CITY OF VANCOUVER

                            REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING

        A Regular Meeting of the Council of the City of Vancouver was held
   on Wednesday, May 15, 1996, at 9:05 p.m., in Committee Room No. 1, Third
   Floor, City Hall, following the Standing Committee on Planning and
   Environment meeting, to consider the recommendations of the Committee. 


        PRESENT:               Mayor Owen
                               Councillors Clarke, Hemer, Ip,               
                                 Kwan, Price, Puil
                                           and Sullivan

        ABSENT:                Councillor Bellamy   (Leave of Absence)
                               Councillor Chiavario (Leave of Absence)
                               Councillor Kennedy   (Leave of Absence)

        CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE: Judy Rogers, Deputy City Manager

        CLERK TO THE COUNCIL:  Gary MacIsaac


   COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE

   MOVED by Cllr. Clarke,
   SECONDED by Cllr. Puil,
        THAT this Council resolve itself into Committee of the Whole, Mayor
   Owen in the Chair.

                                           - CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY



                               COMMITTEE REPORTS

   Report of Standing Committee
   on Planning and Environment
   May 15, 1996                

        Council considered the recommendations of the Committee, as
   contained in the following clauses of the attached report:

        Cl. 1:    Significant Development and Rezoning Applications
        Cl. 2:    Downtown South Planning Program - Progress Report
        Cl. 3:    Downtown Liquor Licensing Policy - 
                  (a)  Enforcement Issues and New Types of
                       Establishments
                  (b)  Proposal for Theatre Row, Yaletown and Other
                       Areas
   Regular Council, May 15, 1996.  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  2



                          COMMITTEE REPORTS (CONT'D)


   Report of Standing Committee
   on Planning and Environment
   May 15, 1996 (cont'd)        


   Clauses 1 and 2                    

   MOVED by Cllr. Clarke,
   SECONDED by Cllr. Puil, 
        THAT the recommendations of the Committee, as contained in Clauses
   1 and 2 of this report, be approved.

                                                - CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY


   Downtown Liquor Licensing Policy - 
   (a)  Enforcement Issues and New Types of Establishments
   (b)  Proposal for Theatre Row, Yaletown and Other Areas
   (Clause 3)                                             

        This Clause was referred for decision to the Regular Council
   meeting on June 11, 1996.



   RISE FROM COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE

   MOVED by Cllr. Clarke,
   SECONDED by Cllr. Puil,
        THAT the Committee of the Whole rise and report.

                                                - CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY


   ADOPT REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE

   MOVED by Cllr. Clarke,
   SECONDED bt Cllr. Puil,
        THAT  the report of the Committee of the Whole be adopted.

                                                - CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY


               The Council adjourned at approximately 9:10 p.m.

                             *    *    *    *    *
                               REPORT TO COUNCIL


                         STANDING COMMITTEE OF COUNCIL
                          ON PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENT 


                              MAY 9 and 15, 1996


        A meeting of the Standing Committee of Council on Planning and
   Environment was held on Thursday, May 9, 1996, at approximately 9:30
   a.m. in Committee Room No. 1, Third Floor, City Hall.


        PRESENT:               Councillor Price, Chair
                               Mayor Owen (Clause 3 only)
                               Councillor Clarke
                               Councillor Hemer
                               Councillor Ip
                               Councillor Kennedy
                               Councillor Kwan
                               Councillor Puil
                               Councillor Sullivan


        ABSENT:                Councillor Bellamy   (Leave of Absence)
                               Councillor Chiavario (Leave of Absence)


        CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE: Judy Rogers, Deputy City Manager


        CLERK:                 Gary MacIsaac


        The meeting subsequently reconvened on Wednesday, May 15, 1996, at
   7:30 p.m. in the Council Chamber, Third Floor, City Hall, with the same
   members present, with the exception of Councillor Kennedy who was on
   Leave of Absence.



        These minutes represent a consolidated version of the May 9 and May
   15, 1996 meetings.



   ADOPTION OF MINUTES

        The Minutes of the Standing Committee on Planning and Environment
   meeting of April 18, 1996, were adopted as circulated.

   RECOMMENDATION


   1.   Significant Development and Rezoning Applications File: 5304-3

        The Committee was informed that the significant development
   application relating to 1300 Marinaside Crescent had already been
   reported at an earlier meeting.

