Vancouver City Council |
CITY OF VANCOUVER
POLICY REPORT
URBAN STRUCTURE
Date:
March 7, 2005
Author:
Phil Mondor
Phone No.:
604.873.7727
RTS No.:
04954
CC File No.:
5306
Meeting Date:
March 15, 2004
TO:
Vancouver City Council
FROM:
Director of Current Planning, in consultation with the Director of Legal Services
SUBJECT:
CD-1 Rezoning of 1211 Melville Street
RECOMMENDATION
A. THAT the application by Hancock Brückner Eng + Wright Architects to rezone the site at 1211 Melville Street (Lots A and 4, Block 30, DL 185, Plan 92), from DD Downtown District to CD-1 Comprehensive Development District, be referred to a Public Hearing, together with:
(i) CD-1 By-law provisions, generally as presented in Appendix A;
(ii) the proposed form of development as shown in plans prepared by Hancock Brückner Eng + Wright Architects received October 14, 2004, presented in Appendix E; and
(iii) the recommendation of the Director of Current Planning to approve the application, subject to approval conditions contained in Appendix B.
FURTHER THAT the Director of Legal Services be instructed to prepare the necessary CD-1 By-law, generally in accordance with Appendix A, for consideration at the Public Hearing.
B. THAT, if this application is approved, and when development (DE) permit is issued for mixed-use development on the site at 1188 West Pender Street, the Director of Current Planning be instructed to make application to rezone the site at 1188 West Pender Street from DD to CD-1 as set out in DE statistics, with form of development as shown in DE approved drawings.
C. THAT the application to amend the Sign By-law, to establish regulations for this CD-1 in accordance with Schedule "B" (DD), be referred to the same Public Hearing; and
FURTHER THAT the Director of Legal Services be instructed to prepare the necessary by-law for consideration at the Public Hearing.
D. THAT, subject to approval of the rezoning at a Public Hearing, the Noise Control By-law be amended to include this CD-1 in Schedule A;
AND FURTHER THAT the Director of Legal Services be instructed to bring forward for enactment the amendment to the Noise Control By-law at the time of enactment of the CD-1 By-law.
GENERAL MANAGER'S COMMENTS
The General Manager of Community Services RECOMMENDS approval of the foregoing.
COUNCIL POLICY
· Central Area Plan
· Triangle West Policies
· Downtown Official Development Plan (DODP)
· Downtown (except Downtown South) Design Guidelines, adopted in September, 1975 and last amended in December, 1993;
· DD (Except Downtown South) C-5, C-6, HA-1 and HA-2 Character Area Descriptions, including a Bute Street Neighbourhood Centre Character Area Description
· View Protection Guidelines
· Transfer of Density Policy and Procedure
· Financing Growth (Community Amenity Contribution) Policy
· Downtown Transportation Plan
PURPOSE AND SUMMARY
This rezoning application requests an increase in the maximum floor area on this site, through a transfer of 4 886.5 m² (52,600 sq. ft.) of commercial floor area potential from the triangular site across Bute Street at 1188 West Pender Street. To accommodate the additional density, the two-storey mixed-use podium in an approved development application (DE 408162) would be raised to three storeys and 3 floors would be added to the 34-storey tower above.
The purpose of the rezoning is to provide a significant commercial anchor on Bute Street which will facilitate its role as a shopping street to serve the emerging residential neighbourhood which surrounds the site. The DD (Except Downtown South), C-5, C-6, HA-1 and HA-2 Character Area Descriptions were amended by City Council in December, 2003 to include a Bute Street Neighbourhood Centre Character Area Description which specifically encourages this proposal. The donor site at 1188 West Pender St. is much too small to provide a large-floorplate retail anchor near the south end of the Bute Street high street.
Staff recommend that the application be referred to a Public Hearing and be approved with conditions.
BACKGROUND
Site and Context (see map diagram below - a more detailed context map is provided in Appendix C): The site is comprised of two lots forming the eastern half of a triangular block bounded by Pender, Melville and Bute Streets. It is on the eastern edge of sub-area `G' of the Downtown District (DD) which is an emerging residential neighbourhood, Triangle West. To the west on the remainder of the block a residential tower of 91.4 m (300 ft.) is proposed. North across Pender Street, from west to east, are the 10-storey Evergreen building, a 25-storey residential tower (Palladio) and a 9-storey office tower.
East across Bute Street , in sub-area F of the DD, is a triangular site at 1188 West Pender Street which has a development application (DE408949) in process for the development of a 31-storey mixed-use building, with 110 residential units in a tower, commercial units at grade, and a 39-space licensed child day-care facility on the second floor. South of the lane from that site, at 1189 Melville Street (previously 575 Bute Street), a mixed-used development (DE 407110) is under construction, containing a 42-storey residential tower, 121.9 m (400 ft.) in height, and a 13-storey hotel.
Diagonally across Bute Street to the south is a 26-storey residential tower (Orca). South across Melville Street, development includes a 6-storey Heritage "B" residential building (Stadacona Apartments) at 601 Bute Street, and a 32-storey residential tower with townhouses at grade (Pointe Claire) at 1238 Melville Street.
