These minutes will be approved at the Regular Council meeting on March 29, 2005

A Special Meeting of the Council of the City of Vancouver was held on Tuesday, March 15, 2005, at 7:45 p.m., in the Council Chamber, Third Floor, City Hall, for the purpose of holding a Public Hearing to consider proposed amendments to the Zoning and Development By-law, Sign By-law and Heritage By-law, and to enter into Heritage Revitalization Agreements.

COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE

MOVED by Councillor Cadman
SECONDED by Councillor Bass

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

An application by Gair Williamson, Architect, was considered as follows:

The Director of Current Planning recommended approval.
Staff Comments

Zlatan Jankovic, Planner, Heritage Group, was present to respond to questions.

Summary of Correspondence

There was no correspondence received on this application.

Speakers

The Mayor called for speakers for and against the application and none were present.

Council Decision

MOVED by Councillor Green

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY AND
BY THE REQUIRED MAJORITY

2. Heritage Revitalization Agreement / Heritage Designation: 540 Beatty Street

An application by Howard Bingham Hill Architects was considered as follows:

The Director of Current Planning recommended approval.

Staff Opening Comments

Zlatan Jankovic, Planner, Heritage Group, provided a description of the application.

Summary of Correspondence

There was no correspondence received on this application.

Speakers

The Mayor called for speakers for and against the application.

Robert Keeling spoke in opposition to the application noting existing concerns in regard to the back alley in terms of idling trucks and diesel fumes will be exacerbated with these two applications (522 and 540 Beatty). He also expressed concern that the proposed additional two stories will completely block heritage windows in his building at 518 Beatty Street.

Applicant Comments

John Bingham, Howard Bingham Hill Architects, advised he was not aware of any windows being blocked by this application. He noted there are existing glass blocks in a party wall between 518 and 522 Beatty which are non-conforming.

Staff Closing Comments

Gerry McGeough, Senior Heritage Planner, clarified the speaker's issues in relation to windows were in regard to the previous application at 522 Beatty Street. He noted the windows referred to are glazed windows which face 522 Beatty and are in place without permit and are non-conforming and will thus be required to be blocked up.

Council Decision

MOVED by Councillor Cadman

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY AND
BY THE REQUIRED MAJORITY

3. Heritage Revitalization Agreement / Heritage Designation: 1498 Laurier Avenue

An application by Stephen Sinclair was considered as follows:

The Director of Current Planning recommended approval.

Also before Council was a memorandum dated March 15, 2005, from Hugh McLean, Heritage Planning Analyst, providing additional information on public consultation and subsequent changes to the proposal to address issues of privacy and shadowing whereby the location of the garage will be shifted two feet to the east to compensate for the two feet in height overage and to raise up and reduce the size of the windows on the west side to prevent viewing down into the neighbour's yard. These provisions will be incorporated into the final conditions of the Development Permit.

Staff Comments

Hugh McLean, Planning Analyst, Heritage Group, was present to respond to questions.

Summary of Correspondence

There was no correspondence received on this application.

Speakers

The Mayor called for speakers for and against the application and none were present.

Council Decision

MOVED by Councillor Sullivan

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

4. Heritage Revitalization Agreement: 36 Water Street

An application by Acton Ostry Architects was considered as follows:

The Director of Current Planning recommended approval.

Staff Opening Comments

Zlatan Jankovic, Planner, Heritage Group, provided an overview of the application.

Summary of Correspondence

There was no correspondence received on this item.

Speakers

The Mayor called for speakers for and against the application.

Anthony Norfolk (materials filed) expressed concern with regard to the proposed fourth storey addition to the Grand Hotel being flush with the existing façade, noting it totally changes its character and is not in accordance with the guidelines. He requested the addition be stepped back from the street wall in a manner similar to what is being proposed for the Terminus Hotel.

Applicant Comments

Robert Fung, developer, advised the current design being recommended to Council was mutually agreed upon between Planning staff and the applicants. He noted a compromise was necessary given the unique nature of the site, and also noted the benefits of providing new construction, which includes seismic upgrading, parking, and economic revitalization for the area.
Staff Closing Comments

Gerry McGeough, Senior Heritage Planner, responded to questions from Council. He noted the proposed application was felt to be the best compromise under the circumstances and provided information concerning the incentives program in relation to this project. Mr. McGeough further noted that issues of design differentiation of the fourth floor addition will be resolved during the design development stage.

Council Decision

MOVED by Councillor Sullivan

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY AND
BY THE REQUIRED MAJORITY

5. Text Amendment: 375 East Pender Street and 485 Dunlevy Avenue

An application by Y.M. May Lee Architect on behalf of the Mennonite Church of B.C. was considered as follows:

The Director of Current Planning recommended approval, subject to conditions.

Staff Comments

Grant Miller, Planning Analyst, Rezoning Centre, was present to respond to questions.

Summary of Correspondence

There was no correspondence received on this application since referral to Public Hearing.

Speakers

The Mayor called for speakers for and against the application and none were present.

Council Decision

MOVED by Councillor Cadman

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

6. Text Amendment: 1155 East Broadway (Vancouver Community College)

An application by Rainer Fassler, Stantec Architecture, was considered as follows:

The Director of Current Planning recommended approval, subject to conditions.

Council also had before it a memorandum dated March 2, 2005, from the Director of Current Planning, recommending a revision to the recommended condition of rezoning (b) (xii) to increase the unallocated Community Amenity Contribution in phase four from $318,000 to $414,000 and recommending adding a condition (b) (xiii) to secure start-up daycare operating subsidies provided by Vancouver Community College. These revisions had been incorporated into the recommendations before Council this evening.

