Vancouver City Council |
REPORT TO COUNCIL
FAMILY COURT / YOUTH JUSTICE COMMITTEE
FEBRUARY 25, 2004
RTS:
4035
CC File:
3118-1
Meeting Date:
April 8, 2004
INFORMATION
1. Annual Report
This annual report covers the period February 2003 to February 2004.
The Vancouver Family Court / Youth Justice Committee is appointed by City Council annually. This role is delegated to Municipalities by the Provincial government. Family Court and Youth Justice Committees' authority and duties are set out in Provincial Legislation. Section 5 of the Provincial Court Act establishes the Family Court Committee. Youth Justice Committees are appointed pursuant to Section 18 of the Youth Criminal Justice Act, which came into force in April 2003.
The Committee reports annually to the Attorney General of British Columbia and to Vancouver City Council regarding its work. Reports are also forwarded to Justice Canada.
Duties
The Committee's duties are to:
· Examine and consider resources available in the community for families, children and youth and those working with these and young offenders
· Assist the Court when requested in individual cases referred to the Committee
· Make recommendations to the Court, to the Attorney General, to the City Council or to others, as required
· Act as a Family Court when required
· Provide leadership on youth justice, family, and social issues
In the past year we have seen two laws passed which many say will influence the way youth justice processes will work in this province. One of the elements that have been identified is the `Extrajudicial Measures' component presented in the federal Criminal Youth Justice legislation. We are familiar with many of the terms used for similar processes used in the past. Diversion, Restorative Justice, and Alternative Measures, and other Alternative Justice models have been a part of some of our work and justice models' lexicon for many years.
We are aware that First Nations communities from the Mohawks with their councils, the Prairies Cree and others use of the circle, and the Long House meetings here on the Coast historically have used these processes to have individuals who were thought to have injured the community and other members hear from them, take responsibility for what they'd done and then make amends. To have these processes acknowledged in Canadian law as a key component in addressing youth justice matters is an important step.
(See Appendix A for list of 2003 community and liaison representatives and community members)
Guest Presenters at FCYJ Committee Meetings
Name of Presenters
Subject
Julianna Torjek, Coordinator
Civic Youth Strategy Outreach Team
Alan Markwart, Assistant Deputy Minister, Children and Youth, Mental Health and Justice
Debbie Anderson
Child and Youth Social Planner
Judge Judith Gedye
Nathan Lusignan
Civic Youth Strategy Outreach Team Justice Issues
Nadim Kara
Child and Youth Social Planner
Jamie Lee Hamilton
Prostitute and Trans Activist
Nick Istvanssy, Researcher
Social Planning and Research Council of BC
Dave Park, Chief Economist
Vancouver Board of Trade
Information re CYS Youth Resources and Services Directory
Overview of the new Youth Criminal Justice Act and what it will mean
Discussed the then upcoming review of Civic Youth Strategy's role, and report to Council
The Changing Environment of Youth Justice - the Criminal Youth Justice Act and its implementation
Youth Police Liaison - working with the VPD on youth issues Research on Youth at Risk
Provided an update on the Civic Youth Strategy (CYS) and Council's endorsement of the CYS action plan.
Discussed prostitution in the lower mainland and responded to questions on prostitution and other issues surrounding it in the City of Vancouver. She also shared the document `The Prostitution Reform Act 2003' from New Zealand, with the Committee
Provided an overview of the findings re youth and homelessness contained in SPRC BC's comprehensive report `Regional Homelessness Plan for Greater Vancouver'
Discussed the VBT report on Crime in Vancouver
Significant Activities
The Committee:
- Hosted public information meeting on Canada's Youth Criminal Justice Act, which came into force in April 2003.The meeting was held on Thursday, January 29, 2004 at the Vancouver Aboriginal Centre. Judge Buller-Bennett, the first and only Aboriginal women Judge in the province `set the tone' for the evening. The CO'S Theatre Group from Children of the Street Society, did a dramatization of the difference in how a young person might have been dealt with under the old legislation, and how they would be dealt with under the Extrajudicial Measures present in the Youth Criminal Justice Act. Karin Hartner, one of the 12 provincial Conference Specialists and a member of the Vancouver FCYJ committee, provided the attendees with an overview of the legislation. Sandra Dworkin from the Crown Counsel's office, Inspector John De Hass Youth Services Section, Operations Support Division of the Vancouver Police Department and Barbara May, Probation, attended and assisted in answering questions. 57 community members participated in the public meeting.
