ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
Date: January 25, 2000
Author/Local: J. Griffin/7928
RTS No. 1254
CC File No. 5804-5
Court: February 15, 2000
TO: Vancouver City Council
FROM: General Manager of Engineering Services
SUBJECT: Local Improvements Subsequent Procedure - February 15, 2000
RECOMMENDATION
A. THAT the projects "by petition" in Court #592 and Court #594 be approved.
B. THAT projects by "Initiative Principle" in Court #593 and Court #595 be approved except for the defeated item and special items #10, #12, #13 and #19 as explained in this report.
COUNCIL POLICY
Policies governing the Local Improvement process are set out in the Vancouver Charter and Local Improvements Procedure by-law.
PURPOSE
Projects by Petition and on the Initiative Principle have been advanced under the provisions of the Local Improvements Procedure By-law and will come before a Court of Revision on February 15, 2000.
The projects are identified as follows:
Court Item Type
Petition
#592 1-32 Lane Lighting
33-38 Pavement & Curbs, Local Residential
39-54 Lane Pavement, Local Residential
55-57 Speed Humps
Items
Court Item Defeated Type
Initiative
#593 1,2 Pavement & Curbs, Higher Zoned
3-6,8,9 Pavement & Curbs, Local Residential
10-16 Lane Pavement, Higher Zoned
17 Lane Pavement, Local Residential
18-22 Speed Humps
23-34 32 Pedestrian Collector Sidewalks
35-36 Sidewalk ReconstructionCourt Item Type
Petition
#594 1 Powell Street Decorative Street Lighting
Items
Court Item Defeated Type
Initiative
#595 1 Powell Street Tree LightingSPECIAL ITEMS
Court #592, Item #33, Pavement & Curbs & Trees & Bulges
Cambridge Street from Slocan Street to Kaslo StreetA petition for this project was returned with sufficient support to carry it forward to a Court of Revision. The petition information that was sent to the owners advised them that the street width would be 8.5 metres and they signed the petition based on this information. However, one of the owners demanded a street width wider than 8.5 meters, citing safety as an issue and that other owners felt this way as well.
The Neighbourhood Transportation Branch reviewed the request and advised that the wider width was not appropriate. During the review the owners were balloted to determine whether they support the street improvement at 8.5 meters or only support the improvement at the wider width or whether they oppose the improvement altogether.
Based on the ballots returned and follow-up phone call, the results are as follows:
Number of owners:
29
Required 2/3 majority
20
In favour of standard 8.5 metres
19
In favour of wider width
3
Opposed to project
4
Response
26
Of the three owners who did not respond, all three had signed the original petition. One was contacted by phone and was in favour of the standard 8.5 metre width. Based on these results
we recommend this project proceed.Court #593, Item #10, Lane Pavement
Lane south of 7th Avenue from McLean Drive to Woodland DriveThis project is being withdrawn because of a major property development occurring on the west side of the lane later this year.
Court #593, Item #12, Lane Pavement
Lane south of 1st Avenue from the lane east of Clark Drive to McLean Drive and the lane east of Clark Drive from 1st Avenue to 2nd AvenueThis project is being withdrawn due to opposition from owners who are adjacent to the lane. These owners do not form a majority in votes but they do comprise a majority of the assessable length.
Court #593, Item #13, Lane Pavement
Lane south of 3rd Avenue from Larch Street to Balsam StreetThis project is being withdrawn at this time to evaluate safety concerns raised by adjacent owners. This project may be initiated again at a later date after a safety review and input from adjacent owners.
Court #593, Item #19, Speed Humps
Lane south of Nelson Street from Chilco Street to Gilford StreetThis project is being withdrawn at the request of two strata councils (comprising of a total of 88 owners) who claim there is not a speeding problem and that noise from vehicles encountering the speed humps would be disturbing to units adjacent to the humps.
Capital Funds
Funds for the City's share of the projects are available from existing Engineering Department Basic Capital Accounts or are subject to approval of the 2000 Streets Basic Capital Budget.
* * * * *
(c) 1998 City of Vancouver