Date: October 29, 1996 Dept. File No. JHD TO: Standing Committee on Planning & Environment FROM: Director of Land Use & Development SUBJECT: Accessible and Usable Dwellings Project - Status Report RECOMMENDATION A. THAT Council receive for information the status report on the Accessible and Usable Dwellings Project (AUDP) which includes a summary of the dwelling design and implementation strategies currently under consideration. AND THAT staff report back the final recommendations of the Accessible and Usable Dwellings Project (AUDP), following review by the AUDP Working Committee and the Special Council Advisory Committees on Seniors and Disability Issues. GENERAL MANAGER'S COMMENTS The General Manager of Community Services RECOMMENDS approval of the foregoing. COUNCIL POLICY Council policy is reflected in the Vancouver Building By-law which requires that residential buildings regulated by Section 3 (generally larger multiple dwellings) provide access for the disabled from the street through 'a' building entrance to the entry door of each dwelling unit. SUMMARY This report, with its appendices, summarizes the current thinking and draft proposals of the AUDP. Included are: - a set of performance objectives establishing the minimum level of accessibility to, and usability of, basic dwelling functions; - a design strategy that relies, to varying extents, on additions and modifications of dwelling features on the part of the occupant; - a design technique that allows designers to develop a design response to suit the unique parameters of each project; - a voluntary implementation strategy based on underwriting additional development risks by providing support in the form of knowledge, incentive and certification programs; and - a proposal for decentralized implementation through partner-ships with relevant organizations. - 2 - Staff expect the outstanding work to be completed in the next few months and intend to review it with the AUDP Advisory Committee, the Special Committee on Seniors and the Special Advisory Committee on Disability Issues in January 1997. BACKGROUND On September 12, 1995, Council resolved to pursue the Accessible and Usable Dwellings Project to increase the general accessibility and adaptability of Vancouver s housing stock. Council approved project funding of $20,000. The purpose of the AUDP is to develop recommendations regarding dwelling design that is more accessible to seniors and people with disabilities, as well as, implementation strategies for achieving the widespread development of such dwellings. Work was commenced in mid-January, 1996 with people representing advocacy, health, research and housing industry organizations (see Appendix A). The work was expected to be completed by the end of June. However, the core working teams (see Appendix B) found the issues to be more complex and contentious than originally anticipated. Consequently, the project schedule was delayed. The bulk of the work has now been completed and a project report is being drafted for final review by the working teams, the larger committee and Council s advisory committees. A summary of the draft report s current directions follows and portions of the draft report are appended at the end of this report. AUDP - CURRENT DIRECTIONS General The Accessible and Usable Dwellings Project seeks to incorporate design changes into all newly-constructed dwellings to accommodate people with a broad range of physical abilities. The design changes are intended to make it easier for each dwelling to be customized to the specific physical needs of its occupant. This approach will better meet the dwelling needs of seniors, who would like to age in place, and people with disabilities, who would like to maximize their personal independence and societal integration. Many of the proposed design features will also improve the general functioning of dwellings for everyone. By 2031, Canada will need approximately 1.5 million dwelling units suitable for seniors and persons with disabilities. This means that 50,000 units need to be built or renovated each year over the next 25 years to meet this demand. (Don Hazelden, CMHC) Seniors and people with disabilities are currently housed in centralized facilities or in special units or developments provided through (mostly) government-funded, non-market housing. Both approaches are expensive, create segregation and often prove ineffective. The philosophy underlying the AUDP is that variations in physical ability are the norm. Therefore, both practically and philosophically, dwellings should be made to be more adaptable to the various physical circumstances of people, rather than vice versa. The challenges in doing this include: - the range of needs and changes to needs over time; - increased initial construction cost to facilitate subsequent - 3 - alterations at lesser cost; and - industry and consumer attitudes that currently do not value the functional flexibility being advocated by this project. The AUDP seeks, as a general strategy, to improve dwelling design/construction and increase the supply of accessible and usable dwellings in a series of steps. This strategy has been called raising the baseline (Ted de Grey, MAIBC). The first baseline is intended to respond to the most immediate and universal needs of seniors and people with disabilities in the context of what is