ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT


                                                   Date:  January 22, 1996 
                                                   Dept. File No.2181IC.COV


     TO:       Vancouver City Council

     FROM:     Deputy Chief License Inspector

     SUBJECT:  Replacement Pound By-law



     RECOMMENDATION

          A.   THAT  the  by-law amendments,  attached  as  Appendix A,  be
               adopted,  including the  consolidation  of  portions of  the
               Pound, License and Canine Waste By-laws.

          B.   THAT the Director of Legal  Services be instructed to  bring
               forward the necessary by-law requirements.


     GENERAL MANAGER'S COMMENTS

          The General Manager of  Community Services RECOMMENDS approval of
          A and B.


     PURPOSE

     To provide information  on a proposed consolidated  and updated Animal
     Control By-law.


     BACKGROUND

     The Pound By-law is the oldest by-law that is still being administered
     and enforced  on a regular basis.   Originally passed in  1930, it has
     seen very  little  in the  way  of  amendment except  for  the  annual
     adjustment of fees and charges.  Because of its age, and the confusion
     created  by outdated terms, it  has now become  awkward to enforce and
     cumbersome  to administer.    Accordingly, Pound  officials have  been
     working with the Director  of Legal Services to upgrade  and modernize
     the by-law.   The proposals for amendments  to the Pound By-law  which
     follow in this report are intended to reduce the  level of frustration
     the public experiences in trying to understand its provisions, to make
     its  administration   easier  and  more  economic,   and  to  increase
     successful enforcement.



     DISCUSSION

     Most of these  amendments are essentially housekeeping  in nature, and
     few make  any substantive changes to the by-law.  The proposals can be
     generally described and grouped as follows:

          1.   The name should be  changed from Pound to Animal  Control to
               reflect  the real nature and purpose of the by-law, which is
               to regulate the  keeping of  animals in the  City and,  only
               where necessary, to require their impoundment.

          2.   The  definitions should  be  simplified and  clarified where
               necessary.

          3.   The  by-law should be written  in a gender-neutral format as
               have nearly all other major by-laws. 

          4.   The by-law  should be  generally rewritten to  modernize and
               simplify its language.

          5.   The  dog  licensing provisions  presently  contained in  the
               License By-law should  be moved  over to the  new by-law  so
               that  the public can find all provisions relating to animals
               in one place.

          6.   The  Canine Waste  Disposal  By-law should  be consoli-dated
               with the new by-law for the same reason as noted above.

          7.   Redundant and unenforceable provisions should be deleted.

          8.   The fees and charges which were contained throughout the by-
               law  should be  relocated to  the fee  schedule so  that the
               public can easily see what charges are involved.

          9.   Specific provisions  relating  to "cows,  bulls,  stallions,
               rams,  horses,  mules, cattle,  sheep, goats,  swine, geese,
               ducks, and fowl" should be deleted and replaced by reference
               to "other  animals besides dogs and  cats", thereby enabling
               an Animal Control Officer  to effectively deal with animals,
               including exotic animals that are not specifically listed in
               the by-law.





          10.  The Pound,  in addition to  the routine incineration  of all
               dead  animals,  and in  response to  a large  public demand,
               provides  a  private  cremation  service.   When  a  private
               cremation  is requested,  the  customer is  provided with  a
               container that has 100% of the pet's ashes.  The current fee
               for this service is $50 (plus the applicable service charge)
               and it should be formalized into the new fee schedule.


     Two amendments  may be  characterized as  being more  substantive than
     housekeeping.  These are:

          1.   Requirements for  advertising in a newspaper  that an animal
               has been impounded  should be replaced by the requirement to
               post  a  notice in  the Pound  with  this information.   The
               Director  of  Permits  &  Licenses  recommends  this  change
               because the cost of  advertis-ing in city-wide newspapers is
               prohibitive.

          2.   A  new provision  should be  added making  it an  offence to
               interfere with, resist or otherwise obstruct the Poundkeeper
               in  the carrying  out of  his/her duty in  seizing a  dog or
               other animal.  The Director of Permits & Licenses recommends
               this  addition because of increasing problems in enforcement
               of the by-law  in city  parks and beaches.   This  amendment
               would allow  for charges to be laid  against individuals who
               obstruct any enforcement action taken by Pound staff.


     CONCLUSION

     A committee made up of Park Board, City and Pound  representa-tives is
     currently reviewing a number  of issues related to enforcement.   This
     process will extend  well into 1996, and  may result in  future by-law
     changes.

     In the meantime, the  consolidation of the three by-laws  dealing with
     animal control, along with  clarification of the powers under  the by-
     law,  will   assist  with   enforcement  and  will   provide  improved
     information to the public.



                            *     *     *     *     *