#
                                                    CITY OF VANCOUVER

                        SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES

                                 July 23, 1996

        A Special Meeting of the Council of the City of Vancouver was held
   on Tuesday, July 23, 1996, at 2:00 p.m., in the Council Chamber, third
   floor, Vancouver City Hall, for the purpose of holding a Public Hearing
   to consider Heritage Revitalization Agreements and a proposed amendment
   to the Heritage By-law.

             PRESENT:  Mayor Owen
                       Councillors Bellamy, Chiavario, Clarke, Hemer,
                                   Ip, Kennedy, Price, Puil and           
   Sullivan

             ABSENT:   Councillor Kwan (Leave of Absence)

             CLERK TO THE COUNCIL:    Gary MacIsaac



   COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE

   MOVED by Cllr. Bellamy,
   SECONDED by Cllr. Puil,
        THAT this Council resolve itself into Committee of the Whole, Mayor
   Owen in the Chair, to consider proposed Heritage Revitalization
   Agreements and a proposed amendment to the Heritage By-law.
                                                - CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY


   1.   Heritage Revitalization Agreement and
        Heritage Designation: 3689 Selkirk Street
        (former Cenacle Convent "Rosemary")      

        An application by Western Asia Land Co. Inc./Andre Rowland,
   Architect, was considered as follows:

        The proposed Heritage Revitalization Agreement by-law and Heritage
        Designation would:

        -    secure the conservation and protection of the historic Cenacle
             Convent listed in the "A" evaluation category on the Vancouver
             Heritage Register; and

                                                          cont'd....

   Clause No. 1 (cont'd)


        -    vary the Subdivision By-law and the Zoning and Development
             By-law to permit three parcels, one for the heritage building,
             and two for the new single-family dwellings, both of which do
             not meet minimum parcel width requirements.

        The Director of Land Use and Development recommended approval of
   this application.

   Staff Opening Comments

        Mr. Robert Lemon, Heritage Planner, advised a Heritage
   Revitalization Agreement is proposed to achieve the conservation of a
   distinct landmark in First Shaughnessy, the historic house "Rosemary",
   presently the Convent of the Order of the Cenacle.

        Mr. Lemon advised this site is eligible for four infill units, but
   the application proposes to retain and restore the exterior of the
   heritage building and subdivide the site from two parcels into three. 
   This proposal requires variances which would be achieved through a
   Heritage Revitalization Agreement.

        The First Shaughnessy Advisory Design panel is in support of this
   application.

   Applicant Opening Comments

        Ms. Andre Rowland, Architect, stated the retention of the Cenacle
   Building is an important part of the project, and the intent of the
   proposed subdivision was to preserve as much ground and landscaping
   around the Cenacle as possible.  This preservation of the land around
   the Cenacle has led to a proposed width of 90 feet for the southern lot,
   rather than 100 feet which is permitted.

        In addition, placement of the lane along the edge of the southern
   lot is proposed to preserve the grandeur of the Cenacle.  This is the
   best location for the laneway because both adjacent properties have
   lanes along the edge, as well as garages and substantial hedging.

   Summary of Correspondence

        There was no correspondence received regarding this application.


                                                          cont'd....

   Clause No. 1 (cont'd)


   Speakers

        Ms. Victoria Gray, Bull Housser and Tupper, advised she was
   representing the neighbourhood property owners.  Council was  requested
   to reject the application and send it back to the Planning Department
   with instruction to address concerns about privacy and loss of trees.

        Ms. Gray submitted that this application is contrary to the First
   Shaughnessy guidelines, which call for preservation of the estate
   character.  It was contended the application will create a suburban
   atmosphere instead.  Also, the property value of the neighbouring
   property will be diminished, as the proposed lane will lead to a loss of
   privacy.  In addition the loss of trees will cause further privacy
   concerns.

        A variety of alternatives were suggested, such as creating
   underground parking, and shifting the siting of the house and driveway.

        Mr. Harold Lando, 1200 Block Matthews Street, advised his property
   shares 120 feet of common fence with the Cenacle property.  Mr. Lando
   expressed concern with the proposed lane running of the property along
   his fence, and the associated loss of privacy, pollution and noise
   resulting from this lane.

   Applicant Closing Comments

        Ms. Andre Rowland advised this application has been before the
   First Shaughnessy Advisory Design Panel on four occasions, and has
   received the support of the Panel.  The density is less than the maximum
   permitted for the site, and the application will result in less
   development which could  be achieved by creating four infill dwellings
   on the site.

        The current subdivision configuration is consistent with the
   comments of the First Shaughnessy Advisory Design Panel, which stated a
   preference that the Cenacle be the primary building on the site.

        Mr. Donald Fuller, owner of the site, advised it would likely be
   more profitable to demolish the Cenacle and develop the site in
   accordance with existing zoning.  However, the applicant has attempted
   to achieve a proposal which would preserve the heritage character and be
   financially feasible.

                                                          cont'd....

