ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT


                                                       Date:  April 9, 1996


     TO:       Vancouver City Council

     FROM:     Director of Finance

     SUBJECT:  1996 Operating Budget - Interim Report



     RECOMMENDATION

          A.   THAT  Council  approve the  interim  estimates  of the  1996
               Operating Budget as reviewed in this report and presented in
               Appendix 1, including the provision  for a 0.1% tax increase
               reflecting  the increase  in the Greater  Vancouver Regional
               Sewerage and Drainage District requisition.

          B.   THAT the  Director of  Finance be  instructed to  submit the
               Final Report on the  1996 Operating Budget to  City Services
               and  Budgets  Committee  on  April  25  for  "in  principle"
               approval.


     GENERAL MANAGER'S COMMENTS

          The General Manager of  Corporate Services RECOMMENDS approval of
          A and B.


     COUNCIL POLICY

     On November  7, 1995, when considering  the report of  the Director of
     Finance related to projections for the 1996  Operating Budget, Council
     approved the following recommenda-tion:

          B.   THAT  in  establishing the  1996  general purposes  tax
               levy, Council  agree to  pass through any  tax increase
               attributable  to  the  Greater Vancouver  Sewerage  and
               Drainage   District  that  exceeds   the  tax  increase
               percentage target approved by Council.

     On  January 16, 1996, when  considering the Preliminary  Report on the
     1996 Operating Budget, Council approved the following recommendations:

          A.   THAT  Council approve  the financial  strategy  for the
               1996   Operating   Budget,    as   detailed   in    the
               Administrative  Report dated  January  11, 1996,  which
               establishes a target general purposes tax increase  not
               to exceed 1%.

          B.   THAT  any  decreases   in  funding   from  the   senior
               governments be  added to the general  purposes taxes in
               1996 only and THAT  the impacts of these reductions  in
               future   years,   including   any   potential   program
               adjustments, be reviewed with Council in developing the
               1997 Operating Budget.



     PURPOSE

     The purpose of  this report is to review the  1996 Operating Budget as
     revised since Council considered the Preliminary Report in mid January
     and to seek Council approval of the measures necessary to finalize the
     estimates.

     BACKGROUND

     During  the  last two  budget years,  the  process for  developing the
     Operating Budget  has followed  a somewhat  different course than  had
     been past practice.   For the 1996  Operating budget this  process has
     involved the following steps:

     -  In November 1995, Council  considered the projections for the  1996
        Operating Budget.   These indicated a tax increase  in the range of
        3.5%  would  be  necessary based  on  the  revenue  and expenditure
        assumptions  in  the  projections.    Council instructed  staff  to
        develop budget scenarios based on general purposes tax increases of
        2%, 1% and  0%.  These scenarios effectively established  a maximum
        budget envelope within which all revenue and expenditures must fit.

     -  On January 17, 1996, during consideration of the Preliminary Report
        on the 1996 Operating Budget, Council approved a cap on the general
        purposes  tax increase  for 1996  at 1%  on the  understanding that
        departmental  budget targets would be established based on a 0% tax
        increase  and that staff would work toward that target in reviewing
     the funding requests submitted by departments.-   U s i n g      t h e
                                                       budget      envelope
                                                       defined by  a 0% tax
                                                       increase as a guide,
                                                       departmental
                                                       expenditure  targets
                                                       were established and
                                                       departments      set
                                                       about      producing
                                                       detailed      budget
                                                       submissions based on
                                                       funding       levels
                                                       necessary         to
                                                       maintain    existing
                                                       programs  and  which
                                                       provide          for
                                                       increases         or
                                                       decreases        for
                                                       Council     approved
                                                       adjustments.  Budget
                                                       staff then  met with
                                                       departments      and
                                                       boards  with  a view
                                                       to    bringing   the
                                                       estimates  to within
                                                       the target levels or
                                                       to identify problems
                                                       that  needed  to  be
                                                       addressed.

