P4
                                 POLICY REPORT
                           DEVELOPMENT AND PLANNING

                                           Date: October 8, 1996
                                           Dept. File No. 95032-PEM


   TO:       Vancouver City Council

   FROM:     Director of Land Use and Development

   SUBJECT:  Proposed Rezoning of 5299 Arbutus Street


   RECOMMENDATION

        A.   THAT the application by  Hugh Shirley Architect to  rezone the
             site at  5299 Arbutus Street  (Lot 10 &  11, Sub 7,  Block 19,
             D.L. 526,  Plan 4855) from RS-1S to CD-1, to permit a range of
             commercial   uses  in   an  existing,   non-conforming  retail
             building, be referred to a Public Hearing, together with:

             (i)  draft CD-1 By-law  provisions, generally as contained  in
                  Appendix A; and

             (ii) the  recommendation  of  the  Director of  Land  Use  and
                  Development  to  approve   the  application,  subject  to
                  conditions contained in Appendix B;

             FURTHER THAT the  Director of Legal Services  be instructed to
             prepare the necessary CD-1  By-law for consideration at Public
             Hearing.

        B.   THAT, subject to approval of the rezoning at a Public Hearing,
             the  Subdivision By-law be amended to delete the site from the
             maps forming part of Table 1 of Schedule A;

             FURTHER  THAT the Director of  Legal Services be instructed to
             bring forward the  amendment to the Subdivision  By-law at the
             time of enactment of the CD-1 By-law.

        C.   THAT, subject to approval of the rezoning at a Public Hearing,
             the Sign By-law  be amended to establish  sign regulations for
             this CD-1 site in accordance with Schedule B (C-1);

             FURTHER THAT the  Director of Legal Services be  instructed to
             bring forward the amendment to the Sign  By-law at the time of
             enactment of the CD-1 By-law.

   GENERAL MANAGER'S COMMENTS

        The General Manager of Community Services RECOMMENDS approval of A,
        B and C.

   COUNCIL POLICY

   City policy for  this site is reflected in the  RS-1 and RS-1S Districts
   Schedule  of the Zoning and Development By-law, and also the Subdivision
   By-law (standards for minimum parcel width and area for sub-area "D" set
   out in Table 1, Schedule A).

   PURPOSE AND SUMMARY

   This report assesses an application  to rezone the site at 5299  Arbutus
   Street  from RS-1S to CD-1 (the site is outlined on the map below).  The
   one-storey, retail  building on the  site is legally  non-conforming and
   two-thirds of  its floor area is  vacant.  (see plans in  Appendix E and
   statistics in Appendix F)  Because the vacancy has existed for more than
   three  months,  only the  uses allowed  in the  RS-1S district  would be
   permitted in the vacant space.  The rezoning application therefore seeks
   approval  for a  range of commercial  and other  uses.   The floor space
   ratio,  0.36,  would  remain  unchanged  as  no  building additions  are
   proposed.

   Many residents in the  surrounding area do not support  the application.
   They  have  many  concerns about  the  operations  of  the retail  store
   (7-Eleven)  which has  occupied the  balance of  the building  since its
   construction in 1982, and they fear  the potential impacts of new  uses.
   Some  residents would  prefer  that  the  two  lots  be  redeveloped  in
   conformity  with existing RS-1S zoning, as was Council s intent when the
   site was rezoned from C-2 in 1981.

   Planning staff support the application, given that the existing building
   is relatively new and  is not out of scale with surrounding development,
   and because permanently vacant premises  are not appropriate.   However,
   given  the   valid  concerns   of  neighbourhood  residents   about  the
   compatibility  of   commercial  uses  on  this   site  with  surrounding
   residential  development,  staff  recommend  conditions  of approval  to
   ensure  that both existing and potential future uses are compatible with
   the adjoining residential district.

   DISCUSSION

   Previous History   In 1979, a trend of gasoline service station closures
   and site redevelopment raised concerns that new commercial redevelopment
   on vacated  sites could result  in buildings and  uses that did  not fit
   their  residential  context.   In  a  report  dated  September 2,  1980,
   Planning staff recommended that  several vacant, former gasoline service
   station  sites, including this one, be rezoned to RS-1 or other adjacent
   residential zoning.

   At  Public Hearing in January 1981, Planning staff recommended that this
   site  be withdrawn  from  the Director's  rezoning application  because,
   although  the site was still  vacant, a development  permit had recently
   been  issued  under  C-2  zoning  regulations.    Delegations  from  the
   neighbourhood  supported   the  rezoning,  and  were   opposed  to  some
   commercial  uses  that could  be permitted  under  C-2 zoning.   Council
   approved rezoning of the site from C-2 to RS-1.  The developer proceeded
   to complete the permitted development, knowing that it would not conform
   to the permitted uses and regulations of the RS-1 district.  (Additional
   information about this development and  the surrounding area is provided
   in Appendix C.)

