Vancouver City Council

CITY OF VANCOUVER ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT

	Date:	November 3, 2004
	Author:	Sara McKittrick
	Phone No.:	604-871-6445
	RTS No.:	01781
	CC File No.:	5757
	Meeting Date:	November 30, 2004

TO:	Standing Committee on Transportation and Traffic
FROM:	General Manager of Engineering Services
SUBJECT:	Traffic Calming Plan for Fairview Heights

RECOMMENDATION

A. THAT Council approve the Fairview Heights "modified" traffic calming plan as described in this report.

B. THAT the total costs of the closure of 2800 block of Willow Street be borne by the Vancouver Coastal Health and Authority; further, that 75% ($82,500) of the remaining traffic calming measures, estimated at $110,000, be recovered from the Vancouver Coastal Health Authority and the remaining 25% ($27,500) be allocated from Streets Basic Capital Unappropriated Account for Local Area Traffic Improvement (SCA5A-UNAP).

C. THAT the Willow Street closure be installed on a trial basis for a period of no less than six months and traffic monitoring be undertaken to ensure there is not an unacceptable transfer of traffic.

D. THAT following the trial period, a follow-up survey be conducted with the affected residents to determine whether the Willow Street closure should be installed on a permanent basis and whether modifications to the plan are required.

E. THAT the Traffic Operations Budget for Signage be increased by $600, without offset and subject to 2006 Budget Review, for the maintenance of the new traffic measures, commencing in 2006.

COUNCIL POLICY

· In May 1997, Council approved the Vancouver Transportation Plan that emphasizes the need to mitigate the effects of traffic in local neighbourhood areas and to give priority to streets and neighbourhoods where traffic impacts are most serious.

· It is Council policy to implement diversionary traffic calming measures on a trial basis, with a follow-up survey, before making the measures permanent.

· On December 6, 2001, at a Public Hearing, Council approved a series of recommendations contained in report dated October 19, 2001 from the Director of Current Planning pertaining to a text amendment to a CD-1 text amendment - 855 West 12th Avenue (Vancouver General Hospital). Conditions in that report direct the General Manager of Engineering Services to pursue a Willow Street Closure timed with the appropriate phase of the development.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this report is to seek Council's approval to implement the Fairview Heights "modified" traffic calming plan, as described in this report.

BACKGROUND

On December 6, 2001, at a Public Hearing, Vancouver City Council approved the CD-1 text amendment to the Vancouver General Hospital (VGH) precinct. Enactment of this amendment was subject to a number of conditions including the proponent agreeing to fund traffic calming improvements to the area bounded by West 12^th Avenue to the north, West 16^th Avenue to the south, Oak Street to the west and Cambie Street to the east. Timing for these improvements was tied to certain redevelopment in the VGH precinct. Language in the agreement between the City and the Vancouver Coastal Health Authority requires that Council approve the planned traffic calming work prior to seeking funding triggered by redevelopment of the property at the SW corner of Willow Street and West 12^th Avenue.

Tied to these traffic calming measures is the closure of the 2800 block of Willow Street (Willow between 12^th and 13^th). This closure will enhance the VGH Open Space plan and allow the "wellness walk" to extend in the Willow Street alignment to West 13^th Avenue. At the time of the 2001 text amendment Council approved a condition related to design development of this walk as part of the VGH open space plan. A second condition pertaining to the Services and Open Space required the closure of Willow Street between West 12^th and 13^th Avenue subject to future Council approval. All costs related to the design and construction of this closure will be borne by VGH as outlined in the Services and Open Space Agreement between the Vancouver Coastal Health Authority and the City of Vancouver.

In 2000 City Staff held an Open House to deal with redevelopments and traffic concerns in the neighbourhood. Based on comments received at the Open House and further meetings with concerned residents, City Staff with Bunt and Associates, (VGH transportation consultants) developed two traffic calming plans. A "diversionary" traffic calming plan included the Willow Street closure plus diversionary measures on other streets to ensure traffic would not be diverted from Willow Street to adjoining streets. While dealing with the traffic travelling through the neighbourhood, this "diversionary" traffic calming plan results in more circuitous routings for residents accessing their houses and emergency access delays.

To maintain access, a "non-diversionary" traffic calming plan was also developed with such measures as traffic circles.

On March 31, 2004, Bunting Coady Architects on behalf of the Vancouver Coastal Health Authority applied for a development permit for an energy centre on a site on the south side of 12^th Avenue abutting (west of) Willow Street. The energy centre is a change in use and a change in phasing from the plans for VGH development considered by Council in 2001. This application triggers the need for an approved traffic calming plan for the neighbourhood.

In June of 2004, an information package describing the two traffic calming plans was sent out to residents within Fairview Heights (shown in Appendix A). Included in the package was a survey for residents to complete and an invitation to an Open House on June 22^nd, 2004.

NEIGHBOURHOOD TRAFFIC PATTERNS

The neighbourhood of Fairview Heights is defined as the area south of West 12^th Avenue, north of West 16^th Avenue, east of Oak Street, and west of Cambie Street. There are several recognised short-cutting routes within the neighbourhood. These were identified through traffic counts, license plate surveys and feedback from local residents.

Heather Street
Heather Street is the only north/south street that extends the whole way through the neighbourhood north of West 12^th Avenue and south of West 16^th Avenue. For this reason traffic wishing to travel north or southbound through the neighbourhood will choose this route. Traffic counts from 2000 show average daily traffic (ADT) volumes of 3800 - 4300 vehicles per day on the 4 blocks of Heather Street within Fairview Heights. These volumes are high. Ecole St. Sacrement Elementary School is located on the 3000 block of Heather Street. Speeding occurs adjacent to the school (85% of vehicles travel 45 km/h in this 30 km/hr speed zone).

Laurel Street
Laurel Street runs one block east and parallel to Oak Street. Within the neighbourhood it carries the second highest volume with an ADT of 3900 vehicles per day. Vehicles trying to avoid Oak Street shift one block east over to Laurel Street. The morning and afternoon peak volumes show northbound trends in the a.m. and southbound trends in the p.m.

Ash Street
The 2800 block of Ash Street (south of West 12^th Avenue) is used in several short-cutting routes. In 2000, the ADT volume in this block was 3400 vehicles per day. Some of the short-cutting routes include:

· vehicles avoiding a left turn from northbound Cambie Street to westbound West 12^th Avenue,
· vehicles avoiding a left turn from westbound West 12^th Avenue to southbound Cambie Street, and
· using Ash Street to gain access to West Broadway Avenue.

13th Avenue
Similarly to Heather Street, West 13^th Avenue is the only east/west street that extends the whole way through the neighbourhood in a straight alignment. Vehicles avoiding West 12^th Avenue congestion shift to West 13^th Avenue. The ADT in 2000 along West 13^th Avenue was approximately 900 vehicles per day. Although this volume is reasonable, residents have complained about more traffic on this street, that has two travel lanes (appears wide), compared to West 14^th Avenue which has one travel lane between parking on both sides of the street (appears more narrow).

TRAFFIC PLAN ELEMENTS

A "diversionary" traffic calming plan and a "non-diversionary" traffic calming plan were created to deal with the traffic concerns in the neighbourhood. A description of the two plans is located in the following text. Note that all traffic calming devices would be designed to be permeable by bicyclists and emergency vehicles.

Diversionary Traffic Calming Plan Components

The components that are a part of the "diversionary" traffic calming plan are explained below, while the whole plan is shown in Figure 1.

· Laurel Street at West 16^th Avenue Right-In/Right-Out Diverter - To discourage the large volume of non-local vehicles cutting through Laurel Street a right-in/right-out diverter is proposed at West 16^th Avenue.

· Willow Street Closure - The closure of the 2800 block of Willow Street will enhance the VGH Open Space plan and allow the "wellness walk" to extend in the Willow Street alignment to West 13^th Avenue. Of all the north/south streets in Fairview Heights, Willow Street carries the lightest volume.

· Heather Street at West 12^th Avenue Right-In/Right-Out Diverter - A right-in/right-out diverter is proposed to deter the high volume of vehicles travelling straight through Heather Street. Bicycles using the Heather Street Bikeway would still be able to proceed through the intersection north or southbound.

· Heather Street Raised Crosswalk and Speed Hump - To reduce speeding along Heather Street, specifically adjacent to Ecole Saint Sacrement Elementary School, a raised crosswalk in combination with a speed hump is proposed between West 14^th Avenue and West 15^th Avenue.

· Ash Street at West 13^th Avenue Diagonal Diverter - This proposed diverter will prevent several short-cutting routes that use the 2800 block of Ash Street. These short-cutting routes are on the previous page.

· West 12th Avenue Additional Parking Restrictions - To encourage vehicles to travel on West 12^th Avenue during the p.m. rush, the parking restrictions will be extended from 6:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. This will reduce the incentive to shortcut along West 13^th Avenue through the neighbourhood.

· West 13th Avenue Additional On-Street Parking - The creation of additional on-street parking results in a narrower section of roadway that will reduce vehicle speeds, thereby making West 13^th Avenue a less attractive route for short-cutting drivers.

· "Traffic Calmed Neighbourhood" Signs - Signs advising that the neighbourhood has been "Traffic Calmed" would be posted at all entrances into the neighbourhood. These signs make drivers aware that traffic calming measures are used within the neighbourhood and will discourage short-cutting.

The cost for this "diversionary plan" is estimated at $130,000.

Non-Diversionary Traffic Calming Plan Components

The components that are a part of the "non-diversionary" traffic calming plan are explained below, while the whole plan is shown in Figure 2.

· Laurel Street at West 13^th Avenue Traffic Circle - This proposed traffic circle will lower speeds along Laurel Street and West 13^th Avenue making these shortcut routes less desirable.

· Laurel Street at West 16^th Avenue Curb Bulges - Proposed bulges on the north leg of Laurel Street will narrow the intersection, reducing vehicle speed and therefore discouraging vehicles from short-cutting along Laurel Street.

· Willow Street at West 13^th Avenue Traffic Circle - Similar to the Laurel Street traffic circle, this proposed circle will lower speeds along Willow Street and West 13^th Avenue discouraging short-cutting drivers.

· Willow Street at West 16^th Avenue Curb Bulges - Again, like the Laurel Street curb bulges, the proposed bulges on the north leg of Willow Street will narrow the intersection, reducing vehicle speed and deterring short-cutting vehicles.

· Heather Street Raised Crosswalk and Speed Hump - as described above in the Diversionary Traffic Calming Plan section.

· Ash Street at West 14^th Avenue Curb Bulges - The proposed curb bulges on the north leg of Ash Street at West 14^th Avenue would act similarly to the Laurel Street and Willow Street Bulges.

· Ash Street at West 13^th Avenue Traffic Circle and Curb Bulge - Like the other traffic circles proposed, this one will lower speeds along Ash Street and West 13^th Avenue. The curb bulge on the west side of the south leg acts to narrow the south leg of the intersection and equalize the intersection road widths.