most do-able (affordable, marketable and effective) from an industry perspective. The initial objectives address mobility and sensory disabilities. Future baselines should include environmental sensitivities and more complex physical disabilities. As well, mental disabilities, which are particularly relevant to seniors (i.e., Alzheimer s Disease), can and should be addressed through physical design. The implementation strategy proposals are based on the premise that the market for these improvements already exists and only needs a jumpstart (Don Hazelden, CMHC) to become self-realizing. The AUDP report recommends a soft implementation approach to avoid the antagonism which often develops when people misunderstand these kinds of broad objectives and/or feel unnecessary requirements are being forced upon them. Also, housing industry representatives have stated that this approach is more conducive to co-operation and innovation. Design The AUDP dwelling design strategy combines open-ended design standards, in the form of performance objectives, and an open-ended design approach , which is further explained below. This strategy is intended to provide a high level of flexibility to accommodate: - widely ranging abilities; - any type of building/dwelling; - the unique development parameters of a particular project; and - the ongoing changes in abilities, products, knowledge and markets. The strategy is based on the assumptions that the dwelling will require some customization and that the occupant should be responsible for completion, through superficial modifications and equipment additions, of the dwelling s accessibility and usability. The performance objectives (attached in Appendix C) establish which basic dwelling functions should be available to all users and the level to which they are expected to function. They are presented as performance objectives rather than as prescriptive requirements to permit a designer to satisfy them in any number of ways. For example, the objective of emergency access to the bathroom is established in lieu of a single solution such as requiring all bathrooms to have pocket doors. With the performance objectives approach, the access issue can be resolved by a pocket door, an out-swinging door, a secondary bathroom entrance, a dutch door, double-direction hinging/opening/locking hardware or innovations that have yet to be made. To give an indication of the practical implications of the objectives, Appendix D notes the design responses visualized by the AUDP working teams in the context of current design knowledge and development practice. A list of the kinds of features that would most likely be added-on by the occupant is attached in Appendix E. - 4 - The design approach establishes options for satisfying the performance objectives with respect to their functional status at the completion of basic construction. For example, doorways may be fully functional (from the point of view of abilities users) if a combination of features - an accessible door width, usable door opening pressures, universal hardware and adequate wheelchair manoeuvring spaces - is built-in . Alternatively, doorways could be potentially functional (again, from the point of view of abilities users) if the accessible width is built-in and wiring for the addition of remote-control electronic door openers is roughed-in . (The door opener can remove the need for strict pressure restrictions, universal hardware and manoeuvring spaces.) In some developments, the first method may be more economical and practical, while in others, the second method may make more sense. In yet others, the two methods might be combined. It is intended that the built-in and roughed-in dwelling features be documented as part of the development proposal and in a users manual - similar to a car manual - explaining the design capabilities of the dwelling/building. A building/dwelling design may incorporate a combination of built-in and roughed-in features to address the various performance objectives. The way in which a designer decides to achieve the objectives in a particular dwelling/building will depend upon the unique parameters of the development and the most current technologies and design techniques. Developments will vary, and individual developments will not be suitable for every potential user. However, each development will be more accessible and usable to more users. In combination, a number of these developments should address the needs of a much broader range of users. The provision of design flexibility is not intended to be a vehicle for off-loading costs from the developer to the occupant or vice versa. Therefore, a method of assessing the cost distribution between the developer and the future occupant must be developed as an aspect of the performance standards and evaluation. The assessment might include a number of factors such as - the development size, dwelling types, topography, target market, cost efficiencies, private versus common areas, the amount of control an individual occupant has over changes to the area in question, for example, common circulation or rental dwellings, and funding and affordability circumstances. Implementation The AUDP proposes an implementation strategy based on voluntary, rather than mandatory, compliance. This approach is believed to be more conducive to the development of