   (The site was subsequently rezoned from RS-1 to RS-1S in 1992 as part of
   a four-block area immediately north of the Kerrisdale apartment district
   where  a majority of property owners supported zoning designed to permit
   secondary suites.)
   Applicant's Rationale   One  of the  two original  retail stores  on the
   site,  Color Your World,  vacated its  premises in  October, 1994.   The
   developer was  subsequently unable  to find  another retail  tenant, the
   only use permitted in this legally non-conforming building.  After three
   months had elapsed  since the premises were vacated, and since the Board
   of Variance  was not  asked to  extend this a  further three  months, no
   retail  use  of  the  premises  was  permitted  and  it  became  legally
   impossible to rent them as such.

   A rezoning  application  has therefore  been  made which  requests  that
   "Retail Store" plus  other uses  be allowed in  this existing  building.
   The applicant  identified 45  cultural and recreational,  institutional,
   office,  retail and service  uses in the C-2  District Schedule which he
   considered appropriate for this site.

   Neighbourhood Concerns:   Many  residents near  the site are  opposed to
   the  rezoning application.   They  have expressed  a number  of concerns
   about the existing  7-Eleven store, some dating  back to its opening  in
   1982:

   -    congregation and  loitering of  high school students,  resulting in
        rowdyism, mischievousness, excessive noise and trespassing;
   -    littering on site and surrounding streets;
   -    a portable sign encroaching upon the Arbutus Street sidewalk;
   -    considerably deteriorated landscape;
   -    trucks  using the city boulevard on West 37th Avenue for deliveries
        rather than the loading spaces at the rear;
   -    very dirty pedestrian walkways and paved parking area;
   -    signs and lighting too large and too bright;
   -    poorly-maintained   and   overflowing   garbage   containers,   and
        accumulating rubbish in the unused loading area; and
   -    considerable graffiti on building, particularly at the rear.

   Based  on  this experience,  the  neighbours  have related  fears  about
   potential new occupants of the vacant space.  Many would prefer that the
   site be redeveloped  for housing  under RS-1S regulations.   Some  would
   support  the rezoning  if the  7-Eleven store was  removed and  no other
   convenience  store allowed.    Following a  public information  meeting,
   several  neighbours  volunteered   to  identify  acceptable  uses,   and
   conditions of use, for the site.  (Additional discussion in Appendix D.)

   Staff Analysis: This rezoning application poses a difficult dilemma.  On
   the  one hand,  Permits  and Licenses  staff  and the  Vancouver  Police
   Department have  confirmed the validity of  most neighbourhood concerns.
   (The property  owner was subsequently  advised of several  violations of
   various City by-laws and most  of these have now been resolved.   Police
   Dept. staff comments are in Appendix D.) 
   On  the other  hand, the  existing building is  relatively new,  and its
   scale does  not  overwhelm the  surrounding neighbourhood  but fits  its
   context better than would  a four-storey building which might  have been
   developed  under former  C-2  zoning.    Considering  its  proximity  to
   residential development  and a healthy  commercial strip, and  given its
   location  on a  major arterial  street, it  also seems  unreasonable and
   inappropriate that retail space should remain vacant for the life of the
   building.

   Planning staff have considered the suggestions made by the neighbourhood
   group and the  recommendations of  the Police Department  staff.   Staff
   believe that implementation of many of these recommendations will ensure
   that the existing  retail store  and potential new  uses are  compatible
   with the surrounding residential neighbourhood.  Planning staff are thus
   prepared  to support a rezoning  that would provide  some flexibility in
   land uses  permitted on the  site, but with  CD-1 By-law  provisions and
   conditions  of  rezoning approval  to  address  neighbourhood and  staff
   concerns:

   -    the list of proposed uses has been pared down to exclude uses which
        could  easily be  incompatible with  adjacent residential  uses, or
        which would not have adequate parking on site;

   -    approval any development application would depend upon confirmation
        that  existing  development  complies  with all  City  by-laws  and
        conforms with the approved landscape plan;

   -    all  uses  would be  conditional and  therefore  may be  subject to
        conditions of use and may involve public input;

   -    measures  would be  required to  prevent any  objectionable impacts
        with respect  to noise, safety,  traffic, parking and  loading, and
        any  related  factors that  could  adversely  affect the  adjoining
        residential area;

   -    development permits for  non-dwelling uses may  be limited in  time
        and  subject to review before renewal, to ensure that conditions of
        use have been adequate to address impacts; and

   -    the  site's potential for RS-1 development would be retained.  (The
        draft CD-1 Bylaw provides  that the RS-1S regulations for  one- and
        two-family  dwellings would  continue  to apply,  and neither  site
        consolidation  nor dedication  to  the City  of  the building  line
        setback area are being requested.)
   Planning  staff do not agree with neighbours and Police Department staff
   that  the 7-Eleven store should be removed and other similar convenience
   stores  not  be  permitted.    Throughout  the city,  commercial  zoning
   districts  offer ample  opportunity for various  types of  retail stores
   near secondary schools, including  convenience stores.  In fact,  if the
   7-Eleven store  was removed from this site it could simply relocate to a
   site in the C-2 district south of West 37th Avenue.