     -  Following  the  detailed review  of  departmental  submissions, the
        Corporate Management  Team met to consider the  budget positions of
        the respective  departments and to  deal with funding  problems and
        other issues that surfaced  during the review process.  Adjustments
        were recommended which addressed  these issues while staying within
        the overall budget envelope.


     Council has  provided two potential  exceptions to the  1% cap on  the
     1996 tax increase.  In November,  1995 Council agreed to pass  through
     to taxpayers any increase in GVS&DD costs that exceeded the percentage
     increase  finally approved  for  the City s  tax  levy.   In  January,
     Council agreed to pass through to taxpayers, in 1996 only, any funding
     decreases  from  senior  governments   that  could  not  otherwise  be
     accommodated  within Council s  taxation  objectives.   Both of  these
     issues are specifically addressed in this report.

     The interim report on  the budget represents completion of  the second
     step in the  budget building process.  The final step  in the  process
     will be the Final Report on the Operating Budget which is scheduled to
     be  considered by  City Services  and Budgets  Committee on  April 25.
     With approval  of that report, the  budget will be finalized  for 1996
     and  the budget resolu-tion and  rating bylaws can  proceed to Council
     early in May.

     CURRENT POSITION OF THE 1996 ESTIMATES

     At  the time  Council dealt  with the  preliminary budget,  staff were
     instructed to cap the general purposes tax increase at 1%  and to work
     toward achievement of a  0% tax increase on City  expenditures. During
     the last two months  the revenue estimates have been  refined based on
     the  most  current information.   Budget  Office  staff have  met with
     departmental  staff  to  ensure  that  individual  department  budgets
     included  no more  funding  that is  necessary  to maintain  programs,
     services and staffing  levels at  current levels  and that  additional
     funding requests could be justified on the basis of Council approvals,
     health and  safety concerns or increased workload.  The result of that
     exercise  is  that the  1996 Operating  Budget  has been  brought into
     balance, with  a 0%  tax increase.The  following table  summarizes the
     current position of the operating estimates including  the increase in
     the GVS&DD requisition  which Council  had agreed to  pass through  to
     taxpayers. As  indicated, it  is recommended  that  this shortfall  be
     offset by an increase in the general purposes tax levy.

         Revenues
             Taxation Revenue          $354,668,500
             General Revenue            173,263,900
             Transfers from Reserves
                                         16,194,900 $544,127,300 

         Expenditures
             Departmental Expenditure   440,796,300
             Debt Charges                66,662,800
             Regional Sewerage Charges   21,571,200
             Transfers to Reserves       16,466,200 $544,496,500 

         Net Budget Position                        $   (369,200)

         Indicated Tax Increase     (0.1%)               369,200 

         Final Budget Position                      $          0 


     Additional detail of the revenue and expenditure estimates is provided
     in Appendix 1 along with a comparison to the 1995 Operating Budget.


     OVERVIEW OF THE ADJUSTED 1996 OPERATING BUDGET

     1.   Expenditure Estimates

     The interim budget  expenditures are  $544.5 million,  an increase  of
     $2.56 million or 0.9% over the 1995 budget position.


     a)   Departmental  Expenditures

     Departmental  Expenditures are  $440.8  million an  increase of  $5.25
     million or 1.2%  from the final 1995 Operating Budget.   If the impact
     of the move of the  Health Department from the budget is  factored in,
     this change increases to 4.2% or $12.6 million.

     In  developing the  1996,  estimates departments  were  guided by  the
     individual targets that arose from the budget envelope.  These targets
     gave consideration to increased salary, wage and fringe benefit costs,
     as  well  as  increases  in  general  expenditure  inflation.    Where
     appropriate, funding was also  provided for "added basic" the  cost of
     new programs and services approved by Council over the past two years.
     In meeting  their  budget targets,  departments  were forced  to  make
     choices among competing demands for resources and, in some case, minor
     reallocation of funding has  taken place to accommodate those  demands
     that were  of a high priority.    However, in  reviewing the estimates
     submitted by departments,  the Budget  Office did  not identified  any
     significant changes in  the on-going  programs that were  funded.   In
     short,  the   current  budget  position  has   been  achieved  without
     significant  change to  departmental programs  and with  no  change to
     staffing levels beyond those approved as part of the Budget Management
     Program.

