SUPPORTS ITEM NO. 1
                                            VTC AGENDA
                                            MAY 16, 1996       

                             ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT

                                            Date: April 26, 1996
                                            Dept. File No. 588 222

    TO:       Vancouver Traffic Commission

    FROM:     General Manager of Engineering Services

    SUBJECT:  Franklin and Semlin Area - Traffic Measures


    RECOMMENDATIONS

         A.   THAT a temporary partial closure be installed to close
              Triumph Street to eastbound traffic, east of Semlin Street.

         B.   THAT temporary diagonal diverters be installed at the
              intersections of Pandora Street and Semlin Street, and
              Franklin Street and Semlin Street.

         C.   THAT funding of $8,000 be allocated from Streets Basic
              Capital Unappropriated Account number 13/32/9801/999 for
              these temporary traffic measures.

         D.   THAT staff continue to monitor the traffic impacts that
              result from the temporary measures and report back after a
              six month trial period.

    COUNCIL POLICY

    Council has a long standing policy of protecting neighbourhoods from
    through traffic and intrusion.


    PURPOSE

    To report neighbourhood support for the proposed temporary traffic
    measures, and to recommend installation of these measures.

    BACKGROUND

    In 1994, residents became concerned about late-night traffic
    circulating the 2000 block of Triumph Street and Pandora Street.  Staff
    investigated and found a unique circulation pattern, generated by
    prostitution activities in the area.  A stop-sign infill program was
    implemented for the area between Semlin and Garden, from Triumph to
    Franklin.  A special Police task force was also organized in 1994 and
    took steps to restrict the prostitution activities within the
    residential area.  The late night traffic circulation was reduced,
    especially along the 2000 block of Triumph Street.

    However, by 1995, another unique cruising pattern developed using
    Franklin Street from Clark Drive to Nanaimo Street.  Staff worked
    closely with neighbourhood representatives to address the traffic
    issues.  A signage plan was developed with local resident and Police
    input in August and installed in September.  The temporary signs were
    intended to restrict circulating traffic related to prostitution
    activities from the residential area east of Victoria Street.
    Late-night volumes were reduced after the sign installations.  Police
    also stepped up their enforcement activities in the area in October,
    which resulted in over 200 violation tickets.

    DISCUSSION

    While traffic volumes collected before and after the installations
    indicated some reduction in traffic cruising within the neighbourhood,
    there were still concerns about the limited effect of the temporary
    signs. Staff met with neighbourhood representatives and developed some
    more restrictive measures for full time application.

    These measures are effective in restricting all eastbound traffic from
    crossing Semlin to the residential area.  For example, eastbound
    traffic on Franklin Street must turn southbound on Semlin to Hastings. 
    However, circulating or cruising around the 1900 block of Franklin is
    still possible.  Residents to the east of Semlin may have to alter
    their access pattern from Semlin to Lakewood.  "Do Not Enter" signs
    will be installed at the west end of the lanes between Triumph and
    Pandora, and between Franklin and Hastings, to further restrict
    eastbound traffic using these lanes.

    An Open House was held on January 29, 1996, to seek input from local
    residents regarding these proposed temporary measures.  (A copy of the
    Open House information sheet is shown in Appendix A).  Over sixty
    people attended the Open House and the majority were in favour of the
    existing temporary signs and the proposed temporary measures.

    Staff then sent out a survey to all residents and businesses in March
    1996 to determine if the community supported the proposed temporary
    measures.  (A copy of the survey together with the survey area is shown
    in Appendix B.)  Approximately 1200 surveys were sent out; 158 surveys
    were returned, with over 75% in favour of the temporary measures.  The
    response rate is only 13%, which is below the typical 20% from other
    neighbourhood surveys.  The results of the survey are as follows:

    Diagonal Diverter at Semlin & Franklin             In Favour  118 (75%)
                                                       Opposed     32 (20%)

    Diagonal Diverter at Semlin & Pandora              In Favour  124 (79%)
                                                       Opposed     26 (16%)

    One-way westbound Triumph at Semlin                In Favour  120 (76%)
                                                       Opposed     30 (19%)
    These results indicate a very strong level of support for all measures.
    The most common comment opposing these measures was that the problem
    would just be relocated to other areas.  A summary of comments is shown
    in Appendix C.

    It is recommended that these measures be installed on a temporary basis
    for six months.  It will give residents first hand experience of the
    benefits and problems.

    After the six month trial period, the local residents will be surveyed
    to determine if there is support to make the measures permanent.

    FUNDING 

    The installation costs are estimated at $8,000.  Funding is available
    in Streets Basis Capital Unappropriated Account #13/32/9801/999.

    CONCLUSION

    The proposed traffic measures will restrict all eastbound traffic from
    crossing Semlin to the residential area. This will substantially alter
    access to the neighbourhood for local residents and a trial period is
    recommended. The six month trial will provide residents first-hand
    experience of the benefits and problems.


                 *     *     *     *     *