   Planning  staff also disagree that  video games and  other machine games
   played for amusement should be  removed from the 7-Eleven store and  not
   be allowed on the site.  Although an   "Arcade", containing four or more
   such machines,  is a conditional  approval use  in  the  C-2   District,
   other  uses  are  permitted to  have up  to three   such machines.   Not
   allowing  them on  this  site would not prevent them on C-2  sites south
   of  West  37th  Avenue.   Staff  also  believe  that  the various  other
   conditions  of  use  and  conditions  of  rezoning  approval  which  are
   recommended   should   be  sufficient   to   ensure  the   neighbourhood
   compatibility of existing and new uses.

   CONCLUSION

   Planning  staff  support  this  application  and  recommend  that  it be
   referred  to a Public Hearing with a recommendation from the Director of
   Land Use  and Development  to approve it,  subject to draft  CD-1 by-law
   provisions  generally as shown in Appendix A, and proposed conditions of
   approval listed in Appendix B.

                                     * * *
                                                                 APPENDIX A
                                                                Page 1 of 2

                         Draft CD-1 By-law Provisions
                              5299 Arbutus Street

   USES

        One-Family  Dwelling  and  Two-Family   Dwelling,  subject  to  the
        provisions of the RS-1 and RS-1S Districts Schedule;

        Institutional Uses,  but limited  to  Child Day  Care Facility  and
        Social Service Centre;

        Office Uses;

        Retail Uses, but  limited to Furniture or Appliance  Store, Grocery
        or Drug Store, and Retail Store;

        Service Uses, but limited  to Animal Clinic, Barber Shop  or Beauty
        Salon, Laundromat or Dry  Cleaning Establishment, Photofinishing or
        Photography Studio, Print  Shop, Repair  Shop - Class  B, School  -
        Arts or Self-Improvement, and School - Vocational Trade; and

        Accessory Uses customarily ancillary to the above uses.


   CONDITIONS OF USE

        If the  building is damaged or  destroyed by fire to  the extent of
        sixty  percent  or  more of  its  value  above  its foundations  as
        determined by the City Building Inspector, it shall not be repaired
        or reconstructed and  any new use or development  of the site shall
        be limited to dwelling uses as permitted in the RS-1S District.

        Development  permits for  any non-dwelling  use may  be  limited in
        time, as determined by the  Director of Planning, who may seek  the
        advice of surrounding residents.  

        Appropriate  measures should  be taken  to the satisfaction  of the
        Director  of  Planning, who  may  seek  the advice  of  surrounding
        residents,  to prevent  any objectionable  impacts with  respect to
        noise,  safety,  traffic,  parking  and loading,  and  any  related
        factors  which could  adversely  affect  the adjoining  residential
        area.

        Any additional ventilation or related equipment on the site or roof
        should  be  modest  in  size,  visually  screened,  and  produce no
        objectionable noise or other disturbance.

                                                                 APPENDIX A
                                                                Page 2 of 2


   FLOOR SPACE RATIO

        The maximum floor space ratio will be 0.6, as per RS-1 regulations,
        except  that non-dwelling  uses will  be limited  to 542  m2 (5,834
        sq. ft.), as per C-2 regulations.

   BUILDING HEIGHT

        The height of a building will not exceed 9.2 m (30.2 feet) from the
        base surface, or 2 1/2 storeys, except that a building approved for
        a non-dwelling use will be limited in height to one storey and will
        not exceed 5.4 m (17.6 ft.) from the base surface.

   PARKING, LOADING, PASSENGER LOADING, AND BICYCLE PARKING

        Off-street parking, loading and bicycle spaces will be  provided in
        accordance with the applicable provisions of the Parking By-law.


                                  *  *  *  *

                                                                 APPENDIX B
                                                                Page 1 of 2

                        Proposed Conditions of Approval
                              5299 Arbutus Street

   1.   THAT  the existing form of  development be approved  by Council, as
        illustrated  in  plans prepared  by  Hugh  Shirley, Architect,  and
        stamped  "Planning  Department,  Received, October  2,  1980",  and
        approved on October  9, 1980  as a Minor  Amendment to  Development
        Permit DP86031 which was issued on February 25, 1980.   2.   THAT, prior to approval by Council of the form of  development, the
        applicant shall  obtain approval  of a development  application for
        the  use  of  the presently  vacant  premises  by  the Director  of
        Planning who shall have regard to the following:

        (i)   principles of  crime prevention  through environmental design
              (CPTED), including  the following  suggestions for  improving
              the  environmental  design  and  operation  of  the  existing
              retail store:

              (a)  relocate garbage away from neighbours and  increase pick
                   up frequency,
              (b)  treat blank walls for graffiti,
              (c)  extend  fence on  the west  property line  to the  front
                   property  line,  (Note:  Consideration  should  also  be
                   given to  extending this  fence and  enclosing the  rear
                   loading  and  garbage  container  area  so  that  it  be
                   secured at all times when deliveries  to loading bays or
                   trash pick up are not  in progress -- to  discourage the
                   use  of this  somewhat  hidden lane  area by  youths for
                   undesirable activities.)
              (d)  maintain  a high  standard  of maintenance  and graffiti
                   removal on the entire property,
              (e)  provide  formal  surveillance  and  signage to  minimize
                   loitering, and
              (f)  limit commercial uses to those which  serve residents in
                   the local neighbourhood without seeking to  specifically
                   attract school-age youth;

        (ii)  confirmation  that  existing  development  complies with  the
              Untidy Premises  By-law,  Standards  of  Maintenance  By-law,
              Graffiti  By-law   and  Parking  By-law,   and  a  plan   for
              maintaining   compliance   with   these  City   requirements,
              incorporating  daily litter patrol  within a one-block radius
              of the site; and
                                                                 APPENDIX B
                                                                Page 2 of 2


        (iii) confirmation   that  existing   landscaping  and  development
              complies  with  the  approved landscape  plan  (approved with
              DP86031 and amended  October 9, 1980) or a new landscape plan
              to  be  approved  by  the  Director  of  Planning,  including
              provision of a  reasonable amount of green planting and other
              surface treatments, recognizing  the heavy foot  traffic that
              affects the health of  plants (areas of compacted dirt,  dead
              plants  and  similar conditions  should  be  eliminated), and
              improved maintenance and pruning of overgrown landscaping  to
              reduce opportunities for loitering in bushes  adjacent to the
              neighbouring property.

   3.   THAT, prior to enactment of the CD-1 By-law,  and at no cost to the
        City,  Tonecraft  Corporation  shall  make   arrangements,  to  the
        satisfaction  of the  Director of  Legal Services,  in consultation
        with the Director of Land Use and Development, for the following:

        (i)   telephone booth(s)  to be  relocated away  from the  7-Eleven
              store  and abutting  residential  development and  nearer  to
              Arbutus Street and street lighting; and

        (ii)  new  telephone  or electrical  services  to  be undergrounded
              within  and  adjacent  the site  from  the  closest  existing
              suitable service point.


                                  *  *  *  *
                                                                 APPENDIX C
                                                                Page 1 of 2

                            ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

   1. SITE, SURROUNDING ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT

   The site is located on the west side of Arbutus Street at the north-west
   corner of Arbutus Street and  West 37th Avenue (see map on page 2 of the
   report).  The north and east boundaries of the Kerrisdale RM-3 apartment
   district  are nearby,  half a  block to  the south.    The site  is also
   located at the northern end  of the C-2 district which borders  the west
   side of West Boulevard.

   The small four-block  area from Arbutus Street west to  Vine Street, and
   between the lane south of  West 37th Avenue and West 36th Avenue  to the
   north,  is zoned  RS-1S.   Development on  the south  side of  West 37th
   Avenue   includes   an   older,   non-conforming   apartment   building.
   Residential areas  beyond that are generally zoned RS-1, and RS-5 on the
   east side of the rail line and East Boulevard.

   Two schools are located nearby, Point Grey Secondary School at 5350 East
   Boulevard and Quilchena Elementary School at 5300 Maple Street.  Current
   enrolments are estimated to be 1,260 and 320 respectively.

   One of fourteen greenways in the City Greenways Plan (adopted by Council
   in  October, 1995), Ridgeway, extends from about Killarney Street to the
   east along 37th  Avenue up to  Arbutus Street where  it turns north  and
   northwest to connect with Quesnel Drive and terminates at Camosun Street
   and West 18th Avenue.

   2. SITE AND EXISTING DEVELOPMENT

   When the  zoning on  the  site was  C-2, a  development application  was
   submitted in November, 1979 to construct a two-storey retail/residential
   building  on this  corner site.   This  application was revised,  and in
   February,  1980,  a  development  permit  (DP86031)  was  issued  for  a
   one-storey  retail building,  720 m2  (7,750 sq. ft.)  in size,  with 16
   parking spaces to be provided.

   In May,  1980, a development application  was made to change  the use of
   258 m2  (2,780 sq. ft.) for an auto-repair shop and to add 377 m2 (4,058
   sq. ft.) retail floor area.  This  application was refused in July, 1980
   for  the reason   the  proposed auto-repair  shop  is considered  to  be
   inappropriate  for  this  location   having  particular  regard  to  its
   proximity with the residential  neighbourhood and numerous objections of
   neighbouring property owners and residents. 