        Mr. Tom Phipps, Planner, reviewed an application by Tom Staniskis
   to rezone 3062-3188 West 41st Avenue from RT-2 to CD-1.  The applicant
   proposes to develop two 3´ storey multiple dwellings containing a total
   of 60 dwelling units, 21 of which would have grade level access, at a
   density of 1.40 FSR with underground parking for 82 vehicles.

        Mr. Phipps identified the following issues which are emerging on
   this application:

        -  traffic and short-cutting associated with UBC; 
        -  traffic and parking associated with Crofton House;
        -  density;
        -  overlook into RS-1 rear yards;
        -  length of building facades along 41st Avenue.

        The following motion by Councillor Ip was put and carried. 
   Therefore the Committee

   RECOMMENDED

        THAT the significant rezoning application for 3062-3188 West
        41st Avenue, prepared by the Planning Department, be received
        for information.


   2.   Downtown South Planning Program -                     File:8007-15 
        Progress Report                  

        In a Policy Report dated April 19, 1996 (on file), the Director of
   Central Area Planning, in consultation with the Director of Social
   Planning, Manager of Real Estate Services, Manager of Housing Centre,
   Director of Permits & Licenses, General Manager of Parks & Recreation,
   Director of Finance, City Engineer and the Chief Constable, presented
   for Council's information a progress report on the Downtown South
   Program.  The report provided an overview of progress since that time,
   and outlined the key planning issues in 1996.


   Clause No. 2 Continued

        Mr. Greg Yeomans, Planner, highlighted some of the key messages in
   the report.  Population growth is at the heart of change in Downtown
   South, and since 1991, the total amount of built housing has grown from
   2,700 to 4,300 units, somewhat ahead of original forecasts.  A further
   754 units are now under construction, and 1,537 units have been applied
   for or are approved.

        In terms of future work, staff are beginning to gear down planning
   activity and resources through 1996, but staff commitment is expected in
   the Downtown South for the foreseeable future.  The two principle work
   items for 1996 are to report on, implement and monitor recommendations
   arising from the liquor licensing review, and complete the Granville
   Street Revitalization Program.  A review of the progress towards the
   creation of the required parks in Downtown South will also be completed
   and fed into the 1997-1999 Capital Planning Process.

        Additional work items include:

        -  continue to implement the City's low income housing policy,
           through retention of existing units and development of new
           units as the opportunities arise;
        -  complete revisions to the Downtown South Guidelines;
        -  report back on adult film viewer policy;
        -  provide ongoing assistance with neighbourhood problem
           solving;
        -  review rezoning and development applications to ensure
           conformity with the Downtown South plan;
        -  continue to support development proposals which include the
           retention of heritage buildings; and 
        -  provide BIA support services for the Granville Street area.

        Members of the Committee enquired about the leaf designs which had
   been imprinted in the sidewalks in Downtown South.  Mr. Yeomans
   responded that the first installation did have some problems, but the
   City has done a better job with the most recent installation of leaves
   in the sidewalk.  Responding to questions concerning the cost of this
   treatment, Mr. Yeomans advised he will provide a breakdown of these
   costs for the Committee.

   Clause No. 2 Continued

        The following motion by Councillor Clarke was put and carried. 
   Therefore, the Committee

   RECOMMENDED

        THAT the Policy Report dated April 19, 1996, on the Down-town
        South Planning Process, be received for information.


   3.   Downtown Liquor Licensing Policy -             File:2610-3/8007-15 
        (a)  Enforcement Issues and New Types of Establishments
        (b)  Proposal for Theatre Row, Yaletown and Other Areas

        Before the Committee was a Policy Report dated April 26, 1996 (on
   file), from the Directors of Central Area Planning and Permits &
   Licenses, in consultation with the Directors of Social Planning and
   Legal Services, Manager of Housing Centre, Chief Constable, General
   Manager of Engineering Services and Vancouver Health Board.  This report
   recommended measures to reduce the impacts of liquor licensed
   establishments on residential areas of the downtown, and proposed new
   types of licenses to provided a fuller array of entertainment
   opportunities for people who live, work or visit  the central area.

        The report before the Committee contained the following
   recommendations:

        A.   THAT the Director of Permits & Licenses and the Chief
             Constable, after consultation with Provincial Liquor
             Inspectors, report back on improved enforcement
             regulations and resources, as proposed in A1 and A2 of
             the Policy report dated April 26, 1996, to ensure
             infractions of liquor regulations can be dealt with in a
             timely and efficient manner.