Staff Comments

Tom Phipps, Planner, Major Projects Group, briefly reviewed the history leading up to this rezoning application and introduced Daniel Naundorf, Planning Analyst, Major Projects Group, who provided an overview of the application. Mr. Naundorf noted the proposal had received wide support during the public consultation process and any concerns raised during the process have been addressed in the recommended conditions of approval before Council this evening.

Paul Pinsker, Parking and Development Engineer, noted there were two items of concern to the applicants. Their first concern was the uncertainty surrounding the amount of parking spaces which may be required and the applicants were therefore hoping to have some assurance that the City would not seek to maximize the parking requirements on the site. The second concern was in relation to the recommended condition that a left turn bay be provided on Broadway, given the significant cost involved. In response to that concern staff note that another infrastructure project has provided an opportunity for doing the left turn bay, if it is required, in tandem with that project during phase 1 of the VCC proposal, at a reduced cost to the applicant. Staff therefore advised a revised Condition (b) (ii) c) was put forward for Council's consideration whereby the applicant would pay $187,500 of the cost of the left turn bay, subject to Council approval of the left turn bay, as part of phase 1 development.

A Council member noted the Park Board had passed a motion the previous night requesting an additional $414,000 be allocated towards parks in the area. Mr. Phipps responded to questions concerning staff's recommended allocation of $350,000 for park development and the amount of park space currently in the area.

Mr. Pinsker responded to questions concerning parking requirements, the proposed transportation demand management plan, the current transportation modal splits for the campus, and the proposed left turn bay. Mr. Pinsker noted the left turn bay is not being committed to at this time, only the amount that the College would pay if it is required.

Paul Bunt of Bunt and Associates, transportation and traffic consultants for the College, advised there had been a comprehensive transportation study conducted in relation to this application, including community consultation. He provided information regarding the current transportation modal split, and also provided clarification on the nature of the College's concerns in regard to parking requirements and the proposed left turn bay.

Summary of Correspondence

There has been no correspondence received on this application since referral to Public Hearing.

Speakers

The Mayor called for speakers for and against the application.

Edward Dinter expressed concern regarding the lack of traffic calming measures proposed with this application for the area south of Broadway adjacent to this location.
Applicant Comments

Larry Waddell, Facilities Manager, Vancouver Community College, advised the College was in desperate need of resolving its critical space deficiencies. He further noted there has been no expansion to the campus since 1983. Mr. Waddell advised that Provincial funds were in place for the first phase of the project, pending Council's decision on the rezoning application, and he urged Council to give its approval to this proposal.

Council Decision

Council members requested staff report back at the appropriate time on options for reduced parking, the projected modal splits, and the need for a left turn bay, including information on the subsequent loss of sidewalk space and whether there are plans for bus priority lanes in the future.

MOVED by Councillor Sullivan

[NOTE: The following conditions have been amended slightly in (b) (xii) and (b) (xiii) and (b) (ii) c) from the version in the referral report]

DESIGN DEVELOPMENT

Note to applicant: A high degree of transparency and accessibility should be provided along these frontages.

Note to applicant: In addition to preserving this principle grade level entry to the campus at the completion of the master plan, provision of interim pedestrian circulation routes (such as from VCC Skytrain Station, from Great Northern Way at Glen Street, and through parking areas) should be provided that will support the importance of this entry.

Note to applicant: Parking access along the south frontage of 7th Avenue should be relocated within Sub area A of the development.

Note to applicant: Further reinforcement of this entrance should include the introduction of animating uses.

LANDSCAPE

Note to applicant: provision of additional street trees adjacent to the development site should be done in consultation with the General Manager of Engineering Services and Park Board. Notation of New street trees on the Landscape Plan should read: "Final species, quantity and spacing to the approval of the General Manager of Engineering Services and Park Board." Contact Eileen Curran (871-6131) of Engineering Streets Division regarding street tree spacing and quantity. Contact Bill Stephen (257-8587) of Park Board regarding tree species.

ENGINEERING SERVICES

DAYCARE

SOILS

PUBLIC ART

PARKS

COMMUNITY
AMENITY CONTRIBUTION

Where the Director of Legal Service deems appropriate, the preceding agreements are to be drawn, not only as personal covenants of the property owner, but also as Covenants pursuant to Section 219 of the Land Title Act.

Such agreements are to be registered in the appropriate Land Title Office, with priority over such other liens, charges, and encumbrances effecting the subject site, as is considered advisable by the Director of Legal Services, and otherwise to the satisfaction of the Director of Legal Services prior to enactment of the by-law; provided, however, the Director of Legal Services may, in her sole discretion and on terms she considers advisable, accept tendering of the preceding agreements for registration in the appropriate Land Title Office, to the satisfaction of the Director of Legal Services, prior to enactment of the by-law.

The preceding agreements shall provide security to the City including indemnities, warranties, equitable charges, letters of credit and withholding of permits, as deemed necessary by and in a from satisfactory to the Director of Legal Services.

The timing of all required payments shall be determined by the appropriate City official having responsibility for each particular agreement, who may consult other City officials and City Council.

CARRIED
[Councillor Bass opposed to Condition (b) (ii) c)]

RISE FROM COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE

MOVED by Councillor Cadman

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

ADOPT REPORT OF COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE

MOVED by Councillor Cadman
SECONDED by Councillor Woodsworth

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

The Special Council adjourned at 9:25 p.m.

* * * * *


ph20050315.htm