· West 12th Avenue Additional Parking Restrictions - as described above in the Diversionary Traffic Calming Plan Components section.

· West 13th Avenue Additional On-Street Parking - as described above in the Diversionary Traffic Calming Plan Components section.

· "Traffic Calmed Neighbourhood" Signs - as described above in the Diversionary Traffic Calming Plan Components section.

The cost of this "non-diversionary" plan is $163,000.

TRIAL/MONITORING PERIOD

If approved, any diversionary traffic calming measure such as the closure of Willow Street, the right-in/right-out diverters and the diagonal diverter would be installed on a temporary basis for a period of no less than six months. During this trial period volumes and speeds of vehicles in the neighbourhood would be monitored. After the trial period, traffic counts would be conducted and the neighbourhood would be re-surveyed to obtain feedback. If the feedback shows that the neighbourhood supports the measures, they would be installed on a permanent basis.

NEIGHBOURHOOD CONSULTATION

In June of 2004, approximately 2630 packages, including letters and surveys, were sent out to residents of the neighbourhood. In the letter there was an invitation to an Open House on June 22^nd, 2004 as well as a description of the two traffic calming plans, "diversionary" and "non-diversionary". See Appendix A for the package sent out. Results and comments from the surveys are included in Appendix B and C. The response rate for the survey was 9%, and comments from the surveys indicated that all respondents, except three (1.3%), approve of traffic calming in their neighbourhood. Support for the two proposed plans is split evenly with 44% supporting the "diversionary" plan, 45% supporting the "non-diversionary" plan, 6% neutral and 5% other. The 6% for neutral were supporting traffic calming in the neighbourhood but did not have a preference to which plan was implemented over the other. The 5% for "other" were people that did not like either plan and wanted a modified plan or did not feel traffic calming was necessary.

DISCUSSION

Through the public consultation process it was found that over 99% of the residents that responded to the survey felt there was a need for traffic calming in their neighbourhood. There was only a small portion of respondents that felt that traffic volumes and speeds were not a problem in the neighbourhood. The support for the two traffic calming plans was split evenly between "diversionary", 44% and "non-diversionary", 45%. Some of the residents felt that the "diversionary" plan affected the access to their homes too much, while others felt that the "non-diversionary" plan would not sufficiently calm the traffic through the neighbourhood. Given this division in the community between the two plans, staff have developed a compromise plan that includes elements of both alternatives.

The closure of the 2800 block Willow Street is an important Civic benefit that will enhance the VGH Open Space plan and allow the "wellness walk" to extend in the Willow Street alignment to West 13^th Avenue. In combination with that, there are two proposed developments on either side of the 2800 block of Willow Street that both have green space abutting the street right of way. The closure of this block and creation of a "wellness walk" will provide a link between these green spaces.

Staff recommend that:

· the 2800 block of Willow Street be closed on a trial basis and that impacts of the closure be closely monitored, and
· portions of the "non-diversionary" plan be implemented as described below in a Modified Traffic Calming Plan.

These recommendations are based on the following reasons:

· the recognition of neighbourhood support for traffic calming in the area while noting that the support for the two traffic calming plans are divided, and
· the appreciation of the Civic benefit of closing the 2800 block of Willow Street and the need to close it temporarily for construction purposes.

With the "modified" traffic calming plan the neighbourhood receives the benefit of the "wellness walk" and traffic speeds will be controlled while maintaining access but volumes may not be appreciably affected.

Modified Traffic Calming Plan Components

The following components make up the "modified" traffic calming plan. The whole plan is shown in Figure 3. This plan will combine the closure of the 2800 block of Willow Street and non-diversionary measures to lower vehicle speeds while maintaining the access in the neighbourhood. The measures and their purpose were previously explained in this report.

· Laurel Street at West 13^th Avenue Traffic Circle

· Willow Street at West 16^th Avenue Curb Bulges

· Heather Street Raised Crosswalk and Speed Hump

· Ash Street at West 14^th Avenue Curb Bulges

· Ash Street at West 13^th Avenue Traffic Circle

· West 12th Avenue Additional Parking Restrictions

· West 13th Avenue Additional On-Street Parking

· "Traffic Calmed Neighbourhood" Signs

PARK BOARD STAFF COMMENT

The closure of the 2800 block of Willow Street as proposed in this report is a first and very important step in the creation of a network of major public open spaces, as envisioned in the rezoning of the Vancouver General Hospital precinct approved by Council in November 2002. The trial closure of Willow Street between 12^th and 13^th Avenues and related measures will allow for neighbourhood traffic patterns to adjust such that a permanent closure is possible in the future. The long term objective is to close this portion of Willow Street to vehicular traffic and develop a greenway/wellness walkway, thus connecting the future large open space around the restored Heather Pavilion with the residential neighbourhood to the south, and also connecting the public open space on the site of the proposed energy centre with the public open space on the site of the Nurses Residence.

Park Board staff support the recommendations in this report as a key initiative towards realizing a public open space concept that has been subject of a lengthy public planning process, and that has been eagerly awaited by the neighbourhood since the first respective legal agreement was signed fifteen years ago.

RECOMMENDED TRAFFIC CALMING PLAN

For reasons laid out in the Discussion, City Staff are recommending that the "modified" traffic calming plan be approved by Council.

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS

The estimated cost for the "modified" traffic calming plan is $110,000 excluding Willow Street closure for which the Vancouver Coastal Health Authority (VCHA) is responsible for 100% of the costs. As per the agreed upon rezoning conditions for VGH, 75% ($82,500) of the total cost for the traffic calming measures will be funded by the VCHA. It is proposed that the remaining $27,500 be allocated from the Streets Basic Capital Unappropriated account for Local Area Traffic Improvement SCA5A-UNAP. All costs associated with the closure of the 2800 block of Willow Street will be borne by the Vancouver Coastal Heath Authority.

There should also be an increase to the Traffic Operating Budget for Signage by $600, without offset and subject to 2006 Budget Review, for the maintenance of the new traffic measures, commencing in 2006.

CONCLUSION

It is recommended that Council approve the Fairview Heights "modified" traffic calming plan as described in this report, based on the Council Policy to pursue a Willow Street closure to extend the "wellness walk" to West 13^th Avenue, the benefits to the neighbourhood and the strong support for neighbourhood traffic calming from the affected neighbourhood residents. The recommended Willow Street closure would be installed on a trial basis for a period of no less than six months and traffic monitoring would be undertaken to ensure there is not an unacceptable transfer of traffic. Following the trial period, a follow-up survey would be conducted with the affected residents to determine whether the Willow Street closure should be installed on a permanent basis and whether modifications to the plan are required.

* * * *

 

APPENDIX A
PAGE 1 OF 4

CITY OF VANCOUVER ENGINEERING SERVICES D.H. Rudberg, General Manager T.R. Timm, P.Eng., Deputy City Manager

May 19, 2004

Dear Resident:

This survey seeks your opinion about proposed traffic calming for your neighbourhood.

Through to 2001, Neighbourhood Transportation staff worked with members of the community and Vancouver General Hospital's (VGH) transportation consultants to develop traffic calming options for the area south of 12^th Avenue, north of 16^th Avenue, east of Oak Street and west of Cambie Street. Two traffic calming plans were developed: one non-diversionary plan and one diversionary plan including the closure of Willow Street between 12^th and 13^th Avenues.

A condition of the VGH rezoning enacted by Council on November 7, 2002, required VGH to enter into agreements which obligates them to pay for the traffic calming measures in the area south of 12^th Avenue. Residents do not pay for these traffic calming measures. Redevelopment of the site located at the southwest corner of Willow Street and 12^th Avenue is creating an opportunity for the traffic calming plans to be implemented.

The two proposed traffic calming plans are enclosed with this letter. Please take the time to review these two plans and complete the enclosed survey. Descriptions of traffic calming measures are attached to this letter.

The non-diversionary plan will have no traffic diverted to adjoining streets. The measures introduced will slow traffic through the neighbourhood. The traffic calming measures proposed include:

· on Laurel Street

o traffic circle at 13^th Avenue,
o corner bulges at 16^th Avenue on the north leg.

· on Willow Street

o traffic circle at 13^th Avenue,
o corner bulges at 16^th Avenue on the north leg.

· on Heather Street adjacent school

o raised crosswalk between 14^th Avenue and 15^th Avenue,
o speed hump between 14^th Avenue and 15^th Avenue.

· on Ash Street

o traffic circle at 13^th Avenue,
o corner bulge at 13^th Avenue on the south-west corner,
o corner bulges at 14^th Avenue on the north leg.

· on 12^th Avenue

o south side between Oak Street and Ash Street, parking restrictions changed from 6:00 pm to 7:00 pm.

· on 13^th Avenue

o traffic circles at Laurel Street, Willow Street and Ash Street,
o additional parking on the north side between Laurel Street and Heather Street,
o additional parking on the south side between Heather Street and Ash Street,
o additional parking on the north side between Ash Street and Cambie Street.

· "Traffic Calmed Neighbourhood" Signs located at all entrances into neighbourhood along 12^th Avenue, 16^th Avenue, Oak Street, and Cambie Street.

The diversionary plan will have some restrictive traffic calming measures which may divert traffic to other streets; however this will deter short-cutters and result in an overall reduction of traffic in the neighbourhood. Traffic calming measures proposed include:

· on Laurel Street

o right-in/right-out diverter on the north leg at 16^th Avenue.

· on Willow Street

o street closure between 12^th Avenue and 13^th Avenue; bicycle and emergency access will be maintained.

· on Heather Street

o right-in/right-out diverter on the south leg at 12^th Avenue,
o raised crosswalk between 14^th Avenue and 15^th Avenue,
o speed hump between 14^th Avenue and 15^th Avenue.

· on Ash Street

o diagonal diverter at 13^th Avenue from the south-west to the north-east corners.

· on 12^th Avenue

o south side between Oak Street and Ash Street, parking restrictions changed from 6:00 pm to 7:00 pm.

· on 13^th Avenue

o additional parking on the north side between Laurel Street and Heather Street,
o additional parking on the south side between Heather Street and Ash Street.

· "Traffic Calmed Neighbourhood" Signs located at all entrance into neighbourhood along 12^th Avenue, 16^th Avenue, Oak Street, and Cambie Street.

There will be an Open House where City staff and members of the working group will be available to answer your questions. The Open House will be from 7:00 pm to 9:00 pm on Tuesday, June 22 at the Ballroom in the VGH Residence, located at 2851 Heather Street. If you are unable to attend the Open House please feel free to contact me with your questions, and return the attached survey with your comments.

The results of the neighbourhood survey will be presented to Vancouver City Council for approval. Your comments are important. If you have any comments or questions please feel free to call me at 604-871-6445 or email me at sara_mckittrick@city.vancouver.bc.ca. Please remember to return the attached survey either at the Open House mentioned above, in the enclosed postage paid return envelope or by faxing it to 604-871-6192 by June 30^th.