accessible and usable dwellings for a number of reasons, including: - the inflexibility and other weaknesses of current regulatory models and compliance systems; - the value of competition to build market momentum and stimulate innovation; - the increasing sophistication and expectations of dwellers and developers ; and - increasing corporate social responsibility, as both a marketing tool and for its own sake. The AUDP report will propose a trial period for the voluntary approach before other approaches are considered. - 5 - The proposed implementation strategy suggests creation and provision of multiple programs in three key areas to encourage and support desirable development. The key areas include: - knowledge (awareness/information/education); - incentives (development costs/other costs/recognition); and - certification (buildings/products/people). Implementation programs would be directed at and developed in the context of each of the many groups with an interest in building/ dwelling development. These groups include users/occupants, the general public, developers, designers, constructors, trades and sub-trades, financiers, insurers, realtors, home-care providers, etc. The implementation programs would be provided on a decentralized basis by the organizations most interested and able to administer them. For example, design awareness might be developed and delivered by the Architectural Institute of B.C., dwelling certification by the Greater Vancouver Home Builders Association and an information clearing house by the Kinsmen's Foundation. Provision of the implementation programs is envisioned as an organic system of partnerships that would spread the costs of programs over a wide base, facilitate cost efficiencies and better cost recovery, and accommodate change more easily. Some ideas for programs are attached in Appendix F. This implementation strategy is very similar to the BC Hydro 'PowerSmart' program except that there would not be a central facilitator like BC Hydro. The AUDP envisions that the City of Vancouver's roles include initiator (this project), short-term facilitator (further exploration and startup of the partnership idea) and future potential partner (i.e., provider of local incentives, such as floor space exclusions, or, implementor of information technology such as GIS software to identify good sites for seniors-oriented developments). If Council wishes to be more proactive, the current AUDP could be viewed as a precursor to future development of an umbrella program - DesignSmart . DesignSmart would aim to stimulate private sector responses to important community issues such as the environment, aesthetics, safer cities and housing affordability by reducing the research effort and financial risk associated with innovative development that is ahead of its market. Such a far-reaching, comprehensive program would, however, be a significant undertaking requiring considerable resources either from the City or another source. NEXT STEPS Continuing Work The work remaining to complete the AUDP and finalize the draft AUDP Report will be undertaken beginning in November, 1996. This work includes: - an analysis of the impact that the proposed design improvements would have on the space requirements and cost of construction of four basic building/dwelling combinations - buildings with common circulation for a single-room occupancy and a one bedroom apartment, and buildings without common circulation for a single-family dwelling and a two-family dwelling; - development of what is called the test of reasonableness - a - 6 - formula intended to balance cost-sharing between the developer and the hypothetical future occupant of the specific building/dwelling. It will assess the timing of, and investment responsibility for, the functional completion of design features. Factors might include the degree of individual control over building modifications, the cost to the supplier (developer or occupant), cost efficiencies, and a reconstruction/modification difficulty factor; - exploration of a road block removal mechanism which would address current regulatory constraints and balance competing interests; - preparation of a business case to quantify the tangible and intangible advantages of an accessible and usable development; and - continuing consultation with the AUDP Advisory Committee and Working Teams and formal consultation with the relevant Advisory Committees of Council. Future Work Staff intend to make a final report on this project early in 1997. Staff anticipate following this project with two new endeavours - a wider consultation process and further exploration of the partnership concept. The consultation process would aim to get formal feedback from the general public and specific interest groups. The partnership work would assess the viability of the decentralized implementation concept, and, identify and begin to develop potential partnerships. Sharing the proposals of the AUDP with new and different audiences will promote feedback and begin developing awareness. It should also plant the seeds of the ideas in the minds of housing and home builders, along with potential program providers and future users. Budget For the completion of the current work, staff intend to use the remaining project budget ($7,963.12) on the following basis: - criteria cost analysis ($1,500); - test