Figure 1: Site and Surrounding Zoning
Existing Zoning: The site is in sub-area `G' of the Downtown District (DD) which permits residential, commercial, office and hotel uses to a maximum FSR of 6.0, except that office uses must not exceed FSR 5.00. The height limit is 91.4 m (300 ft.).
Context - Triangle West: The Triangle West area extends generally from Bute Street west to Cardero Street, and from Alberni Street north to West Hastings Street. The area as we see it today is the result of considerable redevelopment activity in recent years. The Central Area Plan (1991) sought among other things to consolidate a compact downtown central business district (CBD) and to develop housing in highly livable and primarily residential neighbourhoods around and closely linked to the CBD. In areas that had a mix of office and housing development, such as Triangle West, the Plan proposed that they be "choice-of-use" areas for offices, housing or hotels. These areas had general amenity, but zoning had historically favoured office development. According to the Plan, these areas offered a special opportunity to foster an intensive mix in a central area otherwise divided into primarily housing or office precincts.
In 1997, `choice-of-use' zoning was approved for Triangle West (DD sub-area `G'). (See report on file Policy of Residential Rezonings in the Central Business District and Related Zoning Amendments, report dated January 21, 1997). As a result of the zoning changes there has been considerable new residential development in the area, most of it in the form of towers above townhouse podium. The positive consequences include the development of a complete residential community, the widespread development of townhouses at grade, and a high-level of public realm treatment. Concurrently the new Coal Harbour neighbourhood was developed, including the new Coal Harbour Community Centre and waterfront park, to the north of Triangle West.
The pedestrian plan in the Downtown Transportation Plan (2002) identifies a network of pedestrian routes and greenways to facilitate and promote walking as a more attractive transportation alternative, and to provide improved links between neighbourhoods, parks, community centres, open spaces, as well as transportation nodes and commercial precincts. The pedestrian plan identifies several pedestrian arterial (connector) routes to provide easy, direct, safe routes across the downtown peninsula and form part of a dense pedestrian network throughout the downtown. These streets are intended to be fully accessible to all pedestrians including those with mobility challenges and may include:
· wider sidewalks, · corner bulges,
· enhanced landscaping, · public Art,
· resting areas, · pedestrian oriented signage and maps,
· pedestrian oriented lighting, · safer sidewalk crossings at lanes and intersections,
· enhanced weather protection, · street furniture including benches for resting, and
· curb ramps.
At the western edge of Triangle West, Cardero Street is identified in the DTP pedestrian plan as a pedestrian arterial route because of the existing pedestrian investments already made via traffic calming measures and mini-parks along the street. This route also provides a `water to water' connection from English Bay park to the new park along the eastern edge of the Bayshore Hotel. At the eastern edge of Triangle West, on the western border of the CBD, Bute Street is an important pedestrian route serving Coal Harbour, Triangle West, and West End residents. Years before the pedestrian plan was adopted, Bute Street had high pedestrian volumes as a preferred route for many. At its north end, with a public plaza on the north side of West Cordova Street, Bute Street reinforces the sense of entry into Harbour Green Park on Coal Harbour.
In 2003, the Planning Department received several enquiries and applications (rezoning and development applications) for sites with street frontages along Bute Street between Cordova Street and Melville Street. Shown on the following map diagram (Figure 2), seven sites fronting Bute Street are identified, all of which have some potential for retail use:
A. 550 Bute - Preliminary development application approved in principle for 12.2 m (400 ft.) residential tower - includes good potential for retail at grade long Bute Street (256 dwelling units);
B. 1199 West Hastings - Rezoning and development application approved for a restaurant (corner of West Cordova Street);
C. 1201 West Hastings - Rezoning approved for a residential tower that includes a large retail use (grocery store) at grade;
D. 1211 Melville - Rezoning enquiry that suggests a large retail use at grade;
E. 1188 West Pender - Enquiry with transfer of density potential having retail at grade with a community amenity above; and
F. 1199 West Pender, and G. 1201 West Pender - Two existing buildings developed at a time when Bute Street was not envisioned as a shopping street and West Hastings Street did not extend this far west.
Figure 2: Bute Street High Street
When the Coal Harbour and Triangle West neighbourhoods were envisioned as high density, predominantly residential neighbourhoods, larger retail uses such as grocery stores were not contemplated. Retailers and developers argued that new retail space would not be viable and could undermine existing shopping areas, such as Robson Street. Consequently, retail uses were not required except in specific locations and in small premises, such as along the waterfront to complement the Coal Harbour Community Centre and to provide pedestrian animation.
In late 2003, staff identified the opportunity and desirability of establishing a small commercial centre along Bute Street frontages that would provide local services and shopping for the high density residential neighbourhoods of Coal Harbour and Triangle West. The concept was to encourage the transformation of Bute Street into a `high street'. As described in the DTP pedestrian plan High Streets are streets that are easily identified as major neighbourhood or city-wide shopping and entertainment locations. High Streets typically have retail and/or services uses on both sides of the street extending for at least three blocks in length, and are typically public transit routes. Streets like Davie, Denman, Robson and Granville help define a neighbourhood and provide more than just shopping and services but become an important gathering place and the focus of public life.