Yours truly,

Sara McKittrick, E.I.T.
sara_mckittrick@city.vancouver.bc.ca
Phone: 604-871-6445
Phone: 604-871-6192

SM/srm

document3

Traffic Calming Measures

Traffic Circle
A traffic circle is a raised island located in the centre of an intersection. Vehicles travel through the intersection in a counter-clockwise direction around the island. The shape of the traffic circle is determined by the configuration of the intersection, and may not be circular. Stops signs are not used with traffic circles, `Keep Right' signs are placed along the outer edge of the circle. Traffic circles reduce accidents at intersections and may also reduce vehicle speeds and volumes.

Corner Bulge
A corner bulge an extended curb on one or both sides of a roadway to reduce its width for two-way traffic. The purpose of a curb extension is to reduce vehicle speeds, reduce crossing distance for pedestrians and increase pedestrian visibility.

Raised Crosswalk
A raised crosswalk is a marked pedestrian crosswalk at an intersection or mid-block location constructed at a higher elevation than the adjacent roadway.

The purpose of a raised crosswalk on Heather Street is to reduce speeding between 14^th and 16^th Avenues. Raised crosswalks reduce vehicle speeds, improve pedestrian visibility, and reduce pedestrian conflicts.

Speed Hump
A speed hump is a raised area of a roadway, which deflects both the wheels and frames of a traversing vehicle. The purpose of a speed hump on Heather Street is to reduce speeding between 14^th and 16^th Avenues to the posted speed limit.

Parking Restrictions
Increased parking restrictions along 12^th Avenue will discourage vehicles from short-cutting along 13^th Avenue. The restrictions will increase from 6:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. to include the end of the afternoon rush hour.

On-Street Parking
The addition of on-street parking will narrow the roadway width available for travelling vehicles. The effects of on-street parking are reductions in vehicle speeds and reductions in short-cutting traffic. This also replaces parking that may be lost on the closure of Willow Street and the additional parking restrictions on 13^th Avenue.

Full Closure
A full closure obstructs all motor vehicle traffic movements from continuing along the roadway. Bicycles and emergency vehicles would still have access through the closure. The purpose of the Willow Street closure is to eliminate short-cutting traffic, and increase green space in the area.

Right-In/Right-Out Diverter
A right-in/right-out diverter is a raised triangular island at an intersection approach which obstructs left turns and through movements to and from the intersecting street for vehicles only. Bicycles will not be restricted. The purpose of the right-in/right-out diverter is to prevent short-cutting along Heather Street and Laurel Street.

Diagonal Diverter
A diagonal diverter is a raised barrier placed diagonally across an intersection that forces traffic to turn and prevents traffic from proceeding straight through the intersection. The diverter will have gaps for pedestrians and bicyclists and not restrict access to emergency vehicles. The purpose of a diverter is to reduce short-cutting along Ash Street.

"Traffic Calmed Neighbourhood" Sign
This sign advises drivers that traffic calming measures are in place within the neighbourhood, and through increased driver awareness, they will discourage short-cutting and speeding

Neighbourhood Transportation Branch

Survey on Fairview Heights Traffic Calming Plan

ATTENTION: Sara McKittrick, 7^th Floor City Hall

Please complete this survey by checking the appropriate box. Return the survey in the postage paid envelope, fax it to 604-871-6192 by June 30^th, 2004 or hand in at the Open House. To validate this survey, please provide your name, address, postal code and telephone number. All personal information and responses will be kept confidential; however your comments will be forwarded to City Council. Should you have any questions, please contact Sara McKittrick (Tel: 604-871-6445, Fax: 604-871-6192, email: sara_mckittrick@city.vancouver.bc.ca)

Name:_____________________________________________________________________
Address:___________________________________________________________________
Postal Code:_______________________________________________________________
Phone:____________________________________________________________________

2) Do you support:

The Non-Diversionary Traffic Calming Plan

The Diversionary Traffic Calming Plan

Neutral

Yes No

2) Would you like to be notified when this issue goes before Council?

Comments:________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________

APPENDIX B
PAGE 1 OF 1

SUMMARY OF SURVEY RESULTS

	Results
Non-Diversionary	45%
Diversionary	44%
Neutral	6%
Other	5%
Response Rate	9%

APPENDIX C
PAGE 1 OF 28

SURVEY COMMENTS

"Non-Diversionary" Comments:

· Neither plan is entirely satisfactory. Of the two, the non-diversionary plan is the least disruptive to my (our) driving habits with respect to access to my own home. However, I recognize the need to cut down on traffic in the area (and Ash St. is way too busy for the size of street). I am not in agreement with diversion and blockages, or speed humps and raised crosswalks. However, I encourage increased parking in the side streets, and reduced parking along 12th Ave. Traffic "circles" or islands are good, but not enough people know what to do with them when driving, an added source of frustration.

· I fully support traffic calming measure in Fairview Heights BUT prefer Non-Diversionary plan for a number of reasons: 1) Residents of the 500 block of West 13th, 2920 Ash Street and the Connaught Estates (between Ash and Heather and 13th and 14th Ave) have parking garage access such that a diverter would prevent easy and safe access to West 12th Avenue by traveling north on Ash St. 2) Residents wanting to travel north or west would divert onto Heather, a bikeway and a more congested street with schools and higher density of residents with young children and more pedestrian traffic. 3) Turning left onto Cambie from 13th Ave is very dangerous as there is no traffic light.

· The divisionary plan results in people in the neighbourhood having to circle around streets to get into their parking and access to their buildings. E.G. the traffic diagonal diverted would mean that all those with access to parking between Ash and Cambie on 13th could only access from Cambie coming from the east and no access Westbound. Also, to go North residents of 13th Avenue would have to turn left at Cambie where there is no traffic light.

· If the diagonal diverter is placed at 13th and Ash it would make it very inconvenient for vehicles wanting to go downtown. Access from 13th Ave. on 14th Ave. to the northbound land on Cambie is very dangerous. Vehicles go down Ash and use 12th Ave. on 10th Ave. to access the northbound lanes on Cambie. The diverter would force vehicles to use 14th Ave. to Heather then north on Heather which would increase Heather traffic considerably.

· I think that is it BS that VGH pays for this! This is a good representation of the city holding hostage; permits for the reconstruction and betterment of a public facility. As far as your comment "Residents do not pay" this is certainly an ignorant way of looking at this project! Where do you think the construction money will come from to build or change VGH?? DO you suppose they sell of extra organs or other body party to finance these city imposed projects? These are costs that we all share! Let us put a little more thought into the drafting of these one sided and miss guided letters.

· I liked the option I picked because the Diversionary plan will make it difficult for me to get to Broadway and Ash from my home. Instead of going down Ash or Heather, I have to go down Willow or Cambie, both requiring me to travel more.

· I would prefer to be supporting the Divisionary Traffic Calming Plan except for one point. I would find it extremely difficult to drive home from London Drugs and the shops down on Broadway, if I couldn't get through 12th and Heather. For myself, I think that what I would gain in slower and less traffic would be overshadowed by the inconvenience of driving over to Cambie and turning on 14th.

· We favour a non-diversionary calming plan. One-way roads don't equal less traffic - it just means the same amount of cars drive around and around more trying to get to their desired location.

· I prefer non-diversionary because I don't want it to be harder to get home than it already is. 2. Is there some way of stopping people from parking so close to the corner (NE) on 16th at Heather? It makes it impossible to see cars coming from the east on 16th when one is trying to cross 16th going south (by car).

· I appreciate your mailing of these choices to the residents. I personally do not find the traffic that problematic in this area. As a former resident of Kitsilano where I found parking so difficult I left the neighbourhood, I find the traffic/parking in this area reasonably well managed.

· I am strongly against the diversionary traffic calming plan. It would seriously inhibit my ability to get to and from my home. In particular, the right-in/right-out diverter on north leg of 16th at Laurel is right on my corner and I often turn left off Oak onto Laurel to get home and do not want to go a block or two out of my way just to get there of the two plans I would support the non-diversionary plan through I do not find traffic so bad in the neighbourhood that anything really needs to be done.

· I support the idea of traffic calming. My concern is with the right-in/right-out diverter on Laurel and 16th. I live on Oak and while I don't own a car I do occasionally rent or have guests who turn left on Laurel and left on 15th to park in the 2 hour parking. I think you will find those of us who make that left to park (us, those who are shortcutting) will end up doing a u-turn at 15th and Laurel intersection or turning around in peoples driveways. This response may have its own safety concerns although, perhaps not as severe as shortcutting.

· My decision is based on the assumptions that the traffic circles will be nicely planted and not just round slabs of cement.

· I wonder if it is possible to have more non-permit (free) parking in the area. Visitors cannot find spaces, and I assume this must affect local businesses as well. Even metered parking would be an improvement, and the revenue could pay for the traffic controls.

· One thing that is particularly troublesome with respect to the traffic on W.13th Avenue between Cambie Street and Ash Street is the large tour buses. During spring and summer months, they use West 13th Avenue as a short cut back to West 12th Avenue, back to the Plaza 500 hotel. The tour buses should not be allowed to short-cut through residential areas. Perhaps traffic circles at N.13th Avenue and Ash would prevent them from short cutting through the area. The tour buses are too large and noisy to travel down W. 13th. Avenue.

· Please consider putting advance green left turns at 12th and Cambie. The turning bays exist already and although longer east-west lights may slow traffic marginally, the frustration of 12th Ave. drivers will be reduced. An informal survey of friends/neighbours and years of observation tells me drivers cut through this neighbourhood for faster access to main arteries at 12th - Ash and Cambie - 16th. I also hear an alarming number of near-misses at that intersection as people try to turn North or South on that 12th Ave.

· Do no wish to have access and exit to my home restricted nor complicated in any way. If anything is to be done, then I suggest you install a round garden traffic calmer. Appearance matters also. Thanks.

· I would support the diversionary plan if it weren't for the diagonal diverter at 13th and Ash. I would find this a great inconvenience, and I expect it would increase traffic in the alley between Ash and Cambie between 12th and 13th which already has too much traffic and a blind corner behind the hotel.

· 1) Several months ago you began allowing cars to park on the north side of 13th Avenue between Ash and Cambie. Before that, it was parking only on Southside. Parking on both sides has now allowed increased parking spots for all the drunken yahoos going to and from the Jolly Alderman Pub on Cambie between 12th Ave. and 13th Ave., resulting in constant sleep interruptions during the night; especially, on weekends or whenever there is a sports game going on in the pub. 2) Cars exiting the parking lot to the west of 546 W. 13th (or even trying to turn around) have trouble backing out because cars parked on both sides of the street making it too narrow and it is difficult to see approaching cars. I have witnessed two "near misses" within the last month. It is an accident waiting to happen. 3) There is now more traffic on W. 13th between Cambie and Ash as people drive back and forth looking for a parking spot. So, in fact, there is now increased noise - definitely not "traffic calming." 4) Please, again, restrict parking to one side of the street only between Cambie and Ash on W. 13th as well as putting a traffic circle at Ash and W. 13th.