of reasonableness ($1,500); - road block removal mechanism ($1,500); and - business case ($1,500). COMMITTEE COMMENTS The comments of the AUDP Working Committee, the Committee on Disability Issues and the Special Committee on Seniors were not available at the date of report submission. This report will have been circulated to these groups before Council meets and there may be delegation requests. CONCLUSION The draft proposals of the AUDP attempt to recognize and accommodate the complexities of designing for a wide range of physical abilities, the exigencies of housing development, the constraints on governments and the imperatives of change. Until more fully developed, the draft proposals may appear nebulous. However, despite being open-ended, the expectations of the AUDP participants are quite concrete. The draft proposals reflect the combined creativity and effort of a small group of very committed individuals representing an array of interests. These people and staff look forward to a broader discussion of both the proposed first baseline and the design and implementation strategies. - 7 - * * * * * ACCESSIBLE AND USABLE DWELLINGS PROJECT : WORKING COMMITTEE The following organisations were invited to participate in this project. Most contributed time and thought to the project through participation at committee meetings, conversations with staff or involvement with a working team. Participation was voluntary. USER GROUPS COMPREHENSIVE CAROL DIXON BC COALITION OF PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES KEN FRASER VANCOUVER RESOURCE SOCIETY DAN LEVITT BC ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY CARE SIMON COX KINSMEN FOUNDATION LARRY BODEN NEIL SQUIRE FOUNDATION BERT FORMAN BC REHABILITATION SOCIETY/ G.F. STRONG SENIORS SANDY UENO GERONTOLOGY CONSULTANT MARY ANN SCOTT CLARKE GERONTOLOGY RESEARCH CENTRE - SFU MOBILITY NORM HAW B.C. PARAPLEGIC ASSOCIATION LORI CYR ARTHRITIS SOCIETY SENSORY DONNA HICKS CANADIAN NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR THE BLIND KIRSTY DICKENSON ALLERGY/ASTHMA INFORMATION ASSOCIATION OTHER ELIZABETH GRANT AMBULANCE PARAMEDICS OF B.C. HOUSING INDUSTRY DEVELOPERS MICHAEL GELLER URBAN DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE HUNTLEY GORDON URBAN DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE BOB HEASLIP LARCO ENTERPRISES INC. and GREYSTONE DEVELOPMENT PETER SIMPSON GREATER VANCOUVER HOME BUILDERS ASSOCIATION ROY PATZER GREYSTONE DEVELOPMENT BOB TOMBS BURON DEVELOPMENT CO. ARCHITECTS c/o ARCHS BELOW ARCHITECTURAL INSTITUTE OF B.C. REALTORS LISA EXLEY REAL ESTATE BOARD OF - 8 - GREATER VANCOUVER AL DE GENOVA REAL ESTATE BOARD OF GREATER VANCOUVER TECHNOLOGISTS DONNA RODMAN APPLIED SCIENCE TECH AND TECH OF B.C. DESIGNERS TED DE GREY EDWARD DE GREY ARCHITECTS PAT SIMPSON USER FRIENDLY HOMES LTD. BRAD MCCANNELL CANADIAN BARRIER FREE DESIGN JOHN LANE UBC CAMPUS PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SHELLEY PENNER ECO DESIGN LARRY BODEN ACCESS DESIGN INC. SCOTT GORDON SCOTT GORDON ARCHITECT GILLIAN WATSON-DONALD WATSON-DONALD DESIGN JOHN CURRIE JOHN CURRIE ARCHITECT KATHERINE TAYLOR ABILITIES PLANNING AND DESIGN OTHER JANE FONTIEN OAK HILL - SYSTEMS FOR INDEPENDENCE GOVERNMENTS VANCOUVER JANET DIGBY PLANNING JOHN JESSUP HOUSING CENTRE BRIAN PORTER LEGAL SERVICES BARB PARSON VANCOUVER HEALTH BOARD BOB MACDONALD ENGINEERING GORDON MURDOCH PERMITS & LICENSES B.C. CRAIG CRAWFORD BCHMC SAM RIZVI OFFICE FOR DISABILITY ISSUES JEFF VASEY PROVINCIAL ACCESSIBILITY ADVISOR DON HAZELDEN CMHC - REGIONAL VALERIE ROSENTHAL CMHC - LOCAL OTHER KARI HUHTALA RICHMOND JOAN SELBY BURNABY CHERYL KATHLER NORTH VAN CITY STEPHEN SHEVING NEW Westminster-ER MARK BOSTWICK NORTH VAN DISTRICT ADJUNCTS BOOTH PALMER FACILITATION GAIL JOHNSON CLERKING SAM SULLIVAN COUNCIL RICK SCOBIE COMMUNITY SERVICES SPECIAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON DISABILITY ISSUES SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON SENIORS INDIVIDUALS DEREK WILSON MARIE MOSCOVITCH - 9 - GARY GOODWIN PAMELA JAY LYNN BUCHANAN MAINLAND DOOR CONTROL LTD. LILIAN NAKASHIMA BOO JOCK CHONG LEGACY ABILITY PRODUCTS & SERVICES ELIEZER DVIR JULIA STRUSYNA BEV NEILSON APPENDIX B Page 1 of 1 ACCESSIBLE AND USABLE DWELLINGS PROJECT : WORKING TEAMS The following teams and their members undertook the bulk of the project work. They contributed a great deal of time and energy to the process of exploring and developing recommendations. Some members were paid an honorarium for their participation, others represented government departments and yet others volunteered. The commitment of these people was greatly appreciated. START-UP TEAM DON HAZELDEN TED DE GREY KATHERINE TAYLOR BERT FORMAN MARY ANN SCOTT CLARKE PROJECT TEAM BERT FORMAN (DISABILITY ISSUES) MARY ANN SCOTT CLARKE (SENIORS ISSUES) KATHERINE TAYLOR (DESIGN ISSUES) JANET DIGBY (CITY OF VANCOUVER) DESIGN TEAM GILLIAN WATSON-DONALD CO-ORDINATOR SIMON COX DONNA RODMAN BARB PARSON KATHERINE TAYLOR KIRSTY DICKENSON BOB TOOMS ROY PATZER IMPLEMENTATION TEAM SANDY UENO CO-ORDINATOR PATRICK SIMPSON BOB TOOMS ROY PATZER HUNTLEY GORDON GILLIAN WATSON-DONALD BERT FORMAN - 2 - MARY ANN SCOTT CLARKE PROPOSED (FIRST BASELINE) PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES General Dwelling Objectives Goal The goal of this project is to ensure that every dwelling is constructed