In late 2003, Planning staff recommended a Character Area description to encourage the northerly three blocks of Bute Street to develop as a Neighbourhood Commercial Centre (Bute Street as Neighbourhood Commercial Centre for Coal Harbour/Triangle West, report dated November 18, 2003 and approved December 11, 2003). Staff proposed it would be in the public's interest to facilitate establishment of a Neighbourhood Commercial Centre for the growing resident population in the area.
The development of Bute Street as a neighbourhood shopping area would contribute to the City's objectives of enhancing the public realm and animating Bute Street. This opportunity to encourage retail uses oriented to serving the needs of the local residents would link and reinforce this pedestrian environment and give a focus to these neighbourhoods. Local services would become available within a 5 to10 minute walk of all residents in this area, without people having to climb the steep slope all the way to Robson Street. If all the sites along Bute Street realized their full retail potential the result would be a three-block neighbourhood commercial centre with anchors at each end and fairly continuous retail along the sidewalks. This activity would also be directly linked to Harbour Green Park and would bring animation and vitality to the Bute Street End Plaza.
The establishment of a clear objective to create this frontage of Bute Street as a Neighbourhood Centre was intended to and has provided direction for sites in various stages of their development process. In addition, the policy provides a context within which incentives can be pursued with owners of existing buildings, including relaxation of parking provisions or, for those at maximum FSR, allowing for modest FSR increases for retail retrofits. Further, the treatment of the public realm can be coordinated to enhance the pedestrian amenity of the street.
Development Application in Process: On July 25, 2004, the Development Permit Board approved with conditions a development application (DE 408162) for a mixed-used development on this site containing:
· 34-storey residential tower of 18 400 m² (198,056 sq. ft.) to provide 174 dwelling units,
· two-storey commercial podium containing 1 630 m² (17,547 sq. ft.) of retail space at grade and residential amenity area above, and
· 5 three-storey townhouses fronting Melville Street.
The DE application proposed a total FSR of 6.6, which includes a transfer of 1 820.8 m² (19,600 sq. ft.) of heritage density from a suitable donor site, under the provisions of DD zoning (section 3.12) whereby the Development Permit Board (DPB) may permit an increase in floor space ratio (FSR) through heritage density transfer to a maximum of 10 percent over the total permitted FSR.
Proposed Development: The rezoning application requests an increase in the maximum floor area on the site through a transfer of commercial density of 4 886.5 m² (52,600 sq. ft.) from the site across the street at 1188 West Pender Street. This would:
· enlarge the commercial podium base of the proposed development from 1 630 m² (17,547 sq. ft.) to 4 886.5 m² (52,600 sq. ft.), in three floors rather than two, and provide two large-floorplate retail space up to 2 322.5 m² (25,000 sq. ft.), while maintaining smaller retail units at grade along Bute Street; and
· increase the residential floor area from 18 400 m² (198,056 sq. ft.) to 20 029.4 m² (215,602 sq. ft.), and increase the number of dwelling units from 174 to 192.
The total floor area would be increased from 20 029 m² (215,602 sq. ft.) to 24 916.0 m² (268,202 sq. ft.) and the total FSR would be increased from 6.6 to 8.2. This is an increase of 25 percent. Tower height would be increased from 102.4 m (336 ft.) to 113.4 m (372 ft.), through the addition of 3 floors to the 34-storey tower.
DISCUSSION
Land Use: In the Triangle West neighbourhood context described earlier (see Background), it is desirable to accommodate a commercial anchor on Bute Street. The site being the last one fronting Bute Street which is large enough to accommodate a large grocery store and/or drugstore, the proposed rezoning would facilitate the role of Bute Street as a shopping street for the surrounding residential neighbourhood. Two large-floorplate retail spaces at this location between Melville and Pender Streets would `bookend' with the large-floorplate retail space (`Urban Fare') at 1201 West Hastings to pull together into a cohesive whole a range of pedestrian-oriented retail opportunities between West Cordova Street and Melville Street.
Commercial Capacity: The transfer of commercial floor area potential from the site at 1188 West Pender Street will maintain commercial capacity in the DD. Commercial floor area of 4886.5 m² (52,600 sq. ft.) represents 3.7 FSR on the 1 321.5 m² (14,225 sq. ft.) site at 1188 West Pender Street. While this floor area could be accommodated on that site in office and hotel uses, neither of these uses has shown interest in this location. By contrast, retail use space, as encouraged by policy in this area, can not be accommodated in a large-floorplate format on the small site at 1188 West Pender Street. Relocating this commercial potential to provide two large-floorplate retail spaces across the street is thus a sensible thing to pursue.
Form of Development: The rezoning would amend the form of development previously approved through DE 408162 in three areas:
(a) Height - The height would be increased from 102.4 m (336 ft.) to 113.4 m (372 ft.), an increase of 11 m (36 ft.) or 10.7 percent. This increased height is accompanied by a small reduction in tower floorplate size in all storeys.