· 1) Diversionary TCP will force more vehicles into lanes to circumvent diversions - definitely not a good idea at my location. 2) Establish, in addition, 14th Avenue as an official posted bicycle route, complete with crossing lights at Cambie St., and extend east beyond Main Street and west beyond Arbutus St. or further.

· We are strongly opposed to the installation of the diagonal diverter proposed at West 13th Ave. and Ash. St., except with the addition of a right-in, right-out diverter at the south side of West 12th Ave. and Ash St. The diverter at 13th and Ash will, on its own, create new traffic problems for the neighbourhood by forcing several different streams of traffic to circle around the neighbourhood streets. Specifically: 1) Residents of Connaught Estates (located at the 600 block of West 13th and West 14th) traveling south on Ash from 12th will be forced to travel west on 13th, south on Heather, east on 14th, and finally north on Ash to access their parking garage. The garage entrance is only a few feet the other side (south) of the proposed diverter. 2) People traveling south on Ash from 12th to access the church parking lot on 14th near Ash will likewise be forced to circle west on 13th, south on Heather, east on 14th. The church rents its parking lot out to hospital workers, so this will generate two streams of circling traffic for each shift change, each and every day. Added to that are church-goers and people who rent out the churches facilities for events. We counted approximately 120 cars in the church parking lot on each of two weekdays recently. 3 )People traveling from the east on 12th and wishing to access the entrance to the new development on 12th will be forced to travel south on Ash, west on 13th, north on Laurel, and finally east on 12th to get there. The net effect of the above will be to generate a large volume of additional traffic on 13th, Heather and 14th. In short, it will simply push traffic deeper into the neighbourhood, rather than reduce it, which, we believe, should be the objective. Therefore, we are strongly opposed to the 13th and Ash diagonal diverter and suggest that the current stop signs at the intersection remain in place. We support the extension of the no parking time on the south side of West 12th until 7:00 pm. And believe that improving the traffic flow on 12th will do much to mitigate the traffic problems in the neighbourhood. We also support additional parking on the south side of West 13th Avenue, provided it is exclusively "residents only" parking. We suggest that parking be permitted along the entire sough side of West 13th Avenue between Heather and Ash. We note that signs on West 2nd Avenue direct "Cambie South" traffic onto Ash. There is nothing to stop this traffic from entering our neighbourhood. A right-in, right out diverter at the south end of West 12th and Ash would rectify this.

· The concept of traffic calming is a good one. The existing stop signs at Ash and 13th Ave., work just as effectively - our building is already effected therefore we are adamantly against more parking especially on the south side of 13th Ave. between Ash and Heather.

· I am appalled that the hospital was coerced into having to pay for these options. This large amount of money should never be diverted from patient care and facilities when there is a road tax system in place which should be paid by all citizens. I can only hope the November 2002 city council members never need to use the hospital facilities to be told they must wait because of lack of money because the roads are being re-arranged.

· I favour the non-diversionary traffic calming plan but I do not favour the additional parking on 13th, based on the following issue: additional parking will cause greater traffic flow (cars getting in and out of parking space) more congestion which is contraindicated to the purpose of this plan - traffic "calming" plan. - additional parking will cause more flow of people to use these streets, again more congestion, more noise to this neighbourhood - additional parking will cause narrowing of the drivable area causing more waiting time (cars need to divert to one side to enable on coming traffic to go through). Again, causing more congestion and affecting the calmness of the neighbourhood. e.g. Heather St between 14th and 16th (parking on both sides), always busy and congestion, 13th Ave between Ash and Heather (parking only on one side), much smoother traffic and hardly congested.

· The non-diversionary calming plan would achieve the same reduction in traffic. A) Additional parking on 13th should NOT be restricted to residents only. B) There should be restricted hours during the day, say 8:00 AM to 20:00, when a maximum time of two hours should be posted and enforced.

· Diversionary plan funnels traffic along 13th Avenue, increases traffic there. Our underground parking entrance is south of proposed diversion - makes it difficult to come and go traffic on Ash St. is a problem during rush hour only.

· The non-diversionary plan is much better because the other plan cuts off every route I currently use to and from home.

· I hope there is no additional parking on 13th between Heather and Ash. It will spoil the aspect of all the condo owners facing 13th and it is such a pretty street. The problem is more speed than volume. Because there are not calming measures, traffic tends to roar up 13th from either Ash or Cambie. Weekends and afternoons are fine, but both rush hours are busy. What about a speed bump on 13th between Heather and Ash.

· I am very much in favour of speed humps and traffic circles

· Anything that reduces traffic around Oak and 13th is my priority.

· Many residents of the Pacifica Complex (14 -> 16) 500 Block use Ash to avoid the narrow and heavily used Heather St. (especially when parents are dropping off or picking up children from the school at 14th and Heather.

· The identified options fail to address one of the key factors of "shortcutting" the left turning northbound traffic along Cambie Street (in the morning rush hours) and similarly left-turning southbound traffic along Oak Street (primarily during afternoon rush hour.) Since traffic flow is a "dynamic network" the above point should be part of any traffic calming by removing the incentive to cut through the district to gain/save a few minutes. The advantage of prohibiting the indicated left turns would be a more rigid traffic flow on the two arterial streets (i.e., Cambie and Oak) (between King Ed and Broadway respectively.

· Thank you for asking. I support traffic calming, as indicated, but would ask you to reconsider: 1) The need for both a corner bulge and a traffic circle at corner of 13th and Ash (I assume stops will be eliminated @ this intersection) 2) Two speed bumps are needed between Cambie and Heather on 14th. Cars speed on this relatively wide but residential street, or traffic circles at 14th and Ash. 3) General public need education about how to handle traffic circles. Drivers "peel" through them assuming they have right of way, cut corners (in wrong direction), etc. The English would teach us much!

· This is absolutely essential. The increase in noise, # of cars on the street, increased speed has become intolerable. Thank you for listening to residents' concerns and taking action.

· I favour traffic calming measures in my neighbourhood. However, I have a few concerns and points to consider. 1) If the Diversionary Plan is implemented, how will the many residents exiting from driveways in the 500 block of 13th be able to access westbound and eastbound traffic on 12th Avenue and points north? a) Will they create new eastbound traffic on 13th to reach Cambie, and then have to make a left-hand turn north onto Cambie? This is an unacceptable option. This left-had turn can be very dangerous because the intersection is uncontrolled by a signal light, visibility is somewhat restricted by the slope and parked vehicles on west side of Cambie, southbound rush hour traffic on Cambie travels at high speed, and northbound traffic on Cambie is often backed up well past 13th Ave. (and often up to 16th on dark and rainy November hockey nights). b) Will they have to zigzag westward through neighbourhood streets, including Heather street bikeway? This option will substantially increase the risk of accidents on local streets, and will lead to a shift of local-origin traffic from 12th to 14th. 2) Will traffic-calming measures channel traffic onto 14th Avenue and transform it into a collector street? This would be unacceptable. 3) During the morning rush hours, many driver northbound Cambie turn left (west) onto 14th. Will the new traffic calming measures substantially reduce this nuisance? 4) Residents of the redeveloped VGH Nurses Residence who wish to travel south on Cambie and avoid congestion at 12th and Cambie may exit their parkade on 12th, then turn right (south) onto Heather, then turn left (east) onto 14th to Cambie. This route would substantially increase traffic on the Heather Street bikeway and on 14th between heather and Cambie. I would be in favour of any measure to prevent or discourage this shortcut to southbound Cambie (as discussed with Neighbourhood Transportation Engineer Jim Hall at the June 22 open house). 5) For your information, the recent introduction of parking on both sides of the street in the 500 block west 13th may have increased garbage truck traffic in the 500 block of 14th.

· Strata Vias ---- uses area highlighted for corner bulge (13th and Ash) for three containers on garbage day. (currently no stopping zone)

· On new complex going up at Nurses Res I would like to see 1/2 of Willow remain open and then those wishing to turn left on 12th go "west" can do so, rather than having to use the sides streets to go West to Oak, etc.

· Residents of the 500 and 600 blocks of 14th Avenue as well as the 2900 Block of Ash would be significantly affected by a diagonal divider at 13th/Ash. A person leaving the 2900 block of Ash who wanted to travel west along 12th avenue would have to travel an extra 5 blocks just to find a safe entry point (traffic signal at 12th/Laurel). The only other alternative would be to enter Cambie Street off of 14th Avenue, which is nearly impossible at certain times, and not very safe at the best of times. 2) Would much prefer to see a pedestrian operated traffic signal installed at Cambie/14th Ave. than the DTCP recommendations.

· I would like both but more traffic circles would be nicer and close. Will traffic bulges good. May adopt one since I garden.

· A stop sign at Laurel and 16th or pedestrian controlled light would also be useful in curbing speed along 16th Ave. If at all possible something should be done to encourage drivers to divert to either 12th Avenue or King Edward. In addition, though only indirectly a traffic issue, something needs to be done about drainage of 16th Ave. On heavy rainy days 16th at Laurel especially in so deep it is impossible to foot traffic. It seems odd that in a city reputed for the amount of rain there is in many places inadequate drainage.

· I believe a lot of the volume in the area lately is due to the construction on Oak St. between Broadway and 16th Ave; therefore, I am in favour of a minor traffic calming plan. Thank you.

· I would like to suggest the two way stop at the corner of Laurel and 14th be changed to a four way stop. Sight lines for cross traffic are poor here. Laurel Street is busy with traffic entering the hospital parkade, etc. I have witnessed many near misses and traffic that does not come to a stop before entering the intersection. I am not sure if a traffic circle here would be safer.

· In my opinion the non-diversionary plan is very much superior. I hate the diagonal diverter - find the ones in the west end very frustrating. Also I often turn left off 12th Ave. at Ash St. and travel to 14th Ave. I fully support the traffic circles - they do slow traffic and when well planted, they are a very attractive addition to the street.

· I think allowing parking on 13th Ave is a mistake - currently 14th and 15th Ave are always jammed and I am frequently blocked when trying to drive. 14th Ave is terrible, especially at night. It is dangerous - there is also a daycare on 13th and parents are picking up/dropping off. The last thing this neighbourhood needs are streets where it might as well be one way with nowhere to pull in to get by. I strongly disagree with parking on two sides of 13th.

