Vancouver City Council |
CITY OF VANCOUVER
POLICY REPORT
ENVIRONMENT
Date:
April 28, 2004
Author:
M. Holland
S. PanderPhone No.
6677 & 616-2461
RTS No.:
03780
CC File No.:
3501
Meeting Date:
May 18, 2004
TO:
Vancouver City Council
FROM:
The Sustainability Support Group in consultation with the Cool Vancouver Task Force and Sustainability Sponsor Group
SUBJECT:
The Cool Vancouver Task Force's Draft Community Climate Change Action Plan for the City of Vancouver
RECOMMENDATION
A. THAT City Council receive the Cool Vancouver Task Force's Community Climate Change Action Plan and thank the Cool Vancouver Task Force for their significant contributions to Vancouver's work on climate change.
B. THAT Council request that staff undertake a consultation process with the community and stakeholders on the Draft Community Climate Change Action Plan.
C. THAT Council approve the hiring of Karyo Communications to lead Phase I of the consultation process with the community and stakeholders in accordance with the consultation plan in this report, at a total cost of $75,000, with $50,000 of the funding already approved in the current-year budget and $25,000 that was awarded to the City in 2003 from the GVRD's Sustainability Enterprise Fund.
D. THAT, subject to the City being awarded $100,000 from the Federation of Canadian Municipalities' Green Municipal Enabling Funds (FCM's GMEF), Council approve the hiring of Karyo Communications to lead Phase II of the consultation process with the community and stakeholders in accordance with the consultation plan in this report, at a total cost of $75,000.
E. THAT Council endorse several recommendations of the Draft Community Climate Change Action Plan (CCAP) for immediate implementation concurrent with and as part of the consultation process on the CCAP, including:
i. THAT the Chief Building Official report back to Council on the recommended approach to update the Energy Utilization By-law as soon as feasible.
ii. THAT Council direct staff to work with other appropriate local organisations to design a friendly competition for employee home retrofits ("the Corporate Climate Change (C3) Challenge"), and to report back to Council for approval once the program has been designed and a funding source identified;
iii. THAT Council, contingent on the City receiving the $50,000 of Provincial and Federal funding (CAEE) that it has applied for, allocate $25,000 of funding from the 2004 Contingency Reserve to both hire a temporary Community Energy Efficiency Coordinator (subject to classification by the General Manager of Human Resources) and support the Coordinators' work related to implementing the C3 Challenge, non-market housing retrofits, institutional retrofits, trip reduction and efficient driver training programs, as well as other initiatives that may assist in the consultation process.
iv. THAT Council instruct the Director of Finance to work with other staff members and report back to Council regarding the feasibility and the implications of establishing an endowment fund similar to the Toronto Atmospheric Fund that would be used to promote energy efficiency and reduced emissions.
v. THAT Council instruct the Sustainability Support Group in conjunction with the Director of Finance to develop a financial plan associated with the implementation of the Community Climate Change Action Plan.
CITY MANAGER'S COMMENTS
The City Manager recommends approval of the foregoing.
The Draft Community Climate Change Action Plan is a well thought out, comprehensive plan that contains a wide range of ideas for reducing greenhouse gas emissions in and around the City of Vancouver. However, in moving forward with this, it is important to recognise that many of these initiatives fall beyond the City's jurisdiction, or are the responsibility of one or more other agencies in addition to the City.
Since at this time there are very few funding sources in place for the initiatives recommended by the Cool Vancouver Task Force, it is important that the City be very careful through the proposed consultation process to not create a public perception that these recommendations can or will be implemented without further work. Throughout the consultation process, it should be emphasised that before the recommended initiatives can be implemented, appropriate cost-benefit analyses must be conducted, and funding sources secured, for each initiative.
COUNCIL POLICY
On October 16, 1990, Council approved in principle Clouds of Change Recommendation #1 to reduce carbon dioxide emissions by 20% as part of the actions to address global climate change issues, subject to future reports on costs and trade-offs involved in achieving the objectives and targets.
In 1995, Vancouver joined the Federation of Canadian Municipalities' "20% Club", which became the Partners for Climate Protection Program in 1998.
Council has adopted the Transport 2021 Regional Transportation Plan (1993), Vancouver Transportation Plan (1997), Downtown Vancouver Transportation Plan (2002) and Vancouver Transit Strategy (2002) which generally require transit and other non-auto modes to accommodate future increases in travel demand. The City supports maintaining peak road capacity from the region at no more than the present level, with no further significant investment to expand motor vehicle capacity into Vancouver.
On April 23, 2002, Council adopted a Definition and Principles of Sustainability to guide, prioritize, and improve the sustainability of City actions and operations.
On May 2, 2002, Council unanimously carried the motion, proposed by the Federation of Canadian Municipalities, to support the Canadian Government's ratification of the Kyoto Protocol.
On March 25, 2003, Council approved an emissions reduction target of 20% from 1990 levels for the corporation of the City of Vancouver, subject to evaluation of the implications of the target to ensure it is realistic. On this same date, Council created the Cool Vancouver Task Force and requested that it report back with a report on the components of a Greenhouse Gas Reduction Action Plan for both the corporation and the community.
On June 24, 2003, Council received the Cool Vancouver Task Force's Discussion Paper on Greenhouse Gas Reduction Planning and approved (in principle) a target of 6% below 1990 emissions levels for the city (community) as a whole, subject to evaluation of the implications of the target to ensure it is realistic. Council also approved a process to develop GHG Reduction Plans for both the City (Corporate) and the Community and approved $30,000 for technical support for the development of these plans.
On December 2, 2003, Council unanimously approved the Corporate Climate Change Action Plan as proposed from the Cool Vancouver Task Force, affirming the target of a 20% reduction from 1990 levels by 2010 of emissions from the City's own operations and facilities. On this same date, Council approved funding $50,000 for a consultation process for the Community Climate Change Action Plan, as well as another $30,000 for technical expertise to support the consultation process.