        B.   THAT the Vancouver Health Board, in consultation with the
             Directors of Permits & Licenses, Central Area Planning
             and Legal Services, report back with specific
             recommendations on the findings of the Noise Task Force
             with respect to the measures proposed in B1 to B5 of the
             Policy report dated April 26, 1996, to deal with noise
             impacts from licensed establishments.


   Clause No. 3 Continued

        C.   THAT the measures proposed in C1 to C3 of the Policy report
             dated April 26, 1996, be adopted to increase the City's powers
             to regulate the hours of operation and seating capacities of
             licensed establishments in or near residential areas.

        D.   THAT the measures proposed in D1 to D7 of the Policy
             report dated April 26, 1996, be adopted to deal with the
             impacts of patrons entering and leaving drinking
             establish-ments.

        E.   THAT favourable consideration be given to relaxing the
             one mile distancing requirement for endorsing several
             applications for neighbourhood pubs in Theatre Row, on
             Robson Street (Howe to Homer), or Yaletown, subject to a
             legal agreement indicating there will be no outdoor patio
             seating, amplified music or a dance floor on the
             premises; and that it not be operated in conjunction with
             an adjacent restaurant;

             AND THAT the Director of Permits & Licenses, in
             consultation with appropriate staff, monitor the impacts
             of these establishments and report back on whether
             additional Class D licenses should be endorsed under
             these conditions.

        F.   THAT Council not support, at this time, proposals to
             create a new Provincial licensing class or to amend the
             Provincial Class D regulations to accommodate more
             billiard tables.

        G.   THAT Council not support, at this time, proposals to
             amend Provincial regulations to accommodate liquor
             licenses for establishments which enable their customers
             to participate in active sports activities on their
             premises, and that this be reviewed after the City has
             secured additional enforcement powers and amended the
             Noise By-law as described in this report.


   Clause No. 3 Continued

        H.   THAT the Director of Central Area Planning, in
             consultation with the Directors of Permits & Licenses and
             of Legal Services, restaurant owners and the public,
             report back on regulating the location of restaurants
             accommodating more than about 150 to 200 people.

        I.   THAT the Directors of Central Area Planning and of
             Permits & Licenses, in consultation with the Director of
             Legal Services, restaurant owners and the public, report
             back on regulations to permit small dance halls or
             restaurants which cannot be issued a liquor license but
             which have live or recorded music and dance floors for up
             to 50 people.

        J.   THAT favourable consideration be given to endorsing one
             larger cabaret, up to a maximum of 1,000 seats in a
             non-residential area of the downtown, preferably one
             identified as appropriate for an entertainment focus,
             subject to the applicant providing research from other
             cities demonstrating the economic feasibility of such an
             establishment, an analysis of the effect it would have on
             other entertainment venues in Vancouver, and an analysis
             and strategy to deal with any social or neighbourhood
             impacts.

        K.   THAT the Directors of Central Area Planning and Permits &
             Licenses, in consultation with appropriate staff, report
             back with a specific work program and staffing
             requirements to implement approved recommendations on
             liquor licensing and associated by-law amendments in the
             downtown, emphasizing the priorities established by
             Council.

        L.   THAT Council acknowledge the work of the Downtown South
             Liquor Licensing Task Force and thank its members for the
             many hours of voluntary work they have contributed.


   Clause No. 3 Continued

        The report also included comments from the General Manager of
   Community Services in which he recommended approval of A through L, but
   included th following cautionary note: ".... the report reflects a trend
   toward increasing complexity in the City's regulatory environment, and
   an emphasis on increasingly fine and subtle distinctions among the
   subjects of regulation.  This increases the cost and difficulty of
   administration and enforcement.  More importantly, as complexity and
   subtleties increase, the basic intent and rationale for regulations
   becomes more remote and difficult for the public to understand.  This
   acts to devalue the City's regulatory "currency".  People lose respect
   for regulation which does not have patently clear purpose and meaning. 
   Ultimately, this serves to reduce our effectiveness in regulating those
   things which really matter."


