A5
                                                 ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT

                                           Date: June 7, 1996
                                           Dept. File No.  JF


   TO:       Vancouver City Council

   FROM:     Director of Land Use and Development

   SUBJECT:  Re-approval of Strata Title Conversion:
             1310-1360 West 4th Avenue


   RECOMMENDATION

        THAT the application to convert the buildings at 1310-1360 West 4th
        Avenue  (Lot 2  of Parcel  A, Block  272, D.L.  526, Plan  8893) to
        strata  title  ownership  be  re-approved in  principle,  but  that
        pursuant to Section 9(1) of the Condominium Act, the Certificate of
        Approval  (Form  10) shall  not  be  issued  unless  the  following
        condition has been met within one year of this re-approval:

             Completion  of   all  work  required  by   the  City  Building
             Inspector, under the required permits, at no cost to the City,
             in    order    that   these    previously-occupied   buildings
             substantially comply with all relevant by-laws.

   GENERAL MANAGER'S COMMENTS

        The General  Manager of  Community Services RECOMMENDS  approval of
        the foregoing.

   COUNCIL POLICY

   Council Policy is reflected  in the City's Strata Title  and Cooperative
   Conversion Guidelines,  which outline  factors Council will  consider in
   reviewing  applications for converting  previously-occupied buildings to
   strata title or cooperative ownership.


   PURPOSE

   Council  re-approval is  requested for  the application  to convert  the
   previously-occupied buildings at  1310-1360 West  4th Avenue  (Lot 2  of
   Parcel A, Block 272, D.L. 526, Plan 8893) to strata title ownership.

   BACKGROUND

   The triangular site is zoned FCCDD and is developed with two, two-storey
   buildings constructed in 1985 under Development Permit No. DP202720  and
   Building  Permit No.  BP204268.   The  large  building fronting  Hemlock
   Street and  West 6th Avenue contains  six commercial units: four  on the
   lower  level, and two on the  upper level.  The  smaller building on the
   northeast side of this site contains one commercial unit.   The location
   of the site is shown in Figure No. 1, below.

                                   Figure 1


   On June 6, 1995, Council granted approval in principle to an application
   to convert these buildings to seven commercial strata lots.  Pursuant to
   Council policy, the approval in principle lapsed on June 6, 1996.

   The  approval in principle was  subject to completion  of one condition,
   which required that building, fire, plumbing and electrical upgrading be
   completed, in order  to bring the buildings  into substantial compliance
   with all  relevant City by-laws.   Due  to a change  in management,  and
   renegotiations  with various  sub-contractors, the  owners have  not yet
   been able to carry out the work required by the City Building Inspector.

   STAFF ANALYSIS

   The  intent  in  establishing  the  one-year  limit  for  completion  of
   Council-imposed  conditions was not to  necessarily expect that in every
   instance, all conditions of  approval could be completed within  a year.
   Rather,  the  intent  was  to  terminate  approvals in  principle  where
   applicants  clearly had  no plans  to proceed  toward final  approval by
   completing  the  required  work.    Staff  were  concerned  that  either
   revisions to relevant City  by-laws or the possible introduction  of new
   tenants who were  not aware of the  strata title approval in  principle,
   predominantly  of  concern  in  residential buildings,  could  make  the
   approval in principle passe.

   In the case of 1310-1360 West  4th Avenue, the owner is now  prepared to
   obtain  the necessary  permits and  complete the  required work,  to the
   satisfaction  of  the  City  Building  Inspector.    The  City  Building
   Inspector believes it is reasonable to expect that the required work can
   be  completed  within twelve  months, and  on  this basis,  supports the
   recommendation that this  re-approval be  valid for  a further  one-year
   period.

   CONCLUSION

   Based  on  the  foregoing, the  Director  of  Land  Use and  Development
   supports this  application for  re-approval in principle  and recommends
   that a further one-year limit be imposed.

                           * * *