PURPOSE and SUMMARY
This report is submitted to Council to convey the Cool Vancouver Task Force's Draft Community Climate Change Action Plan (CCAP) for the City of Vancouver, and to request authorization to commence a consultation process to encourage feedback from the community and stakeholders on the Draft Community CCAP and assistance in developing the actions to meet the targets for the purpose of making revisions and refinements and bringing a final plan to Council by December, 2004. In addition, this report suggests early implementation of a limited group of emissions reduction-related initiatives.
The Draft Community CCAP outlines how Vancouver as a community can reduce its Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions. The Plan is the product of a year of work by both the Cool Vancouver Task Force and City staff, with additional input from technical experts at The Sheltair Group.
Targets
The Plan outlines how Vancouver can achieve the following emissions reductions:
· Return to its 1990 levels of emissions by 2010; and
· Achieve a 6% reduction below 1990 levels by 2012.In order to quantify the total emission reductions required to meet the 6% reduction target the following emissions inventory numbers have been established:
· 1990 GHG emissions for Vancouver = 2.9 million tonnes
· 2012 Business-as-usual forecasted GHG emissions = 3.16 million tonnes
· 2012 Targeted Total GHG Emissions = 2.75 million tonnes (Vancouver's share of the national 6% reduction target)Meeting our emission reduction target means that we must reduce our forecasted annual GHG emissions by 410,000 tonnes between now and 2012.
Initially the Task Force worked to create a plan that would achieve the 6% reduction by 2010, but ultimately it was agreed that there was insufficient time to achieve the reductions by 2010 and a 2012 deadline was seen as more reasonable yet still ambitious.
Emissions are measured on a "per person basis" - based on Vancouver's share of federal per capita emissions.
The Energy and Emissions Linkage
This Plan focuses heavily on reducing the use of "energy" because it is through using energy that most of Vancouver's emissions occur. For instance, emissions occur during the burning of fuel for transportation and space or water heating, as well as through the burning of natural gas and coal to create electrical energy. In the past, BC has supplied most of its electricity through hydropower, however, BC Hydro is now meeting new demand for electricity largely through natural gas or coal powered generators, thus increasing emissions associated with electricity use. While BC Hydro is also using "renewable sources" to meet some of its energy requirements, this percentage is relatively small compared to fossil fuel supplied sources. The only primary source of emissions not associated with the "use" of energy, is the "methane" that escapes from the city's landfill, which the City is now capturing for re-use.Personal and Institutional Behaviour
Changes are required in many areas to meet the proposed emissions reductions target, including:
· Personal lifestyle choices - the things we all can do everyday to be more energy efficient; and
· Institutional (incl gov't) policy and programs - to address the approach we have to governance and organizational practices to reduce emissions and to put influence on the market to make changes in the emissions associated with goods and services.This Plan addresses both of the above areas, and while it proposes a list of things we each can do in our daily lives to reduce emissions, it primarily focuses on changes to policy and programs in key agencies. The reason for this focus is that to achieve significant emissions reductions over the long term, we need to make these "foundational" changes in how we deal with energy and emissions with respect to our buildings, transportation systems and others.
High-Priority Action Areas
Several areas of action have been identified as priorities for change in policy and programs to reduce GHG emissions in Vancouver, including:
· Home energy renovations
· Institutional facility energy retrofits
· Large commercial building retrofits
· Bio-diesel fuel blends
· Driver training and anti-idling
· Transportation alternativesThe Draft Community CCAP offers recommendations in each of these areas for the Vancouver community to undertake to meet the proposed target of Vancouver's share of Canada's 6% reduction in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions below 1990 levels by 2012.
Everyone is Involved
The City of Vancouver does not have jurisdiction over many areas where action needs to be taken. This plan therefore outlines a comprehensive path to meet the City's reduction targets, including actions that many stakeholders need to pursue, from the federal government to the individual. The Task Force suggests that the City do everything it can within its jurisdiction to reduce emissions and that it encourage others to do the same to meet this collective goal.Costs are Unknown
The real financial implications to the City and Vancouverites associated with implementing this plan are largely unknown at this point. The primary reasons for this are:
· The costs are associated with the specific actions to achieve the plan's goals and these will be developed in conjunction with the upcoming consultation process. Some action paths could be very costly and others may be more cost-effective;
· The costs will be shared by many stakeholders;
· The Federal Government is increasingly investing in climate change initiatives and changing policy and programs accordingly;
· Industry is increasingly addressing climate change issues (such as the auto industry) making reductions more cost-effective over time; and
· The cost of fossil fuels is predicted to rise reducing the comparative costs of energy saving measures.The scale of costs for implementing this plan are also connected to the final target and completion date chosen for the plan, as the proposed date may change due to feedback during consultation. The greater the reductions chosen and the shorter the time to meet the target, the greater the cost will be.
A financial strategy to support the implementation of the plan will be developed in conjunction with the consultation process.
BACKGROUND
The Science
Scientists throughout the world are in widespread agreement that the earth's climate is warming and that one the primary causes of that warming is human activity, particularly that which increases the concentrations of six gases that are known as "Greenhouse Gases" (GHG) in the atmosphere (i.e., carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons, sulphur hexafluoride).Solar energy from the sun hits the earth and a significant amount of the energy then re-radiates out into space. Greenhouse gases affect the atmosphere by inhibiting the reflection of solar energy that hits the earth's surface, thereby trapping extra heat and warming the earth's atmosphere. The impacts of global warming on climate, water, sea level and other areas are widely believed to be potentially significant and catastrophic if the process of climate change is not addressed.
