CITY OF VANCOUVER

ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT

 

Date:

February 3, 2004

 

Author:

Martin C. Crocker

 

Phone No.:

7647

 

RTS No.:

03908

 

CC File No.:

1203

 

Meeting Date:

February 24, 2004

TO:

Vancouver City Council

FROM:

Director of Information Technology in Consultation with the General Manager of Engineering Services

SUBJECT:

Extension of City Telecommunications Duct License Agreement with Urban Networks Inc.

RECOMMENDATION

GENERAL MANAGER'S COMMENTS

The General Manager of Corporate Services RECOMMENDS approval.

COUNCIL POLICY

Execution of legal agreements by the Director of Legal Services and General Manager of Engineering Services with respect to access to City streets requires Council approval.
On July 30, 1996, when dealing with a report on Telecommunications Policies, Council approved a number of goals including one to ensure that the City maintains its authority to regulate equitable access to rights-of-way, secure valuable compensation for their use, minimize negative impacts associated with their use, and utilize them in a manner that furthers other telecommunications policy objectives.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this report is to ask Council to approve a modification to the duct licence agreement ("Licence Agreement") with Urban Networks Inc. ("UNI"). This modification will authorize UNI to extend its fibre-optic network through additional City-owned ducts beyond those already approved by Council. As compensation for such extension, the City will benefit through its right to use 48 fibres of the extended network for its own telecommunications needs.

BACKGROUND

On January 22, 2002, City Council approved a recommendation that:

The City's agreement with UNI has two components:

Under the Licence Agreement, UNI has built an optical fibre network of around 20 kilometres along Hastings Street from Boundary Road, through the downtown core and out to UBC along 10th Ave.

The City has been able to take good advantage of this network through the IRU agreement. At present, the network provides high-speed telecommunications connectivity:

To acquire these services commercially would cost around $100,000 a year, or $2 million over the term of the agreement. Additional opportunities, in the form of deploying the fibre to other City facilities adjacent to the network route, remain to be developed.

DISCUSSION

UNI and the City have agreed in principle that there would be a mutual benefit to extending the scope of the existing agreement. The City proposes to license UNI to expand their optical fibre network through a further approximately 20 kilometres of City duct, listed in the Appendix.

As compensation for the licence to extend its network, UNI will provide the City with 48 optical fibres throughout the additional licensed duct, creating a network backbone that will enable high-speed connectivity to more than 20 additional City facilities, including the main Park Board office, the VPL main office, Manitoba Works Yard, the Orpheum and Queen Elizabeth Theatres, and a number of community and recreational facilities, branch libraries, fire halls, and fire protection system pump stations. While these facilities have existing telecommunications connectivity, the expansion of the optical fibre network provides both financial and operational benefits:

Under the proposed extension agreement, UNI will supply the optical fibre at no cost to the City. The City will pay UNI a one-time installation fee of around $55,000 based on the number of kilometres of fibre laid and the number of connections to City facilities. The market value of the optical fibre and installation services is estimated at $200,000.

Final connection of City facilities through the network backbone necessitates laying short sections of optical from the street-based duct system into the buildings, internal cabling and termination, and telecommunications equipment. Estimated costs of these "building laterals" are $225,000, for a total of $280,000. Funding for these costs is available from a network expansion budget and from savings in existing budgets, both operating, related to telecommunications costs, and capital, relating to file server replacements. These funds have all been approved by Council.

Optical fibre can reasonably be expected to have a 20-year lifespan. On a conservative 10-year basis, potential telecommunications and server replacement savings are estimated at $1,000,000.

It is difficult to place a value on the City owned duct infrastructure, or on the value to UNI of this extension agreement. The alternative available to UNI is to use Telus duct. Telus is required by the CRTC to make surplus ducts available at an annual rate of 95 cents per metre. There is no indication that any telecommunication carrier is willing to pay that rate for City duct, which because of its structure is less valuable than Telus duct for most purposes, but that translates to an annual rent of $19,000. As the City derives an immediate construction benefit estimated at $145,000, gets network repair and maintenance included for the life of the contract, and expects to realize an average $100,000 a year in cost savings, staff consider that the City is receiving valuable compensation for use of its duct.

ALTERNATIVES

As an alternative to extending the Licence Agreement with UNI, the City could install its own optical fibre backbone using either internal resources or sub-contracting part of the work. While outright ownership might be seen as desirable:

The UNI arrangement offers the benefits identified at a significantly lower cost.

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS

The $55,000 fee payable to UNI will be made from funding approved by Council on May 28, 2002 for networking and telecommunications upgrades, as part of the Information Technology Infrastructure - 2002 Expansion and Replacement Program.

The $225,000 costs of the building laterals will be funded through:

CONCLUSION

Deploying optical fibre to City facilities offers significant financial and operational benefits and is clearly the telecommunications approach of choice. Extending the existing duct license agreement with UNI offers the City the most cost-effective way of realizing this goal.

-----

Appendix

* * * * *


ag20040224.htm