     In reviewing  the change  in departmental  expenditures  from 1995  to
     1996, it is  important to note  how the  settlement of major  employee
     group collective agreements is reflected.   The 1995 estimates reflect
     1994 salary levels while 1996 estimates include two years of increased
     funding,  creating an  extra-ordinary  time  increase in  departmental
     salary  expenditures of  3.02%.   This tends  to overstate  the actual
     change in departmental estimates from 1995 to 1996.

     Throughout  1994 and  1995,  and  in  developing the  1996  estimates,
     departments have  been adjusting  allocations to implement  the Budget
     Management  Program changes approved by  Council in April,  1994.  The
     full  impact  of  these adjustments  has  been  included  in the  1996
     Operating Budget  and reflect expenditure  reductions in the  range of
     $13.5  million from  the  1993 expenditure  level.   As a  result, the
     transition  funding required in 1994 and 1995 has been discontinued in
     the  1996 budget  estimates.   Once the  Operating and  Capital Budget
     cycle  is  completed, the  Director of  Finance  will bring  forward a
     report to Council summarizing the program.

     The following summarizes some  of the more significant changes  in the
     estimates:

     -  General  Administrative   includes  most  of  the  internal  service
        departments,    including  the  City  Manager s  Office,   Corporate
        Services,  Human  Resources, Legal  Services  and  the  City  Clerk.
        There are  several  reasons for  the significant  increase in  these
        estimates:

        -  the cost of the November civic election ($1.0 million);
        - addition  of the  third of  four installments  of funding  to the
          Staff Training and Development Program ($337,500),
        - the  move  of  the  Occupational  Hearing  Conservation   program
          ($390,000) from the Health Department to Human Resources; and,
        - the  rental costs associated with  the move of  Legal Services to
          the VanCity Building ($160,000).


       Other General  Government includes those  estimates that are  inter-
        departmental   or  corporate  in  nature  and  which  tend  to  vary
        significantly  from  year-to-year.    The  two  most     significant


        components of this allocation are:

        - $1.278 million  to continue  the Better City  Government Program;
          and, 
        - $1.75 million  for  new and  non-recurring  items which  will  be
          distributed  to  departmental  budgets to  provide  for  one-time
          health and  safety issues, items that provide an economic payback
          and normal replacement of furniture and equipment.


        The  allocation of  NNR  funding  to  departmental budgets  will  be
        included as part of the final Operating Budget estimates.

     -  The  reduction in  the Fire  Department estimates  arises  primarily
        from moving  vehicle and  equipment costs  out of  the budget  ($1.3
        million).  As  reported to Council  at the preliminary stage  of the
        budget,  it is  recommended that  replacement of  this equipment  be
        handled through  the Truck  and Equipment  Plant Account  as is  the
        case for most other City vehicles.

     -  Expenditures  have been reduced in the Permits  & Licence department
        reflecting the  changes to the Secondary  Suite Program approved  by
        Council earlier this year.

     -  There  are  many  changes  in  the   Public  Works  section  of  the
        expenditure estimates, however  many of them represent the  addition
        of  inflation  or  one-time  expenditures  and  the   reorganization
        initiatives within the department, rather than changes in  programs.
        For  example,  the Street  Cleaning  program  has been  shifted from
        Sanitation to Streets in anticipation of  the creation of the  Solid
        Waste  Utility.   The  Sanitation  estimates have  been  reduced  by
        $450,000  representing the  change in  residential  collection costs
        reported to Council earlier this year.   Parking Program costs  have
        increased  to reflect the  one-time costs  of installing  new meters
        and making changes to meter rates.