City Leadership
The City of Vancouver has shown significant leadership on the issue of climate change in the past 15 years, both in many City initiatives as well as advocating and organizing at the provincial and federal level.Following Council's support of the Federal Government's ratification of the Kyoto Protocol, the City has moved forward with new plans to directly address the City's GHG emissions through a number of venues, including:
· Working with the Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM) through their Partners for Climate Protection (PCP) process which offers a five step process with support from FCM to develop and implement a GHG reduction plan;
· Establishing the Cool Vancouver Task Force to advise staff on the components of a GHG Action Plan and its range of issues and priorities;
· Funding, developing and approving a Corporate CCAP for the City's buildings, facilities, fleets and operations with a target of a 20% reduction in GHG emissions below 1990 levels to be achieved by 2010;
· Setting a working target for emissions reductions of 6% below 1990 emissions levels for the city (community) as a whole; and
· Approving funds for consultation and additional technical expertise to support the development of the Community CCAP.DISCUSSION OF PROCESS
Creating the Cool Vancouver Task Force
The Cool Vancouver Task Force was created in March 2003 by Council to assist the City in developing Climate Change Action Plans (CCAPs) for both the City as a corporation (Corporate CCAP) and for the city as a whole community (Community CCAP). The Task Force members were chosen by Council and the co-chairs of the Task Force to represent a very wide range of interests and groups (a membership list of the Task Force is included in the appendix 1 of the Draft Community CCAP).Developing a Discussion Paper
During its first three months of operation, the Task Force created a Discussion Paper on GHG Reduction Planning that was presented to Council on June 24, 2003. This Paper explored the issue of climate change and identified a wide range of potential actions to reduce emissions. Council received the Discussion Paper and thanked the Task Force for its work. It then asked the Task Force to continue its work and bring forward a Corporate and Community Climate Change Action Plan for the City. Council approved $30,000 in funds to hire expertise in technical issues to support the Task Force and staff in the creation of these plans.Developing the Corporate CC AP
During the months of July to October 2003, the Task Force, City staff and the Sheltair Group worked together to create a Corporate Climate Change Action Plan and the first sections of a Community Climate Change Action Plan. The Task Force, in light of the scope of work required to complete these Plans, recommended the Corporate CCAP be brought to Council at the earliest possible date and that the Community CCAP follow.On December 2, 2003, Council unanimously approved the Corporate CCAP, including funding for its immediate implementation, which has since commenced.
Energy and Emissions Inventory and Baselines
In order to set a target for emissions reductions below 1990 levels, the City first had to identify its levels of emissions in 1990. City staff worked closely with the GVRD, BC Hydro, Terasen, TransLink's AirCare Division and others to establish detailed energy consumption and emissions baselines for the past 15 years. This process is described more fully in a later section.Developing the Draft Community CCAP
The Task Force has been working closely with staff from many departments through the coordination work of the Sustainability Group to develop the Draft Community CCAP, since fall 2003.Consultation
The Draft CCAP needs to be discussed with a broad range of stakeholders and the public. This process is described more thoroughly in the next section.Final Community CCAP
Following consultation, integration of the advice and feedback from the consultation and technical experts, the Task Force and City staff will complete the proposed final Community CCAP and present it to Council for adoption. It is expected that this final plan will be ready by the end of 2004.Integration of Climate Change Considerations into all City Activity
Currently, the City's Sustainability Group has been coordinating the Task Force and the development of the Corporate and Community CCAPs. This process is thereby through this staff team being integrated into a larger sustainability direction emerging in the City.More importantly, staff from many City departments have taken Council's direction that addressing climate change is a key policy priority and have therefore put this process at the top of their priority lists, undertaking a significant amount of work in a very short time. The results of this intensity of work is that the City of Vancouver has completed an amount of work on this issue that typically takes much longer in other jurisdictions, and furthermore, has completed this work to a higher level of detail than is often achieved.
CONSULTATION PROCESS
The Cool Vancouver Task Force has been the focus of consultation on this plan. The Task Force represents several dozen stakeholders and community interests on climate change issues and the City has had the benefit of their direct guidance and feedback on issues over the entire process to develop the CCAPs. However, more widespread discussion is now needed, with other stakeholders and the public.
The Task Force is submitting this Draft Community CCAP to Council for permission to commence a several-month public consultation process with the community and stakeholders, following which a final Community CCAP will be submitted to Council for approval and implementation.
Purpose for Consultation
At the end of the consultation process, staff and the Task Force would like to have identified a pragmatic path to achieve each one of the proposed strategies for reduction. The CCAP outlines a series of strategies and "sub targets" for the amount of emissions reductions proposed to achieve through each area. As noted earlier, the City of Vancouver cannot implement all aspects of this plan - it will take effort from everybody. Thus the "action plan" needs to be created "with" those who will be responsible for implementing it.The purpose of the consultation process therefore includes:
· To raise general public awareness and support for reducing GHG emissions;
· To acquire feedback from the public and stakeholders on the proposed Plan; and
· To develop with key stakeholders a clear set of specific actions for implementing the Plan.The Consultation Plan
A proposed consultation process has several basic elements including:
· A public "launch" for the consultation process
_ May 31, 2004 at the Vancouver Public Library including a planned special appearance by David Suzuki as a speaker.