· Dear Ms. McKittrick, First thank you for taking the time last Wednesday to answer some of my questions. Further to our conversation, I would like to offer the following comments to the proposed Traffic Calming Plans. I have lived - and bicycled - in the hospital district (what the City of Vancouver calls "Fairview Heights") for seven years. In general, I have never seen the need for further traffic calming measures in my neighbourhood. However, as you explained, the City required Vancouver Hospital to add traffic calming measures in anticipation of increased motor traffic, due to its proposed projects. You also said the two options sent out recently were first drawn up four years ago, and therefore may not reflect current traffic patterns and/or local resident's concerns. While I do not wholly favour either proposal, I believe that "Non-diversionary" Plan would disrupt the neighbourhood less. In particular, I have the following concerns: - I have never seen so much through-traffic on W. 13th Avenue, and do not favour any added traffic circles. Please consider not adding them, or at least not adding them at every intersection. - Restricting parking along W. 12th Avenue is an excellent way to reduce through-traffic congestion. The proposed additional parking along W. 13th Avenue will compensate for the loss of parking along W.12th Avenue. Specifically, what kind of added parking is being proposed? Will it be metered, restricted to local residents, or some other type? - You assured me that the proposed corner bulges on Laurel Street and Willow Street at W. 16th Avenue would not protrude into w. 16th Avenue. I do not see the need for them at all. However, if the choice lies solely between adding corner bulges and adding diverters, then corner bulges are the less disruptive alternative. Please consider the option of not adding either at the two corners. - You said the City is adding raised crosswalks near many schools, and it usually adds a second speed "hump" near the new raised crosswalks. Would the City consider making an exception on Heather Street? Drivers already take Heather Street slowly, due to bicycle traffic and posted school zone speed limits. Adding the second speed hump would simply increase driver's frustration, without necessarily slowing them down even further. - While I do not favour adding a traffic circle and corner bulge to the intersection at W. 13th Avenue and Ash Street, I really oppose installing a diagonal diverter. Local residents have complained about eastbound drivers avoiding the congestion at W. 12th Avenue and Cambie Street by turning right on Ash Street to W. 13th Avenue. But blocking that intersection would, in an attempt to eliminate one annoyance, create new frustration, this time on the part of local residents. Please consider leaving the intersection free of all obstacles, perhaps adding corner bulges instead. - Finally, please DO NOT close Willow Street between 12th Avenue and W. 13th Avenue. That would increase motor traffic on Heather Street and Laurel Street. Heather Street is already congested with impatient drivers negotiating the narrow street, avoiding cyclists and pedestrians. If the City felt it absolutely necessary to close Willow Street, then please re-direct the Heather Street bicycle route along Willow Street, to reduce the driver-cyclist conflict between W.12th Avenue and W. 16th Avenue. Otherwise, if Willow Street is closed off to motor traffic, we will see an increase in bicycle accidents on Heather Street. The hospital district is a relatively densely populated area. I knew that when I moved into the neighbourhood, and I knew to expect a heavier volume of traffic than if I'd chosen to live in a less dense area. The City's traffic calming proposals can only do so much toward reducing traffic volume. Local residents cannot fairly demand and expect low traffic volume miracles in an area only twenty square blocks, and bordered on all sides by main thoroughfares. Thank you, again, Ms. McKittrick, for your time and attention to this matter.

· I do not see the need to close Willow St. to calm traffic. If you can not turn left at Heather, and Willow is closed, all traffic coming into the area will use Laurel. There is a problem at Willow and 16th. I will not use that intersection as you can not see cars coming from Heather down 16th. People park illegally close to the corner with policemen in the coffee shop; so maybe the corner bulges will help that as well as for pedestrians to cross on the way to parks and schools.

· Does "neutral" mean do nothing or "don't care"? My preference is to leave traffic patterns as is.

· We would strongly prefer the status quo. There is no real need for any traffic diversion, in our opinion. Residents in the area for 15 year.

· Only those I already spoke to Sara about regarding the speed that drivers take the corner of Oak and 15th (east side) Ave.

· This non-diversionary traffic calming plan does not help the increased traffic we are seeing on the 900 block West 15th. This plan will force more traffic on to our block. We need speed bumps or restricted entry onto the 900 block of West 15th.

· If you could limit or even prohibit left hand turns off Cambie St. heading West onto W. 14th Avenue and W. 13th Avenue during rush hour this would calm traffic substantially in this neighbourhood. 14th Avenue in front of 518 W 14th is like a freeway most mornings and afternoons.

· My problem with the diversionary plan is the diagonal diverter at 13th and Ash. Since Ash does not go through to 16th I don't think it is necessary. There is not a great deal of non-residential traffic on Ash as it is. The diverter will interfere with residents commuting routes and travel to the shops at market square. It will also serve to divert traffic over to Heather which is already a through street and has a school on it. It does not seem that the benefit of restricting traffic on the less traveled street will be worth the price paid by increasing traffic on the busier street.

· I do not think there is a need for any traffic calming plan; would support no changes.

· Diversionary too restrictive for residents.

· The diversionary traffic calming would be a mistake as it would eliminate left hand turns onto 12th Avenue from Heather and from Heather onto 12th Avenue - any accident on another route like 16th or Cambie will just cause mayhem. I much prefer the non-diversionary calming plan. In addition, something needs to be done for the 16th Avenue and Willow Street intersection for pedestrians to safely cross - perhaps the same kind of signal that exists at Heather/16th Ave.

· Auto traffic volume average speed and visibility at the corner of 16th Avenue and Willow is extremely concerning. Traffic accidents are very much the 'norm' for residents living adjacent to the corner (check ICBC for records). Although the non-diversionary plan may provide some relief for traffic there is still equally an important questions as to pedestrian safety. Willow Street is the main corridor of traffic (foot) between VGH thru to Douglas Community Centre/park and Heather Park. Can you please install a 'pedestrian cross-walk' to help the hundreds of people crossing here everyday.

· I would like to see parking meter on 16th Avenue between Heather and Willow.

· Thanks for making this a public forum.

· A mirror system installed on some dangerous corner streets will certainly avoid some accidents. It is sometime really difficult to see the traffic coming from left or right. As an example: On Laurel street south of 16th, it is always a challenge to access the 16th Avenue and plenty of streets as dangerous.

· I would like to advise you or whomever it may concerned of late night speeders/racers along this street of West 16th i.e. between Oak and Cambie. This speeding is much more prevalent in spring and summer and has increased a good deal since downtown bar hours were extended. Perhaps a speed trap at 16th and Oak might provide the city more revenue.

· Any areas of the city I have driven in with the diversionary "calming" are very confusing - often resulting in driving around and around trying to get somewhere resulting in frustration and higher speeds. Other areas using non-diversionary do seem to slow things down without frustrating people not familiar with the layout.

"Diversionary" Comments:

· I am supporting the proposed traffic plan. The diversionary traffic calming plan - which is - the diagonal diverter. I am ---- owner of ---- Ash. St.

· I am strongly in favour of any measure helping to prevent speeding an/or shortcutting traffic. In my opinion diversionary measures achieve this better than non-diversionary.

· Could you also add a "resident parking only" sign in front of the townhouses on Ash Street and North of 16th Ave. We cannot park in front of the building as so many hospital workers park there. I would be grateful if this could be also put parkland regarding the VGH traffic impact?

· I like the diversionary plan because it reduces the number of cars as well as slowing them down. I live right beside VGH, and I do realize that with my location there will be more traffic etc., but I would like to see that reduced in as many ways as possible. We get super fast traffic - especially along on 12th Avenue as well as by Douglas Park (Heather Street). Ambulance sirens at all times (unavoidable I know), etc. But I think in fairness it is only fair to decrease the number/quantity of traffic as well as the speed of them. (I picked divisionary because it appears this is what it will do, as the non-diversionary only slows it down.) I don't like increased parking hours though as it will add to the number/quantity of traffic in the area.

· Traffic must be slowed or decreased on Heather St. Making Heather a bicycle way" has only doubled the vehicle traffic. 2) Speed bumps should be installed at the entrances to the lane between Heather and Ash (between 12th and 13th) and after each parking entrance. 3) More policing and stiffer fines for parking violators fines must be many times higher than parking costs at VGH parking garage to eliminate employee parking in front of our house. 4) More speed bumps on Heather to force traffic to not short cut on Heather.

· Add speed humps in alley between 12th and 13th from Heather to Ash.

· Do you need more parking on 13th?? I would suggest less parking on Ash and Heather between 12th and 16th.

· Right now Heather street is being used as a speedway for through traffic to Broadway. Speed humps are a must.

· I would also like to see a pedestrian controlled cross light at Cambie and 14th as it is difficult and dangerous to cross there.

· I don't like traffic circles or corner bulges. I'd much rather see other traffic calming measures everywhere in the city. I am a cyclist as well as a driver.

· Would like a light at 16th and Heather that is not pedestrian controlled. This is a busy crossing.

· Taking into consideration the "new developments" at 16th and Heather and 12th and Heather, the divisionary calming plan makes more sense for the neighbourhood.

· The speed bump and raised crosswalk will hopefully reduce speeding on that section of Heather St. school zone. The right-in/right-out diverter will stop the barrelled down syndrome the hill so frequent in the Heather St. down past Broadway St. Merci et Bonne chance.

· I have been living on Heather for 18 years and the traffic is increasing too much. Even buses and trucks are using Heather now.

· I would like to suggest another speed bump between 16th Avenue and 15th Avenue, for a total of two speed humps on Heather Street. People tend to ignore stop signs on 16th and Heather. The speed humps will make them slow down and stop at the corner.

· There have been so many accidents and near accidents on 16th and Heather that I believe you should make it a right in/right-out diverter on Heather and 16th. Also, the street is used as a main cut street and it is often difficult to cross. I commend you for the looking into calming the traffic on this neighbourhood cycling streets.

· This is a good start. There are frequent accidents at the corner of Laurel and W. 16th caused by cars turning left and poor visibility (and too much traffic) However, it will not stop cars from shortcutting around the Oak/W. 16th lights. Westbound cars can still turn right onto Laurel, left onto W. 15th and right back onto Oak without any stopping! Many cars fly by here using these 'detour'. There should be a roundabout or 4-way stop at laurel and W. 15th or the stop signs should be reversed on to Laurel instead of on W. 15th.

· I can not count the number of accidents I have attended to at Laurel and 16th. Ave. "right/in-right/out diverter" will help but it will not solve the problem. Half the accidents are caused by people leaving the hospital parkade, driving up Laurel and turning right on to 16th.It is the logical route it you are heading south of the city. If the street was also narrowed between 15th and 16th causing a bit of a bottle neck people coming out of the parkade would be much more likely to take 12th to Oak. A much safer route to Oak.

· If the diversionary traffic plan does go through I would like to see speed bumps on Ash on both sides of the traffic circle.

· I would also like the traffic congestion at Ash between 12th and 13th Ave. addressed. With parking on both sides of Ash between lane behind 12th and 13th Avenue it is a dangerous area to turn out of lanes onto Ash and there is gridlock there at rush hour with cars cutting through from Cambie onto Ash and then to 12th etc. At least only allow one side to park.

· A small bundle of these bland surveys were almost burned under a slough of Westender and courier newspapers in the lobby of my building - hardly encouraging for a wide participation by the tenants. I am a bicycle commuter and favour all initiatives that gets commuters cars off of the side streets.

· Remove the parking along Ash between 12th and 13th Ave to reduce traffic congestion.