to permit, or to be adapted to permit, persons with varied physical abilities to access, manoeuvre between and use basic dwelling functions in a healthy, safe, secure and convenient manner. Basic Function The site and building can provide access from the public thoroughfare to the building and/or dwelling entrance and associated services and amenities. The dwelling can provide access to and use of entry, bathing, cooking, live/ sleep facilities and the circulation between them (minimum accessible area). At minimum, the basic dwelling functions should be available to any user. Ideally, all spaces and functions in a dwelling and/or building would be accessible to and usable by any user. Basic User The site/building/dwelling can accommodate: - a visitor or a person with a temporary disability, with borrowed assistive equipment; - a person who is aging with on-going adaptations; and, - a person with a disability with customizing adaptations. In no case should the design of the dwelling preclude discharge from hospital or other facilities at the appropriate time. Minimum Performance Per test of reasonableness . Specific Functional Objectives The performance objectives for each function are listed below. The objectives include expectations that are generally applicable to the space or facility and expectations related to specific sub-functions. The enhancements category makes suggestions for improvements above the baseline. - 2 - These sentences are to be read as A person in a seated or standing position is able to ..... . Bathing Facilities General manoeuvre into and out of space with forward/backward motion manoeuvre to and between functions with forward/backward motion use assistive devices contact help in event of accident or need for assistance receive help in event of emergency increase illumination levels avoid burns Specific get to and use sink in full frontal position get on to/off of and use toilet get into/out of and use bath tub get into/out of and use shower Enhancements enter/exit room with all forward motion adapt counter height adapt toilet layout adapt bathroom layout have pre-installed universal taps, faucets and other controls have additional storage for assistive equipment Cooking Facilities General manoeuvre into and out of space with forward/backward motion manoeuvre to and between functions with forward/backward motion use small electrical appliances increase illumination levels avoid burns Specific use sink in full frontal position use one work surface in full frontal position use appliances from side position use microwave from side position use counter space from side position Enhancements enter/exit room with all forward motion - 3 - use appliances from full frontal position adapt counter height have adjustable cabinet shelving have drawer system in lieu of base cabinets have pre-installed universal appliances have pre-installed adjustable/modular cabinet system have pre-installed universal taps, faucets and other controls have additional storage Living / Eating / Sleeping / Storing Area(s) General manoeuvre into and out of space with forward/backward motion manoeuvre to and between functions with forward/backward motion use assistive equipment (transfer lifts, central monitoring, Telecommunications Device for the Deaf/Teletype, curtain/window controls, etc.) customize furniture and equipment layout increase illumination levels see outside Specific use space and functions (living, sleeping, eating and storing) by one person Enhancements enter/exit room with all forward motion use space and functions by two people have an adjustable closet storage system Private Circulation and Amenity/Service Facilities General move between public thoroughfare and dwelling entry with all forward motion or in horizontal position (ie ambulance stretcher) with forward/backward motion move between dwelling entry and functional areas (minimum accessible area) with mostly forward motion add assistive technologies Specific access/egress dwelling use outdoor space use laundry facilities use garbage and recycling facilities Enhancements store mobility devices - 4 - have pre-installed universal hardware on all circulation components Common/Shared Circulation and Amenity/Service Facilities General move between public thoroughfare, building entry, dwelling entry and common amenity and service areas with all forward motion or in horizontal position (ie ambulance stretcher) with forward/backward motion, in both cases permitting an ambulatory person to pass by or assist use amenity and service areas and functions including recreation and outdoor space, mail, laundry, parking and garbage disposal and recycling facilities add assistive technologies Specific access/egress site approach building entry use building entry use recreation facilities use outdoor space use mail facilities use laundry facilities use parking facilities use garbage/recycling facilities Enhancements have covered building approach have more usable building entry Building/Dwelling Infrastructure and Systems General use building systems install assistive technology increase illumination levels control lighting sequentially utilize existing technologies add/accommodate emerging technologies Specific specific features are detailed under their associated functional area Building/Dwelling Components General use windows - 5 - use doors use