· Public education
_ The Draft Community CCAP will be made widely accessible to all who are interested, in paper and digital form;
_ Research into public attitudes is proposed (where funding permits) as well as the development of information for widespread distribution;
_ The City's website will include information on this and related projects;· Issue-based roundtables of stakeholders on core action areas
_ These roundtables would be organized around key issues and actions proposed in the Draft Community CCAP, including but not limited to:
· Housing retrofits for increased energy efficiency;
· Commercial and institutional building retrofits for increased energy efficiency;
· Energy efficiency for new buildings (all types);
· Cleaner fuels;
· A range of transportation issues including transit planning and financing, school-related transportation, driver training, corporate fleets management, and travel pricing and others;
· Intergovernmental relationships; and
· Others.· Pilot projects
_ The consultation process proposed for the Draft Community CCAP goes beyond the exchange of information. As noted in the recommendations in this report, staff are proposing to commence, in a limited fashion, the implementation of some of the proposed actions to gain insight into challenges the initiatives may present;
_ These include a number of programs, but most notably "The C3 Challenge" - a friendly competition between the City and other key organizations (including the GVRD and possibly Hydro, Vancity and others) to see which organization's staff can undertake the largest proportional number of home energy audits and various energy efficiency upgrades. It is hoped that the experience City staff gain from undertaking their own home energy retrofits will significantly improve the initiatives with other organizations and the public to promote their efforts in similar areas;
_ Other programs such as the negotiation of mileage reporting with the Province and ICBC;· Integration with other City consultation projects
_ The Task Force has recommended that some of the key issues and recommendations from the Draft Community CCAP be integrated into the consultation processes and policy discussions associated with other ongoing City projects, including but not limited to:
· The CityPlan Neighbourhood Visioning processes;
· The LEED / Green Building project;
· The Local Area Transit Management Planning process; and
· Others.Consultation Specialists and Funding
The City requested Expressions of Interest / Proposals in the fall of 2003 from interested companies to lead the consultation process. Following a full objective evaluation of the submissions including staff from several City departments, the group led by Karyo Communications was unanimously selected as the best suited to lead the consultation process. The Karyo team offers significant experience and demonstrated ability to deal with issues around emissions reduction measures in buildings, transportation, intergovernmental relations, sustainability, and other key issues. Karyo also offers a full service communications capacity to support widespread public information dissemination.The City has established the first phase of funding for the consultation process at $75,000, sourced from $50,000 approved by Council for this purpose (December, 2003) in addition to $25,000 from the 2003 award funding from the GVRD's Sustainability Enterprise Fund (2003).
The City has also applied to the Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM) Green Municipal Enabling Funds (GMEF) for an additional $100,000 to assist in the funding of the consultation and technical support for the Community CCAP. It is uncertain when the City will hear on whether this application has been successful, but notice is anticipated by July, 2004 - early in the consultation process.
The proposed consultation process has been structured around two phases of funding, to be successful with or without the GMEF grant. If the City receives the GMEF grant, a more comprehensive consultation process is possible, including additional research into community attitudes and willingness to make changes to support reduced emissions, and developing a social marketing strategy to promote emissions reduction.
DISCUSSION OF ISSUES in the COMMUNITY CCAP
Community Emissions Profile
The emissions inventory was a complex process that was completed through identifying how much energy Vancouverites used in their buildings (utility bills) and its associated emissions. Transportation emissions were then calculated through integrating mileage with fuel sales for vehicles registered in Vancouver. Emissions were then calculated based on that fuel use.This piece of work was a significant undertaking, but ultimately it was successful. Staff believe that Vancouver's emissions inventory is detailed and credible and establishes a defensible target for reductions. Staff also note that there will be challenges in the future in monitoring progress due to changes in the AirCare protocols, and this issue is raised in the Community CCAP, and as a result, staff are recommending that the City commence discussions with the Province and ICBC about developing more reliable methods for tracking mileage in the city.
Emissions summary
In order to quantify the total emission reductions required to meet the 6% reduction target the following emissions inventory numbers have been established:
· 1990 GHG emissions for Vancouver = 2.9 million tonnes
· 2012 Targeted Total GHG Emissions = 2.75 million tonnes (Vancouver's share of the national 6% reduction target)
· 2012 Business-as-usual forecasted GHG emissions = 3.16 million tonnesMeeting our emission reduction target means that we must reduce our forecasted annual GHG emissions by 410,000 tonnes between now and 2012.
Developing the emissions inventory
The above inventory was developed largely in accordance with FCM's PCP emissions measurement protocol that is the standard for municipalities across Canada. Vancouver's inventory varied slightly in methodology from the PCP protocol around transportation-related emissions.The PCP protocol would allocate to Vancouver's inventory all emissions from vehicles that travel anywhere within Vancouver's boundaries, including vehicles that only travel "through" Vancouver. As a further example, this method would allocate emissions regionally from a vehicle travelling on local roads (such as Kingsway) from Surrey to West Vancouver (depending on its route) partly to Surrey, partly to New Westminster, partly to Burnaby, partly to Vancouver and finally partly to West Vancouver.
The problem that was identified with this method is that it does not sufficiently recognize or support local land use and transportation policy initiatives to develop mixed use, complete, walkable communities or decreases in per capita vehicle use within Vancouver. With the PCP protocol emissions from other municipalities who may not be so aggressively promoting walkable communities would be allocated to Vancouver regardless of Vancouver's actions.
An alternative measurement method for transportation emissions
Working with the GVRD, Vancouver has undertaken an alternative emissions measurement protocol for light duty vehicles (including cars, light trucks, mini-vans, etc) that is more "policy-supportive" to efforts to reduce automobile transportation within Vancouver. The new measurement method includes Vancouver's emissions inventory taking responsibility for "all emissions associated with a light duty vehicle registered to a resident / business within Vancouver", regardless of where that vehicle travels. This approach will more directly recognize through monitoring Vancouver's emissions inventory, successes from Vancouver's emissions reductions policies.During the drafting of the Draft Community CCAP, both staff from the City of Vancouver and the GVRD concurred that this measurement approach best supports the policies of the Livable Region Strategic Plan, the emerging Sustainable Region Initiative, as well a whole host of Vancouver's policies.
Vancouver utilized AirCare data to establish the mileage associated with vehicles owned by residents of Vancouver. However AirCare plans to reduce its schedule of checks for new cars to once ever 3 years commencing in 2005. This change in practice will make any accurate measurement of mileage difficult in the future. Due to this challenge, it is recommended that Council instruct staff to approach the Province and ICBC to require mileage be recorded at the time of auto insurance renewal and that this information be provided to municipalities on annual basis. It is expected that this information would be associated with the first 3 symbols of the postal code of the owners address. As such, mileage would be available at a level not only highly useful for emissions monitoring, but also for larger scale transportation planning.
EMISSIONS REDUCTION TARGETS
The following discussion on targets examines measurement methods and proposed dates for achieving those targets.