· Greater peace on the streets is always welcome. However, if diversions go to 12th, I am aware that traffic there is quite heavy already. The thought of more parking on both sides of 13th Ave at my address (and traffic congestion because of street narrowing) is also not attractive to me.

· Parking on Ash 1/2 block from 13th to lane (between 13th and 12th) on East side also causes a lot of congestion, at times interfering with intersection at 12th and Ash. Strongly suggest removing parking on East side of Ash (in front of Cambie Surgical Centre). Perhaps a "drop-off" zone or taxi loading only would be more appropriate. No additional parking on 13th Ave. between Cambie and Oak. Too congested already!

· The diagonal diverter prevents how I enter and exit my building's lane at Ash and 13th but there is a lot of traffic using Ash in the morning and evening rush hour. Cars parked on Ash between 12 and 13th add to congestion. Will need speed humps in lane as traffic will divert itself to use lanes: the taxis from the hotel already do this. Don't need extra parking on 13th - if the idea is to get out of cars then don't increase parking. 13th is lovely for road space - moving and delivery trucks. Ambulances have space to park and cars and people can get by. Basically, you need to increase and develop public transit that is convenient. Why is Willow being closed? Is it for the development for the Nurse's Residence? You need space for workers and visitors to the hospital - you need a cheaply priced parkade that is only for hospital workers. Sometimes, you can make yourself so exclusive that you can not enter your own neighbourhood.

· With the current traffic set-up on Ash St. at 13th Ave. (parking on both sides of street in front of Cambie Surgical Center) there is often a traffic jam resulting in honking and impatient driver behaviour. This is due to the reduction to single lane traffic at this particular location. It would be nice to see this issue resolved as it is very disturbing as residence in this area. Please consider adding a turn signal to the Cambie and 12th traffic lights for northbound and westbound traffic.

· I like both but prefer the diversionary plan to the other one. We do need something in this neighbourhood - it seems to be the thruway for a few reckless drivers which gave no place in this residential family oriented area.

· Having the diverter landscaped would be nice and would be compatible with the traffic circles on Heather. I think the large Boulevard trees in the 600 block 13th are too large and need to be removed and replaced.

· Although I approve of the divisionary plan I don't approve of adding additional parking on 13th Avenue

· The non-diversionary traffic plan completely chops up 13th Avenue and overcrowds it. I prefer the diversionary plan because it hopefully will reduce traffic into the area and in places slow it down. I am not in favour (for either plan) of the additional parking. The only reason it slows traffic is because if two cars are there at the same time there is only room for one car to go. If there is only one car it can drive just as fast, but visibility is reduced because of additional cars. Plus why is additional parking needed? You'll be reducing cars through the area and any new building should be providing sufficient parking themselves.

· Why not a four way stop on Heather and 13th as the traffic calming circle does not work! Cars speed by and it is first come first serve. Spoke to Sarah and Debbie about this at the open house. I support the DTCP; the reasons are: 1) this plan will deter short - cutters who avoid using the intersection at Cambie and 12th Ave. 2) the diagonal diverter at 13th Avenue and Ash will deter drivers cutting through the neighbourhood from 12th Avenue to 16th Avenue, and 3) the right-in/right-out diverter at 12th Avenue to 16th Avenue and Heather will eliminate drivers turning left from 12th Avenue onto Heather, crossing the neighbourhood to 16th Avenue.

· Unfortunately, traffic circles are not successful because most people do not know how to use them. Often drivers will speed right through them if they believe they are on the most busy route. At Heather and 13th drivers going north-south think they have the right of way regardless of those on the east/west route. Drivers speed along Heather through the school zone and through the traffic circle regardless of pedestrians, bicycles, etc. Perhaps Heather should be diverted at 16th also. Thank you. P.S. Heather is a poor bicycle route because of traffic!

· I am a cyclist. Three times per day, all through the year, I commute on a tandem bike and carry my child (on my back). Traffic circles do not work. I travel Heather Street and along Ontario to get to work in South Vancouver. Each day I am nearly hit by speeding taxis and motorists who wish to avoid main traffic arteries like Cambie, Oak, and Main. Motorists rush through traffic circles and often try left hand turns nearly causing head-on collisions instead of following correct right of way procedures at intersections with traffic circles. The "Diversionary Traffic Calming Plan" will create less short-cut traffic in my area as the existing traffic circles already prove to be ineffective. Put cyclists on your traffic planning committees.

· We prefer the Diversionary Plan however, we disagree with "on 13th Avenue, additional parking." The street is busy with people parking to access the day care between Laurel and Willow and less street space may block the street. We would also like to see "speed humps" along the lanes in the area. The lanes are being used as roadways at present.

· After reviewing both plans I recommend the diversionary plan with some changes as below: 1) I do not support 'additional' parking on 13th Ave. especially in the 800 block as a Day Care Center is located there and there are many cars dropping and picking up kids. Additional parking would crate more congestion and accidents. 2) I would not support the diagonal diverter at Ash at 13th Ave. I would not like to see three traffic circles on 13th (non-divisionary). As a resident I do need to drive down the street. Other ideas: VGH parkade - suggest exit diverted to North (to 12th) as I have seen many near misses on turns left out of parkade.

· Please install a speed hump on 13th Avenue between Laurel and oak, and a speed hump on Laurel between 12th and 13th to stop motorists treating these two sections of the road as drag strips while trying to avoid the traffic light at Oak and 12th. Thank you for this opportunity.

· Obviously a great deal of care and attention has gone into both these plans and I am very please to see efforts to ease the increasingly heavy traffic in the residential parts of this neighbourhood. Now if only you'd also put left turn lights at 12th and Cambie!!

· I think it is potentially dangerous to allow parking in front of day care centre on 13th between laurel and Willow in case kids dart out. There are unpredictable. Everything else looks good. Thank you.

· It is my assumption that drivers on Cambie St. are trying to avoid the "long light" intersection at 12th Ave., this shows up at 14th where cars heading east who wish to turn south use 14th Ave. - the result is a back up of as many of 8 to 9 cars wishing to turn south at the stop sign (during busy times). Cars heading north on Cambie St. wishing to head west, line up in the left turn lane at 14th Ave. Result: Traffic along 14th Ave. in front of my apartment dwelling is not very calm.

· Would like to see signed restricting left turns onto and off Cambie St. - especially in blocks near major intersections (traffic backs up near King Edward and 12th for example) 2. Suggest traffic signals with left turn signals specifically at 16th Avenue and King Edward Avenue. 3) Suggest speed enforcement and stop sign observance along residential street especially 14th Avenue and Ash. People might get the message that it is not fast to go through residential streets. 4) Explanatory sign at "traffic circle" heather and 13th (who has right of way)?

· Why not calming on 14th? Traffic coming off Cambie is speeding all day and night

· I would support any of the "traffic calming" options but we need more parking that is not restricted to permit only.

· We are very enthusiastic about the proposed traffic calming measures in our neighbourhood, especially on our street. Our ground level apartment faces onto Ash Street, and it is very clear to us that Ash St. and 14th Ave east of Ash St. has become a major bypass route for commuters who want to avoid the intersection at 12th Ave. and Cambie St. At any time of day there is a regular flow of vehicles on Ash, and the driver often drive with considerable urgency. Our clear preference is for implementation of the diversionary traffic calming plan. We feel that the non-diversionary plan would not be nearly as effective in eliminating the use of Ash and 14th Ave. as a commuter bypass. But either of the traffic calming plans would be wonderful improvement in the quality of our neighbourhood. Thanks very much.

· If I had to choose between the two plans I would elect the diversionary plan. However, I think that both plans are sound and logical and represent huge steps forward. The neighbourhood is in dire need of traffic calming and I support who-heartedly this initiative and I congratulate you for developing these plans and for involving the local neighbourhood community. I have only one suggestion for your consideration. There is a lot of pedestrian traffic along Ash St. that goes back and forth across 14th Ave. That traverses the church property. We are at risk when crossing 14th as drivers frequently accelerate to racing speeds between Cambie and Heather on 14th. We need to have some speed reducing measures on 14th such as speed humps or stop signs at Ash (in the case of the diversionary plan).

· I don't see either of these plans having any significant effect on the heavy east west traffic on 14th Ave between Cambie and Heather.

· We both support the diversionary plan but could live with the non-diversionary plan. We hope that something will be done and are prepared to be inconvenienced to make the short green light at Ash and 12th. We hope that city council will not be persuaded by those who disagree with one or more "parts" of each plan and there fore vote against the whole thing.

· Some suggestions for both plans: Non-Diversionary: To facilitate northbound on Cambie, perhaps put in an advance left turn signal at Cambie and 12th to prevent northbound cars on Cambie shortcutting through 14th and 13th Avenues trying to get to 12th Ave. on non-diversionary plan. Diversionary. - perhaps put up a right turn restriction sign (for certain hours, like rush hour) at Heather and 12th to prevent Eastbound 12th Ave. cars wanting to turn right onto Heather shortcutting to Cambie along 14th Ave.

· I am in favour of the diversionary plan to reduce traffic in the neighbourhood. The traffic circle at 13th and Heather has done little to improve pedestrian safety. I have crossed there everyday/week X 2 for five years and am intimately acquainted with speeding cars and bicycles. A four-way stop would have been far more wise. Not only do many cars still speed around the circles but they seem to take it as their right of way and are not inclined to stop for pedestrians. Certainly whichever is chosen there will be an improvement.

· These new crosswalks and speed humps etc. are a good idea. I have lived here 18 years and the traffic has increased so much. There is also a school here and children are around here all the time. So the drivers should be very careful. The speeders still go on.

· Traffic along Heather St. (North to South) is a big problem! Commuters are using Heather to avoid Cambie St. at peak hours. The school zone at Heather and 14th is a serious concern as vehicles travel too fast along here. The diversionary plan is needed and the right-in/right-out diverter is desperately needed at 12th and Heather to clam traffic flow along Heather.

· I attended the meeting June 8, 2004 at the Nurses Residence. I like the extension of the green spaces. However, we have been waiting for a very long time for the critically proposed changes. How will all this be implemented? When I move out of the neighbourhood?

· Traffic speed - generally traffic on willow and Heather streets is too fast. Traffic density - much too much traffic on Heather Street. The full closure of Willow between 12th and 13th would greatly calm the area and extend the park from the re-developed nurse's residence.

· I support both plans, slightly prefer (B). Put a sidewalk along south side 500 - 600 block. W. 14th Avenue in front of church.

· Currently Heather Street is the only one with a traffic circle and is also the busiest and noisiest of all. The circle hasn't appeared to "calm" Heather Street so I don't feel addition of more circles will have much of a "calming" affect on the other streets either. Diversion would also make it a safer street for children at school.

· The less speeding cars the better.

· The most important thing is to reduce through traffic on Heather from 6th to 16th Avenues. Currently, motorists are using this route as a through route because there are cyclist/pedestrian activated signals that enable motorists to cross Broadway and 16th with ease. All this motor traffic is destroying the bike route.