        There  has been only one significant change in program funding.  The
        radio   replacement   program,  which   had  provided   funding  for
        replacement and upgrading of the City s  mobile radio plant has been
        suspended  for   1996   pending  clarification   of  the   direction
        communications will  go in the  future as  a result  of the  ongoing
        review by Teleconsult.
     -  With  the move  of the  Health  Department  to the  Vancouver Health
        Board, the City will no longer  be incurring expenditures for Health
        care  services  with  the  exception  of  the  Occupational  Hearing
        Conservation  and  FitCity  programs  and the  Cemetery.    The City
        continues to provide some administrative services  to the Board on a
        full cost recovery basis and contracts  with the Board for  services
        of the Environmental Health Branch.

     -  The  increase  in  Park  Board  expenditures  and  revenues   arises
        primarily from the  partial-year re-opening of McCleery Golf  Course
        in mid 1996  after 22 month  of closure for  renovation.   On a  net
        basis, the Park Board  budget is anticipated to increase by 1.5%.  A
        report on the 1996  Park Board global budget  will be before Council
        in the near future.
      
     -  The Library Budget has been increased  for the balance of  operating
        costs  related to  Library Square  as  well  as the  recent staffing
        approval ($315,000  for 1996,  $475,000 ongoing).   Offsetting  this
        growth  has  been   reductions  in  expenditures  from  the   Budget
        Management Program.

     -  Bookings at the Civic Theatres are  predicted to increase over  1995


        resulting in  an  7.7% increase  in  revenues.   This  increase  has
        exceeded the  noted increase in  operating expenditures leaving  the
        theatres in a surplus position of $98,700.

     b)   Debt Charges

     The growth  in debt  charges reflects  continuation  of the  borrowing
     program related to the  1994-1996 Capital Plan.   The net increase  in
     debt charges  from 1995  to the  1996 interim  estimate stage  is $1.5
     million or  2.4%, bringing debt  charges to  $66.67 million.  However,
     there are a variety of items that have resulted in this growth.

     The  City  retired the  last of  its  remaining US  dollar denominated
     debentures and the  US Premium Exchange Reserve was closed  at the end
     of 1995.   As a  result, the  1996 budget  makes no  provision for  US
     exchange costs.

     The  preliminary estimates for the 1996 Operating Budget were built on
     the  assumption that the 1996  debenture issue would  require a coupon
     payment  in 1996.  However, when  the issue  was placed  in the  Euro-
     Canadian market the requirement  for this payment was eliminated.   As
     the Operating  Budget has been  brought into balance  within Council s
     taxation objectives, the Director of Finance is recommending that this
     $2.55 million  provision in the preliminary estimates  be retained and
     moved to the  Debt Repayment Reserve.  This reserve  will be available
     to offset the increase in debt charges related to this debenture issue
     that will have to be accommodated in the 1997 Operating Budget.

     Since   1993,  Council  has  approved  rebates  of  interest  on  City
     debentures held in the Capital Financing Fund sufficient to reduce the
     effective interest rate earned  by the fund to current  market levels.
     In 1996, the Director of Finance is recommending that these rebates be
     continued and that they be extended to two additional debenture issues
     held by  the Property Endowment Fund.   The value of  these rebates is
     estimated at $1.5  million and  go directly to  reducing debt  charges
     supported  by the Operating Budget ($1.5 million) and water rates ($.5
     million).

     c)   Greater Vancouver Sewer and Drainage District

     The final requisition from the GVS&DD for sewer purposes has increased
     by $369,200 above  the 1995 level, an increase of  1.8%. The Vancouver
     Sewerage Area budget reflects a recovery from UBC  of $1.4 million for
     their share of sewer system costs.