Measurement methods
The Draft Community CCAP was developed around a working target of achieving a 6% reduction in emissions below 1990 levels for Vancouver by 2010 - based on all emissions coming from within City limits (geographically based rather than population based). This target was recommended by the Task Force and approved in principle by Council as "a starting point" for planning. This target translated to a 425,000 tonne reduction in annual GHG emissions by 2010 from all sources within Vancouver's city limits.During the development of the Draft CCAP, additional perspectives on the targets have emerged that have important implications to Vancouver, including:
· Vancouverites have significantly lower emissions per capita than many who live in other cities in Canada in part due to Vancouver's compact development pattern and high levels of liveability and walkability;
· Vancouver is growing disproportionately fast compared to the national community average; and
· The federal Kyoto target was not allocated regionally but rather conceived of as a national challenge regardless of where people live.Staff are recommending that the municipal target of a 6% reduction in emissions be understood as the city's "fair share" of Canada's 6% target based on population. The reason for this recommendation is that this revised target recognises population growth but does not place an extra burden upon faster growing communities while excusing slower growing communities from taking any action at all.
The national per person emissions reduction commitment means that all Canadians must reduce their GHG emissions by 27% compared to 1990 levels by 2012. This target is arrived at by combining the estimated national population increase of 21% from 1990 to 2012 with a 6% overall GHG reduction target for the country.
Vancouver's "fair share of Canada's 6% reduction target" based on its projected 2012 population translates into a 410,000 tonne reduction in annual GHG emissions from the 2012 business-as-usual emissions forecast.
Target completion dates
The Draft Community CCAP was originally developed around a target date of 2010. This date falls in the middle of the Kyoto measurement window (2008-2012) and corresponds to the recommendations of the PCP protocol and the City's hosting of the 2010 Winter Olympics.Staff are now concerned that a 2010 target is likely not possible to attain, even with extreme effort. The reason for this concern lies not in whether the reductions can be achieved, but rather in how long it will take to implement the required changes, programs and retrofits, in the context of the market and the timelines for senior government investment in reduction measures.
The recommended schedule for reaching the 6% reduction target is now as follows:
· 2010 interim target - Return to 1990 per capita levels of emissions
· 2012 - Reach the 6% reduction below 1990 levels (by end of Kyoto measurement window)Staff have received advice from many stakeholders who have noted that while setting a challenging target is important to stimulate immediate action, the City should not choose a target that is not reachable, as it may undermine commitment and momentum to the long term emissions reductions. As one discussion described it, "...emissions reductions initiatives in the City should not be seen as an ambitious `post-Christmas diet,' rather it should be more like a long term, sensible change in lifestyle."
The Task Force has noted that the City should view the Kyoto Protocol target is only the first step of a series of emissions reductions that the scientific community has called for in order to "stabilize the climate change process." This will likely mean that following 2010, new global emissions reduction targets will be negotiated, including a continuing mandate for Vancouver to make further reductions from those in this Plan.
Sequestration of Carbon Dioxide
Sequestration is a favourite topic of climate change discussions at the federal level, recognizing that trees capture (sequester) carbon out of the atmosphere during the process of photosynthesis. This argument has some validity for climate change planning at a national scale, however it has limited applicability to Vancouver. It is expected that the direct climate change benefits from sequestered carbon is expected to be less than 1,000 tonnes per year for a significant tree-planting campaign, including 5,400 trees net annual increase in the city (estimated current tree planting rate).
A REVIEW OF THE DRAFT COMMUNITY CCAP ACTIONS
Changes are required in many areas to meet the proposed emissions reductions target, including:
· Personal lifestyle choices - the things we can all do to be more energy efficient in our personal lives; and
· Institutional policy and programs (incl gov't) - to address governance and organizational practices to reduce emissions and to put influence on the market to make changes in the emissions associated with goods and services.This Plan addresses both of the above areas, and while it proposes a list of things we each can do in our daily lives to reduce emissions, it primarily focuses on changes to policy and programs in key agencies. The reason being for this focus is that to achieve significant emissions reductions over the long term, we need to make these "foundational" changes in how we deal with energy and emissions with respect to our buildings, transportation systems and others.
The following reviews the primary initiatives addressed in both of the above areas in the Draft Community CCAP.
PERSONAL LIFESTYLE
The Draft Community CCAP outlines a range of areas where Vancouverites can take personal action to educate themselves and take action to reduce energy use and emissions. These include actions with respect to:
· How we live at home and take care of our houses;
· Decisions we make around food;
· Options we chose for transportation;
· Things we can do in the workplace; and
· Activities we choose for recreation.The federal government has launched a "one-tonne challenge" to support Canadian citizens reducing their emissions through personal behaviour. Many other organizations are supporting personal choices that reduce emissions, including the Suzuki Foundation, Better Environmentally Sound Transportation, and Vancouver's Society Promoting Environmental Conservations (SPEC) - all of whom worked with the City on the Task Force.
INSTITUTIONAL POLICY AND PROGRAMS
As noted above, in addition to personal lifestyle choices, the Plan calls for action in the following policy and program areas:
· Buildings (residential, commercial /institutional and industrial);
· Transportation;
· Energy systems; and
· Solid waste management.The following outlines the key issues associated with achieving the desired emissions reductions in each area.
BUILDINGS
Buildings account for a significant portion of the city's emissions. Emissions from buildings come primarily from energy used (natural gas and electricity) for space and water heating, as well as from lighting and "equipment" (plug-loads), and others.
In the long run, the most cost-effective approach to making buildings more energy efficient is to simply build new buildings to be more energy efficient. However, because this Plan is focused on achieving emissions reductions in the short term (2012) as well as the long run, much of this Plan has had to focus on retrofitting existing buildings for increased energy efficiency. Even with a significant growth rate, the total number of existing buildings far outnumbers new buildings that will be built by 2012.
Buildings are organized for the purpose of this plan into 3 categories:
· Residential;
· Commercial; and
· Institutional.These building types are further classified as "existing (for retrofits)" or "new".