        In a second Policy Report dated April 26, 1996 (on file), the
   Directors of Central Area Planning and Permits & Licenses, in
   consultation with the Directors of Social Planning and Legal Services,
   Manager of Housing Centre, Chief Constable, General Manager of
   Engineering Services, and Vancouver Health Board, recommended measures
   to reduce the impacts of cabarets on the residential areas of Downtown
   South and to enhance the Theatre Row Entertainment District.  The report
   also identified other areas in the downtown which may be appropriate for
   additional licensed establishments, as part of an entertainment focus.

        The following recommendations were before the Standing Committee:

        A.   THAT cabarets in the emerging residential areas of
             Downtown South remain non-conforming to the zoning and
             that favourable consideration be given to proposals to
             reduce their impacts on nearby housing and the resulting
             public costs of enforcement, as proposed in A1 and A2 of
             the Policy report dated April 16, 1996.

        B.   THAT the 700 to 900 Blocks of Granville Street be
             designated as the Theatre Row Entertainment District and
             that the Director of Central Area Planning, in
             consultation with the Director of Legal Services, report
             back with appropriate recommendations to amend the
             Downtown Official Development Plan.


   Clause No. 3 Continued

        C.   THAT the Directors of Central Area Planning and of
             Permits & Licenses, in consultation with the Directors of
             Legal Services and Social Planning, the Manager of the
             Housing Centre and the General Manager of Engineering
             Services, report back with procedures for a proposal call
             for up to 1,000 licensed Class A, C or D seats, initially
             limited to applications which would result in a reduction
             of existing cabaret seats in the residential areas of
             Downtown South, as described in C1 of the Policy report
             dated April 26, 1996.

        D.   THAT the measures identified in D1 and D2 of the Policy
             report dated April 26, 1996, be adopted to help to
             attract new licensed establishments to 
             Theatre Row.

        E.   THAT the measures identified in E1, E2 and E3 of the
             Policy report dated April 26, 1996, be adopted to prevent
             new housing from being built in Theatre Row, to ensure
             that nearby housing is designed to accommodate
             anticipated impacts and to inform potential owners and
             tenants about the entertainment district.

        F.   THAT the measures identified in F1 to F4of the Policy
             report dated April 26, 1996, be adopted to enhance the
             1100 to 1300 Blocks of Granville as a local commercial
             focus for the surrounding residential community, with the
             1000 Block as a transition area; to help integrate
             existing hotels into the emerging community; to encourage
             entertainment for all residents; and to secure housing
             affordable to low income residents.

        G.   THAT the measures for Yaletown identified in G1, G2 and
             G3 of the Policy report dated April 26, 1996, be adopted
             to endorse applications for neighbourhood pubs and Class
             2 restaurants (limited to 150 seats) and to reduce the
             impacts of cabarets.


   Clause No. 3 Continued

        H.   THAT the measures identified in this report for Robson
             Street (Howe to Homer) be adopted to give favourable
             consideration to applications for licensing hotel pubs or
             lounges, Class 2 restaurants and neighbourhood pubs,
             ensure any housing in or near this area be designed to
             accommodate the impacts of licensed establishments; and
             to not permit cabarets, subject to detailed analysis and
             public consultation concerning the appropriate mix of
             entertainment and housing for this area.

        I.   THAT in the Plaza of Nations, favourable consideration be
             given to applications for cabarets on a case-by-case
             basis and for licensing pubs or lounges, should the
             zoning be amended to permit hotels; and that staff report
             back on designating this area as an entertainment
             district as outlined in I1, I2 and I3 of the Policy
             report dated April 26, 1996.

        J.   THAT favourable consideration be given to proposals for
             entertainment uses in the Central Business District and
             that the entertainment functions of this area be
             reviewed, in consultation with the public as outlined in
             J1 and J2 of the Policy report dated April 26, 1996.

        K.   THAT, in Victory Square, as described in K1 of the Policy
             report dated April 26, 1996, no cabarets be permitted
             until staff report back on policies to create an
             appropriate mix of licensed liquor establishments, as
             part of the community planning process for that area.

        L.   THAT the moratorium on new licensed establishments in
             Gastown remain in place and be reviewed as described in
             L1 of the Policy report dated April 26, 1996, once
             Council indicates that adequate enforcement measures are
             in place to deal with negative impacts.


   Clause No. 3 Continued

        Mr. Nathan Edelson, Central Area Planner, and Mr. Paul Teichroeb,
   Deputy Director of Licensing, reviewed the report before Council and
   responded to questions.