The applicant undertook a detailed analysis of private views from existing buildings located near this site (particularly the Point Claire at 1331 West Georgia, the Venus at 1239 West Georgia, the Residences on Georgia at 1200 West Georgia, and the Orca at 1166 Melville Street). The analysis demonstrates that the taller, slightly slimmer tower results in less view obstruction, particularly for the lower floors of existing towers nearby. The upper floors of existing buildings will experience some view blockage, but their views are much more panoramic to begin with and are thus less adversely affected.
The Urban Design Panel unanimously supported the increase and considered the extra height to be an improvement over the development application scheme because it adds some variety to an area which already has a number of towers of similar height. (See additional information in Appendix C.) Most Panel members did not consider the additional view impacts to be significant.
(b) Enlarged commercial podium base - The Urban Design Panel was generally satisfied with the design development direction being taken for the podium, although stressed that it needs further work. In addition, Some Panel members had some concerns about the approach suggested by the sketches noting the tendency for larger retailers to impose their corporate image on the streetscape. The applicant was cautioned against the emergence of a "big box" appearance on Pender Street and urged to ensure that a smaller scale expression prevails. The Pender Street facades should be broken up into noticeably different massing treatments. Consideration should also be given to more variation in the individual storefront treatments, more richness of detail and colour, and the use of more decorative accent features.
(c) Stacked townhouses - The five two-storey townhouses fronting Melville Street are proposed to be replaced by ten "stacked" townhouses. Where three-storey townhouses were previously approved, the application proposes two two-storey townhouses, one stacked atop the other. As the fourth storey is set back, the appearance of the townhouse component is little different than what has already been approved.
The Urban Design Panel unanimously supported the application (see minutes in Appendix D).
Neighbourhood Impact and Livability: This rezoning application is not significantly different from the project already approved in DE 408162 to affect either the surrounding public realm or livability for surrounding residents. However, the provision of a commercial anchor for the Bute Street high street, on this pedestrian arterial street, will animate Bute Street, reinforce the pedestrian environment, give a focus to the surrounding neighbourhood, and serve the needs of local residents.
Parking and Loading: The City Engineer has reviewed the application and recommends conditions of approval included in Appendix B.
Transfer of Density: The Transfer of Density Policy and Procedure states many public objectives which might be achieved through density transfer, of which two are relevant in this case:
- to facilitate development in areas with mixed-use zoning; and
- to achieve and improve urban design.
There are also several requirements stated in the policy:
- the sites should not be separated by a zoning boundary or use, density or height district boundary in an Official Development Plan (however if the objective is improved urban design, it is sufficient that the sites are within the same block or separated only by a single street);
- a site should not be involved in more than one transfer; and
- the proposal has demonstrated it will further the intent of Council's policies and regulations for the area.
The approved DE application already permits the transfer of up to 1 820.8 m² (19,600 sq. ft.) of heritage density from a donor site. The proposed transfer of 4 886.5 m² (52,600 sq. ft.) of commercial space from the site across the street is thus a second transfer. In addition, this transfer is across a density boundary within the DD. However, the two sites are separated by only a single street; indeed the donor and receiver sites are directly across the street from one another.
Staff have assessed this application against the Transfer of Density Policy and are supportive for the following reasons. The sites are separated by a single street and the proposal will result in improved urban design. Secondly, the intent of Council's policies and regulations for the area will be furthered by the provision of large floorplate retail spaces to serve the emerging residential community, as discussed above.
The transfer will also enable serious consideration of a bonused child day care facility which is contemplated at 1188 West Pender Street in a mixed-use development, with retail uses at grade, childcare indoor and outdoor floor area at the second and third storeys of the podium, and residential use above. While the site is too small to accommodate large-floorplate retail space, as noted earlier, its size, configuration and location does lend itself to a childcare facility which is much needed in this area, and Social Planning staff are actively finalizing a review of a 39-space childcare facility in a development application (DE 408949) under review for 1188 West Pender Street. Should this proposal be pursued, a report to Council regarding a childcare bonus will be forthcoming.
Staff note that the subject properties are both being developed by Pinnacle International and/or affiliates ("Pinnacle"). Pinnacle presently owns 1211 Melville Street, and has contracted to purchase 1188 West Pender Street and will be its owner when the density transfer takes place.
Staff therefore recommend that Council endorse this second density transfer over and above the heritage density transfer involved in DE 408162. The transfer would be achieved in the first instance through a Section 219 covenant on the property at 1188 West Pender Street to reduce its commercial development potential by 4 886.5 m² (52,600 sq. ft.). For the longer term, however, it is recommended that the site be eventually rezoned to CD-1. Staff thus recommend that, if this application is approved, and when development (DE) permit is issued for mixed-use development on the site at 1188 West Pender Street, the Director of Current Planning be instructed to make application to rezone the site at 1188 West Pender Street from DD to CD-1 as set out in DE statistics, with form of development as shown in DE approved drawings. When that rezoning is concluded with a CD-1 By-law which appropriately reflects the site's actual development potential, the covenant can be released.