Existing Residential Buildings
The greatest amount of energy in the residential sector is consumed by single-family homes and duplexes. Nearly 70% of residential building emissions in the city come from single family and semi-detached homes. This group also happens to be the majority of the older, less energy-efficient stock. Moreover, most population growth in the city is being absorbed in multifamily residential areas so energy efficient new buildings will be primarily multi-family buildings. Thus the retrofitting of single-family and semi-detached stock is one of the highest priority areas for action in the Draft Community CCAP.
The Draft Community CCAP calls for a significant program of retrofits in existing homes through the measures below. The target for this housing group is 35% of detached/semi-detached non-market housing will be retrofitted to a level that improves their energy efficiency by 25% by 2012. This is a challenging but achievable target.
The Draft Community CCAP outlines a wide range of measures proposed to achieve this target including:
· Information on opportunities for "do-it' yourself" improvements;
· Awareness of energy efficient renovation rebates/funding available;
· Encouraging the home renovation industry to promote efficiency considerations amongst their customers;
· The development of a business case for non-market housing retrofits; and
· Friendly competition for home energy improvements amongst staff of major organisations in the city.Existing Commercial and Institutional Building Retrofits
Commercial buildings (offices, retail, warehouses, and institutional) are another significant source of GHG emissions in Vancouver. Improving the energy efficiency of the existing building stock is one of the five central strategies in this plan.The Draft Community CCAP calls for significant retrofitting of commercial and institutional buildings to increase efficiency through measures described below. The 2012 target for retrofits includes:
· 25% of medium and large commercial buildings to improve energy efficiency by 15%;
· 75% of institutional buildings improve energy efficiency by 15%; and
· 15% of small commercial buildings improve energy efficiency by 10%.As with residential retrofits, this is a very challenging target, but there is significant expertise and interest in the commercial buildings community for this. In particular, BC's Building Owners and Managers Association (BOMA) has launched a "Go Green" campaign that assists commercial building owners and operators to achieve more sustainable building performance. It is expected that stakeholders will work with BOMA to identify the most effective path forward on this part of the target.
![]()
New Buildings
New energy efficiency standards for new buildings is one of the most cost- and time-effective long term strategies available to the City to achieve emissions reductions in the future. Since relatively few new buildings will be built in Vancouver before 2010 compared to its current building stock, the implications of this measure are not expected to be significant to a 2010 or 2012 target, but rather to be critical to longer term reductions. The Draft CCAP outlines a range of measures proposed to accomplish this. Two specific measures should be highlighted.
· Updating the City's Energy Utilization Bylaw
It is recommended that the City upgrade the energy efficiency requirements of its Energy Utilization Bylaw to current standards (AHRAE 90.1 - 2001) as a key step in improving the energy efficiency of new buildings. This raised standard should also be applied to significant renovations, through the City's permitting process (where the planned work relates to affected systems). Discussion has been underway with the CBO's office since early 2003 on the proposal to update the building code to reference the ASHRAE 90.1-2001 energy standard. This standard is considered to be more rational and effective for most building forms and will result in approximately 13% less energy consumption than the current standard, ASHRAE 90.1 - 1989. Discussion on this issue has involved the UDI, the Provincial Energy Mines and Resources, and members of the Energy Task Force chaired by BC Hydro. The construction industry has expressed concern with the cost of implementing this standard where it could result in abnormally high incremental costs to achieve full compliance. This concern is largely focused on curtain wall cladding systems for residential high rise buildings with in excess of 60 - 65% exterior glazing. Accordingly, after extensive cost analysis and discussion between interested parties, the CBO intends to present a recommendation to adopt the standard as soon as practicable, but to allow selective relaxations from the standard for a limited time in cases where the incremental cost of full compliance of high performance glazing systems would exceed savings from discounted future energy costs.
o Energy Efficient New Construction for Commercial / Multi-family Buildings
This element would include encouraging new commercial and multi-family buildings to meet the requirements of the Commercial Building Incentive Program (CBIP) which exceeds ASHRAE 90.1 (2001)) by 10- 15%. The target for this initiative is that 50% of all VBBL Part 3 buildings built between now and 2010 meet CBIP requirements and to have 100% compliance thereafter.
Work is being undertaken already on these issues under the direction of the Chief Building Official in consultation with both the Planning Department and the development industry. Staff are proposing to report back to Council on the best path to move forward on these energy efficiency requirement upgrades prior to the end of July 2004.
TRANSPORTATION
Mobile sources such as cars, trucks, and heavy-duty construction equipment are expected to account for over 1.1 million tonnes of GHG emissions (over 35% of all Vancouver emissions) by 2010. The good news in this category is that the growth of vehicle mileage within the city has not increased at anywhere near the rate it has elsewhere in the region. It is believed that this is due to Vancouver's aggressive promotion of mixed use, compact, walkable neighbourhoods and higher density housing.
The Draft Community CCAP includes efforts to reduce the amount of vehicular usage by promoting transportation alternatives and reducing the GHG impacts of vehicles and of the fuels they use in order to meet the 2012 target.
Proposed measures to reduce transportation emissions are consistent with the direction of City transportation plans and the region's Transport 2021 plan. However, Transport 2021 does not include interim targets relevant to the target timeframe proposed in this Plan. In addition, the current proposals provide greater specifics than previous transportation plans in several areas, including adding cleaner fuel and vehicle efficiency measures and expediting shifts towards transportation alternatives. New initiatives that were not known of, or not adequately developed, at the time the original plans were written are also included. A strong focus, towards increasing awareness and usage of practical alternatives to the single occupant automobile, is particularly important in meeting the draft plan's targets.
The Draft Community CCAP focuses on:
· Reducing Automobile Use and Supporting Transportation Alternatives:
o This element includes a bundle of measures to encourage the provision and use of transportation alternatives with an aim of reducing light vehicle use by 10% from the projected 2012 total. Most all aspects of these initiatives are fully harmonious with current transportation policy and directions.