(See one pager `YCJA - The Legal Process and an overview of Act attachments)
- Provided information to other Family Court Youth Justice Committees in the Province on the Bill 63, the Provincial Youth Justice Act, which received Royal Accent on November 17, 2003, and comes into force under regulations - no date given.
- Toured `Insite', Canada's first safe injection drug site located in downtown Vancouver.
- As a member of the Mayor's Vancouver Coalition on the Four Pillars initiative, took part in and made recommendations during the three sessions held during the year
- Attended, toured and reviewed the Drug Treatment Court for adults, located in downtown Vancouver
- Participated in and made recommendations to the City's Task Force charged with the Review of Civic Advisory Bodies.
- Supported and worked with the Civic Youth Strategy Team in its development of actions to increase the involvement of young people in civic and community affairs, and having their voices heard on issues.
- Was active in the organizing of, and participated in the Provincial Family Court Youth Justice Committee Conference in October 2003. It introduced 6 resolutions, all of which were passed by Conference delegates. The resolutions addressed the following areas:
¬ the establishment with Justice Canada and other partners, a pilot `Youth Drug Treatment Court' the first of its kind which would also undertake comprehensive drug education.
¬ actions to be taken on the sexual exploitation of children
¬ addressing homelessness
¬ work with Aboriginal communities regarding the possible establishment of an Aboriginal Child Welfare Provincial Court similar to services in Ontario, Manitoba and Saskatchewan
¬ raise the visibility of child prostitution
¬ work to end child poverty by 2006
¬ ending the trafficking of children to and in Canada and providing protection.
(See attached copies of resolutions App. C 1- 6, which were forwarded to and passed at the Provincial FCYJ Conference in October 2003.)
Sherryl Yeager, Bill Walkus, and Sadie Kuehn drafted the resolutions, which were passed by the FCYJ before being forwarded for consideration at the Provincial Conference. The resolutions reflects the outcome of work done by the `Sexual Exploitation and Socio-Economic Conditions of Families' and the `Additions, Youth Drug Court and Drug and Alcohol Preventive Services' sub-committees.
Sub-committees
The Family Court Youth Justice Committee began the process three years ago of using sub-committees and working groups to get work done on important matters identified by the Committee. These sub-committees and working groups met between the regular monthly meetings of the full Committee and reported at them.
At the beginning of the terms of newly appointed Committees, members review the list of pervious sub-committees, the work they've undertaken, and whether they believe that sub-committee and or working groups are the best way to get work done, if there is still interest in the particular area previously worked on, and/or if there are other issues/areas that should be considered. The full Committee then decides the number of areas they want to work on, and prioritises the areas identified. Sub-committees are then identified and individual members identify the subcommittee or subcommittees they will work on. At their first meeting, subcommittees identify their goal and a process for conducting their business. They provide monthly updates at the monthly meetings of the full committee. Subcommittees conduct work on issues for the full committee and does not take the place of or speak for the Committee.
Materials restating these matters and forms to systemize the current process will be considered at the first meeting of the newly appointed FCYJ Committee on February 25th, 2004. (See Appendix B for list of 2003 Subcommittees)
Operational
These items were approved by the Committee:
- Members adopted a `Code of Conduct' for Committee members.
- A `Conflict of Interest Policy' for members was also adopted
- `Banking Guidelines for the Family Court Youth Justice Committee' document was approved
- Motions regarding the appointment of members
- Request for the appointment of a liaison Councillor to the Committee
Significant Topics
· The Youth Criminal Justice legislation and what it will mean to the community and how it might affect Family Court youth Justice Committees
· The direction of Sub-committees for the 2002-03 term
· The Committee's approval of the Alternative Justice Model Subcommittee's meeting with the VSB to plan a September 2003 Conference on Alternative Measures. This event did not take place.