     In November 1995,  Council approved the recommendation of the Director
     of Finance that any increase in regional charges beyond the percentage
     increase  in  the City s  general purpose  tax  levy should  be passed
     through to  taxpayers.  As  the tax increase  based on growth  in City
     expenditures has  been held  at 0% for  1996, the  increase in  GVS&DD
     costs will  result in an effective tax increase of $369,200 or 0.1%.

     d)   Transfers to Reserves and Funds

     Transfers to reserves and other funds have declined by $2.1 million to
     $16.4  million.  The  most  significant  of  these  transfers  is  the
     provision for capital  from revenue,  which is set  at $14.2  million.
     Other  transfers include:   $600,000   to  the Residential  Demolition
     Reserve, reflecting the fee for demolition of residential units in the
     City; and  the transfer of  $1.66 million to  the Solid  Waste Capital
     Reserve, being the surplus  earned on commercial solid waste  disposal
     services provided by the City.

     e)   Contingency Reserve


     The interim estimates include a contingency reserve provision of $3.37
     million.    Of this  amount,  approximately  $800,000  is reserved  to
     provide  for salary and wage adjustments for those employee groups who
     have yet to settle  contract with the City for periods  extending back
     to  1994.   In  addition, there  are  several budget  items for  which
     discussion continues  prior to  funding being allocated  to individual
     budgets.  It is anticipated that these items will be resolved prior to
     the budget  being finalized.   It  is the  intention that the  general
     provision available for  Council to deal  with emergent issues  during
     the  balance of  the  year will  be  in the  range  of $1.75  million,
     comparable to expenditure levels in 1994 and 1995.


     2.   Revenue Estimates

     The 1996 interim estimates include a revenue budget of $544.0 million,
     an increase of 0.9% or $4.6 million  over the 1995 level.  This change
     results from growth  in taxation,  general and utility  revenue and  a
     reduction in transfers from reserves.

     a)   Taxation Revenue

     The interim estimates include three changes to the General Purpose Tax
     Levy from the 1995 position:

     -  Supplementary roll  adjustments affecting  the base  tax levy  which
        have increased the base levy by $90,700.
     -  new  construction values  added  to the  1996 Assessment  Roll which
        converts to new taxes of $6.6 million.
     -  an increase in the  provision for taxes  written off as a result  of
        assessment appeals from $1.0 million to $2.0 million reflecting  the
        increased number and value of appeals outstanding.

     Overall, these adjustments represent a net increase in tax revenues of
     $5.7 million over the 1995 level.

     Increases in payments-in-lieu of  property taxes have also contributed
     to increased taxation revenues.  These changes, totalling $1.3 million
     are primarily the result of the changing mix and valuation of  federal
     and provincial properties subject to payments-in-lieu of taxes.


     b)   Non-Taxation Revenues

     Non-taxation revenues  originate from  a variety of  sources including
     fees  and  charges,  rental  income,  short  term  interest  earnings,
     Provincial Revenue  Sharing and  utility revenues.   While changes  in
     individual  revenue  sources  are  more  varied,  overall,  the  these
     revenues are expected to  increase by $2.8 million from the 1995 level
     to $173.3 million.   However, it is noted that all of this increase is
     concentrated in  Waterworks revenue  and that, excluding  this utility
     revenue, non-taxation  revenues have actually declined  by $800,000 or
     0.6%.




     -  Provincial Revenue Sharing has been held at the 1995 level with  the
        exception   of  an  small  downward  adjustment  reflecting  changes
        anticipated as  a result  of application  of the  provincial revenue
        sharing  formula.   It is  anticipated  that  the City  will receive
        information from the  Provincial Government shortly on the level  of
        funding to be received in 1996.


        It is  also noted  that the  Provincial funding  for the  70/30 cost
        sharing  program   for  preventative   health   services  has   been
        discontinued  with the  move of  these responsibilities  to  the new
        Vancouver Health Board.

     -  Short  Term Interest  Earnings  have  been increased  over the  1995
        level  reflecting,  in   part,  the  City s  larger  cash   reserves
        following from the 1996 debenture issue.   This revenue is sensitive
        to short term interest rates which continue to fluctuate.

     -  Rental revenues have been increased from  the 1995 level because  of
        changes in  the mix  of City-owned  properties out  on lease  and in
        their value for purposes of calculating rents-in-lieu of taxes.