· Promoting Widespread Use of cleaner fuels, including biodiesel and ethanol blends:
o This element includes the continued promotion of biodiesel and ethanol blended fuels fleets and the support for other opportunities for a significant penetration of biodiesel into the regional market, including the following targets:
_ 85% of diesel fuel sales in Vancouver (for all diesel vehicles and heavy construction equipment) need to be of a 20% biodiesel blend by 2012; and
_ 25% of gas sales in Vancouver should be of a 10% ethanol blend by 2012.· Promoting behaviour changes for increased energy efficiency:
o This element includes promoting changes in behaviour including fuel-efficient driving habits, reduced idling of vehicles and the purchase of more efficient vehicles; and
· Encouraging the federal government to increase fuel efficiency standards:
o This element amounts to an important contribution to the CCAP (over 135,000 tonnes) that is based on the Vancouver share of reductions from a federal government commitment to increased efficiencies in new vehicles. We cannot ensure the federal government will follow through (it is outside City jurisdiction), but increased efficiencies are critical to meeting the Kyoto commitment and the Draft Plan calls for local stakeholders to lobby the government to fulfill its commitment.
Once again, it is important to note that the Draft CCAP is not intended to replace the targets and actions outlined in the Vancouver Transportation Plan (1997) and the Downtown Transportation Plan (2002), rather it provides greater specifics regarding transportation demand management and emphasizes the importance of addressing resources to implement the current transportation plans in order to reduce emissions.
ENERGY SYSTEMS
The development of local, renewable energy systems is important to long term emissions reductions in the City, however, they will take time to develop and as such, they will not offer significant emissions reductions between now and 2012. This part of the Climate Change Plan therefore speaks to beyond 2012.
Emissions are generally produced during the creation or extraction of energy and fuels, their transmission and distribution, and ultimately their consumption. The large-scale production of electricity in particular is increasingly accomplished through fossil fuel driven systems that are driving up emissions.
Opportunities exist to create local, more renewable and lower-impact sources of heat and electricity within the city and region. Opportunities also exist to capture heat that is currently wasted.
The Draft Community CCAP focuses its recommendations on local energy systems around:
· Organizational development:
o This element includes the use of advisory groups, local utilities, industrial ecology systems and others to support the research and development of these alternative systems;
· Distributed generation of energy:
o This element includes the generation of heat and electricity in small, decentralized systems throughout the city, especially those that use renewable energy sources; and
· Harvesting and re-circulating of waste heat:
o This element includes the harvesting of waste heat from one land use or building and using that heat elsewhere.
The City has some experience with these systems (geothermal and others) but it is expected that many more opportunities exist and that emissions reductions can be achieved through them.
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT
The final section of emission reduction measures in the Draft Community CCAP is associated with solid waste. This section is more focused on acknowledging what the City is doing now as part of the way to achieving emissions reductions than it is about proposing new programs.
The primary focus in this topic is around capturing methane from the City's landfill. Methane is 20 times more potent than CO2 as a greenhouse gas. The City of Vancouver's currently has a landfill gas recovery program that is reducing Vancouver's GHG emissions by nearly 200,000 tonnes per year.
Additional measures to further reduce GHG emissions from the solid waste stream are to:
o Continue expanding the landfill gas recovery and cogeneration project;
o Increase awareness and enforcement of the solid waste disposal ban on paper; and
o Support existing programs that encourage waste reduction through reducing, re-using, and recycling.ORGANIZATIONAL INITIATIVES
The Cool Vancouver Task Force highlighted the need to develop sufficient "institutional capacity" to implement the Community CCAP. This recommendation recognizes that while it is not the City of Vancouver's responsibility to implement many of the recommendations in the CCAP, some central group should both coordinate the implementation of the plan amongst its many stakeholders, and should be responsible for reporting on its implementation progress.
With this in mind, the Draft Community CCAP recommends the development of a Community Energy and Emissions Group (CEEG) that would coordinate the implementation of the Community CCAP, including finding resources and building partnerships to support its initiatives, as well as monitoring and reporting on its progress.
It is expected that this team would be located in the Sustainability Group in the City of Vancouver unless or until such time as their scope and responsibilities suggested they become more arms length from the City. The Sustainability Group has been the staff team responsible for coordinating the Cool Vancouver Task Force and the drafting of the CCAPs.
Depending on funding availability, the first element of this staff team could include the temporary hiring of a Community Energy Efficiency Coordinator to begin immediate implementation of the proposed C3 challenge, non-market housing retrofits, institutional retrofits, trip reduction and efficient driver training programs, and to assist in the consultation process. A significant amount of the funding for this position is potentially available if the City's application for $50,000 from Provincial and Federal funding (CAEE) is successful. Contingent on receiving this funding, Council is being asked to approve a City contribution to this position of $25,000 from Contingency Reserve.
ADAPTATION STRATEGY
Climate change action plans need to address two things:
o Reduction of emissions to mitigate climate change impacts; and
o Adaptation to the impacts of climate change that cannot at this time be avoided.The majority of effort in the Draft Community CCAP is directed at reducing GHG emissions through policy, programs and behaviour. However, Vancouver will likely experience a range of impacts from climate change that has already occurred or will occur before the global climate change process can be slowed and stabilized. The extent of these impacts is unknown at this time, however, with this in mind, the Cool Vancouver Task Force has included in the Draft Community CCAP a recommendation that the City create a "Climate Change Adaptation Strategy" for the city. No timelines have been set for this, as it is not seen as an "urgent" matter. It is expected that timelines and a process will be developed in conjunction with the consultation process for inclusion in the final Community CCAP.
INITIATIVES FOR IMMEDIATE IMPLEMENTATION
The Task Force recognized both the need to undertake consultation on the Draft Action Plan, as well as the need to take action on some things right away. Staff also believe that significant benefit can be achieved from commencing implementation in a limited way, some of the actions in the CCAP in a manner that is integrated into the consultation process.