floors replace hardware and fittings Specific specific features are detailed under their associated functional area Enhancements have pre-installed universal hardware and fittings all locations APPENDIX D Page 1 of 11 IMPLICATIONS OF THE PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES To give an indication of the practical implications of the objectives, Appendix D notes the considerations and/or design responses visualized by the AUDP working teams in the context of current design knowledge and development practice. Bathing Facilities manoeuvre into and out of space with forward/backward motion adequate entry turning radius (varies with layout) adequate door width (3' or varies with layout) not obstructed by other components inside or outside area (layout- ie other door swings) manoeuvre between functions with forward/backward motion adequate area in front of fixtures and cabinet (3') access and use not obstructed by other dwelling components (layout - ie door swings, other fixtures, position of user) use assistive devices provision for addition of transfer lift for toilet and tub (wiring and outlet) contact help in event of accident or need for assistance emergency communication connection (telephone jack) receive help in event of emergency emergency access from outside bathroom (various) increase illumination levels various - 2 - avoid burns pressure balance and scald control devices APPENDIX D Page 2 of 11 get to and use sink in full frontal position knee space under (removable cabinet and kick) offset plumbing (6 projection max) adjustable height sink (lowered plumbing rough-ins) fittings reachable with minimum bending/leaning/ stretching (layout) get on to/off of and use toilet functional seat height (16") transfer space at front and one side (3' each) provision for securing grab bars in custom locations and configurations (various) fittings reachable with minimum bending/leaning/ stretching get into/out of and use bath tub full-length space at side (3' w x 5'-6' l) provision for securing grab bars in custom locations and configurations (various) fittings reachable with minimum bending/leaning from inside or outside tub (layout) get into/out of and use shower low, bevelled threshold (1/2" slope max) adequate area to accommodate wheelchair provision for securing grab bars in custom locations and configurations (various) fittings reachable with minimum bending/leaning/ stretching (layout) Enhancements enter/exit room with all forward motion space to permit wheelchair pivoting (5') adapt counter height adjustable height counter (various) adapt bathroom layout to accommodate preferred transfer side pivot toilet 90 degrees with adequate plumbing and transfer clearances - 3 - APPENDIX D Page 3 of 11 have pre-installed usable taps and faucets universal hardware fittings (various) flex hose faucets for sink and tub adjustable height shower head have additional storage for assistive equipment large closet or storage space Cooking Facilities manoeuvre into and out of space with forward/backward motion adequate entry turning radius (varies with layout) adequate door width (3' or varies with layout) not obstructed by other dwelling components inside or outside areae (layout- ie other door swings, probable furniture locations) manoeuvre between functions with forward/backward motion adequate area in front of and/or between fixtures and cabinets (4') access to and use of all appliances and storage not obstructed by other components (layout - ie door swings, other fixtures, position of user) use small electrical appliances rough in for some outlets and switches at front of base cabinets increase illumination levels rough-in for under-cabinet light fixtures and/or task lighting avoid burns pressure balance and scald control devices APPENDIX D Page 4 of 11 use sink in full frontal position knee space under (removable cabinet and kick) offset plumbing (x projection max) adjustable height sink (lowered plumbing rough-ins) fittings reachable with minimum bending/leaning/ stretching (layout) - 4 - counter space immediately adjacent to sink (12" wide min) use one work space in full frontal position knee space under (removable cabinet and kick) use appliances from side position counter space immediately adjacent to each appliance (12" wide min) fittings, including stove light/fan, reachable with minimum bending/leaning/stretching or risk of burns (layout) use microwave (for ease of meal preparation and/or heating provided meals) from side position provision of microwave, or space for microwave, reachable with minimum bending/leaning/stretching (layout) use counter space from side position Enhancements enter/exit room with all forward motion space to permit wheelchair pivoting (5') use appliances from full frontal position cooktop/ wall oven combination knee space under cooktop (removable cabinet and kick) adjustable height cooktop changeable door opening directions create more usable counter space adjustable height counter (various) work area with knee space under (removable cabinet and kick) alternate work surfaces (i.e., - pull-out boards) APPENDIX D Page 5 of 11 have more usable cabinets adjustable shelving pot drawers in lieu of base cabinets de/re-mountable modular cabinet system have more storage additional storage/cabinetry to compensate for cabinetry removed from adapted areas - 5 - Living / Eating / Sleeping / Storing Area(s) manoeuvre into and out of space with forward/backward motion adequate entry turning radius (varies with layout) adequate door width (3' or varies with layout) not obstructed by other dwelling components (layout - i.e., another door swing, furniture) manoeuvre between functions with forward/backward motion area for manoeuvring around and/or in front of furniture (3') area for opening doors and manoeuvring in front of storage use assistive equipment and customize furniture and equipment layout increased number of electrical and other systems (ie cable, telephone) outlets (2 x current) systems outlets grouped together (ganged) even distribution of systems outlets (layout) increase illumination levels rough-in for addition of area ceiling light fixture and/or fan rough-in for in-closet lighting see outside window heads and sills set to permit exterior view balcony railings designed to permit exterior view APPENDIX D Page 6 of 11 use space and functions (living, sleeping, eating and storing) by one person single bed with full length transfer both sides (3' wide) eating area with full width manoeuvring area one side one closet Enhancements enter/exit room with all forward motion space to permit wheelchair pivoting (5') use space and functions by two people queen bed with full length transfer both sides (3' wide) - 6 - eating area with full width manoeuvring area two sides two closets use closets adjustable shelving system Private Circulation and Amenity/Service Facilities move between public thoroughfare and dwelling entry in seated or standing position with all forward motion, or, on ambulance stretcher in horizontal position with forward/backward motion see common circulation move between dwelling entry and functional areas in seated or standing position with mostly forward motion hallways (3'6 w) doors (3' door leaf) stairways (3' w) spaces to make three-point turns and/or pivot 360 degrees adequate turning radius at changes in direction and doorways stair glides (rough-in wiring or wiring and outlet) lifts (space, rough-in wiring or wiring and outlet) powered door openers (rough-in wiring or wiring and outlet) APPENDIX D Page 7 of 11 access egress dwelling level in and level out adequate space to manoeuvre around assistive equipment (ie stair glide) entry control system reachable from standing or seated position entry control system close to door security viewing from seated or standing position use laundry facilities adequate manoeuvring area in front of machines/ laundry closet adequate door width (3' or varies with layout) not obstructed by other components inside or outside area (layout- ie other door swings) Enhancements store mobility devices - 7 - large storage closet use laundry facilities universal hardware and controls on all components Common/Shared* Circulation and Amenity/Service Area move between public thoroughfare, building entry, dwelling entry and common amenity and service areas with all forward motion, or, on ambulance stretcher in horizontal position with forward/backward motion, in both cases permitting an ambulatory person to pass by or assist horizontal circulation (per current accessibility standards for stated objective above) vertical circulation (per current accessibility standards for stated objective above) minimized travel distances minimized travel interruptions (ie gates and doors) spaces to pivot 360 degrees visual and textural cueing (per current standards) universal hardware and controls on all components APPENDIX D Page 8 of 11 add assistive technologies stair glides (rough-in wiring or wiring and outlet) lifts (rough-in wiring or wiring and outlet) powered door openers (rough-in wiring or wiring and outlet) doorbells at unit entries (rough-in wiring) access/egress site area for vehicular pick-up and drop-off view between drop-off area, site entry and building entry approach building entry hard surfaces railings visual and textural cuing lighting use building entry covered area (5' x 5') level in and level out (5' x 5' each) entry control system close to door and reachable view from inside to outside and vice versa for security use recreation facilities - 8 - use mail facilities counter with knee space under several large-format mailboxes use laundry facilities manoeuvring room in front of machines not obstructed by other components inside or outside area (layout- ie other door swings) one washer and dryer with tubs and controls reachable from a seated or standing position without significant leaning, bending or stretching use parking facilities increased proportion of large format parking spaces level access from large format parking spaces to circulation areas APPENDIX D Page 9 of 11 use garbage/recycling facilities some receptacles reachable Enhancements approach building entry covered route use building entry provide bench provide parcel shelf outside door (Note: * includes any building/development of any size with any type of shared circulation and common areas.) Building/Dwelling Infrastructure use building systems electrical panel reachable from a seated or standing position without significant bending, leaning or stretching electrical, cable, telephone and all other outlets, switches, controls and alarms reachable from a seated or standing position without significant bending, leaning or stretching centralized