     -  The  decline  in  service  and  inspection  fees  reflects   revised
        expectation that development activity in the  City will be below the
        1995  levels.  The  estimates also  include the  impact of increased
        development and trade  permit fees  in place  or soon  to be  before
        Council for approval.

     -  During 1995, the City s parking meter program experienced  vandalism
        problems which  impacted on  revenues from meters  and from  parking
        enforcement.  With the actions taken  to deter these problems, these
        revenues  are  anticipated to  return  to  prior  year  levels.   In
        addition new  metered  areas and  revised  parking  meter fees  will
        impact  on  meter  revenue  and  the  impact  of  the  new  two-tier
        voluntary payment system will improve parking enforcement revenue.

     -  Park Board revenue is also expected to  increase for 1996 over  1995
        levels.  City Services and Budget  Committee will consider a  report
        on the 1996 Park Board global budget at its April 18 meeting.

     -  Waterworks  revenues have  increased by  9.5%, consistent  with  the
        increase approved  by  Council in  December  1995.   Water  revenues
        offset the costs of system operation  and maintenance (up 7.7%  over
        1995), water purchase costs (12.8%) and water debt charges (11.6%).



     c)   Transfers from Reserves and Funds

     The 1995 interim estimates contain funding from four areas outside the
     Operating Budget:

     -  the surplus on the City s Sinking Fund, at $7.5 million.
     -  the annual transfer  from the Property  Endowment Fund, continued at
        $7.0 million.
     -  a transfer  from the  Hasting Park  Capital Reserve  to fulfill  the
        City s commitment  to provide operating funding  to the  PNE for the
        duration of its lease.
     -  a transfer  from the  Art Gallery  Reserve to  partially offset  the
        City s operating grant to the Vancouver Art Gallery.


     Transfers  from other reserves utilized in the 1995 and 1994 Operating
     Budgets have been discontinued,  resulting in a reduction of  24.8% or
     $5.3  million.   Transfers  from  Revenue Surplus  have  been utilized
     during 1994 and  1995 to provide transition  funding while expenditure
     reductions arising  from  the Budget  Management Program  were put  in
     place.   These  reductions  have been  achieved  in full  in the  1996
     Operating Budget eliminating the  need for this transfer to  continue.
     As noted above, with  the retirement of US denominated  debentures, no
     transfer from the US Premium Exchange Reserve is required.


     CONCLUSION

     This  report presents the interim results of the 1996 Operating Budget
     building  process.    It  presents  a  balanced  budget  position  for
     Council s  consideration   which  includes  a  0%   tax  increase  for
     expenditures  that are controlled by  Council.  A  nominal increase of
     0.1% is recommended  to provide  for the increase  in the  requisition
     from the Greater Vancouver Regional Sewerage and Drainage District.


     SUBSEQUENT PROCEDURES

     On  Thursday  April  18,  City Services  and  Budgets  Committee  will
     consider the 1996 Park Board global budget and the Board s request for
      added   basic   funding.      The  decisions   following  from   that
     consideration may impact on these budget estimates.

     On  Thursday,  April  23, City  Services  and  Budgets Committee  will
     receive  a  report  summarizing  the  final  adjustments  to the  1996
     Operating  Budget  for approval  in principle.    This report  will be
     accompanied  by a  book on  Budget position  embodied in  this report,
     along  with appropriate overview notes and commentary on the detail of
     the  revenues and expenditures.  On May 9, the committee will consider
     a report from the Director of Finance dealing with additional taxation
     policy items  for 1996, including the taxation limitation program (tax
     capping) and consideration of a further shift  of tax burden among the
     property classes.   On May  14, Council will  formally adopt  the 1996
     Operating  Budget  along with  the  averaging  resolutions and  rating
     bylaws which  give effect to Council  decisions on May  9. These final
     actions will complete the budget cycle.



                                *   *   *   *   *