        The following speakers appeared before the Committee over the
   course of the two meetings:

        Mr. Charles Wertman, on behalf of the Entertainment District,
   (brief on file) advised the Board and members are enthusiastic about the
   lifting of the Liquor License moratorium and revitalization of Granville
   Street.  The following amendments to Report 3(b) were recommended:

        C.   Option C2: (not option C1) Proposal Call with the limited
             period of time being set at two months and removing the
             suggested criteria of helping to provide for low income
             housing and social services.

        D1.  Adding:
             - relaxing the one mile distancing requirement for  
               neighbourhood pubs;
             - removing development cost levies; and
             - removing the parking requirement for small sites.

        E1.  Adding:
             c) Require at-grade retail; permit cabarets at grade, but 
                limit the width of entryways.
             d) permit the banking and sale of residual density from 
                developments on the 700 to 900 blocks Granville Street    
             to residential developments in Downtown South.


   In addition, Mr. Wertman requested that Council reconsider its 1991
   decision to down zone Granville Street to 3.5 F.S.R. from 5 F.S.R.

        Mr. Alan Herbert (brief on file), a member of the Downtown South
   Liquor License Task Force, noted while there are several points of
   progress recommended in the report, the report falls short of meeting
   established goals.  Specifically:

        -  it is long on bureaucracy and regulation;
        -  it is misguided on the business realities affecting
           existing licensees;
        -  it almost completely avoids addressing public demand; and
        -  it is devoid of any cultural or entertainment vision.


   Clause No. 3 Continued

        Mr. Herbert referenced the cautionary comments of the General
   Manager of Community Services regarding the emphasis on increased
   regulations, and advised these comments are accurate and should be
   addressed.

           Mr. Herbert drew the following conclusions from the report:

        -  the moratorium has been tinkered with but essentially, it
           has been sustained;
        -  Theatre Row, long an unofficial entertainment area, has
           been recognized for its function, but not ameliorated;
        -  if you were a businessperson last week seeking a license to
           open a new bar, your chances for success have not changed;
        -  there is scarce little to improve or spark the
           entertainment or cultural scene of Vancouver; and
        -  Vancouver remains Salt Lake City North.

        Mr. Gary Penny, owner of Denman Station and the Pony Cabaret,
   emphasized that the experience gained from smaller venues such as Denman
   Station indicates smaller cabarets may be a viable long-term solution in
   the Downtown area.  Mr. Penny cautioned that any proposals to allow
   licensed facilities on Granville Street to open at 5:00 p.m. would have
   a negative impact on clubs located immediately outside of this area.

        In terms of the Pony Cabaret, Mr. Penny indicated a preference to
   move this facility from its present location in Gastown to Granville
   Street, but a transfer of license is required to permit this to happen. 
   With the recommendations proposed in the report, he would still be
   unable to move the Pony Cabaret from its present location.

        Mr. Jack Card advised Council of a proposal to bring back the Cave
   Supper Club as a theatre/cabaret showroom.

        Ms. Linda McMullan, on behalf of The Entertainment District,
   endorsed the recommendations of Mr. Charles Wertman and the
   Entertainment District, that Council reconsider its 1991 decision to
   down-zone Granville Street to 3.5 F.S.R. from 5 F.S.R.


   Clause No. 3 Continued

        Mr. Bong Ng, on behalf of Johnny Loves Cabaret, advised Council his
   lease at 871 Beatty Street expired in 1993.  Since that time, Mr. Ng has
   been attempting to relocate his business into the Entertainment
   District, on advice of the City Planning Department, but has been unable
   to do so until the moratorium is lifted.  In the meantime, his landlord
   was allowed to apply for a neighbourhood pub license to be operated on
   the premises currently occupied by Mr. Ng, and he now stands to lose his
   license.  Mr. Ng stated he should not be penalized for following the
   directive of officials in the City Planning Department.

        Mr. Roger Gibson, on behalf of the BC Cabaret Owners Association,
   disagreed with the statements from earlier delegations which suggested
   that smaller licensed facilities may be a better option in the downtown
   area.  Mr. Gibson cautioned that economies scale need to be considered,
   and an increase in the number of establishments may result in
   competition through the provision of cheap drinks, which is something
   that should be discouraged from happening.

        Responding to a question from a member of the Committee regarding
   noise complaints from residents in the Downtown South area, Mr. Gibson
   advised that one solution to decrease the amount of street noise is to
   extend the closing hour by one-half hour, in order to permit an orderly
   dispersion of the crowd.  This would not involve serving drinks any
   later than it is permitted at present, but would allow patrons to stay
   an extra one-half hour.

