SUPPORTS ITEM NO.  5
                                                P&E COMMITTEE AGENDA
                                                JULY 20, 1995       

                             ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT

                                                         Date: July 4, 1995


   TO:       Council Committee on Planning and Environment

   FROM:     General Manager of Engineering Services

   SUBJECT:  PNE Area Resident Parking Program


   RECOMMENDATION

   A.   THAT Council approve a revised resident parking program as detailed
        in this report  and illustrated  in appendix A,  and authorize  the
        General Manager of Engineering  Services to continue monitoring the
        program and make necessary adjustments after discussions with local
        residents.

   B.   THAT  the  estimated  cost of  $25,000  to  change  the signing  be
        approved with  costs offset by any  net decal fee revenues  and the
        balance provided from contingency reserve.

   C.   THAT  Council approve the annual operating costs, estimated to be $
        20,000, to be  recovered by a decal  fee of $16.00 for   area A and
        $8.00 for a two  year permit for those  residents only affected  by
        the annual  fair and  in areas  where the permit  program is  to be
        phased out (areas B and C).

   COUNCIL POLICY

   The City supports  the protection  of residential  areas from  overspill
   parking, and  recovers the annual  costs to distribute  resident permits
   and  to  maintain signs  by charging  a permit  fee  (now set  at $16.00
   including GST).

   On  April 19, 1994  City Council as  part of the  1994 Budget Management
   program passed a  motion that the PNE Parking Program  be eliminated and
   noted that if the community wished to continue  the service, costs could
   be recovered  through a moderate fee, as in all other areas where permit
   parking is applied.

   PURPOSE

   The purpose  of this report is  to review the PNE  area resident parking
   program and to  propose changes to reflect the  changes occurring on the
   PNE site  and the  changing  needs of  the  community. The  report  also
   recommends a decalfee forcost recovery wherepermits areissued.BACKGROUND

   The  residential  neighbourhood  adjacent  to the  PNE  has  experienced
   overspill parking and parking  pressures for many years. To  improve the
   parking  situation this  neighbourhood was  the  first to  have resident
   permit parking regulations.  The parking program was designed to respond
   to many  different types of events  that happen on the  PNE grounds. The
   regulations in this  area are  permit parking only  during posted  event
   times  (these times are posted in  special signs). Permits are issued to
   residents and  one visitor  pass is issued  to households.  There is  no
   charge for permits as there is in other areas.

   Over the  next two years there  are significant changes taking  place at
   the PNE. These include the  Canucks moving to the new arena  downtown in

   September  1995, and  the relocation of  the annual  fair at  the end of
   1996.  These  changes  mean there  will  be  far  less pressure  on  the
   surrounding  neighbourhood  with fewer  large  events.  This allows  the
   parking regulations  to be  simplified and  reduces the overall  program
   costs. In  addition it is proposed  that a permit fee  be charged, where
   permits are  required, to offset  the costs of  issuing the  permits and
   maintaining the required signs.

   PROPOSED CHANGES

   Area A.   The event  times signing would  be removed in  September 1995,
             after  this year's fair, and  be replaced by  full time permit
             parking. Permits would continue to be issued to residents with
             the visitor  pass phased  out at  the end  of  the 1996  fair.
             Permits would cost $16.00 annually. Parking would be monitored
             by Parking Enforcement, particularly during events.

   This area is  directly adjacent to the  PNE grounds on the  west side of
   Renfrew St. It has and will experience the highest parking pressures and
   will  continue to  need a  higher level  of regulation  and enforcement,
   particularly during horse racing events. 

   The  main issue  in this  area  is whether  the visitor  pass should  be
   maintained.  The  visitor pass  is issued  in  this area  to accommodate
   visitors of the residents during events. With the changes to the PNE the
   need for a visitor pass  is reduced. There are fewer events  and most of
   area A has a very high level of off  street parking. Indeed this area is
   somewhat unique  in the city as almost all  of the backyard space of the
   single family  housing has been  developed to accommodate  parking. This
   parking  could be used by visitors.The visitor pass does create problems
   for  many residents  during events  and is  abused; some  residents make
   passes  available to  friends and  others that  attend the  events. This
   means that parking on the street during events is often full and parking
   pressures are not  reduced. Because of  these problems, staff  recommend
   that the visitor pass be phased out.

   Area B.   The  permit  parking during  event times  would be  removed in
             September  1995 and  be  replaced with  resident parking  only
             signs. Street parking would  be restricted to block residents'
             vehicles only. Residents would not require permits which would
             be  phased out  as they  expire in  1996. Because  the permits
             would only be required until the new signs are installed it is
             recommended that an $8.00 permit fee be charged to help offset
             the administrative  costs. Enforcement  would be  by complaint
             only.