system panels to permit interactivity install assistive technology - 9 - add automatic door openers (rough-in wiring or wiring and outlet at doors) add automatic window openers and/or curtain controls (rough-in wiring or wiring and outlet at windows) add security system (various) add back-up power system (rough-in wiring) add alternate safety/security alert devices (rough-in wiring) connect alternate alert devices to building safety/security systems APPENDIX D Page 10 of 11 increase illumination levels add ceiling and/or wall mounted light fixtures in key functional areas (rough-in wiring) control lighting three-way connections along circulation routes and in conjunction with bed locations other, more specific building/dwelling infrastructure and component features are detailed under the functional area and performance objective with which they are associated, including Enhancements fully utilize existing and emerging technologies home run wiring system remote control operation of appliances, doors, etc. add/accommodate emerging technologies blank outlet box adjacent to electrical panel Building/Dwelling Components use windows opening windows and hardware reachable from sitting or standing position without significant leaning, bending or stretching hardware (opening, closing and locking) that is easy to use with limited strength and mobility use doors weight air pressure flush thresholds - interior doors low, bevelled thresholds - exterior doors *including - 10 - patios/decks/balconies hardware (opening, closing and locking) that is easy to use with limited strength and mobility APPENDIX D Page 11 of 11 use floors slip-resistant hard surfaces easily changed soft surfaces flush surfaces at changes in flooring material replace hardware and fittings easily interchangeable hardware and fittings systems Enhancements have more usable hardware and fittings universal (various) APPENDIX E Page 1 of 2 MODIFICATIONS AND ADD-ONS The CMHC publication, Focus Groups to Examine Barrier-Free and Adaptable Housing Design, lists dwelling features desirable to seniors, older adults and people with disabilities. This list was used to initiate discussions leading to the performance objectives outlined in the AUDP report. The following items from the CMHC list were categorized as add-ons and are believed to be best suited for addition to the dwelling by the occupant for various reasons including: cost; aesthetics; practicality; and, extent of need. Bathroom grab bars lever faucets mirror usable when standing or seated hand-held shower on vertical rail overhead transfer lift colour-contrasted grab bars elevated bath tub special toilet seat at end of the bath tub walk-in shower with seat swing-away grab bars stationary hair dryer soap trays in shower shelving over toilet hands-free faucets tactile markings on taps colour-contrasted fixtures - 2 - magnifying mirror with light auditory hot/cold indicators colour pictograms on faucet therapeutic bath Kitchen non-slip flooring lever faucets custom cabinet handles side opening wall oven shelf between upper and lower cabinets slide out fridge shelves pull-out board with cutouts for bowls hands-free faucets touch control cabinet doors colour pictograms on controls tactile and colour-contrasted controls garbage compactor/ disposal smooth top range timers on appliances APPENDIX E Page 2 of 2 Windows power-operated windows and curtains markings on full height windows Doors voice and other electronic activators double swing colour contrast rounded door edges Controls/Outlets rocker switches special environmental control systems colour-contrasted switch plates child-proof outlets custom switches Alarms personal emergency response system audible internal monitoring audible external monitoring Living Room functional floor coverings high baseboards protective mouldings dense carpet underlay special carpet colour-contrasted features Bedroom transfer lift built-in shelving over bed full-length mirror closet organizer shoe shelf Laundry front-loading washer and dryer pull-down drying rack - 2 - Garden/Patio drip watering system Public Circulat n parcel shelf beside entry door visual and tactile marking on handrails colour contrast exit doors infra red receptor for elevator control Private Circulat n lever handles A complete copy of the Focus Group Report may be obtained from Canada Housing and Mortgage Corporation. APPENDIX F Page 1 of 1 IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAMS - A FEW IDEAS Following are a few of the ideas generated by the Implementation Team with respect to the target groups for implementation programs and the kinds of tools that might be used. These can be mixed, matched and supplemented in many ways. Targets Tools Users Awareness General Public Web Site Seniors Open Houses People with Disabilities Mini - Campaigns Near-future Users Competitions Housing Providers Information Developers Info Centre Designers Info Clearing House Constructors Expert Advice Financiers Product Info Funders Specialists List Realtors Education Building Owners Courses Product Makers How-to Manuals Health Care Providers Incentives MSP Reduced DCL s Home Care Processing Speed Therapists FSR Bonusing Regulators Mortgage Rates Mortgage Insurance Tax Breaks MSP Rebate Recognition MLS Designation Awards Programs Corporate Campaigns Certification Buildings Products - 3 - People