Vancouver City Council |
CITY OF VANCOUVER
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
Date:
January 21, 2005
Author:
Pattie Hayes
Phone No.:
604-873-7787
RTS No.:
04858
CC File No.:
2701
Meeting Date:
February 17, 2005
TO:
Standing Committee on City Services and Budgets
FROM:
City Building Inspector
SUBJECT:
620 E 61st Avenue
Warning to Prospective PurchasersRECOMMENDATION
A. THAT the City Clerk be directed to file a 336D Notice against the title to the property at 620 E 61st Avenue (Lot A, Blocks 8-11, District Lot 326A, Plan 15970) in order to warn prospective purchasers that there are contraventions of the Zoning and Development and Vancouver Building By-laws related to this building.
B. THAT the Director of Legal Services is hereby authorized, in her discretion, to commence a legal action or proceeding in relation to the premises located at 620 E 61st Avenue (Lot A, Blocks 8-11, District Lot 326A, Plan 15970) and may, in her discretion, seek injunctive relief in that action or proceeding, in order to bring this building into compliance with City By-laws.
GENERAL MANAGER'S COMMENTS
The General Manager of Community Services RECOMMENDS approval of the foregoing.
COUNCIL POLICY
Section 336D of the Vancouver Charter provides a mechanism whereby the City of Vancouver can warn prospective purchasers of contraventions of City By-laws relating to land or a building or structure. It provides that if the City Building Inspector observes a condition that he considers to be a contravention of a By-law relating to the construction or safety of buildings; or as a result of that condition, a building or structure is unsafe or unlikely to be usable for its expected purpose; or is of a nature that a purchaser, unaware of the contravention, would suffer a significant loss or expense if the By-law were enforced against him, he may recommend to City Council that a resolution be considered directing the City Clerk to file a notice against the title to the property in the Land Title Office.
Sections 334 and 571 of the Vancouver Charter allow the City to seek injunctive relief for any By-law contravention.
PURPOSE
The purpose of this report is to request approval to file a 336D Notice against the title to 620 E 61st Avenue to warn prospective purchasers of By-law violations and to request approval to seek injunctive relief.
BACKGROUND
The property addressed as 620 E 61st Avenue is approved as a one family dwelling and is located in an RS-1 (One Family Dwelling) District. This building was constructed in 1975.
As a result of a complaint, our inspection services reported that an approximate 16 X 8 second storey deck addition with aluminum cover over, was erected without permit or approval to the rear of the building in contravention of the Zoning and Development and Vancouver Building By-laws.
The owners were sent a letter in June of 2003 to make application for the required permits or remove the unapproved work. A Development Permit was applied for and then refused in March of 2004. The owners were then found guilty in Provincial Court and were fined. A subsequent appeal to the Board of Variance was disallowed in June of 2004.
A follow-up inspection was carried out and it was reported that the addition to the rear deck and the enclosure were still existing. A new order was again sent to the owners in April of 2004 to remove the unapproved addition to the rear. In December of 2004 the owners were again found guilty in Provincial Court and received a second fine.
DISCUSSION
A recent inspection indicated that the unapproved deck addition still exists and no permits or approvals have been obtained however the aluminum deck cover has now been removed.
CONCLUSION
Although the building is not currently listed for sale, it is recommended that a 336D Notice be filed against the title so that any prospective purchasers will be warned that there are violations of the Zoning and Development and Vancouver Building By-laws. Subject to Council approval, I will be referring this matter to the Director of Legal Services to request that she commence legal action and seek an injunction if, in her opinion, it is appropriate to do so.
* * * * *