· It is about time! Strongly support this. People drive way too fast down this street (Heather). It will be much better for bikes with the diversions in place.

· In addition to making it more difficult for traffic to shortcut through this area, we believe that it would be helpful to make alternate routes easier. To that end, we would suggest advance green arrows for 12th Avenue traffic at both Oak and Cambie streets. Arrows for other directions may help as well.

· Thank you for allowing the residents a say in the decision making regarding much increased traffic in our neighbourhood. Heather Street has fast become an alternate through street to Oak and Cambie. This is unacceptable from a safety and noise point. Facing east onto Heather are my kitchen and living room windows. I moved here six years ago and since then it has become worse; but in particular since the bike path was installed. I did vote in favour of the bike path route not realizing that adding a pedestrian controlled light at West 16th and Heather would make it more attractive a route to vehicular traffic heading southbound from the VGH area.

· Though we prefer the diversionary plan: My concern with closing Willow is that it will create more of the unwanted traffic on Heather. However, it seems the best option. As a resident here, I can say with plenty of experience that the traffic circles (i.e. - non diversionary plan) do not slow down nor decrease the traffic flow; as our experience with the existing are on Heather can attest to. Thank you for attending to this matter and our concerns.

· Ash Street is a main access to cross town arteries like Cambie and 6th Avenue for neighbourhood residents. Heather is a tank trail and more. Subject to health services foot traffic. Any diagonal diversion should be placed at Heather and 13th NOT at Ash and 13th.

· Many accidents occur at 16th and Willow. I therefore support the right-in/right-out diverter at that intersection.

· A few four way stops could be added. 1) 15th at Willow 2) 14th and Willow and perhaps others.

· While I do like the concept of traffic circles, I feel the implementation in this city has been poor. 1) People do not know how to use them - both direction and right of way. There has been no attempt to educate. 2) Parking is permitted too close to the circle blocking visibility of oncoming cars. 3) Street corners in some places have hedges and other obstructions that block views of traffic.

· Badly needed: a pedestrian/cyclist-activated light at the intersection of Cambie and 14th Avenue.

· Well done. Cars use Laurel as a short cut and this will be an improvement.

· Instead of the diagonal diverter on 13th and Ash, I would like it be a traffic circle. I would like to have speed humps along Laurel and Willow streets between 13th and 15th Avenues. With the many accidents and new accidents at the intersection of 16th and Laurel, an "no left entry" into Laurel from 16th is long over due. Parking along the 700 block on the north side of 16th Ave. should be made restrictive to enhance better view of traffic for vehicles doing left hand turns from 16th Ave at rush hours especially.

· Dear Ms. McKittrick: Thank you very much for the clear presentation of the options. We favour the diversionary plan since it reduces overall traffic. Thank you.

· My only hesitation is that this measure might increase traffic on 16th Avenue which is already too much at peak hours. Is 16th destined to become like 12th? If so, I am moving on!

· I believe it to be essential that the pedestrian signal at 16th and Heather be converted to a full traffic signal and that something must be done at 16th and Willow, such as proposed for 16th and Laurel, to prevent the seemingly never ending collisions that occur there. I am sure ICBC records will confirm my assertion. A pedestrian crosswalk would also be beneficial. I suggest a right-in/right-out diverter for 16th and Willow.

· Save our Parkland Assoc was established in 1963 to protect parkland and support the acquisition of new parkland, primarily within the Lower Mainland but also within the GVRD and the province. In 1989 our then president Dr. Frank Turnball was involved in the agreement between the city and the hospital to establish a park within the VGH precinct. As the current president, I attended the meetings regarding the development of the park area. SOPA supports the closing of Willow St. as an internal part of the scheme to develop parkland within the VGH precinct.

"Neutral" Comments:

· The Heather Heritage Society is unlikely to be affected by the traffic calming proposed, but thank you for including us.

· Anything would be better than the stop signs which are almost always ignored, run through or cars speed through the non-stop sign cross street.

· I am not sure of all the issues and problems involved as I just moved into the area in Dec 1003. I would like to learn more, hear different concerns before I decide. Thanks.

· My main concern is with either option there are no efforts to stop or slow traffic turning left from southbound Cambie onto 14th. I have noticed a major increase in traffic on 14th even in the few months I have lived here (Including many trucks). The diversionary plans leave a concern for residents leaving the parking garage on 13th and having no easy access southbound or heading to 12th. There will be more traffic meandering through streets for a longer distance trying to get to 12th. The extra parking allowance on 13th seems to have forced many garbage trucks onto 14th. Note: THESE SURVEYS SHOULD HAVE BEEN MAILED. (I nearly missed this survey and info package). Additional comments, emailed in.

· The problem with traffic in this area is lack of parking for employees of the hospital and of the Broadway corridor. Every morning before 9 a.m. and again at around 5 p.m. the traffic around heather St. increases and is a hazard to pedestrian. The traffic circle at Heather and 13th is especially hazardous to pedestrians. Drivers watch only for other cars and to them pedestrians are invisible. Making more parking restrictions will only penalize the residents of this area and will not solve the traffic/parking problem. Maybe the solution would be to give all employees of hospital free or nominal cost bus passes like they do with students.

· I am looking forward to the traffic improvements in my neighbourhood. Especially with the VGH Nurses Residence renovation and expansion and the underground power generation steam plant. P.S. For both proposals I have no objection.

· No comments

· I think both plans would be helpful. Neither one would affect me hugely - although I think no matter what, there should be a Right-In/Right-Out Diverter at 16th and Willow. (someone is going to get killed at that corner turning left! Thank you - ---.

· I strongly support whichever plan will calm traffic on 16th Ave. I couldn't determine which of the above plans would most effectively do this. If this is not an option, then whatever plan calming around our schools and the "Heather Place" housing Complex.

"Other" comments:

· The traffic calming I find very confusing, stop signs work much better. All these circles are expensive why don't you reduce the speed to 40 and ticket speeders. Once the trees in the middle of circles grow no emergency vehicle will be able to access. Try standing at one and view how motorists do not obey right of way they are confused. Try viewing a fire truck trying to get around. You are making the neighbourhood unsafe and wasting a lot of money.

· Dear Sara, The Non-Diversionary Traffic Calming Plan is the one I like the best. Traffic can still get through, but hopefully at a more calming and reasonable speed. The amount of traffic cutting onto 13th Avenue is unbearable and is very disturbing when trying to sleep at night. Cars are racing down this street at unacceptable speeds all hours of the night and day. This is a residential area as you know and these speed racers have absolutely no consideration of the noise pollution they are causing. Thank you for sending me this information package.

· I am not in favour of parking on both sides of the street along 13th Avenue. This is not traffic calming. Cars (people in them) are constantly looking for parking spots. I work at Children's Hosp. and I either walk or park ON SITE. There is very little parking in the residential neighbourhoods - and it is mostly for residents of the neighbourhood. i.e. There is NO parking after 6:00pm along 28th. I strongly object to parking along both sides of the street.

· The current traffic patterns are fine the way they are. The diversion plan only makes it more difficult for local residents to get around and is the worst solution of the two proposals. The non-div plan is only a little better. The traffic circles already in place in the area do little but cause confusion - most drivers either go through without slowing down much or stop completely and don't know what to do. Adding parking so that both sides of the street have parking only adds to the congestion.

· I have reviewed both plans, and find pros and cons with both and support neither. I suggest that you look at a hybrid alternative, per my suggestion below. I support the closing off of Willow, between 12th and 13th. The extension of the green space will enhance the park area for mutual benefit of residents and VGH. I support the use of Corner Bulges (at Laurel/16th and Willow/16th), because of the added safety feature of keeping the corner clear of parked cars and creating improved line of sight for approaching traffic from the left and right. I support the extended parking restrictions on 12th Ave., south-side, Oak to Ash. This will allow the traffic to flow better along 12th. I do NOT support the 'additional parking' along 13th Ave. This is especially true in the 800 block, where there is a child day care facility. Currently, this is a no parking zone (unenforceable), yet in the morning and evening, there are many cars using this area for drop off. Allowing parking would create chaos. This is a really bad idea. I do NOT support the non-diversionary TCP suggestion for 13th, to create three traffic circles. Neither do I like the Diagonal diverter at 13th/Ash. This is my access route from Cambie southbound. I do not like the Diagonal Diverter at Laurel/16th. This is my access route to Emily Carr Elementary, the school zoned for the area. Corner bulge is much preferable. Suggestions: Improve the west side of 13th and Cambie. This is very congested and I have experienced many near accidents. a right-in/right-out might help. Also no-stopping area for the first 20 meters. VGH parking garage entrance on laurel: Suggest that you make access only from the north. No access from 13th. This will divert traffic away from 13th and from Laurel on the south. To summarize my hybrid plan: Start with the Non Diversionary TCP. Remove the three circles and additional parking on 13th. Close off Willow (12th to 13th). Add the RI/RO Diverter at 16th/Heather/Cambie. Restrict access to VGH parking garage from the north only. Thank you for the opportunity to provide this input.

· I am not in favour of more parking on 13th Ave. All this will do will be to give the hospital staff more spaces to park. The daycare continually parks illegally as it is. We pay a high amount to park in or near our homes, only to see it abused by others. Rarely are tickets issued. Individuals have been parking in our lane for months. The city says it is okay, so why do we pay to park. I suggest the hospital provide parking for it's staff and visitors. My visitors have no place to park because of this. Traffic circles do not work, speed humps do - right - in/diverters - will move traffic to Willow. Provide parking for hospital staff - use parkade enforce parking.

· Overall, I like the features of the diversionary plan except for the implications that it will impose on the residents of Connaught Estates at 13th/14th and Ash. The diagonal diverter at 13th/14th will severely impair the movements of the 76 owners (150 cars) of our complex. May I suggest the following changes? - replace diverter with traffic circle at 13th/Ash - add corner bulges to 14th/ Ash - add speed bumps along 14th between Cambie and Heather - add `No RV Parking' signs along 14th between Ash and Heather (south side) Thank you for your time in evaluating this ongoing problem. Members of Strata Council VAS ---- would welcome additional discussion in this regard. P.S. Our parkade enters from Ash between 13th and 14th.

· We live at 14th and Heather. We walk and bike through this neighbourhood daily; we do not own a car. We do not perceive any traffic problem that needs rectification, and certainly not the dramatic measure of the diversionary plan. We simply do not find that cars speed through our neighbourhood. Rather, we feel entirely safe on our bikes walking. The raised crosswalk on Heather is probably a good idea although an additional speed hump would be overkill. Increased parking restrictions on 12th are also laudable. The remaining measures of the non-diversionary plan are unnecessary. The additional measures of the diversionary plan would make car movement in our neighbourhood unnecessarily frustrating, with no real benefit that we can see.