SUSTAINABILITY
The City does not yet have comprehensive requirements in regulations or policy regarding sustainable or `green building' development, however the applicant has identified several measures which will be considered:
1. Low water flow irrigation for landscaping.
2. Some storm water retention on site for irrigation during dry periods.
3. Drought resistant planting.
4. Heat recovery between commercial and residential uses.
5. Dual flush W.C.'s
6. Use of tinted, low-e glass other than ground floor storefronts.
7. Limit area of vision glass to ±50% of exterior walls.
8. Intensive use of downtown site adjacent to transit route.
9. Green roof courtyards.
COMMUNITY AMENITY CONTRIBUTION
A Community Amenity Contribution (CAC) is anticipated for any rezoning in the DD which seeks a net increase in total floor area above the maximum permitted by the DD ODP. For this application, which was encouraged by Planning staff, the intent is to maintain existing commercial capacity in the core CBD and, while this commercial potential is being transferred across a zoning boundary and across the street, the close proximity of the site effectively maintains CBD commercial capacity and represents no net loss or increase in overall commercial density in the CBD.
We also note that it is the same developer who will be undertaking the projects at 1211 Melville and 1188 West Pender Streets, and that the pro forma analysis and determination of a bonus for provision of a child care facility at 1188 West Pender Street will take account of the increased value of the site at 1211 Melville Street. For this reason, staff do not recommend any CAC for the rezoning of 1211 Melville Street. While the analysis of the child day care facility bonus at 1188 West Pender Street is not yet completed, staff expect to be able to report on the results of this at Public Hearing.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
Approval of the report recommendations will have no financial implications with respect to City budget, fees, or staffing.
PUBLIC INPUT: 1,540 notification letters, dated October 25, 2004, were mailed to property owners in the surrounding area, rezoning information signs were installed on the site on November 5, 2004, and the applicant held an Open House on November 30, 2004.
In response to notification, a few telephone calls were received primarily with questions. In terms of commentary, two letters were received and one e-mail, all 3 opposed to the application with concerns about absence of public benefit, increased building height is too high and increased density is too much.
Regarding public benefit, the staff report describes how the provision of a commercial anchor at Bute and Pender Streets will help achieve a City policy objective for the area. It will also enable consideration of a licensed and bonused childcare facility at 1188 West Pender Street.
Urban design analysis of the application, and Urban Design Panel review, confirmed that the additional tower height and density will not have significant impact, and that normal urban design principles are achieved, for example the 24.4 m (80 ft.) separation which is sought between residential towers.
APPLICANT COMMENT: The applicant, Martin Brückner MAIBC MRAIC, has been given a copy of this report and provides the following comment:
"We confirm on behalf of our client, Pinnacle International, that we are in general agreement with the report's provisions."
CONCLUSION
Staff support the rezoning application subject to the conditions set out in Appendix B. The application and associated transfer of density will provide the capacity for a large commercial anchor tenant to serve the emerging residential community, without compromising the development previously approved in principle by DE 408162. The Director of Planning recommends that the application be referred to a public hearing and be approved.
- - - - -
APPENDIX A
1211 MELVILLE STREET
DRAFT CD-1 BY-LAW PROVISIONS
Note: A draft By-law will be prepared generally in accordance with the provisions listed below, which are subject to change and refinement prior to posting.
1. Land Uses
The only uses permitted, subject to such conditions as Council may by resolution prescribe, and to the conditions set out in this By-law, and the only uses for which the Director of Planning or Development Permit Board will issue development permits are:
(a) Dwelling Uses,
(b) Office Uses,
(c) Retail Uses,
(d) Service Uses, and
(g) Accessory Use customarily ancillary to any of the uses listed above.
2. Conditions of Use
Dwelling units are in an "activity zone" as defined in the Noise Control By-law, and, as a result, are subject to noise from surrounding land uses and street activities at levels permitted in industrial and downtown districts.
3. Density
The maximum floor area, based upon the calculation provisions of the Downtown District Official Development Plan, and including exclusion of floor area beneath building overhangs, will be 20 029.4 m² (215,602 sq. ft.) or 6.6 FSR for dwelling uses and 4 886.5 m² (52,600 sq. ft.) or 1.6 FSR for commercial uses.
4. Height
The maximum building height, measured above the base surface and to the top of the roof slab above the uppermost habitable floor and excluding the mechanical penthouse, roof garden, and roof, must not exceed 113.4 m (372 ft.).
5. Parking
Any development or use of the site requires the provision, development, and maintenance of off-street parking, loading, and bicycle storage in accordance with the requirements of, and relaxations, exemptions and mixed use reductions in, the Parking By-law, except that the following shall apply:
(a) parking for dwelling uses shall be
i) for units less than or equal to 44 m² gross floor area, a minimum of 0.3 space per dwelling unit and a maximum of 0.5 space per dwelling unit shall be provided,
ii) for units over 44 m² gross floor area up to and including 70 m² gross floor area the minimum and maximum number of parking spaces, as specified in (i), are to increase at a rate of 0.025 space per m² above 44 m², and
iii) for units of more than 70 m² gross floor area, the minimum and maximum number of parking spaces, as specified in ii), are to increase at a rate of 0.008 parking space per square metre above 70 m², except that in no case shall more than 2.0 parking spaces per dwelling unit be required or more than 2.2 spaces per dwelling unit be permitted.