· A Council liaison to the Committee
· The Committee's ability to address identified gaps in it membership
· Action on drug courts
· Clarifying the Committees status in light of the federal Youth Criminal Justice and the provincial Youth Justice Act
· Informing the public about the Youth Criminal Justice legislation
· The involvement of the Family Court Youth Justice Committee partners in the work of the Committee
· The need for comprehensive and coordinated services for/to youth e.g. housing, drug and mental health services and education.
· Gaining and maintaining an adequate number of members, and develop a common base of knowledge, which could take on intense sub-committee work.
· Police youth relations
· Responding to the federal Bill 43, re corporal punishment
· Initiative to educate the community regarding child prostitution
* If Council members would like further information on any of these matters, the Committee would be pleased to provide it.
Resolutions Forwarded to Council
a.) Appointments to the Family Court /Youth Justice Committee
On April 22, 2003, City Council approved the following resolution forwarded by Family Court/Youth Justice Committee
"THAT Council annually appoint up to two members to the Vancouver Family Court Youth Justice Committee, in addition to the Council appointees, on recommendation of the Committee following its due deliberation and consideration of its needs."
b) Request for Council Liaison Appointment
On September 16, 2003, Vancouver City Council approved the following forwarded by the Committee:
"THAT Vancouver City Council appoints at least one Council Liaison to sit on its Family Court/Youth Justice Committee;
FURTHER THAT Councillor Ellen Woodsworth be appointed as the Council Liaison to the Family Court/Youth Justice Committee."
Future Directions
The Committee expects to pursue the following issues during its 2004 term, subject to any direction, which Council chooses to provide:
· Assist in the planning of and participate in Youth Week 2004
· Continue to consult with, and educate the community about the Committee, its role, the `Federal Youth Criminal Justice Act' and the Provincial `Youth Justice Act'
· Develop a process for the Committee to ensure that it is aware of proposed rules, laws and protocols and changes to these, which affects children, youth and their families
· Work more intently with partners on ending the sexual exploitation of young
people
· Work with Aboriginal communities in its development of its approach to the introduction of Alternative Justice Models.
· Continue work on the possible establishment on a pilot youth drug court
· Clarify the current statue of Youth Justice and Family Court Committees re the new YCJA and the Attorney General of B.C.
There have been a number of changes, which could affect the work of Family Court, Youth Justice and CAP committees in the province. Under the federal youth justice legislation, and with current BC statues, the provincial Attorney General has the authority to allow committees to maintain their current designations, change their designations and/or to expand their roles. The provincial and municipal governments are also faced with the reality that existing Committees need resources to be able to carry-on their voluntary work. With the adoption of the federal Youth Criminal Justice legislation and the provincial Youth Justice Act, Youth Justice and Family Court Committees could be key in building greater understanding; increasing community engagement and involvement; and improving accountabilities, all of which will create more democratic and safer communities.
At present, the Vancouver Committee has representatives from the Ministry of Children and Family Development, the Vancouver Police Department, Vancouver Coastal Health, the Vancouver School Board, the Parks Board, Probation, Jurist, Civic Youth Strategy, Social Planning, as well as the expertise of the community appointees made by Council. In light of the new Federal Youth Criminal Justice Act and the adoption of the Provinces' Youth Justice Act, the Committee has encouraged, and received agreements from their agencies, that the two Vancouver Youth Justice Conferencing Specialists legislated under the Act and representatives of the Native Court Workers Association and Vancouver Aboriginal Transformative Justice Services to provider liaison representation to the 2004 Vancouver FCYJ Committee.
Vancouver Family Court/Youth Justice Committee is not alone in its inclusion of other relevant bodies at its table. With better communications, a few more resources, acknowledgement of their work, and improved visibility, they can be a more affective force in the community.
Recommendations:
A. THAT the list of liaison representatives be reviewed annually, and that updates and additions be made to reflect relevant law and policy changes;
B. THAT City Council request Justice Canada and the BC Ministry of Attorney General to undertake an integrated approach to educate the community about the Youth Criminal Justice Act and the protocols surrounding it, and to clarify the role of Youth Justice Committees in this process;
C. THAT Council request Justice Canada to identify and provide the resources referenced in the Act to assist in the effective implementation of the legislation.