The highest profile of these early implementation initiatives is the proposed Corporate Climate Change (C3) Challenge. This element includes launching a friendly competition between staff from the City of Vancouver and employees of other organizations such as BC Hydro, Terasen, GVRD, and others, to see which organization's staff can achieve the greatest proportional number of home audits and/or retrofits for energy efficiency. It is expected that through this project, many homes could become more energy efficient right away and that all organizations involved (all of whom are promoting emissions reductions) would gain significant value from insights from their staff's experiences addressing emissions in their personal lives. Staff are proposing to report back for permission to proceed once a plan has been created and funding identified for the project.
PRIORITY MEASURES
As noted earlier, some of the measures proposed in the Draft Community CCAP are within City jurisdiction, and many are not. The following outlines a recommended list of high priority items the City might consider from the Draft Community CCAP, and a summary of the responsibilities for the remaining amounts of reductions.
The collection of initiatives that the city might have a good deal of influence or control over and could take a new (or renewed) proactive role in implementing include:
1) Home energy renovations (38,000t)
2) Institutional facility energy retrofits (27,000t)
3) Large commercial building retrofits (14,000t)
4) Bio-diesel (24,000t)
5) Driver training and anti-idling (35,000 t)
6) TDM (91,000 t)The above list could result in 229,000t of emission reductions below the projected 2012 emissions in a business as usual context. This is over 50% of the total reduction required to meet the proposed 6% target.
Two additional activities that are already part of existing work programs include:
· Improved energy efficiency standards for new construction (ASHRAE and move to CBIP) (12,000t)
· Non-market housing retrofits in association with the provincial government (12,000t)Over one quarter of the proposed targeted emission reductions (135,000t) depends on Federal implementation of their proposed improvements in vehicle fuel efficiency standards noted in the federal climate change plan.
The remaining 20,000t of targeted reductions arise from the expanded use of ethanol blended fuels, an assumption of improved industrial efficiency, employee energy awareness, and small commercial retrofits.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
The only immediate cost implication of this Report is that contingent upon receiving $50,000 from the Province and the Federal Government, $25,000 would be required from contingency reserve to hire and provide support for a temporary Community Energy Efficiency Coordinator to begin implementing some of the measures proposed in this Draft Plan.
There are financial implications to many of the recommendations in the Draft Community CCAP, however, most of these implications are unknown at this time, and extensive discussion is expected during the consultation stage and during implementation of many of the projects around financing strategies.The primary reasons for unknown costs at this time are:
· The costs are associated with the specific actions to achieve the plans' goals and these will be developed in conjunction with the upcoming consultation process. Some paths of action could be very costly and others may be more efficient;
· The costs will be shared by many stakeholders;
· The federal government is increasingly investing in climate change initiatives and changing policy and programs accordingly;
· Industry is increasingly addressing climate change issues (such as the auto industry) making reductions more cost-effective over time; and
· The cost of fossil fuels is predicted to rise reducing the comparative costs of energy saving measures.The scale of costs for implementing this plan are also connected to the final target and completion date chosen for the plan, as the proposed date may change due to feedback during consultation. The greater the reductions chosen and the shorter the time to meet the target, the greater the cost will be.
A strategy needs to be developed to coordinate opportunities and partnerships to harness funding and resources to implement the actions outlined in the plan. The financing strategy will need to address the range of types of funding could be accessible, including:
· Grants or donations (whole or matching funds) from various individuals, agencies, foundations and government programs;
· Operating or program / project budgets from various organizations (incl the City, utilities, and corporations);
· Subsidies for various energy efficient products or services;
· Low interest loans (such as FCM's GMIF funds) or revolving funds driven by savings found in increased efficiencies;
· Regular market-based financing options;
· Changes in tax policy (tax shifting); and
· Others.The Toronto Atmospheric Fund (TAF) is a successful initiative to promote energy efficiency and reduced emissions in Toronto. It includes a significant endowment that the City of Toronto established through the sale of a piece of publicly owned land. This endowment serves to support the core staff in the TAF office as well as provide a yearly budget for both grants and revolving loans, where the loan amount is partially or entirely paid off with savings resulting from energy efficiencies achieved from the initiatives. It is recommended that Council instruct the Director of Finance to work with other staff and stakeholders during the consultation process to evaluate the potential for establishing a similar fund in Vancouver and to bring recommendations to Council with the final Community CCAP.
CONCLUSION
The Draft Community CCAP developed by the Cool Vancouver Task Force is a strong plan with a diversity of approaches to address GHG reductions throughout the city. The Task Force and staff believe that this Plan is now ready for a discussion with key stakeholders and the public. The Task Force and City staff have developed a consultation plan to support the review of this Draft of the Community CCAP, in order to garner detailed feedback from the community and stakeholders.
The range of proposed emissions reduction measures in this plan are as far reaching as the sources of emissions in the city. They include the involvement of a significant scope of stakeholders and as such, the discussion should be as broad of scope as resources will allow.
The financial implications of this Plan have not yet been analysed in detail, and this issue will be of high priority in the consultation process.
The development of this Action Plan is an important experience for the Vancouver community as it both positions us to increase environmental quality and economic efficiencies within the city, as well as positioning the city to be seen as pursuing a path of responsible leadership amongst world cities, as the Kyoto Protocol's time of reckoning comes closer.
The work the Cool Vancouver Task Force has done has created a powerful Draft Action Plan for the community, and one that represents a wide range of interests and insights. From this position, staff believe that the consultation process, for which this report requests permission to engage, will be one of focused discussion and excellent advice to the City on how to proceed.
- - - - -
APPENDICES
Appendix A - The Draft Community Climate Change Action Plan
with Appendix A1: Background
Appendix A2: Emissions Profile MethodologyAppendix B - The Consultation Plan
- - - - -
Appendix A - The Draft Community Climate Change Action Plan
Appendix B - The Consultation Plan
* * * * *