(b) parking for grocery store, drug store, or liquor store use shall be a minimum of 1 space per 100 m² gross floor area (gfa) for the first 300 m² gfa, and 1 space per 50 m² gfa in excess of 300 m² gfa. The maximum parking permitted shall be no more than 20% above the minimum required.
(c) the minimum parking requirement may be reduced by 3 spaces for each co-operative vehicle and parking space provided to the satisfaction of the General Manger of Engineering Services, to a maximum of one co-op vehicle per 60 dwelling units, rounded to the nearest whole number.
6. Acoustics
All development permit applications require evidence in the form of a report and recommendations prepared by a person trained in acoustics and current techniques of noise measurement, demonstrating that the noise levels in those portions of dwelling units and hotel units listed below do not exceed the noise level set opposite such portions. For the purposes of this section, the noise level is the A-weighted 24-hour equivalent (Leq) sound level and is defined simply as noise level in decibels.
Portions of dwelling units Noise levels (Decibels)
bedrooms 35
living, dining, recreation rooms 40
kitchen, bathrooms, hallways 45
APPENDIX B
1211 MELVILLE STREET
PROPOSED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
These are draft conditions which are subject to change and refinement by staff prior to the finalization of the agenda for the public hearing.
FORM OF DEVELOPMENT
(a) THAT the proposed form of development be approved by Council in principle, generally as prepared by Hancock Brückner Eng + Wright Architects, and stamped "Received Planning Department, October 14, 2004", provided that the Director of Planning or the Development Permit Board, as the case may be, may allow minor alterations to this form of development when approving the detailed scheme of development as outlined in (b) below.
(b) THAT, prior to approval by Council of the form of development, the applicant shall obtain approval of a development application by the Director of Planning, or Development Permit Board, as the case may be, who shall have particular regard to, among other things, the following:
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
(i) substantive design development to the podium to improve its overall architectural character, articulation and the clarity of its relationship with the tower, emphasizing the site's unique geometry and the detailed interface of the podium with the Public Realm along Bute and Pender Streets and at the Bute/Pender Street corner;
Note to Applicant: The creation of a bold architectural statement with a dynamic presence both day and night is sought. The Bute Street and Pender Street facades should be broken up into noticeably different massing treatments. Consideration should also be given to more variation in the individual storefront treatments, more richness of detail and colour, and the use of more decorative accent features.
(ii) design development to the residential tower entry area on Melville Street to strengthen its sense of entry and to provide additional pedestrian amenities;
Note to Applicant: Permanent seating should be provided closer to the entrance lobby. Elimination of blank walls facing the street is required. Planter wall heights at the west side of the entrance should be stepped or reduced to not exceed approximately 0.762 m (2.5 ft.).
(iii) design development to the townhouses on Melville Street to achieve a better interface with the sidewalk, improved visibility of entries, a more secure interface with the tower at the easterly end, and a more coordinated integration with the proposed adjacent townhouses at the westerly end (approved 1280 West Pender Street development site);
(iv) design development to the amenity courtyard proposed on level 3 to introduce more variety of texture and landscaping;
Note to Applicant: Consideration should be given as well to programming the space for the use of residents.
(v) design development to the Bute/Pender Street corner to achieve a stronger termination and focal point to the "Triangle West" public realm treatment;
Note to Applicant: provision of a visual point of interest at the corner by deleting the proposed corner planter and providing either a work of public art or a seating area.
(vi) design development to the Bute Street public realm treatment to provide further details of the proposed concrete planter walls and decorative lighting, to achieve a consistency of treatment with completed public realm areas on Bute Street to the south (of Georgia Street);
(vii) design development to the proposed glazed canopy system above the commercial uses on Bute Street to provide more continuous weather protection for pedestrians along the full building frontage and a minimum 2 m (6.5 ft.) projection out from the storefronts; and
(viii) design development to refine the tower mechanical screening to further sculpt and minimize its bulk and better integrate it with the tower facades;
LANDSCAPE
(ix) design development to ensure the health and longevity of the trees proposed for the townhouse patios on Melville Street by widening the planters at the points where trees are proposed;
(x) provision at the development permit stage of a full Landscape Plan illustrating propose plant materials (common and botanical names), sizes and quantities; paving, walls, fences, light fixtures and other landscape elements; and site grading. The Landscape Plan should be at 1:100 (1/8" = 1'-0") minimum scale;
(xi) provision at the development permit stage of detailed large scale (1/4" or 1:50) architectural sections and elevations, illustrating the detailed treatment of the public realm interface (street, open space, townhouse etc.) including planter walls, stairs, gates, guardrails, landscaping, soil depth (indicating any underground structures), patios and privacy screens;
CRIME PREVENTION THROUGH ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN (CPTED)
(xii) design development to take into consideration the principles of CPTED (Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design) having particular regard for reducing opportunities for:
- theft in the parking areas, and
- mischief in alcoves and unwatched areas.