Special note
· According to archivist of the Office of the City Clerk, the Family Services Division Committee, a predecessor body to the Family Court Youth Justice Committee of the City of Vancouver was established in 1973. The name appears to have been changed to the Family Court/Youth Justice Committee in 1977.The City and the Committee may want to recognize these dates in some way.
· Honoree Findlay who is leaving the Committee this term, is the longest sitting member of the Committee with more than 13 years of service. We thank her for her many years of lending her expertise, knowledge and wisdom to its work.
List of some of materials shared with the Committee:
· Canada's Youth Criminal Justice Act - A New Law- A New Approach
· YCJA - BC Context
· Restorative Justice - A list of materials available at the JI Library
· Civic Youth Strategy - List of Youth Resources
· The Youth Criminal Justice Act - Canada - A Pocket Guide
· Sexual Exploitation in Canada - 2002 Report
· Health Connections: Listening to BC Youth - Survey ll the McCreary Centre Soc.
· Overview of the April 2003 Four Pillar Presentation and the Consolidated Comments
· Canada - Facts on Child Prostitution
· The Commercial Sexual Exploitation of Children in the US, Canada and Mexico
· Conferencing and the Youth Criminal Justice Act in British Columbia
· Selected Alcohol and Other Drug Abuse Prevention Links- Visioning a Future for Prevention in Vancouver
· A Path to Poverty: A Review of Children and Family Poverty Condition in British Columbia - SPARC BC August 2003
· First United Nations Decade for the Eradication of Poverty 1997- 2006
· Resources for Parents & Guardian - the Alcohol-Drug Education Service
· What Can be Done Differently - Recommendations from Additions Sex-Trade Education Prevention (A Step) Consultation- Report to Council Nov. 26/02
· Drug Treatment Courts - Substance Abuse Intervention Within the Justice
· Memorandum re Cost Benefits/Costs Avoided Reported By Drug Court Programs (rev.) - OJP Drug Court Clearinghouse, a program of the Bureau of Justice - May /03
· LGBT Communities and Substance Use- What Health Has to Do With It!
· Overview of the Youth Justice Act
· SPRC BC's comprehensive report `Regional Homelessness Plan for Greater Vancouver'
· Prostitution Reform Act 2003' - New Zealand
The outgoing Chair extends her thanks to those individuals, who presented before the Committee; those who took part in our public information meeting; and to those individuals such as Tracy Booth, who although they were not members of the Committee, shared their knowledge and expertise to make our work more relevant.
Thank you also to the three Meeting Co-ordinators of the Office of City Clerk, who clerked at regular meetings of the Committee this past year, Barbara Sage, Tina Hildebrandt and Diane Clairmont. And a special thanks to members of the 2003 Committee particularly those who worked on sub-committees, and working groups. They demonstrated a clear understanding of the old adage that `you can choose to be either a part of the problem or part of the solution'.
Signed) "Sadie Kuehn", Past-Chair
(approved by Committee February 24, 2004)
____________________________
CITY MANAGER'S COMMENTS
The City Manager notes that annual reports are intended to be information reports highlighting the achievements of a committee during the past year, and do not usually include recommendations. However, Recommendation A is acceptable, since advisory bodies should regularly review any relevant law and policy changes affecting their mandates and consider what changes, if any, may be required as a result.
The City Manager notes that there have been substantial changes in the role and responsibilities of the Family Court Youth Justice Committee as set out in the federal Youth Criminal Justice Act enacted in 2003. Staff of the Ministry of Attorney General are currently working with staff from the Ministries of Public Safety and Solicitor General, as well as Children and Family Development, to review the roles of all Family Court Committees under the new federal Youth Criminal Justice Act. However, it is possible to state, at this juncture, that the Committee's responsibilities may be increased, and additional resources may be required to implement the legislation. In that light, it would be reasonable to approve Recommendations A, B and C, requesting the senior governments to provide clarification and identify resources. In the interim, Council should request to be kept in the loop during the course of the Attorney General's review.
