SUPPORTS ITEM NO. 1
                                                        VLLC AGENDA        
                                                        JULY 25, 1996      


                              ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT


                                                        Date:  July 9, 1996
                                                        Dept. File. 2192IC 


     TO:       Vancouver Liquor Licensing Commission

     FROM:     Deputy Chief License Inspector

     SUBJECT:  555 Seymour Street - B.C. Institute of Technology
               'A' Lounge



     CONSIDERATION

          A.   THAT the Vancouver Liquor Licensing Commission endorse the
               request by the British Columbia Institute of Technology for
               a Class 'A' Lounge at 555 Seymour Street, having considered
               community opinion determined as a result of neighbourhood
               notification.


          OR


          B.   THAT the Vancouver Liquor Licensing Commission advise the
               Liquor Control & Licensing Branch it does not endorse the
               request by the British Columbia Institute of Technology for
               an 'A' Lounge at 555 Seymour Street.


     GENERAL MANAGER'S COMMENTS

          The General Manager of Community Services submits the choice of A
          or B for CONSIDERATION.


     COUNCIL POLICY

     Council policy requires that new liquor license applications be
     subject to a referendum prior to receiving final consideration if the
     premises are located in close proximity to residential accommodation.

     PURPOSE

     The British Columbia Institute of Technology (BCIT) is requesting a
     City Council resolution endorsing its application for a 225 seat Class
     'A' Lounge in the new downtown campus at 555 Seymour Street.


     BACKGROUND

     The new BCIT facility is being built on the corner of Seymour and
     Dunsmuir Streets, and the Class 'A' Lounge will cater to clients
     attending BCIT for educational purposes as well as provide
     refreshments for the small conference centre.

     The hours of operation will be:

          Monday to Saturday  11:00 a.m. to  1:00 a.m.
          Sunday              11:00 a.m. to 12 midnight 


     The premises are located in the DD (Downtown) zoning district.  The
     surrounding area is a mixture of retail, office and restaurant uses
     (Appendix A).

     There are four Class 'A' Pubs (826 seats), eight Class 'A' Lounges
     (975 seats), three Class 'C' Cabarets (599 seats) and approximately 30
     licensed restaurants.


     COMMENTS

     The Police Department has no specific concerns regarding this
     application.

     The Environmental Health Division of the Vancouver Health Board has no
     objection, on the condition that there is no outdoor seating.

     The Planning Department advises that the approved plans, which
     permitted the construction of this building, do not indicate a
     specific area for a cafeteria and/or lounge, although these uses are
     customarily ancillary to this type of institutional use.

     Provided the lounge area is located above the ground floor and within
     the area of the building designated for school use, the Planning
     Department has no additional comments on this proposal.  It should be
     noted that an application for a Minor Amendment to Development Permit
     DE216989 would be required, clearly indicating where the proposed
     lounge would be located in the school. 



     The Housing Centre does not oppose this application because the lounge
     would be operated in conjunction with BCIT's meeting facilities, and
     would be unlikely to have any impact on neighbouring residents.

     The Social Planning Department is supportive of this application as
     long as the potential late hours of operation have no impact in an
     area with residential dwellings nearby.


     CONCLUSION

     Staff support this application, noting its primary function is to
     provide refreshments for campus related activities and some social
     amenities for the conference centre.  Approval should be contingent on
     the response to the neighbourhood notification.  A referendum is not
     recommended, even though there are several SRO's nearby, as two of the
     three closest contain licensed facilities themselves.  In addition,
     because of the nature of the operation, the facility will unlikely
     impact on neighbouring residents. 



                           *     *      *     *     *