        Ms. Dorothy Milne urged Council to consider the health life, safety
   and welfare of children and families in Vancouver, and suggested Council
   reduce the operating hours of liquor licensed facilities in residential
   areas.  Ms. Milne also urged Council to approve measures to eliminate
   noise from licensed facilities in residential areas.

        Mr. Peter Weber, area resident, expressed concern with the impact
   that licensed liquor facilities in Yaletown are having on residents. 
   Mr. Weber cited traffic parking and noise problems in existence which
   the City is not regulating properly.  The solutions outlined in the
   staff report are vague and will not change the attitude of the patrons,
   as the majority of them live outside the area.  Support was given for
   the recommendation to eliminate cabarets as a permitted use in Yaletown.

        Mr. Tom Mullins advised the Committee of the need for additional
   venues for country music in the Downtown.


   Clause No. 3 Continued

        Mr. Blaine Culling, owner, Roxy Cabaret, advised the
   recommendations contained in the reports represent a step in the right
   direction.  Mr. Culling emphasized the need to designate a specific area
   in the City as an entertainment zone, and a suggestion was made that the
   700 to 900 block on Granville Street may, in fact, be too small an area.

        In terms of the cabarets, Mr. Culling suggested that another
   solution may be to change the license to something which is more
   acceptable to the residential neighbourhood, rather than encouraging all
   the cabarets to move.  The Committee was requested not to allow the
   existing problem cabarets which are poorly run to move to Granville
   Street, and create problems there.

        Mr. Bill Casson, area resident, advised the report is trying hard
   to address problems in the area, but is unrealistic in what will
   actually be achieved.  He described the noise emanating from three
   nearby cabarets which plague the residents at the Pacific Point
   Development on a nightly basis.  Mr. Casson put forward the following
   points for Council's consideration:

        -  the extension of hours at closing time should not be
           supported;
        -  no more cabarets should be permitted in Downtown South;
        -  amplified music in adjacent cabarets in Downtown South
           should not be permitted;
        -  street parking in front of the cabarets and valet parking
           should not be permitted; and
        -  nuisances and disturbing the peace should be made
           punishable offenses.

        Ms. Laura Stannard, Task Force member, spoke in favour of the
   recommendations in the report and suggested they represent the diversity
   of interests and views which were represented on the Task Force.  Given
   the wide variety of interests among the Task Force, it was not
   surprising that everyone is not completely satisfied with the
   recommendations.

        Mr. Brian Edward, area resident, echoed the concerns of the
   previous speaker from Pacific Point and emphasized the need for a buffer
   area.  Mr. Edward also advised there may be acoustical solutions that
   could be used to insulate the nightclubs and prevent the noise from
   emanating into the residential neighbourhood.


   Clause No. 3 Continued

        Ms. Patricia Brantingham, SFU professor, advised her field of
   expertise is in crime prevention through Urban Planning.  Surveys have
   shown that it is repetitive noises which bother people and an
   entertainment district is required, as there is a strong need to
   separate entertainment from residential areas.  Ms. Brantingham
   expressed support for the recommendations in the report as they are
   headed in the right direction and will begin to solve future problems.

        Mr. Micheal Levy,  on behalf of the Odyssey Nightclub, asked the
   Committee to consider the potential problems arising with a nightclub
   catering to gay patrons co-existing with businesses catering to non-gay
   patrons on Granville Street.  The recommendations in the report require
   existing cabarets wishing to expand or upgrade to move to Granville
   Street, but this is not a workable solution for the Odyssey Nightclub.  

        Representative, Wild Coyote Bar & Grill,  advised the transfer of
   seats from Downtown South to Granville Street will not alleviate the
   problem, as there is still residential development on both ends of the
   proposed entertainment district, and the same problems are likely to
   emerge.  A better solution would be to designate an enclosed type of
   space as an entertainment district which would ensure that adequate
   controls and security are in place.  

        After hearing from all of the delegations present, the Standing
   Committee agreed to defer a final decision on this application to the
   June 11, 1996, Regular Council meeting where it will be considered as
   Unfinished Business.  



       The meeting on May 15, 1996, adjourned at approximately 9:05 p.m.


                  *    *    *    *    *