· Combination non-diversionary and two corner bulges at 16th and Willow and additional two corner bulges on south side of 15th and Willow plus two in one side would be even better. Something definitely needed at 16th and Willow because of coffee shop traffic that parks in no stopping areas and also often pulls out quickly. I live by the 15th/Willow intersection. I have noticed for along time that approximately 1/2 the vehicles traveling on Willow only slow down at the stop sign and do not stop. And now in the last week, I have seen two cars go through this intersection without even slowing down. I think some sort of calming is needed here for pedestrian safety. Can 4 corner bulges be added on the Willow street part of this intersection? Something is needed. Willow is used as quick way to 12th Ave.

· I do not support any plan that would involve any narrowing of the 16th and Laurel corner it's already narrow enough.

· Having lived in this area (the same house) for 54 years, I am very concerned with some of the ideas put forward in the survey. Unfortunately, a prior engagement forced me to miss the meetings. On the attached sheet I am putting forward some alternatives and reasons. I walked to work through this neighbourhood for more than 20 years. I have always been a cyclist; driving only if necessary. Dear Sirs: I agree with a diverter at 12th and Heather, too many people are using bicycle routes as short cuts. Certainly speed bumps and raised crossing at schools and playgrounds is a good safety idea. I would not object to driving over a speed bump (in this area) in the middle of each long (E- W) block, it certainly would slow everybody. Possible 4 way stop signs are also going to be necessary, rather than traffic circles (most intersections are narrow now.) Corner bulges make the intersection more dangerous for everyone - pedestrians, cyclists, and drivers. I say it is safer for a pedestrian because it is narrower, doesn't make sense. If there is traffic it is not safe for a pedestrian whatever the crossing distance. Also, dangerous to pedestrians are traffic circles. I have found that the cars getting around the obstruction are well into the sidewalk crossing alignment that I am in. Except for tall people, car drivers and pedestrians cannot really see each other until they are both in the intersection, unless the circles were made smaller than the ones that I have seen. There is a lot of VGH parking garage traffic on Laurel St., the intersection at 16th is quite narrow now and needs to be left as is. However, a 3 - 6 PM no left turn off of Oak St. onto 15th would solve a lot of short cutting that I witness every day concluding, there is also the necessity for large service vehicles and sometimes emergency vehicles to be able to get into and around the area's streets. This is the most important reason to be against corner bulges and oversized traffic circles.

· I do not agree with a right-in/right-out turn at Laurel - especially if there is a problem on Oak (like the fire). Cars need to have an alternate without a hazard of crossing 16th which is very busy at rush hour - how about lights and one way? Do away with the stop sign on willow Laurel and Heather put in traffic circles. Note with all the street parking you pretty well have to slow to a half at every intersection as cars cannot see clearly oncoming traffic. Also, do not narrow any more it is hard enough to get through with big vans etc. nowhere to pull into. Suggest one way streets with speed humps.

Comments from Letters

· Re: Fairview Heights Traffic Calming Plans

I live in the 600 block of 13^th Avenue, the block between Heather and Ash Streets. Having experience the unpleasantness of the increase in traffic caused by the sewer replacement project on 12^th Avenue, I wish to express my opposition to the Diversionary Traffic Calming Plan proposal for my neighbourhood. This plan will greatly increase the traffic in the 600 block of 13^th Avenue for several reasons:

1. Traffic north-bound on Willow Street will no longer have access to 12^th Avenue.

2. Traffic north-bound on Heather Street will only be able to turn east onto 12^th Avenue. It will not be able to turn to the west or continue north across 12^th Avenue. (A significant amount of traffic currently does so.)

It is clear that this traffic will, therefore, proceed east along 13^th Avenue (through the 700 and 600 blocks) and turn left at Ash Street. This turn on Ash Street will be made much easier by the proposed diagonal diverter at 13^th Avenue and Ash Street. This raises the prospect of not only more, but faster traffic in the two blocks, since the traffic racing along 13^th Avenue is no longer impeded at Ash Street by a stop sign or crossing traffic.

Of course, similar reasoning applies in the reverse. Traffic west-bound on 12^th Avenue will not be able to turn south onto Heather or Willow Streets. North-bound traffic on Heather Street will not be able to cross 12^th Avenue. All of this traffic will use Ash Street and the 600 block of 13^th Avenue, aided by the proposed diverter.

It is true that the Diversionary Traffic Calming Plan will benefit the 500 blocks of 13^th and 14^th Avenues; however, what is needed is a traffic calming plan that benefits all parts of the neighbourhood. Its aim should be to cause traffic to use existing arterial routes (i.e. 12^th Avenue, 16^th Avenue, Cambie Street, etc.) rather than to cut through residential neighbourhoods. Clearly, a plan that benefits one part of the neighbourhood at the expense of another, such as the proposed Diversionary Traffic Calming Plan, is not an acceptable solution. Therefore, I opposed the proposed Diversionary Traffic Calming Plan.

However, if the Diversionary Traffic Calming Plan is chosen, it must be amended to include a means of calming traffic on the 600 and 700 blocks of 13^th Avenue (and particularly the 600 block to which the Diversionary Traffic Calming Plan will divert traffic). I suggest:

1. a right-in/right-out diverter on the south side of the intersection of 12^th Avenue and Ash Street; or

2. a diagonal diverter running from the northwest to southeast corners of the intersection at 13^th Avenue and Heather Street.

The right-in/right-out diverter at 12^th Avenue and Heather Street should not be installed. That intersection should remain unchanged.

· Hello Sara
Thank you for calling me back so quickly this morning.
The following is just a brief summary of what I called about this morning.
We live on 13th avenue between Ash and Heather. It has always been rather busy for a side street and the traffic calming proposals sent out in May for comment were most welcome. We voted for the diversion as the traffic on 13th is quite noticeable and felt that a little inconvenience was worth getting some calm in the neighbourhood.
However, we have had cause to rethink that recently. The recent construction on 12th has really driven up the traffic on 13th and we noticed that they actually seem to be following the path that reflects the diversion at Ash and 13th and that it would do little to hinder traffic coming along 13th from the East or turning off Ash onto 13th and heading West. There is substantial number of cars doing this so we started to look at just exactly what is happening. Basically there seems to be two sources of "busyness" in the area. One source has to do with cars going between Ash and Cambie, and the proposed diversion at Ash and 13th does a great job of trying to cut this off. It also stops cars coming from Cambie and running all the way along 13th.
However, there are a significant volume of cars that go from the South or West and head over to and along Ash to 12th. They:
Travel East on 12th, turn south on Ash and then west on 13th and away they go to wherever.
Go North down Heather and turn or cross at 12th.
Go east along 13th and turn North onto Ash and cross 12th or turn onto 12th.
Go East along 14th, swing North onto Ash and cross 12th or turn onto 12th.
All of this happens at very high, non residential, "gosh we are in a hurry to get somewhere else" velocities-i.e.-at least 50 kph.
All of the above also operates in reverse with the traffic flowing in the opposite directions.
While the propose diversions will help the people east of Ash, it is my belief and concern that it will make it much worse for the people on 13th west of Ash for the following reasons:
The people now using 14th and turning North down Ash will find the diversion a problem and so will go down to 13th, turn, travel along 13th, and sweep directly onto Ash in parallel with the diversion.
The people who used to be able to cross 12th at Heather will be cut off and so the only way across 12th will be to move over and use Ash-which now sweeps them directly onto 13th, or requires using 13th to get to Ash to go North across 12th
Cars going up Ash which used to go up to 14th and turn west will now do that on 13th because the diversion will force them to do that, and it heads them off in the direction they wanted to go anyway.
All in all - it seems to be a good solution for East of Ash, but it seems to me that it will substantially increase the already significant non-local traffic running along 13th between Oak and Ash.
All of the above makes us want to reconsider our positive vote for the diversion scheme. In order to now support the current diversion scheme, which we believe will significantly increase traffic on 13th between Ash and Heather, we believe something along the lines of the following is needed:
The traffic flow to or on 13th needs to be interrupted.
This could be done by adding a diversion at Heather and 13th going from South-East to North-West.
Making the intersection at Ash a right-in and right-out intersection. This would stop the cross traffic on Ash at 12th and stop the east bound 12th avenue traffic from making left turns onto Ash and running along 13th.
How the hospital parking garage fits into the traffic flow may be worth looking at.
Cheers-and looking forward to a solution that works for the whole neighbourhood, not just East of Ash.

· Hi Sara:
I received the information package on the traffic calming south of 16th Avenue.
I have already returned the survey to you but wanted to add some additional thoughts.
I had actually planned to write to city hall about the extra traffic coming onto 14th Avenue from south bound lanes of Cambie. I have watched this from my balcony in the morning rush hour and noticed many many cars using this as a short cut route.
It seems to me that the non-diversionary plan serves to do little to alleviate this problem. The diversionary plan may do this but it also inhibits access in and out of 13th avenue garages.
I am not sure if it as option but I believe that a "No Left Turn" (between 7-9am?) sign at 14th and maybe 13th also.
I have also been informed about the nurses residence and the fact that the traffic from there may be diverted onto 14th in order to avoid congestion at 12th. This concerns me as there is already a lot of traffic using the area as a through route.
 
I am not sure if I mentioned in the comments on the survey that it would have been much better to mail these information packages out.
Thanks very much for your time and please do not hesitate to contact me should you need to.

· Hello,

 

I have returned my survey form but realize that my choice of the diversionary plan which I favour over the other, still leaves a lot to be desired. It seems as if it will send traffic circling around the complex where I live (639 W 14th) in a never ending stream. Also 14th Avenue between Cambie and Heather for instance remains open to misuse by motorists. I suggest a three way stop at Ash.
 
I look forward to the open house to see whether some further innovations to the plan have evolved.
 
thank you,
----

· You gave me a survey form the other day, and I put it in such a good place that now I can't find it. However, I would like to make a couple of comments.

1) Ash at 12 Ave --southbound - the north leg curb lane should be signed 'Right turn only' . Southbound traffic tries to merge within the intersection, from 2 lanes to 1 lane. A 'Right turn only' lane designation sign would eliminate this hazardous movement. (The south leg is narrower than the north leg on the west side).

2) The proposed extension of the rush hour regulation to 7pm from 6pm is not compatible with the neighbourhood. East/west rush hour traffic should be using Broadway which is a major arterial, whereas 12 Ave is mainly residential and a 'quiet' hospital zone. The existing traffic on 12 Ave is very noisy with high speeds that should also be 'calmed' . Many pedestrians in the area are handicapped, ill (possibly medicated/limited mobility/mental disability) and in wheelchairs, with reduced awareness of inattentive drivers and traffic hazards. There is also a need for 'Quiet, Hospital Zone' signage -- the excessive noise of speeding motorcycles/cars with loud mufflers, trucks, boombox vehicles, road rage, plus all of the other environmental noise, make this a very stressful place to live.

I am looking forward to the traffic calming measures and hope they can be installed very soon.

Thanks, ----

Comments or questions? Send us e-mail at info@city.vancouver.bc.ca
© 2002 City of Vancouver