These changed terms of reference merit a report to Council in their own right, spelling out what they will mean for the City. The changed terms of reference should also be reviewed by the City's Legal Services Department to clarify what is, and what is not, the City's responsibility. The report back on the changed terms of reference should await the outcome of the Attorney General's review, since its conclusions will help to better define the Committee's role and responsibilities.
Finally, the City Manager notes the recent retirement of long-time member Honorée Findlay, who has served the City as a member of this committee for thirteen years. I believe this record was exceeded only by the late Dr. Sydney Segal, who served for fourteen years, also on the Family Court Youth Justice Committee. Ms. Findlay is to be congratulated on her commitment to the needs of families, children, and young offenders.
The City Manager RECOMMENDS that Recommendations A, B and C be approved. The City Manager further RECOMMENDS
D. THAT the Family Court Youth Justice Committee be congratulated for its achievements in 2003.
E. THAT City Council express its thanks to retired member Honorée Findlay for her thirteen years of volunteer service on the Family Court Youth Justice Committee.
F. THAT Council instruct the Family Court Youth Justice Committee to report back at the conclusion of the Ministry of Attorney General's review, in consultation with the Director of Legal Services, on changes in the role and responsibilities of the Youth Justice Committee as set out in the new federal Youth Criminal Justice Act and what these changes will mean for the City, and clarifying what is, and what is not, the City's responsibility.
G. THAT City Council request the Attorney General to keep the City Manager apprised during his Ministry's review of the roles of Family Court Committees under the new federal Youth Criminal Justice Act.
* * * *
APPENDIX A
Members of the 2002-03 Committee
Community members:
Sadie Kuehn, Chair
Franca Bassanes
Roberta Bradbury
Gawain Chan
Larry Cohen
Anne Derek
Honoree Findlay
Darryl Flasch (left Committee for out of town work)
Charlotte Gottschau
Rania Hatzioannou (left Committee because of other commitments)
Karin Hartner
Heather Johnson
Philip Law
Jennifer McNeil (was not able to make meetings
Marlene Morgan (left the Committee because of work commitments)
Alvin Singh (left the Committee because of other commitments)
Frank Tester
Andy Thompson
Bill Walkus
Cherie Williams
Sherryl Yeager
Liaison Representatives:
Sergeant Garry Lester
School Unit Liaison Vancouver Police Department
Commissioner
Lyndsay Poaps
Board of Parks and Recreation
City Staff
Jeff Brooks
Director Social Planning
Community Service Group
Jamie Graham
Chief Constable
Vancouver Police Department
Greg Eng
Recreation Manager
East Van District
Park Board
Coralys Cuthbert
Social Planner
Community Service Group
Julianna Torjek
Civic Youth Strategy Youth Outreach Team Coordinator
Social Planning
Debbie Anderson
Child & Youth Planner
Social Planning
Inspector Ken Frail
Inspector #367 - i/c DEEP on loan D.2
Nathan Lusignan
Civic Youth Strategy
Ian Mass
Executive Director, Advocacy
Office of Children and Youth
Box 6
600 - 595 Howe Street
Vancouver, BC V6C 2T5
Michael White
Youth Services Manger
550 Cambie Street
Vancouver, BC V6B 2N7
Judge Judy Gedye
Judges' Chambers
200 - East 23rd Street
North Vancouver, BC V7L 4R4
Family Court/ Youth Justice Committee Members 2004
Community members:
Catherine Adair
Aharon Arnstein
Roberta Bradbury
Diane Bryden
Anne Derek
Charlotte Gottschau
Nichola Hall
Karin Hartner
Rosalind Kellett
Norm Larkins
Eileen LeGallais
Kent Lui
Christine Marton
Paul Mulangu
Shirley Nelson
Lee Purkin-Simpson
Samarjit
Deborah Sullivan
Frank Tester
Cherie Williams
Margaret Wright
Amy Yiu
APPENDIX B
Vancouver Family Court/Youth Justice Committee
Sub-committees
The Alternative Models, Diversion and
Restorative Justice
Subcommittee
The Addictions, Youth Drug Court
and Drug and Alcohol Preventative
Services Subcommittee
The Child Sexual Exploitation and Socio-Economic Condition of Families Subcommittee
Roberta Bradbury
Gawain Chan
Charlotte Gottschau
Karin Hartner
Heather Johnson
Frank Tester
Cherie Williams
Larry Cohen
Philip Law
Sadie Kuehn
Sherryl Yeager
Andy Thomson
Franka Bassanese
Anne Derek
Honoree Findlay
Sadie Kuehn
Marlena Morgan (resigned in September because of work)
Gawain Chan
Rania Hatzioannou (stop attending meetings because of personal reasons in
July)
APPENDIX C 1
Resolution For the 2003 Family Court Youth Justice Annual Conference
New Westminster, British Columbia
October 26, 2003
Submitted by: The Vancouver Family Court Youth Justice Committee
Rationale: The Over representation of Aboriginal people in the child welfare system
And Whereas: Aboriginal families continue to be disproportionately represented in the child welfare system as a direct result of the residential school legacy and other forced assimilation policies.