SUSTAINABILITY
(xiii) the applicant to work with staff to pursue sustainability measures so as to design and construct a "green building" and possibly to seek LEED certification;
ENGINEERING
(xiv) the applicant to provide a detailed analysis and loading management plan conducted by a Transportation Professional to assess the loading, access, garbage and recycling needs to ensure provision of an adequate number of loading spaces of sufficient size and with adequate manoeuvring aisles to meet the expected requirements of large scale retail tenancies.
AGREEMENTS
(c) THAT, prior to enactment of the CD-1 By-law, the registered owner shall, at no cost to the City make arrangements for the following to the satisfaction of the Director of Current Planning and General Manager of Engineering Services, on terms and conditions satisfactory to the Director of Legal Services, unless otherwise specified:
SUBDIVISION
(i) consolidation of all lots, or other arrangements;
ENGINEERING
(ii) clarification of all charges on title. A charge summary is required.
(iii) dedication of the north 7'-0" of lot A for road purposes.
(iv) dedication of a portion of the north east corner of the site for road purposes. Note to Applicant: to delete portions of the building above and below grade shown within the proposed dedication area.
(v) provision of appropriate access agreements to allow for underground parking access from this to the neighbouring site to the west.
DENSITY TRANSFER
(vi) register a section 219 covenant on the property at 1188 West Pender Street to reduce the commercial development potential on that site by 52,600 sq. ft., such covenant not to be released until such time as this site is rezoned to CD-1 to appropriately reflect its actual development potential.
APPENDIX C
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
The following diagram provides more detailed context information:
a) 555 Broughton - Harbourside Towers [26 storeys]
b) 1328 W Pender - the Classico [33 storeys]
c) 1331 W Georgia - the Pointe [27 storeys]
d) 610 Jervis - the Banffshire [7 storeys]
e) 1280 W Pender [28 storeys] DE approval successfully appealed at Board of Variance
f) 1285 W Pender [10 storeys]
g) 1228 W Hastings - the Palladio [25 storeys]
h) 408 Jervis - the C-Side [29 storeys]
i) 1201 W Hastings - the Cielo [30 storeys] under construction
j) 1238 Melville - the Pointe Claire [35 storeys]
k) 1239 W Georgia - the Venus [33 storeys]
l) 1211 Melville - the Ritz - DE approved [34 storeys]; rezoning in process [37 storeys]
m) 1166 Melville - the Orca [26 storeys]
n) 550 Bute - the Melville [42 storeys] under construction
o) 1188 W Pender [27 storeys] DE in process
p) 1177 W Pender [18 storeys]
APPENDIX D
COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC,
REVIEWING AGENCIES AND THE APPLICANT
PUBLIC INPUT: 1,540 notification letters, dated October 25, 2004, were mailed to 2,107 property owners in the surrounding area (536 multiple property owners). Rezoning information signs were installed on the site on November 5, 2004. The applicant held an Open House on Tuesday evening, November 30, 2004.
In response to notification, a few telephone calls were received primarily with questions. In terms of commentary, two letters were received and one e-mail, all 3 opposed to the application:
· additional public benefit is not demonstrated,
· increased building height is too high - one resident states "there are too many over-height buildings going up in the area", and
· increased density is too much - one resident states "more density in the area is unanticipated by earlier residents and [will] ruin the life standard in this part of the city" and "the development will cause severe proximity problems for neighbours and increase risk of traffic accidents."
Regarding public benefit, the staff report describes how the provision of a commercial anchor at Bute and Pender Streets will help achieve a City policy objective for the area. It will also enable consideration of a licensed and bonused childcare facility at 1188 West Pender Street.
Urban design analysis of the application, and Urban Design Panel review, confirmed that the additional tower height and density will not have significant impact, and that normal urban design principles are achieved, for example the 24.4 m (80 ft.) separation which is sought between residential towers.
COMMENTS OF THE GENERAL MANAGER OF ENGINEERING SERVICES: In a memo dated January 10, 2004, the General Manager of Engineering Services raised no objections to the proposed rezoning provided that the applicant complied with parking and loading provisions set in Appendix A and approval conditions now listed in Appendix B.
URBAN DESIGN PANEL: The Urban Design Panel reviewed this proposal on December 8, 2004 and unanimously supported the use, density and height, as follows:
"EVALUATION: SUPPORT (6-0)
· Introduction: Phil Mondor, Rezoning Planner, introduced this application. The Panel unanimously supported a preliminary development application for the site in April 2004 and the Development Permit Board subsequently approved it in principle in July 2004. The Panel supported the complete application on October 27, 2004. The application proposed a 34-storey tower with six or seven townhouses fronting Melville Street and a three-storey retail and office podium along Pender and Bute Streets. Total FSR was 6.6, which included a 10 percent density transfer, and a height of 336 ft.
The subject rezoning application is to increase the floor area on the site by 52,600 sq. ft. in an additional three floors in the residential tower. This additional floor area is to increase the retail and commercial floor space (from the 18,088 sq. ft. in the existing development application to 52,600 sq. ft.). The proposal is for two large retail floor plates of about 20-25,000 sq. ft. each. This proposition is strongly encouraged by Planning staff in response to recent Council policy that Bute Street between the waterfront and Georgia Street become a high street to provide a neighbourhood commercial centre and some destination retail space for the growing residential community in Triangle West and Coal Harbour.
