ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT

                                                       Date:  July 10, 1996


   TO:        Vancouver City Council

   FROM:      City Treasurer and Manager of Purchasing Services

   SUBJECT:   Award of R.F.P. No. 25-96-01: Supply of Pre-Collection
              Services



   RECOMMENDATION

        THAT Council accept the low bid from CBV Collection Services, a
        privately owned company, for the supply of Pre-Collection Services
        for a 9 month period from October 1st, 1996 at an estimated cost of
        $170,000 (based on a 60%  completion rate) plus the 7% Goods and
        Services Tax (less any municipal rebate received), subject to a
        contract satisfactory to the Director of Legal Services.  

   GENERAL MANAGER'S COMMENTS

        The General Manager of Corporate Services RECOMMENDS approval of
        the foregoing.

   COUNCIL POLICY

   On January 16, 1996, City Council approved the recommendation of the
   General Manager of Corporate Services that the City proceed to a Request
   for Proposal for a telephone follow-up process for outstanding by-law
   fines.  

   The City s By-law Fines Collection Branch currently issues approximately
   280,000 Final Notices per year.  The City will establish a weekly
   assignment with the successful contractor of approximately 5,400 files
   containing the Final Notice number, the offense date, the registered
   owner of the vehicle, and the address of the registered owner.

   DISCUSSION

   Requests for Proposals were opened by the City Clerk on May 21, 1996,
   and referred to the City Treasurer and the Manager of Purchasing
   Services for report.

   A copy of the tabulation of bids is on file in the Purchasing office.

   The 7% Goods and Services Tax (less any municipal rebate received) is in
   addition to all prices shown in this report and in the tabulation.  The
   Provincial Sales Tax does not apply.

   Funds for this project are to be provided from increased fine revenues.

   The Request for Proposal called for a Pre-Collection Service consisting
   of a personal phone contact to the registered owner of the vehicle to
   which a By-Law Violation Notice has been issued.

   The purpose of performing this service is to: 

        -  supplement the city s existing collection practises,
        -  to answer any questions the alleged offender may have concerning
           the voluntary payment amount and/or the process for appeal or
           dispute,
        -  to inform the alleged offender about payment options and on
           subsequent follow-up procedures which the City will pursue
           including issuance of a summons,
        -  to increase the level of customer service,
        -  to achieve greater collections on by-law fines.

   Thirteen proposals were received from eight firms.

   A committee consisting of a Buyer from the Purchasing Services Division,
   the Deputy City Treasurer and Collector, the Supervisor of By-Law Fines,
   and the Systems Analyst for Revenue Services evaluated the proposals
   based on the criteria set out in the original R.F.P. document.  CBV
   Collection Services, the low bid, met or exceeded all of the criteria.

   CBV Collection Services submitted two bids.  One bid was for $1.19 per
   completed phone call and an additional $.27 per uncompleted phone call. 
   The alternate bid was for $1.35 per completed phone call and no charge
   for uncompleted calls.  It was determined that if less than 65% of the
   calls are completed, the alternate bid is the most cost effective.  As
   there will be a certain amount of difficulty in establishing phone
   contact, there is an anticipated completion rate at this time of 50% to
   60%.

   1. Optional In-House Program

   When Council approved the issuing of a Request for Proposal, direction
   was also given to evaluate the alternative of performing this activity
   with City staff.  Recognizing that City staff do not have any experience
   in this activity, consultation was carried out with those companies,
   including B.C. Telephone, who are active in this industry.  Staff were
   able to make estimates of the up-front capital costs to set up a
   City-run operation, including accommodation, computers and software.The
   estimated cost is $280,000.

   Developing estimates for the number of staff required was more
   problematic, but a fairly simplified analysis suggests that it would
   require 10 FTE (plus supervision and support) to complete the projected
   5400 calls per week.  Industry representatives suggest that this staff
   would probably be required to work evenings and weekends in order to
   successfully complete calls.  Further, due to the repetitive nature of
   the work, shifts would probably be limited to five hours per day.

   Staff have not attempted to factor all these constraints into the
   analysis, but ballpark estimates of operating costs, on an annual basis,
   would total $460,000 (or $345,000 for a nine month period - to compare
   to the period for the tender).

   ANALYSIS:
      One-time costs:
        Facilities: workstation furniture (12 @ $6,000/ea)  $ 72,000
        Office set-up                                         60,000
        Computer systems hardware & software                 150,000
          (Includes predictive dialer, Dominion Directory
          software)
    
        Estimated Total                                     $282,000

      On-going costs:
        Staff: l supervisor @ PG22 plus benefits         $ 47,000/yr.
        1 support @ PG13 plus benefits                     33,000/yr.
        10 telephone staff @PG15 plus benefits            355,000/yr.
        Supplies                                            2,000/yr.
        Office space rental @ $17/sq.ft. X 1422 sq.ft.     25,000/yr.
    
        Estimated Total                                  $462,000/yr.

   In comparing the costs for a City-run operation for nine months of
   $345,000, plus amortization of capital costs of $40,000, to the bid
   price of $170,000, there is no economic basis for operating this program
   internally.  Further, this program is clearly an experiment, to assess
   the effectiveness of establishing personal contact with alleged
   offenders. 

   The program will be evaluated at the end of nine months.  Given this
   trial nature, it would be unwise to make the up-front investments and
   hire staff until there is more assurance of the continuation of the
   program.

   We are therefore, recommending the acceptance of the alternate bid from
   CBV Collection Services.


             *     *     *     *     *