And Whereas: Aboriginal people have the inherent right to self-government as affirmed by 5.35 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
Resolution: Start an Aboriginal Child Welfare Provincial Court
Therefore Be It Resolved: That Family Court Youth Justice Committees in British Columbia support Aboriginal groups in the establishment of an Aboriginal child welfare provincial court that will oversee the welfare of Aboriginal children and their families, and
Be It Further Resolved: That governments provide funds to train, educate, communicate, establish, build, legislate, and undertake whatever is necessary to prevent Aboriginal children and their families from being separated.
APPENDIX C 2
Resolution For the 2003 Family Court Youth Justice Annual Conference
New Westminster, British Columbia
October 26, 2003
Submitted by: Vancouver Family Court Youth Justice Committee
Rationale: Child Poverty is destructive to Canadian Society
And Whereas: More than 132,000 of British Columbia's children, 1in 5 and almost three time entire population of New Westminster live in poverty.
And Whereas: Two thirds of this number resides in single parent households, many of which receive no support from the absent parent.
And Whereas: Many of these children continue to fall between the cracks with the current legal, financial, and social measure now in place.
And whereas: Canada is a signatory to United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, which includes Article 27 (1)... " the right of every child to a stander of living adequate for the child's physical, mental, spiritual, moral, and social development." (3)... "shall take appropriate measures to assist parents and others responsible for the child to implement this right and in the case of need provide material assistance and support programmes, particularly with regard to nutrition, clothing, and housing." And in 1989 the Canadian government made the commitment to end child poverty in Canada by the year 2000.
Resolution: That Canada undertakes concrete measures to ending Child Poverty.
Therefore Be It Resolved: That the government Canada undertakes to end child poverty in Canada by 2006 the last year in the United Nation's "Decade for the Eradication of Poverty". That this undertaking be done in a comprehensive and non- stigmatic manner.
APPENDIX C 3
Resolution For the 2003 Family Court Youth Justice Annual Conference
New Westminster, British Columbia
October 26, 2003
Submitted by: Vancouver Family Court Youth Justice Committee
Rationale: Child prostitution is the sexual abuse of a child
And whereas: Article 34 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child states participating countries shall: "...undertake to protect the child from all forms of sexual exploitation and sexual abuse. For these purposes, (participating countries) shall in particular take all appropriate national, bilateral and multilateral measures to prevent:
(a) The inducement or coercion of a child to engage in any unlawful sexual activity;
(b) The exploitative use of children in prostitution or other unlawful sexual practices;
(c) The exploitative use of children in pornographic performances and materials.
And whereas: There are a significant number of youth involved in the sex trade in the Lower Mainland and other parts of the Province,
And whereas: The reasons for children becoming involved in the sex trade are multi-factorial;
Resolution: That a coordinated, multi-disciplinary, multi-lateral approach be developed to combat child sexual abuse through prostitution
Therefore Be It Resolved: Therefore Be It Resolved: That Family Court Youth Justice Committees continue its work with current task forces and other groups working to ending child prostitution, and assist in the creation of a co-coordinated, targeted approach to combat it, and support a province-wide network that incorporates youth, schools, parents, educators, police, social services, drug and alcohol counselors, and the Crown, which would focus on the education of youth, and the criminal prosecution of those who are involved in this form of sexual abuse against children.