   A minor amendment to DP86031 was approved in October, 1980 to reduce the
   floor area to 596 m2 (6,412  sq. ft.) and increase the number of parking
   spaces  to 18.    Building permits  to  demolish the  existing  gasoline
   service station and to construct the new retail 

                                                                 APPENDIX C
                                                                Page 2 of 2

   building  were  issued  in  January, 1981.    The  building subsequently
   constructed has  a total net floor  area of 542  m2 (5,834 sq.  ft.). An
   occupancy   permit  was  issued  in  April,  1982.    The  building  was
   subsequently occupied  by a convenience  grocery store (7-Eleven)  and a
   paint store  (Color Your World), 202.5  m2 (2,180 sq. ft.)  and 339.5 m2
   (3,654 sq. ft.)  in size respectively (37 and 63  percent of total floor
   area).

   In 1980, Imperial  Oil Ltd.  leased the site  to Tonecraft  Corporation,
   which developed  the present building on the site.  The lease expires in
   September, 2020.   In 1987, Imperial  Oil Ltd. sold  the site and  lease
   obligation with Tonecraft to the present owners.  Tonecraft Corp. states
   that  the lease with 7-Eleven (Southland Canada Inc.) expires on October
   31,  2001, but  that  Southland  has  first  option  on  two  additional
   consecutive 5-year leases.

   In  September,  1982, the  Standing  Committee of  Council  on Community
   Services  considered a  petition  from surrounding  residents about  the
   noise and vandalism problems associated  with the 24-hour operations  of
   the 7-Eleven store.   7-Eleven volunteered  to permanently restrict  the
   hours of this store from 6:00 am to 12:00 a.m.

   3. ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPLICATIONS

   The  proposed rezoning will neither  detract from nor  contribute to the
   City's objective of reducing atmospheric pollution.

   The  proposed  rezoning  may  have  some  implications with  respect  to
   Vancouver's   Children's   Policy  and   the  Statement   of  Children's
   Entitlement.  With  respect to  the first, the  City of Vancouver  will,
   among  other  things,   ensure   that  neighbourhoods  are  planned  and
   maintained  in  a  manner  that  provides safe,  secure  and  supportive
   environments  for families and children.    With respect  to the second,
   all children are entitled,  among other things, to  freedom  from family
   and  societal  violence,  physical  and sexual  abuse  or  exploitation,
   neglect, emotional  harm and  abandonment and  protection from  these as
   needed. 

   The neighbours  have complained, and the Vancouver Police Department has
   confirmed,  that the 7-Eleven store  has a relatively  high incidence of
   disturbances,  fights,  annoying   persons,  mischief,  and   suspicious
   circumstances.  Approval of the rezoning application with  conditions to
   ameliorate the neighbourhood  compatibility of existing and new  uses on
   the  site has some likelihood  of increasing the  physical and emotional
   safety  of  children.   The removal  of  video games,  periodic graffiti
   removal and landscape maintenance, relocation  of telephone booths to  a
   more  open  and  well-lit  area,  use  of  the  rear  loading  zone  for
   deliveries, a  daily litter patrol,  and related measures  should reduce
   opportunities  for  mischief  and   bad  example  by  teenagers  towards
   children.


   COMMENTS FROM REVIEWING AGENCIES, THE PUBLIC, AND THE APPLICANT

   Engineering Services:  The Manager of  Engineering Services advises that
   he has  no objection  to the  proposed  rezoning provided  that any  new
   telephone or  electrical services are undergrounded  within and adjacent
   the site from the closest existing suitable service point.

   The  Manager of  Engineering  Services has  also advised  that Recycling
   Depot, which  is in the list  of uses proposed by  the applicant, should
   not be considered since the property abuts a residential area.  Planning
   staff agree, and  have not included this use in  the recommended list of
   uses.   Planning staff have also not included in this list any use which
   has  a  greater parking  requirement than  can  be provided  by existing
   development on the site, e.g. Fitness Centre.

   The Arbutus Street Building Line presently  affects the site, 5.2 m  (17
   feet) from the  east property line, an area within  which no development
   is permitted.   Engineering Services staff have considered  whether this
   portion of  the site should be dedicated  to the City for  a future road
   widening.    However,  as  existing development  provides  a  landscaped
   setback  in  the  building  line  area,  Engineering Services  does  not
   recommend the area be obtained as a condition of rezoning approval.

   Engineering Services  staff have also subsequently  agreed with Planning
   staff that consolidation  of the  site s two parcels  is not  necessary,
   given  the  configuration  of existing  development  on  the  site.   By
   retaining  the two parcels in their present configuration, the potential
   for  One-Family Dwelling or Two-Family  Dwelling development on the site
   is retained.

