A6
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
Date: May 10, 1995
Dept. File No. H764-1
TO: Vancouver City Council
FROM: General Manager of Engineering Services
SUBJECT: Comfort Station Contracts 1995
RECOMMENDATION
A. THAT Council approve, without tender, awarding the
contracts for the operation of the City's two comfort
stations to selected qualified Operators on the basis
of historic rates adjusted annually on a negotiated
basis but with increases not to exceed those awarded
under the provisions of the V.M.R.E.U. contract
B. THAT the General Manager of Engineering Services be
authorized to negotiate the contract each year with the
incumbent Operator, if continuation of his/her services
is mutually agreeable, or to recruit a suitable
replacement, under the established contract provisions,
from the local community served.
C. THAT the Director of Legal Services be authorized to
prepare and execute new agreements with the present
Operator, Mr. Gerald London, for the period April 1,
1995 to December 31, 1995, inclusive on the basis of
the appropriate rates for this period.
COUNCIL POLICY
The Policy of Council is to award contracts for the purchase of
equipment, supplies and services that will give the highest value
based on quality, service and price.
There is no specific Council policy on tendering procedures but
contracts in excess of $50,000 are generally open to public
tender.
PURPOSE
This report seeks Council approval for the continuation of the
practice of awarding the contracts for the City's two comfort
stations outside of the normal public tender process.
BACKGROUND
Engineering Services administers the City's two Comfort Stations.
They are located at Hamilton and Hastings and at Main and
Hastings and were opened in 1922 and 1923 respectively.
Historically, the Comfort Stations have been operated under
contract by people familiar with the community they serve. The
normal tendering process has never been followed in the award of
these contracts. Instead, new Operators have been recruited from
existing comfort station staff and annual extensions or new
appointments have been approved through Manager's Minutes.
Increases have been negotiated annually with the Operator but
have been limited to wage increases under the provisions of the
City's V.M.R.E.U. contract. This process has provided the City
with a certain degree of service level continuity when individual
Operators retired or were no longer available and has resulted in
a high level of commitment on the part of the Operators, and
acceptable wage rates.
In the late 1993, the Operator, Mr. Bill Smith, passed away
suddenly. At that time Mr. Smith's assistant, Mr. Gerald London,
took over the operation under an interim agreement. He has
proven to be a capable Operator over the interim period and has
indicated that he wishes to continue with the present operation.
He has also indicated that he would undertake the contract at no
increase. As the present contract award process is not in strict
compliance with the normal tendering procedures, it was felt that
it should be reviewed and put forward for Council endorsement.
DISCUSSION
The present agreement provides for the following monthly rates,
including net GST:
Station 1994 Contract
Location Rate/Month
#1 - Hamilton & $ 6,130.48
Hastings
#2 - Main & $ 6,130.48
Hastings
The agreement provides that the Contractor/Operator must pay the
attendants 4% vacation pay and pay the employer's share of
Unemployment Insurance and the Canada Pension Plan, as well as
the Worker's Compensation Board assessments on the total of all
wages. In order to keep the stations open a minimum of 12 hours
daily, the Contractor/Operator must hire a minimum of three (3)
part-time attendants. The Contractor also supplies the needed
brushes and brooms.
The City supplies paper towels, toilet paper, soap, utilities and
provides building maintenance. The present hourly rate
stipulated for the operator is $10.75 per hour, and for the
attendants $7.65 per hour.
Attendants are generally from the local community who care about
the facility operation. This process offers them an employment
opportunity that may not otherwise be available to them. In
effect, the existing award process helps to ensure that the
comfort stations provide physical and social benefits in tune
with the community they serve. It is felt that a formal tender
process would introduce restrictions on our ability to maintain
the local pride and commitment to neighbourhood service we have
enjoyed to date.
* * * * *