APPENDIX C 4
Resolution For the 2003 Family Court Youth Justice Annual Conference
New Westminster, British Columbia
October 26, 2003
Submitted by: Vancouver Family Court Youth Justice Committee
Rationale: Ending the Trafficking of Children to and in Canada and Providing Protection
And whereas: The trafficking of children in Canada has been identified and is a major phenomenon much of which is controlled by organized crime for the purposes of prostitution
And whereas: The trafficking of children to and in Canada has been acknowledged by the Canadian Government and NGO's internationally as well as by local organizations and police.
And whereas: Canada is a signatory to Article 24 of the Convention, which "requires States Parties to adopt appropriate measures to protect witnesses from potential intimidation or retaliation. This includes physical protection, relocation, and within legal constraints, concealment of identities. It may also mean the ... " international relocations of witnesses where appropriate". And Article 25 that "provides for the protection and support of victims (who will also usually be witnesses under Art. 24)."
And whereas: Canada has indicated its support for the "Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, Especially Women and Children, which is a supplement to the United Nations Convention Against Transnational Organized Crime
And whereas: it is also a signatory to the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child specifically Article 35, which states "States Parties shall take all appropriate national, bilateral and multilateral measures to prevent the... traffic in children for any purpose or in any form."
Resolution: That Canada undertakes a coordinated, inter-disciplinary, multi-lateral national and transnational approach to end the trafficking of children.
Therefore Be It Resolved: That the government of Canada ensures that the new Criminal Code includes language that addresses the trafficking in children. And that Family Court Youth Justice Committees work with all levels of government, youth organizations, other NGO's, the Bar, the police and others, in arriving at effective methods for ending the trafficking of children and for monitoring them.
APPENDIX C 5
Resolution For the 2003 Family Court Youth Justice Annual Conference
New Westminster, British Columbia
October 26, 2003
Submitted by: Vancouver Family Court Youth Justice Committee
Rationale: Homelessness has reached epidemic proportions in British Columbia and other parts of Canada.
And Whereas: Canada has seen a loss of low cost housing, which includes rental accommodation and houses, and has more and more people living on its streets over the last two decades.
And Whereas: Through government action and/or inaction at both the federal and provincial levels, we know that more individuals and families are finding it harder and harder to attain and maintain adequate housing. And that for many of those who have housing, maintaining a roof over their heads means that they and their families go without food, clothing, heat and other basics
And Whereas: Homelessness and the lack of affordable housing for children, youth, their families and others in our communities, affects the health and quality of life of Canadian society.
Resolution: That the federal government take specific actions to improving the availability of affordable housing for Canadians.
Therefore Be It Resolved: That the federal government with its provincial, municipal and NGO partners, take immediate and meaningful action to ensure that low income Canadians have adequate and affordable housing. And that particular attention to be paid to the housing needs of children, youth, and families including immigrants, those with disabilities, and those with mental illness. That an annual report on the progress of this initiative be issued to the public through the popular media.
APPENDIX C 6
Resolution For the 2003 Family Court Youth Justice
Annual Conference
New Westminster, British Columbia
October 26, 2003
Submitted by: Vancouver Family Court Youth Justice Committee
Rationale: Youth drug addiction and abuse affects all municipalities
And whereas: Drug courts are proving to be cost effective to the justice system in other jurisdictions - as much as 1/10th to 1/20th of the cost of incarceration,
And whereas: Participants in drug courts have an over 50% lower recidivism rate and graduates are staying clean longer than "regular" attendants at treatment programs,
And whereas: The new Youth Criminal Justice Act provides for extrajudicial measures and promotes non-custodial sentencing,
And whereas: Article 33 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child directs participating countries shell ..." take all appropriate measures, including legislative, administrative, social and educational measures, to protect children from the illicit use of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances as defined in the relevant international treaties, and to prevent the use of children in the illicit production and trafficking of such substances,"
Resolution: Initiating a Youth Drug Court pilot project shall be a priority
Therefore be it resolved: That Family Court Youth Justice Committees shall work together to lobby the municipal, federal and provincial governments to establish a youth drug court in the Province, on a priority basis.
* * * * *