   Principles   of  Crime  Prevention  Through  Environmental  Design:  The
   Vancouver Police Department comments as follows:

         Although  the general  area  is  a  low  to  medium  crime  impact
        environment, calls  for service surrounding this  location are high
        and include noise disturbance,  fights, annoying persons, mischief,
        suspicious  circumstances.    This  appears to  coincide  with  the
        community comments.

        Traditionally,  convenience  stores located  in close  proximity to
        high  schools present a great  challenge for the  operators to keep
        the impacts on  direct neighbours  to a minimum.   Complaints  from
        neighbours show  that neighbourhood  disturbances have  presented a
        continual challenge over an extended period.  This facility appears
        to be catering to youth with three video games (but does not appear
        to sell single cigarettes). Slushy machines cater to a wide variety
        of people but are also particularly attractive to youth.

        If a choice were presented, continued operation of this convenience
        store in this location (next to  a high school) is not supported by
        the Vancouver Police Department and the CPTED planner.

        Suggestions for improving the environmental design and operation of
        the existing facility are outlined below:

        a)    relocate garbage  away from neighbours  and increase pick  up
              frequency;
        b)    treat  blank   walls  for  graffiti   (contact  873-7162  for
              information and resource);
        c)    improve maintenance and  pruning of overgrown  landscaping to
              reduce  opportunities  for loitering  in  bushes adjacent  to
              neighbour;
        d)    extend  fence to  the front  property  line at  the adjoining
              property to the west;
        e)    set a  high standard of  maintenance and graffiti removal  on
              the entire property;
        f)    relocate telephone  booths away  from  the convenience  store
              and away from  neighbours (i.e. locate them nearer to Arbutus
              Street);
        g)    provide   formal   surveillance  and   signage   for  keeping
              loitering to a minimum;
        h)    remove video machines; and
        i)    carry products that cater to commuters  and neighbours rather
              than youth. 

   Planning staff have  incorporated most of  these recommendations in  the
   proposed  conditions of  rezoning approval,  except for  the recommended
   closure  of the  7-Eleven store  or the  removal of  video games  in the
   7-Eleven store.

   Planning staff do not agree that retail convenience stores should not be
   permitted  next to high schools.  Throughout the city, commercial zoning
   districts offer  ample opportunity  for various  types of  retail stores
   near secondary schools, including  convenience stores.  In fact,  in the
   present circumstances, 7-Eleven could  simply relocate to a site  in the
   C-2 district south of West 37th Avenue.

   Planning  staff also disagree that  video games and  other machine games
   played for amusement or entertainment be removed from the 7-Eleven store
   and not  be allowed on the site.  Although an   Arcade , containing four
   or more such  machines, is a  conditional approval use in  C-2 District,
   other  uses are  permitted  to have  up  to three  such  machines.   Not
   allowing them on this  site would not prevent them on C-2 sites south of
   West 37th Avenue.

   Public Input:  On October  31, 1995, staff mailed  a notification letter
   to 137 surrounding  property owners within  approximately two blocks  of
   the  site.  The applicant  installed an application  information sign on
   the site on November 2, 1995.

   Staff received  many telephone calls  and some letters  from surrounding
   residents querying and opposing the application.  They expressed a range
   of complaints about the 7-Eleven convenience store on the site:

   1)   high school  students from  Point Grey Secondary  School congregate
        and  loiter  in  large  numbers  in  front   of  the  store,    and
        occasionally  at the rear garbage container and loading bay area --
        resulting in rowdyism, mischievousness, littering and trespassing;
   2)   there is frequent litter on the surrounding streets and 7-Eleven no
        longer  honours  a previous  agreement  to  patrol daily  within  a
        one-block radius;
   3)   a portable sign advertising a hot-dog stand in the store encroaches
        upon the Arbutus Street sidewalk;
   4)   landscaping  in the  setback  areas of  the  site is  deteriorated,
        particularly  in  the  south-west   corner  which,  with  the  city
        boulevard, is used by  delivery trucks rather than the  two loading
        spaces at the rear of the site;
   5)   the  hard surfaces,  including both  the paved  vehicular  area and
        concrete pedestrian walks, are very dirty;
   6)   the signs and lighting are  too large and bright for  a residential
        area;
   7)   the  garbage  containers  are  not  well-maintained,  with  garbage
        spilling onto the ground and into the lane and a significant amount
        of rubbish in the unused loading area; and
   8)   there are  considerable graffiti  on the building,  particularly on
        the north wall and in the loading area.

   Planning  staff referred  these  complaints to  the  Permits &  Licenses
   Department  and Engineering  Services, which  addressed those  that City
   By-laws can regulate (3, 4, 6, 7,  and 8 above).  Official City requests
   to remedy these situations were made and have been complied with.

