POLICY REPORT
                           DEVELOPMENT AND BUILDING


                                                   Date:  July 16, 1996    
                                                   Dept. File No. 94036-PEM

   TO:       Vancouver City Council

   FROM:     Director of Land Use and Development

   SUBJECT:  Rezoning of 3211-3245 Oak Street - Amendments to Draft CD-1
             By-law 

   RECOMMENDATION

        THAT prior  to enactment of the draft CD-1 By-law for 3211-3245 Oak
        Street,  approved at Public Hearing on January 19, 1995, Sections 5
        and 6 be amended as shown in Appendix B.

   GENERAL MANAGER'S COMMENTS

        The General  Manager of  Community Services RECOMMENDS  approval of
        the foregoing.

   COUNCIL POLICY

   There is no relevant Council policy pertaining to this report.

   PURPOSE AND SUMMARY

   This report identifies  two errors in  the draft CD-1  By-law which  was
   posted  at Public  Hearing for  the proposed  rezoning of  3211-3245 Oak
   Street  (Attached  as Appendix  'A').   To  correct these  errors, staff
   recommend the draft By-law be amended prior to its enactment by Council.

   DISCUSSION

   At Public Hearing on January 19, 1995, Council approved in principle the
   rezoning of 3211-3245 Oak Street from C-1 and RM-3A to CD-1, to permit a
   four-storey mixed-use commercial and residential development.  

   A Development  Application (DE 400053) was  subsequently submitted which
   proposes a reduced floor space ratio and height, as recommended by staff
   and  required  by  the  draft  CD-1 By-law  approved  by  Council.   The
   application  also  responds  to  several  design development  conditions
   pertaining  to  character,  livability   and  security.    However,  the
   development application does not meet the requirements of Sections 5 and
   6 of the draft CD-1 By-law. 
                                      -2-


   Sections 5 (Setbacks) and 6 (Horizontal Angle of Daylight) were intended
   to ensure that redesign, to decrease floor space ratio and height and to
   address  several design  development  conditions, would  not reduce  the
   proposed  south and  west setback  dimensions and  would not  reduce the
   livability  of  proposed dwellings    looking  into the  setback  areas,
   particularly the south side yard.

   Unfortunately, Sections 5 and  6 are worded in such a  way as to require
   changes  which were  not intended,  recommended, or  approved at  Public
   Hearing.    Staff erred  by  drafting Sections  5 and  6  in a  way that
   inadvertently  prevents  approval  of  some  elements  of  the  proposed
   development (e.g., bay  projections and bay windows not  conforming with
   Zoning By-law provisions) which  were acceptable to staff and  the Urban
   Design Panel  and which  were shown  in  the drawings  posted at  Public
   Hearing.

   CONCLUSION

   Given  the errors in  Sections 5  and 6  of the  draft CD-1  By-law, the
   Director of  Land  Use  and  Development recommends  these  Sections  be
   amended as  shown in Appendix B  prior to the enactment  of the amending
   By-law by City Council.

                               * * * * *
                                                          APPENDIX B


                          Proposed Amendments
                      to the Draft CD-1 By-law for
                3211-3221 Oak Street Prior to Enactment



   THAT Sections 5 and 6 of the draft CD-1 By-law for 3211-3221 Oak
   Street be amended as follows:

   1.      In Section 5 (Setbacks) by removing the text which is
   struck out and inserting the text shown in bold italics:

           "The minimum setback of a building is 2.1 m from the
       south property boundary and 7.6 m from the west property
       boundary, except that below-grade development and any
       architectural features excluded from floor space ratio
       calculation sundecks, trellises, streetwall architectural
       elements, bay projections, bay windows other than as
       provided for in section 10.7 of the Zoning and Development
       By-law, and the residential entrance, including the elevator
       and covered walkways and stairs, may be permitted in the
       setback areas."


   2.      In Section 6 by adding subsection 6.4 (same as Section
   5.2 of the C-2 District Schedule), as follows, to allow a
   relaxation for dwellings with habitable rooms facing an internal
   courtyard:

           "The Director of Planning may relax the horizontal angle
       of daylight requirement of section 6.1, having regard to the
       livability of the resulting dwelling units and providing
       that a minimum distance of 3.7 m of unobstructed view is
       maintained."