   Clause No. 1 (cont'd)


   Staff Closing Comments

        Mr. Robert Lemon responded to questions from members of Council
   concerning the public consultation which has occurred on this site.  A
   notification letter was mailed to the neighbours, from which a response
   was received from one of the neighbouring properties.  Changes were made
   to the application to reflect the comments made in the letter from the
   neighbours, but no formal meeting was held.

   MOVED by Cllr. Hemer,

        A.   THAT Council authorize the City to enter into a Heritage
             Revitalization Agreement for the site at 3689 Selkirk:  to
             vary the Subdivision By-law to permit a non-conforming parcel
             size; to secure the preservation of the heritage building, the
             Cenacle Retreat, listed in the "A" category on the Vancouver
             Heritage Register; and to commemorate it with a bronze
             heritage plaque.

        B.   THAT Council authorize the City to enter into a statutory
             right-of-way to secure prompt performance of certain
             restoration work on the exterior of the heritage building.

        C.   THAT Council approve the designation of the heritage building,
             the Cenacle Retreat at 3689 Selkirk and listed in the "A"
             category on the Vancouver Heritage Register; and amend
             Schedule A of the Heritage By-law accordingly.

        D.   THAT the Director of Legal Services bring forth the by-laws to
             authorize the Heritage Revitalization Agreement and the
             designation.

                                                - CARRIED


   MOVED by Cllr. Puil,
        THAT the Public Hearing be adjourned, and staff be directed to
   undertake additional public consultation regarding this application.
                                                - LOST

           (Councillors Chiavario, Clarke, Hemer, Ip, Kennedy, Price
                             and Sullivan opposed)

                                                          cont'd....

   Clause No. 1 (cont'd)


        The motion by Councillor Puil to adjourn the Public Hearing having
   lost, the motion by Councillor Hemer was put and CARRIED with
   Councillors Bellamy, Puil and Mayor Owen opposed.



   2.   Heritage Revitalization Agreement
        2005 West 16th Avenue            

        An application by Susan Lorraine Pouchet/Actual Homes Ltd. was
   considered as follows:

        The proposed Heritage Revitalization Agreement would:

        -    secure the conservation and protection of the heritage house
             at 2005 West 16th Avenue listed in the "B" evaluation category
             on the Vancouver Heritage Register;

        -    vary the Subdivision By-law to allow subdivision of the site
             into two parcels: one for the heritage house and the second
             for the proposed new dwelling; and 

        -    vary the Zoning and Development By-law to allow construction
             of the proposed new dwelling.

        The Director of Land Use and Development recommended approval of
   this application.

   Staff Comments

        Mr. Robert Lemon, Heritage Planner, advised this application was
   before Council two years ago, but an issue emerged regarding the costs
   of sprinklering a heritage building.  Through this Heritage
   Revitalization Agreement, the City can vary the Subdivision By-law to
   permit a fee simple site subdivision as opposed to strata titling of the
   premise.  This will eliminate the sprinklering requirement.

   Applicant Comments

        The applicant offered no comments in this application.

   Summary of Correspondence

        There was no correspondence received on this application.

                                                          cont'd....

   Clause No. 2 (cont'd)


   Speakers

        Mayor Owen called for speakers for and against the application and
   none were present.

   MOVED by Cllr. Kennedy,

        A.   THAT Council authorize the City to enter into a Heritage
             Revitalization Agreement for the site at 2005 West 16th
             Avenue: to vary the Subdivision By-law to permit a
             sub-standard sized parcel and to increase the conditional RT-8
             maximum FSR of 0.75 to 0.89 FSR for the conservation of the
             heritage building on its new parcel; to vary the Zoning and
             Development By-law for the construction of a new dwelling, as
             proposed in Development Application DE215420; to secure the
             preservation of the heritage building, listed in the "B"
             evaluation category on the Vancouver Heritage Register; and to
             commemorate it with a bronze plaque;

        B.   THAT Council authorize the City to enter into a statutory
             right-of-way to secure prompt performance of certain
             restoration work on the exterior of the heritage building;

        C.   THAT the Director of Legal Services bring forward the by-law
             to authorize the Heritage Revitalization Agreement;

        D.   THAT Council rescind the following recommendations it approved
             on February 24, 1994:

                  "THAT the Director of Planning be advised that Council
                  supports the approval of a floorspace relaxation for 2005
                  West 16th Avenue, from the conditional RT-8 maximum FSR
                  of 0.75 to 0.903 FSR, on the basis of the development
                  generally as proposed in DE 215420. 

                  THAT the Director of Legal Services be instructed to
                  draft a heritage designation by-law for the house at 2005
                  West 16th Avenue."

                                                - CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY




   RISE FROM COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE

   MOVED BY Cllr. Bellamy,
        THAT the Committee of the Whole rise and report.

                                                - CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY




   ADOPT REPORT OF COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE

   MOVED by Cllr. Bellamy,
   SECONDED by Cllr. Puil,
        THAT the report of the Committee of the Whole be adopted, and the
   Director of Legal Services be instructed to prepare and bring forward
   the necessary by-laws.

                                                - CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY


                                  *  *  *  *




       The Special Council meeting adjourned at approximately 3:05 p.m.