   Planning  staff  also  advised   the  applicant  to  consult   with  the
   neighbourhood about the proposed rezoning.  The applicant  and developer
   held a public  information meeting  on January 23,  1996, with  Planning
   staff in  attendance.  About  30 residents attended  the meeting.   Most
   were much opposed  to the rezoning, based  on strong concerns  about the
   existing store  (as  summarized above).   They  expressed reluctance  to
   consider continued commercial use of the site, and a preference that the
   lease  with 7-Eleven be terminated  at the earliest  opportunity and the
   site  be  redeveloped with  housing.    Many  were angry  to  hear  that
   Tonecraft Corporation  had sought a 24-hour video outlet as a tenant for
   its vacant space.

   The applicant invited residents to review the list  of proposed uses for
   the site and to suggest any  amendments plus conditions of use to ensure
   that  an expanded  range  of uses  would  be compatible  with  adjoining
   residential use.  Several residents volunteered to undertake this review
   on  behalf of  the neighbourhood.   In a  letter dated  May 5,  1996 (on
   file), they state that the neighbourhood remains opposed to the rezoning   but, in the  event that Planning  staff support it  and recommend it  to
   Council, that several neighbourhood recommendations be considered.

   First, concerning  the existing 7-Eleven store,  the neighbourhood makes
   the following suggestions:

   1)   "If the store remains on the premises, then the CD-1 By-law  should
        include a  condition that such a  use no longer  be permitted after
        the present lease runs out."

   Staff do  not support this  suggestion, just as  they did not  support a
   Police  Department  staff  recommendation  that the  7-Eleven  store  be
   removed (see discussion on page 2 of Appendix D). 

   2)   "The existing site landscaping  should be significantly improved in
        a manner to provide a reasonable amount of green planting and other
        surface treatments, recognizing the heavy foot traffic that affects
        the  health of  plants (areas  of compacted  dirt, dead  plants and
        similar conditions should be eliminated)."

   Staff  recommend that the  applicant should confirm  compliance with the
   approved  landscape plan (part of  the plans approved  under DP86031 and
   amended  October  9,  1980), or  an  alternative  landscape  plan to  be
   approved  by the Director  of Planning,  incorporating such  measures as
   suggested above. [See Appendix B, condition 2(iii)]

   3)   "The store should  establish and maintain a  minimum daily standard
        of  maintenance  for its  site and  the surrounding  sidewalk areas
        (i.e. litter)."

   Staff recommend that the applicant should confirm compliance of existing
   development  with  Untidy  Premises  By-law,  Standards  of  Maintenance
   By-law,  Graffiti By-law and  Sign By-law, and should  submit a plan for
   maintaining future compliance, including a daily litter patrol within  a
   one-block radius of the site. [See Appendix B, condition 2(ii)]

   4)   "The west side yard and rear area of the site should  be fenced off
        with some type  of chain link system and secured  at all times when
        deliveries to loading bays or trash pick up are not in progress (to
        discourage the use of this somewhat hidden lane area by youths  for
        undesirable activities)."

   This suggestion is incorporated  in the recommended approval conditions.
   [See Appendix B, condition 2(i)(c)]

   5)   "The  illumination  in the  7-Eleven signage  and the  parking area
        lighting should be adjusted so that it is less harsh as viewed from
        the east."

   Permits & Licenses Department staff have confirmed that signage conforms
   to  Sign By-law  provisions for  a C-2  site in  effect  at the  time of
   approval.  Planning staff recommend that any future signs on the site be
   regulated  by provisions  for C-1  districts rather than  C-2 districts.
   Staff note however that the size and illumination of fascia signs is the
   same  in C-1  and C-2  districts, whereas  standards for  projecting and
   free-standing signs are more stringent in the C-1 district.

   Second,  concerning proposed new uses  on the site,  the neighbours make
   the following  recommendations should Council consider  approval of this
   application:

   1)   "Uses that  operate primarily during regular business hours (8 a.m.
        - 6 p.m.) are preferred to 24-hour operations."

   The City and  other municipalities are no longer able  to regulate store
   closing  hours.  However, if a development applicant wishes to volunteer
   restricted store  operating  hours,  a letter  of  undertaking  will  be
   accepted as a condition of development permit issuance.

   2)   "Professional  office  uses  such  as  legal,  medical  or  dental,
        insurance,  and real  estate are  preferred to  another convenience
        store, fast-food  outlet, restaurant, sex shop  or massage parlour,
        second-hand  store,  video arcade,  video or  other media  sales or
        rental shop,  a motor cycle or  motor vehicle related  store, a pop
        shop or any  store that  is specifically geared  to adolescents  or
        teenagers,  generates  a  very  high  traffic  volume,  or  creates
        excessive noise, odours, or other disturbance."