The 52,600 sq. ft. is proposed to be transferred from across the street to the east (1178-1196 West Pender Street, fronting Bute Street), which is in a different sub area of the Downtown District where the maximum permitted FSR is 7.0. However, it is a very small site and cannot accommodate the large floor plate retail being sought in this neighbourhood commercial centre. This area of the downtown is also in urgent need of child daycare space and it has been determined that a fairly large, two-storey child daycare facility can be accommodated on the West Pender site. Planning staff are therefore prepared to recommend a transfer of density from the West Pender site to 1211 Melville Street.
Ralph Segal, Development Planner, noted a development application for the 1178 West Pender Street site is scheduled for review by the Panel on January 5, 2005. The subject rezoning application seeks a maximum density of 8.2 FSR and a height of 372 ft. There is no change to the form proposed in the Development Application other than the addition of three residential floors and expansion of the two main floors of commercial retail space. Mr. Segal noted the applicant is continuing to incorporate the Panel's previous comments into the scheme, in particular with respect to the treatment of the podium.
The Panel's advice is sought on whether the site can accommodate the additional height and density being requested, as well as comments on the detailed design of the podium.
· Applicant's Opening Comments: Martin Bruckner, Architect, described the proposal in greater detail and responded to questions from the Panel.
· Panel's Consensus on Key Aspects Needing Improvement:
· Design development to Pender Street podium to ensure an appropriately urban expression of CRUs including consideration of signage and consideration of smaller scale elements;
· Design development to ensure appropriate scale and rhythm relationship between this project and the flatiron building, especially at the podium level.
· Related Commentary:
The Panel unanimously supported this rezoning application and was satisfied that this site can accommodate the additional height and density. It was noted that this will be fairly significant building in the cityscape but some Panel members considered the extra height to be an improvement over the development application scheme because it adds some variety to an area which already has a number of towers of similar height. Most Panel members did not consider the additional view impacts to be significant.
The Panel also considered the rezoning to be very supportable for the neighbourhood benefits it achieves. There is no doubt the destination retail and the daycare are very worthwhile additions to the area. It was noted that the scheme may create some challenges for the donor site that will need to be addressed when that application comes forward.
The Panel was generally satisfied with the design development direction being taken for the podium, although stressed that it needs further work. Some Panel members had some concerns about the approach suggested by the sketches noting the tendency for larger retailers to impose their corporate image on the streetscape. The applicant was cautioned against the emergence of a "big box" appearance on Pender Street and urged to ensure that a smaller scale expression prevails. Some Panel members expressed strong support for the more robust podium which they considered to be very appropriate for this very large project.
Suggestions for the podium treatment included:
- the wrapping of the retail onto Melville Street might be handled in a more interesting way in terms of how it blends into the residential character of Melville;
- further thought should be given to the angle of the retail canopies on Bute Street;
- further consideration should be given to the treatment of the knife edge corner at Bute and Pender where glass rather than solid wall would create more interest on the Bute Street side.
It was noted that transition of this development to the adjacent flatiron building will need careful consideration to ensure the two projects mesh appropriately, particularly at the podium level.
Given the Panel has now reviewed this project five times (including an initial non-support), one Panel member urged the applicant to ensure that care is taken to achieve a coordinated presentation with all the design details properly documented when the proposal is returned to the Panel at the next Development Application stage.
The Panel commended the City for taking the initiative to address off-site issues that impact the community in general. Such broader thinking will achieve much welcome public benefits for the whole neighbourhood."
APPENDIX E
APPENDIX F
APPLICANT, PROPERTY AND DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL INFORMATION
Applicant and Property Information
Street Address |
1211 Melville Street (1200 and 1240 West Pender Street) |
Legal Description |
Lots A & 4, Block 30, DL 185, Group 1, Plan 92 |
Applicant and Architect |
Hancock Brückner Eng & Wright |
Property Owner / Developer |
Pinnacle International Ltd. |
Site Area |
3 034.8 m² (32,667 sq. ft.) |
Development Statistics
DE408162 Approved
|
Proposed |
Recommended | |
Zoning |
Downtown District
|
Comprehensive Development District (CD-1) |
as proposed |
Land Uses |
Office, Retail, Service, Residential |
as permitted in DD |
as permitted in DD (`G') |
Max. Floor Area
|
18 400 m² (198,056 sq. ft.)
|
20 029.4 m² (215,602 sq. ft.)
|
as proposed |
Floor Space Ratio
|
0.55
|
|
as proposed |
Dwelling Units |
174 |
192 |
n/a |
Storeys |
33 |
37 |
as proposed |
Maximum Building Height |
102. 4 m (336 ft.) |
113.3 m (371.8 ft.). |
113.4 (372 ft.) |
Parking Spaces |
346 |
as required |
generally as required by Parking By-law |
Loading Spaces |
4 Class B |
as required |
|
Bicycle Spaces |
234 |
as required |
* * * * *