   This area will continue  to experience parking pressures. If  there were
    no parking  signing it would be expected that the streets would fill up
   during events such as horse racing. However the area could be controlled
   by  signing that  acts primarily  as a  deterrent to  parking. Residents
   would  not  have to  have  permits  and  enforcement would  only  be  on
   complaint.  This  could  return  the  neighbourhood  to  a  more  normal
   situation and  eliminate the inconvenience  to residents of  getting and
   using  passes. Enforcement  would  be readily  available as  enforcement
   staff would be in the adjacent area A during events.

   Area C.   Street  Parking would  be controlled  with the  existing event
             time  permit parking  signs until  the end  of the  1996 fair.
             These  signs  are  only  in effect  during  the  annual  fair.
             Residents would be able  to obtain two-year permits at  a cost
             of $8.00  for  the  two  years to  help  offset  the  cost  of
             issuance. 

             After the 1996 Fair  much of this area  will have the  signing
             removed. Any areas with localized problems would be protected,
             similar to the proposal for area B.

   Much of  area C is  further removed from  the PNE grounds  and after the
   annual  Fair would not experience  parking pressures. Area  C is only in
   effect  during the  annual fair,  however,  the signing  does  act as  a
   deterrent and  some of area  C may  experience overspill parking  if the
   existing  signing  were  removed.  Staff would  continue  to  work  with
   individual blocks to deal with problems if they occur  and would install
   Resident Parking Only, as in area B, after discussion with the  affected
   residents. 


   TIMING OF PROPOSED CHANGES

   The  changes occurring on the PNE Grounds will happen at different times
   and this  complicates the timing  of the changes  to any of  the parking
   regulations. To maintain flexibility and to provide  a smooth transition
   from  one set  of regulations  to the  next it  is recommended  that the
   changes be phased.

   FLEXIBILITY OF REGULATIONS

   The boundaries shown on the map are dynamic and will move to accommodate
   the  changing needs  of  specific areas  and  the wishes  of  individual
   blocks. Staff would  continue to work  with the community to  ensure the
   regulations meet the needs of the community.

   CITIZEN INPUT

   A survey of  the neighbourhood  was conducted, meetings  were held  with
   local community representatives, information on the proposed changes was
   mailed to  all residents, and they were invited to an open house to talk
   about these changes.

   The survey  that was conducted noted the changes taking place on the PNE
   grounds and asked if  the existing regulations should be  maintained and
   if the residents would be willing to pay a decal fee to maintain a decal
   program. In general  the closer the residence was to the parking problem
   and the greater the parking pressure the greater the desire  to keep the
   parking  regulations and to pay  for them. In  Area A a  majority of the
   residents  were willing to pay a  decal fee to maintain the regulations.
   In area B less than half the residents were willing to pay and in area C
   very few were willing to pay.

   A number of meetings were held with community representatives to discuss
   the program and to evaluate  options for the parking program. There  was
   general consensus that there would  still need to be a program  for much
   of  the area to protect the community from overspill parking from events
   that would stay at the PNE  site; in particular, horse racing and events
   that would  continue  to be  held  at the  Coliseum.  There was  also  a
   consensus that the existing program needed to be changed to better serve
   the community, and  to simplify the programs  administration. With input
   from this group  the recommended  parking program was  developed and  is
   supported.

   Information on  this proposal  was mailed  to all  the residents  in the
   affected  area and they were invited  to an open house  that was held on
   April 29, 1995. The open house was attended by 150 people from all areas
   of the  community. Everyone  generally supported the  changes with  some
   comments on area  boundaries, and the need  to maintain the  program for
   special  needs in several parts of  area  C. There were also a number of
   supportive  letters  received  from  residents   in  the  area.FINANCIAL
   IMPLICATIONS

   The PNE area parking program is the only area in the city were  there is
   no permit fee and cost recovery of the City's costs. Because of this and
   the changes coming to the PNE, City Council passed a motion on April 19,
   1994 to discontinue the PNE area parking program in the fall of 1995. 

   There  is a continuing need to keep  parking regulations in parts of the
   community  and  the  proposed program  will  do  this  and achieve  cost
   recovery  to fund  decal issuance  and sign  maintenance. The  costs are
   significantly lower than  the previous regulations.  This is because  of
   reduced  sign maintenance and fewer permits issued to residents, as much
   of the area can be controlled without permits.

   The  capital costs  to make these  changes are estimated  to be $25,000.
   $5,000 of this cost is to remove signs that are no longer required.  The
   balance is to install the new signing proposed in this report. Funds for
   this work are not included in  this years budget. It is recommended that
   this funding be  provided from any  net decal revenues with  the balance
   from contingency reserve.

   CONCLUSION

   Because of  changes occurring on the  PNE site, a number  of changes are
   proposed  to   the  permit   parking  regulations  in   the  surrounding
   neighbourhood. These changes  will simplify the  program and reduce  its
   costs. It  is also recommended that  a permit fee be  applied to recover
   the administrative costs.

   These changes have been reviewed with the community and there is general
   support for the proposed changes.





                              *   *   *   *   *