   With  four  exceptions, these  uses, and  others  which staff  agree are
   inappropriate, have  been excluded  from the list  of uses in  the draft
   CD-1  By-law provisions (see Appendix  A).  Convenience  store, video or
   other  media sales  or rental  shop, and  pop shop  or  any  other store
   geared  to teenagers   are  included within  the Zoning  and Development
   By-law definition of retail store and would be permitted, but subject to
   CD-1 By-law conditions  of use  and conditions of  rezoning approval  to
   ensure their compatibility with the surrounding residential area. 

   3)   "New or  revised signage  or architectural modifications  should be
        restrained and  inoffensive to the surrounding residential property
   users and owners, including the tenants of the    a p a r t m e n t
                                                     building to the south.
                                                     Overly bright  site or
                                                     graphic   lighting  is
                                                     n o t    w a n t e d .
                                                     Advertising structures
                                                     or        applications
                                                     outside     of     the
                                                     existing      building
                                                     (such   as   a   large
                                                     inflated   dummy)   or
                                                     added to  the exterior
                                                     building  walls  (wall
                                                     murals or reliefs) are
                                                     not acceptable."

   As  discussed earlier,  staff  recommend  that  signs  on  the  site  be
   regulated by  Sign By-law provisions for C-1 districts.  Staff also note
   that  no  building  additions  or   alterations  are  proposed  in  this
   application.   Alterations  will  be possible,  but  they will  also  be
   subject to development permit approval.

   4)   "Any additional  ventilation or  related equipment  on the site  or
        roof  should be modest in  size, visually screened,  and produce no
        objectionable noise or other disturbance."

   A condition of use to this  effect is included in the draft CD-1  By-law
   provisions (see Appendix A).

   5)   "Should the existing building suffer significant damage, or after a
        given period  of time, the CD-1  zoning would become null  and void
        and the site should revert back to existing zoning (RS-1S)." 

   CD-1 zoning could only  revert back  to RS-1S following a public hearing
   at a future date  to rezone the site,  and Council cannot bind a  future
   Council  to approve  such  a change.   However,  the  draft CD-1  By-law
   provisions recommended  by staff respond  in part to  this neighbourhood
   recommendation: (See Appendix A)

   -    non-dwelling uses  may be limited in time and may not be renewed by
        the Director of Planning if the use has been problematic;
   -    only one-family dwelling and two-family dwelling uses are permitted
        if  the existing building  is damaged or  destroyed by  fire to the
        extent of sixty percent or more of its value above its foundations;
        and
   -    there is opportunity to develop a one-family dwelling or two-family
        dwelling at any time at the owner s discretion.

   Applicant's Comments:

   The applicant  was given a  copy of this report  on October 8,  1996 and
   subsequently advised that  he has  read the report  and agrees with  its
   recommendation.

                                                                 APPENDIX F

    APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION

     APPLICATION BY          Hugh Shirley, Architect
     PLANS BY                Hugh Shirley, Architect

     PROPERTY OWNER          Wing Tang and William Tang

     DEVELOPER               Tonecraft Corporation


    SITE INFORMATION AND STATISTICS

     STREET ADDRESS          5299 Arbutus Street 
     LEGAL DESCRIPTION       Lots 10 & 11, Sub 7, Block 19, D.L. 526, Plan 4855

     SITE AREA               1 643.9 m2 (17,695.4 sq. ft.)

     WIDTH                   39.2 m (128.5 ft.)    [2 x 19.6 m (64.3 ft.)]

     DEPTH                   41.9 m (137.6 ft.)


    DEVELOPMENT STATISTICS

                             PERMITTED DEVELOPMENT      EXISTING DEVELOPMENT
                             (RS-1S District)           (approved under C-2      
                                                        regulations)
     LAND USES               One-Family Dwelling        Retail Store
                             Two-Family Dwelling

     MAXIMUM                 0.6                        0.362
     FLOOR SPACE RATIO

     TOTAL FLOOR AREA                                   596 m2 (6,412 sq. ft.)
     MAXIMUM SITE COVERAGE   40 %                       36.2 %

     MAXIMUM HEIGHT          9.2 m (30.2 ft.)           5.4 m (17.6 ft.)

     MAX. NO. OF STOREYS     2 1/2                      1

     FRONT YARD SETBACK      20 % of site depth
     from West 37th Ave.     [i.e. 8.4 m (27.5 ft.)]    4.6 m (15.2 ft.)
     SIDE YARD SETBACKS      11 % of site width (for    1.5 m (5 ft.) setback
     from east and west      lot width of 19.6 m)       from west property line,
     property lines          [i.e. 2.2 m (7.1 ft.]      5.4 m (17.6 ft.) from
                                                        east property line at
                                                        Arbutus Street

                             Note: There is a 5.2 m (17 ft.) building line from
                             Arbutus Street. 

     REAR YARD SETBACK
     from north property     45 % of site depth 
     line                    [i.e. 18.9 m (62 ft.)]     1.2 m (4 ft.)
     PARKING                 1/dwelling, but max. 5     18
                             spaces on site wider
                             than 14.5 m at rear